ON the 25th of November, 1918, the
Parliament elected in December 1910 was at last dissolved,
a few days after the Armistice with Germany. The
new House of Commons was very different from the old.
Seventy-two Sinn Fein members were returned from Ireland,
sweeping away all but half a dozen of the old Nationalist
party; but, in accordance with their fixed policy,
the Sinn Fein members never presented themselves at
Westminster to take the oath and their seats.
That quarter of the House of Commons which for thirty
years had been packed with the most fierce and disciplined
of the political parties was therefore now given over
to mild supporters of the Coalition Government, the
only remnant of so-called “constitutional Nationalism”
being Mr. T.P. O’Connor, Mr. Devlin, Captain
Redmond, and two or three less prominent companions,
who survived like monuments of a bygone age.
Ulster Unionists, on the other hand,
were greatly strengthened by the recent Redistribution
Act. Sir Edward Carson was elected member for
the great working-class constituency of the Duncairn
Division of Belfast, instead of for Dublin University,
which he had so long represented, and twenty-two ardent
supporters accompanied him from Ulster to Westminster.
In the reconstruction of the Government which followed
the election, Carson was pressed to return to office,
but declined. Colonel James Craig, whose war
services in connection with the Ulster Division were
rewarded by a baronetcy, became Parliamentary Secretary
to the Ministry of Pensions, and the Marquis of Londonderry
accepted office as Parliamentary Under-Secretary of
State in the Air Ministry.
Although the termination of hostilities
by the Armistice was not in the legal sense the “end
of the war,” it brought it within sight.
No one in January 1919 dreamt that the process of
making peace and ratifying the necessary treaties
would drag on for a seemingly interminable length of
time, and it was realised, with grave misgiving in
Ulster, that the Home Rule Act of 1914 would necessarily
come into force as soon as peace was finally declared,
while as yet nothing had been done to redeem the promise
of an Amending Bill given by Mr. Asquith, and reiterated
by Mr. Lloyd George. The compact between the
latter and the Unionist Party, on which the Coalition
had swept the country, had made it clear that fresh
Irish legislation was to be expected, and the general
lines on which it would be based were laid down; but
there was also an intimation that a settlement must
wait till the condition of Ireland should warrant
it.
The state of Ireland was certainly
not such as to make it appear probable that any sane
Government would take the risk of handing over control
of the country immediately to the Sinn Feiners, whom
the recent elections had proved to be in an overwhelming
majority in the three southern provinces. By
the law, not of England alone, but of every civilised
State, that party was tainted through and through with
high treason. It had attempted to “succour
the King’s enemies” in every way in its
power. The Government had in its possession evidence
of two conspiracies, in which, during the late frightful
war, these Irishmen had been in league with the Germans
to bring defeat and disaster upon England and her
Allies, and the second of these plots was only made
possible by the misconceived clemency of the Government
in releasing from custody the ring-leaders in the
first.
And these Sinn Fein rebels left the
Government no excuse for any illusion as to their
being either chastened or contrite in spirit.
Contemptuously ignoring their election as members of
the Imperial Parliament, where they never put in an
appearance because it would require them to take an
oath of allegiance to the Crown, they openly held
a Congress in Dublin in January 1919 where a Declaration
of Independence was read, and a demand made for the
evacuation of Ireland by the forces of the Crown.
A “Ministry” was also appointed, which
purported to make itself responsible for administration
in Ireland. Outrages of a daring character became
more and more frequent, and gave evidence of being
the work of efficient organisation.
President Wilson’s coinage of
the unfortunate and ambiguous expression “self-determination”
made it a catch-penny cry in relation to Ireland;
but, in reply to Mr. Devlin’s demand for a recognition
of that “principle,” Mr. Lloyd George
pointed out that it had been tried in the Convention,
with the result that both Nationalists and Unionists
had been divided among themselves, and he said he
despaired of any settlement in Ireland until Irishmen
could agree. Nevertheless, in October 1919 he
appointed a Cabinet Committee, with Mr. Walter Long
as Chairman, to make recommendations for dealing with
the question of Irish Government.
But murders of soldiers and police
had now become so scandalously frequent that in November
a Proclamation was issued suppressing Sinn Fein and
kindred organisations. It did nothing to improve
the state of the country, which grew worse than ever
in the last few weeks of the year. On the 19th
of December a carefully planned attempt on the life
of the Lord-Lieutenant, Lord French, proved how complete
was the impunity relied upon by the organised assassins
who, calling themselves an Irish Republican Army,
terrorised the country.
It was in such conditions that, just
before the close of the parliamentary session, the
Prime Minister disclosed the intentions of the Government.
He laid down three “basic facts,” which
he said governed the situation: (1) Three-fourths
of the Irish people were bitterly hostile, and were
at heart rebels against the Crown and Government. (2)
Ulster was a complete contrast, which would make it
an outrage to place her people under the rest of Ireland.
(3) No separation from the Empire could be tolerated,
and any attempt to force it would be fought as the
United States had fought against secession. On
these considerations he based the proposals which
were to be embodied in legislation in the next session.
Sir Edward Carson, who in the light of past experience
was too wary to take all Mr. Lloyd George’s declarations
at their face value, said at once that he could give
no support to the policy outlined by the Prime Minister
until he was convinced that the latter intended to
go through with it to the end.
The Bill to give effect to these proposals
(which became the Government of Ireland Act, 1920)
was formally introduced on the 25th of February, 1920,
and Carson then went over to Belfast to consult with
the Unionist Council as to the action to be taken
by the Ulster members.
The measure was a long and complicated
one of seventy clauses and six schedules. Its
effect, stated briefly, was to set up two Parliaments
in Ireland, one for the six Protestant counties of
Ulster and the other for the rest of Ireland.
In principle it was the “clean cut” which
had been several times proposed, except that, instead
of retaining Ulster in legislative union with Great
Britain, she was to be endowed with local institutions
of her own in every respect similar to, and commensurate
with, those given to the Parliament in Dublin.
In addition, a Council of Ireland was created, composed
of an equal number of members from each of the two
legislatures. This Council was given powers in
regard to private bill legislation, and matters of
minor importance affecting both parts of the island
which the two Parliaments might mutually agree to commit
to its administration. Power was given to the
two Parliaments to establish by identical Acts at
any time a Parliament for all Ireland to supersede
the Council, and to form a single autonomous constitution
for the whole of Ireland.
The Council of Ireland occupied a
prominent place in the debates on the Bill. It
was held up as a symbol of the “unity of Ireland,”
and the authors of the measure were able to point
to it as supplying machinery by which “partition”
could be terminated as soon as Irishmen agreed among
themselves in wishing to have a single national Government.
It was not a feature of the Bill that found favour
in Ulster; but, as it could do no harm and provided
an argument against those who denounced “partition,”
the Ulster members did not think it worth while to
oppose it.
But when Carson met the Ulster Unionist
Council on the 6th of March the most difficult point
he had to deal with was the same that had given so
much trouble in the negotiations of 1916. The
Bill defined the area subject to the “Parliament
of Northern Ireland” as the six counties which
the Ulster Council had agreed four years earlier to
accept as the area to be excluded from the Home Rule
Act. The question now to be decided was whether
this same area should still be accepted, or an amendment
moved for including in Northern Ireland the other three
counties of the Province of Ulster. The same harrowing
experience which the Council had undergone in 1916
was repeated in an aggravated form. To separate
themselves from fellow loyalists in Monaghan, Cavan,
and Donegal was hateful to every delegate from the
other six counties, and it was heartrending to be
compelled to resist another moving appeal by so valued
a friend as Lord Farnham. But the inexorable
index of statistics demonstrated that, although Unionists
were in a majority when geographical Ulster was considered
as a unit, yet the distribution of population made
it certain that a separate Parliament for the whole
Province would have a precarious existence, while its
administration of purely Nationalist districts would
mean unending conflict.
It was, therefore, decided that no
proposal for extending the area should be made by
the Ulster members. Carson made it clear in the
debates on the Bill that Ulster had not moved from
her old position of desiring nothing except the Union;
that he was still convinced there was “no alternative
to the Union unless separation”; but that, while
he would take no responsibility for a Bill which Ulster
did not want, he and his colleagues would not actively
oppose its progress to the Statute-book.
It did not, however, receive the Royal
Assent until two days before Christmas, and during
all these months the condition of Ireland was one
of increasing anarchy. The Act provided that,
if the people of Southern Ireland refused to work
the new Constitution, the administration should be
carried on by a system similar to Crown Colony government.
Carson gave an assurance that in Ulster they would
do their best to make the Act a success, and immediate
steps were taken in Belfast to make good this undertaking.
To the people of Ulster the Act of
1920, though it involved the sacrifice of much that
they had ardently hoped to preserve, came as a relief
to their worst fears. It was represented as a
final settlement, and finality was what they chiefly
desired, if they could get it without being forced
to submit to a Dublin Parliament. The disloyal
conduct of Nationalist Ireland during the war, and
the treason and terrorism organised by Sinn Fein after
the war, had widened the already broad gulf between
North and South. The determination never to submit
to an all-Ireland Parliament was more firmly fixed
than ever. The Act of 1920, which repealed Mr.
Asquith’s Act of 1914, gave Ulster what she had
prepared to fight for, if necessary, before the war.
It was the fulfilment of the Craigavon resolution to
take over the government “of those districts
which they could control." The Parliament of
Northern Ireland established by the Act was in fact
the legalisation of the Ulster Provisional Government
of 1913. It placed Ulster in a position of equality
with the South, both politically and economically.
The two Legislatures in Ireland possessed the same
powers, and were subject to an equal reservation of
authority to the Imperial Parliament.
But with the passing of the Act the
long and consummate leadership of Sir Edward Carson
came to an end. If he had not succeeded in bringing
the Ulster people into a Promised Land, he had at least
conducted an orderly retreat to a position of safety.
The almost miraculous skill with which he had directed
all the operations of a protracted and harassing campaign,
avoiding traps and pitfalls at every step, foreseeing
and providing against countless crises, frustrating
with unfailing adroitness the manoeuvres both of implacable
enemies and treacherous “friends,” was
fully appreciated by his grateful followers, who had
for years past regarded him with an intensity of personal
devotion seldom given even to the greatest of political
leaders. But he felt that the task of opening
a new chapter in the history of Ulster, and of inaugurating
the new institutions now established, was work for
younger hands. Hard as he was pressed to accept
the position of first Prime Minister of Ulster, he
firmly persisted in his refusal; and on his recommendation
the man who had been his able and faithful lieutenant
throughout the long Ulster Movement was unanimously
chosen to succeed him in the leadership.
Sir James Craig did not hesitate to
respond to the call, although to do so he had to resign
an important post in the British Government, that of
Parliamentary Secretary to the Admiralty, with excellent
prospects of further promotion. As soon as the
elections in “Northern Ireland,” conducted
under the system of Proportional Representation, as
provided by the Act of 1920, were complete, Sir James,
whose followers numbered forty as against a Nationalist
and Sinn Fein minority of twelve, was sent for by
the Viceroy and commissioned to form a Ministry.
He immediately set himself to his new and exceedingly
difficult duties with characteristic thoroughness.
The whole apparatus of government administration had
to be built up from the foundation. Departments,
for which there was no existing office accommodation
or personnel, had to be called into existence and
efficiently organised, and all this preliminary work
had to be undertaken at a time when the territory
subject to the new Government was beset by open and
concealed enemies working havoc with bombs and revolvers,
with which the Government had not yet legal power
to cope.
But Sir James Craig pressed on with
the work, undismayed by the difficulties, and resolved
that the Parliament in Belfast should be opened at
the earliest possible date. The Marquis of Londonderry
gave a fresh proof of his Ulster patriotism by resigning
his office in the Imperial Government and accepting
the portfolio of Education in Sir James Craig’s
Cabinet, and with it the leadership of the Ulster Senate;
in which the Duke of Abercorn also, to the great satisfaction
of the Ulster people, consented to take a seat.
Mr. Dawson Bates, the indefatigable Secretary of the
Ulster Unionist Council during the whole of the Ulster
Movement, was appointed Minister for Home Affairs,
and Mr. E.M. Archdale became Minister for Agriculture.
The first act of the House of Commons of Northern
Ireland was to choose Major Hugh O’Neill as
their Speaker, while the important position of Chairman
of Committees was entrusted to Mr. Thomas Moles, one
of the ablest recruits of the Ulster Parliamentary
Party, whom the General Election of 1918 had sent
to Westminster as one of the members for Belfast, and
who had given ample evidence of his capacity both
in the Imperial Parliament and on the Secretarial
Staff of the Irish Convention of 1917.
Meantime, in the South the Act of
1920 was treated with absolute contempt; no step was
taken to hold elections or to form an Administration,
although it must be remembered that the flouted Act
conferred a larger measure of Home Rule than had ever
been offered by previous Bills. Thus by one of
those curious ironies that have continually marked
the history of Ireland, the only part of the island
where Home Rule operated was the part that had never
desired it, while the provinces that had demanded
Home Rule for generations refused to use it when it
was granted them.
In Ulster the new order of things
was accepted with acquiescence rather than with enthusiasm.
But the warmer emotion was immediately called forth
when it became known that His Majesty the King had
decided to open the Ulster Parliament in person on
the 22nd of June, 1921, especially as it was fully
realised that, owing to the anarchical condition of
the country, the King’s presence in Belfast
would be a characteristic disregard of personal danger
in the discharge of public duty. And when, on
the eve of the royal visit, it was intimated that the
Queen had been graciously pleased to accede to Sir
James Craig’s request that she should accompany
the King to Belfast, the enthusiasm of the loyal people
of the North rose to fever heat.
At any time, and under any circumstances,
the reigning Sovereign and his Consort would have
been received by a population so noted for its sentiment
of loyalty to the Throne as that of Ulster with demonstrations
of devotion exceeding the ordinary. But the present
occasion was felt to have a very special significance.
The opening of Parliament by the King in State is
one of the most ancient and splendid of ceremonial
pageants illustrating the history of British institutions.
It was felt in Ulster that the association of this
time-honoured ceremonial with the baptism, so to speak,
of the latest offspring of the Mother of Parliaments
stamped the Royal Seal upon the achievement of Ulster,
and gave it a dignity, prestige, and promise of permanence
which might otherwise have been lacking. No city
in the United Kingdom had witnessed so many extraordinary
displays of popular enthusiasm in the last ten years
as Belfast, some of which had left on the minds of
observers a firm belief that such intensity of emotion
in a great concourse of people could not be exceeded.
The scene in the streets when the King and Queen drove
from the quay, on the arrival of the royal yacht,
to the City Hall, was held by general consent to equal,
since it could not surpass, any of those great demonstrations
of the past in popular fervour. At any rate,
persons of long experience in attendance on the Royal
Family gave it as their opinion in the evening that
they had never before seen so impressive a display
of public devotion to the person of the Sovereign.
Two buildings in Belfast inseparably
associated with Ulster’s stand for union, the
City Hall and the Ulster Hall, were the scenes of the
chief events of the King’s visit. The former,
described by one of the English correspondents as
“easily the most magnificent municipal building
in the three Kingdoms," was placed at the disposal
of the Ulster Government by the Corporation for temporary
use as a Parliament House. The Council Chamber,
a fine hall of dignified proportions with a dais and
canopied chair at the upper end, made an appropriate
frame for the ceremony of opening Parliament, and
the arrangements both of the Chamber itself and of
the approaches and entrances to it made it a simple
matter to model the procedure as closely as possible
on that followed at Westminster.
Among the many distinguished people
who assembled in the Ulster Capital for the occasion,
there was one notable absentee. Lord Carson of
Duncairn for this was the title that Sir
Edward Carson had assumed on being appointed a Lord
of Appeal in Ordinary a few weeks previously was
detained in London by judicial duty in the House of
Lords; and possibly reasons of delicacy not difficult
to understand restrained him from making arrangements
for absence. But the marked ovation given to Lady
Carson wherever she was recognised in the streets of
Belfast showed that the great leader was not absent
from the popular mind at this moment of vindication
of his statesmanship.
Such an event as that which brought
His Majesty to Belfast was naturally an occasion for
bestowing marks of distinction for public service.
Sir James Craig wisely made it also an occasion for
letting bygones be bygones by recommending Lord Pirrie
for a step in the Peerage. Among those who received
honours were several whose names have appeared in the
preceding chapters of this book. Mr. William Robert
Young, for thirty years one of the most indefatigable
workers for the Unionist cause in Ulster, and Colonel
Wallace, one of the most influential of Carson’s
local lieutenants, were made Privy Councillors, as
was also Colonel Percival-Maxwell, who raised and
commanded a battalion of the Ulster Division in the
war. Colonel F.H. Crawford and Colonel Spender
were awarded the C.B.E. for services to the nation
during the war; but Ulstermen did not forget services
of another sort to the Ulster cause before the Germans
came on the scene. A knighthood was given to Mr.
Dawson Bates, who had exchanged the Secretaryship of
the Ulster Unionist Council for the portfolio of a
Cabinet Minister.
These honours were bestowed by the
King in person at an investiture held in the Ulster
Hall in the afternoon. There must have been many
present whose minds went back to some of the most
stirring events of Ulster’s domestic history
which had been transacted in the same building within
recent years. Did Sir Hamar Greenwood, the Chief
Secretary, as he stood in attendance on the Sovereign
in the resplendent uniform of a Privy Councillor,
look in curiosity round the walls which he and Mr.
Churchill had been prohibited from entering on a memorable
occasion when they had to content themselves with
an imported tent in a football field instead?
Did Colonel Wallace’s thoughts wander back to
the scene of wild enthusiasm in that hall on the evening
before the Covenant, when he presented the ancient
Boyne flag to the Ulster leader? Did those who
spontaneously started the National Anthem in the presence
of the King without warrant from the prearranged programme,
and made the Queen smile at the emphasis with which
they “confounded politics” and “frustrated
knavish tricks,” remember the fervour with which
on many a past occasion the same strains testified
to Ulster’s loyalty in the midst of perplexity
and apprehension? If these memories crowded in,
they must have added to the sense of relief arising
from the conviction that the ceremony they were now
witnessing was the realisation of the policy propounded
by Carson, when he declared that Ulster must always
be ruled either by the Imperial Parliament or by a
Government of her own.
But the moment of all others on that
memorable day that must have been suggestive of such
reflections was when the King formally opened the
first Parliament of Northern Ireland in the same building
that had witnessed the signing of the Ulster Covenant.
Without the earlier event the later could not have
been. If 1921 could have been fully foreseen in
1912 it might have appeared to many Covenanters as
the disappointment of a cherished ideal. But
those who lived to listen to the King’s Speech
in the City Hall realised that it was the dissipation
of foreboding. However regarded, it was, as King
George himself pronounced, “a profoundly moving
occasion in Irish history.”
The Speech from the Throne in which
these words occurred made a deep impression all over
the world, and nowhere more than in Ulster itself.
No people more ardently shared the touchingly expressed
desire of the King that his coming to Ireland might
“prove to be the first step towards an end of
strife amongst her people, whatever their race or
creed.” So, too, when His Majesty told the
Ulster Parliament that he “felt assured they
would do their utmost to make it an instrument of
happiness and good government for all parts of the
community which they represented,” the Ulster
people believed that the King’s confidence in
them would not prove to have been misplaced.
Happily, no prophetic vision of those
things that were shortly to come to pass broke in
to disturb the sense of satisfaction with the haven
that had been reached. The future, with its treachery,
its alarms, its fresh causes of uncertainty and of
conflict, was mercifully hidden from the eyes of the
Ulster people when they acclaimed the inauguration
of their Parliament by their King. They accepted
responsibility for the efficient working of institutions
thus placed in their keeping by the highest constitutional
Authority in the British Empire, although they had
never asked for them, and still believed that the system
they had been driven to abandon was better than the
new; and they opened this fresh chapter in their history
in firm faith that what had received so striking a
token of the Sovereign’s sympathy and approval
would never be taken from them except with their own
consent.