Voltaire’s Terrestrial Paradise at Berlin did not long continue perfect.  Scarcely had that grand Carrousel vanished in the azure firmaments, when little clouds began rising in its stead; and before long, black thunder - storms of a very strange and even dangerous character.

It must have been a painful surprise to Friedrich to hear from his Voltaire, some few weeks after those munificences, That he, Voltaire, was in very considerable distress of mind, from the bad, not to call it the felonious and traitorous, conduct of M. D’Arnaud, - once Friedrich’s shoeing - horn and “rising - sun” for Voltaire’s behoof; now a vague flaunting creature, without significance to Friedrich or anybody!  That D’Arnaud had done this and done that, of an Anti - Voltairian, treasonous nature; - and that, in short, life was impossible in the neighborhood of such a D’Arnaud!"D’Arnaud has corrupted my Clerk (Prince Henri hungering in vain for la Pucelle, has got sight of it, in this way); [Clerk was dismissed accordingly (one Tinois, an ingenious creature), - and Collini appointed in his stead.] D’Arnaud has been gossiping to Freron and the Paris Newspapers; D’Arnaud has” [Voltaire to Friedrich ( - OEuvres de Frederic, - xxi, undated, “November, 1750."] - Has, in effect, been a flaunting young fool; of dissolute, esurient, slightly profligate turn; occasionally helping in the Theatricals, and much studious to make himself notable, and useful to the Princely kind.  A D’Arnaud of nearly no significance, to Friedrich or to anybody.  A D’Arnaud whose bits of fooleries and struttings about, in the peacock or jackdaw way, might surely have been below the notice of a Trismegistus!

Friedrich, painfully made sensible what a skinless explosive Trismegistus he has got on hand, answers, I suppose, in words little or nothing, - in Letters, I observe, answers absolutely nothing, to Voltaire repeating and re - repeating; - does simply dismiss D’Arnaud (a “Bon diable,” as Voltaire, to impartial people, calls him), or accept D’Arnaud’s demission, and cut the poor fool adrift.  Who sallies out into infinite space, to Paris latterly ("alive there in 1805"); and claims henceforth perpetual oblivion from us and mankind.  And now there will be peace in our garden of the gods, and perpetual azure will return?

Alas, D’Arnaud is not well gone, when there has begun brewing in threefold secrecy a mass of galvanic matter, which, in few weeks more, filled the Heavens with miraculous foul gases and the blackness of darkness; - which, in short, exploded about New - year’s time, as the world - famous Voltaire - Hirsch lawsuit, still remembered, though only as a portent and mystery, by observant on - lookers.  Of which it is now our sad duty to say something; though nowhere, in the Annals of Jurisprudence, is there a more despicable thing, or a deeper involved in lies and deliriums by current reporters of it, about which the sane mind can be called upon accidentally to speak a word.  Beaten, riddled, shovelled, washed in many waters, by a patient though disgusted Predecessor in this field, there lies by me a copious but wearisome Narrative of this matter; - the more vivid portions of which, if rightly disengaged, and shown in sequence, may satisfy the curious.

Duvernet (who, I can guess, had talked with DArget on the subject) has, alone of the French Biographers, some glimmer of knowledge about it; Duvernet admits that it was a thing of Illegal Stock - jobbing; that -

1.  “That M. de Voltaire had agreed with a Jew named Hirsch to go to Dresden and, illegally, purchase a good lot of Steuer - Scheine [Saxon Exchequer Bills, which are payable in gold to a Bona fide Prussian holding them, but are much in discount otherwise, as readers may remember]; and given Hirsch a Draft on Paris, due after some weeks, for payment of the same; Hirsch leaving him a stock of jewels in pledge till the Steuer - Scheine themselves come to hand.

2.  “That Hirsch, having things of his own in view with the money, sent no Steuer - Scheine from Dresden, nothing but vague lying talk instead of Steuer:  so that Voltaire’s suspicions naturally kindling, he stopped payment of the Paris Draft, and ordered Hirsch to come home at once.

3.  “That Hirsch coming, a settlement was tried:  ’Give me back my Draft on Paris, you objectionable blockhead of a Hirsch; there are your Diamonds, there is something even for your expenses (some fair moiety, I think); and let me never see your unpleasant face again!’ To which Hirsch, examining the diamonds, answered [says Duvernet, not substantially incorrect hitherto, though stepping along in total darkness, and very partial on Voltaire’s behalf], - Hirsch, examining the diamonds, answered, ’But you have changed some of them!  I cannot take these!’ - and drove Voltaire quite to despair, and into the Law - Courts; which imprisoned Hirsch, and made him do justice.” [Duvernet (T.J.D.V.), 170, 173, 175: - vague utterly; dateless (tries one date, and is mistaken even in the Year); wrong in nearly every detail; “the ’STAIRE or Steuer was a Bank?” &c. &c.]

In which last clause, still more in the conclusion, that it was “to the triumph of Voltaire,” Duvernet does substantially mistake!  And indeed, except as the best Parisian reflex of this matter, his Account is worth nothing: - though it may serve as Introduction to the following irrefragable Documents and more explicit featurings.  We learn from him, and it is the one thing we learn of credible, That “Voltaire, when it came to Law Procedures, begged Maupertuis to speak for him to M. Jarriges,” a Prussian Frenchman, “one of the Judges; and that Maupertuis answered, ’I cannot interfere in a bad business (me Meler d’une mauvaise affaire).’” The other French Biographies, definable as “IGNOR - AMUS speaking in a loud voice to IGNOR - ATIS,” require to be altogether swept aside in this matter.  Even “Clog.” jumbling Voltaire’s undated letters into confusion thrice confounded, and droning out vituperatively in the dark, becomes a Minus quantity in these Friedrich affairs.  In regard to the Hirsch Process, our one irrefragable set of evidences is:  The Prussian law - report by Klein, - especially the Documents produced in Court, and the Sentence given. [Ernst Ferdinand Klein, - Annalen der Gesetzgebung und Rechtsgelehrsamkeit in den Preussischen Staaten - (Berlin und Stettin), 1790, - 260.] Other lights are to be gathered, with severe scrutiny and caution, from the circumambient contemporary rumor, - especially from the preface to a “Comedy” so called of “Tantale en Procès (Tantalus,” Voltaire, “at Law"); - which preface is evidently Hirsch’s own Story, put into language for him by some humane friend, and addressed to a “clear - seeing Public.” [Tantale en Procès (ascribed to Friedrich himself, by some wonderful persons!) is in - Supplement aux OEuvres Posthumes de Frederic ii. - (Cologne, 1789), et seq.  Among the weakest of Comedies (might be by D’Arnaud, or some such hand); nothing in it worth reading except the Preface.] “And in fine,” says my Manuscript, “by sweeping out the distinctly false, and well discriminating the indubitable from what is still in part dubitable, sufficient twilight [abridgable in a high degree, I hope!] rises over the Affair, to render it visible in all its main features.”

THE VOLTAIRE-HIRSCH TRANSACTION: PART I. ORIGIN OF LAWSUIT (10th November-25th December, 1750).

“Saxon Steuer - Schein, some readers know, is, in the rough, equivalent to Exchequer Bill.  Payable at the Saxon Treasury; to Prussians, in gold; to all other men, in paper only, - which (thanks to Bruhl and his unheard - of expenditures and financierings) is now at a discount say of 25, or even 30 per cent.  By Article Eleventh of the Dresden Treaty of peace, King Friedrich, if our readers have not forgotten, got stipulated, That all Prussian holders of these Scheine should be paid in gold; interest at the due days; and at the due days principal itself: - in gold they, whatever became of others.  No farther specifications, as to proof, method, limits or conditions of any kind, occur in regard to this Eleventh Article; which is a just one, beyond doubt, but most carelessly drawn up.  Apparently it trusts altogether to the personal honesty of all Prussian subjects:  ’Prove yourself a Prussian subject, and we pay your Steuer - Schein in real money.’  But now if a Saxon or other Non - Prussian, who can get no payment save in paper, were to have his Note smuggled or trafficked over into Prussia, and presented as a Prussian one?  In our time, such traffic would start on the morrow morning; and in a week or two, all Notes whatsoever would be presented as Prussian, payable in gold!  Not so in those days; - though a small contraband of that kind does by degrees threaten to establish itself, and Friedrich had to publish severe rescripts (one before this Hirsch - Voltaire business, [10th August, 1748 (Seyfarth, .] one still severer after), and menace it down again.  The malpractice seems to have proved menaceable in that manner; nor was any new arrangement made upon it, - no change, till the Steuer - Scheine, by their gradual terms, were all paid either in real money or imaginary, and thus, in the course of years, the thing burnt to the socket, and went out.”

Voltaire’s rash Adventure, dangerous Navigation and gradual Wreck, in this Forbidden Sea of Steuer - Scheine, - will become conceivable to readers, on study diligent enough of the following Documents and select Details: -

Document first (a small Missive, in Voltaire’s hand).

“Je prie instamment monsieur hersch de venir demain mardi matin a potsdam pour affaire pressante, et d’aporter (sic) avec luy les diamants qui doivent servir pour la representation de la tragédie qui se jouera a cinq heures de soir chez S.A.R.  Monseigneur lé Prince henri Ce lundy a midy.  Voltaire.”

Which being interpreted, rightly spelt, and dated (as by chance we can do) with distinctness, will run as follows in English: -

“Potsdam, Monday, 9th November, 1750.  “I earnestly request Mr. Hirsch to come to - morrow Tuesday morning to Potsdam, on business that is urgent; and to bring with him the Diamonds needed for the Tragedy which is to be represented, at five in the evening, in His Royal Highness Prince Henry’s Apartment.” [Klein, .]

“On Tuesday the 10th,” say the Old Newspapers, “was Rome SAUVEE;” - with Voltaire, perceptible there as “Cicerón,” [Rodenbeck, .] in due A glorious enough Cicero; - and such a piece of “urgent business” done with your Hirsch, just before emerging on the stage!

“Hirsch, in that narrative, describes himself as a young innocent creature.  Not very old, we will believe:  but as to innocence! - For certain, he is named Abraham Hirsch, or Hirschel:  a Berlin Jew of the Period; whom one inclines to figure as a florid oily man, of Semitic features, in the prime of life; who deals much in jewels, moneys, loans, exchanges, all kinds of Jew barter; whether absolutely in old clothes, we do not know - certainly not unless there is a penny to be turned.  The man is of oily Semitic type, not old in years, - there is a fraternal Hirsch, and also a paternal, who is head of the firm; - and this young one seems to be already old in Jew art.  Speaks French and other dialects, in a Hebrew, partially intelligible manner; supplies Voltaire with diamonds for his stage - dresses, as we perceive.  To all appearance, nearly destitute of human intellect, but with abundance of vulpine instead.  Very cunning; stupid, seemingly, as a mule otherwise; - and, on the whole, resembling in various points of character a mule put into breeches, and made acquainted with the uses of money.  He is come ’on pressing business,’ - perhaps not of stage - diamonds alone?  Here now is document second; nearly of the same date; may be of the very same; - more likely is a few days later, and betokens mysterious dialogue and consultation held on Tuesday 10th.  It is in two hands:  written on some scrap or torn bit of paper, to judge by the length of the lines.”

DOCUMENT SECOND.

In Voltaires hand, this part: -

’If it is still time to declare [to announce in Saxony and demand payment for] Notes one holds on the Steuer?  If one is to specify the No. in the declaration?’

In Hirschs hand, this part: -

’One can declare Notes on the Steuer, which one holds in deposit in Foreign Countries; and of which one cannot state the No. till after a fortnight or three weeks.’

“Which of these Two was the Serpent, which the Eve, in this Steuer - Schein Tree of Knowledge, that grew in the middle of Paradise, remains entirely uncertain.  Hirsch, of course, says it was Voltaire; Voltaire (not aware that document second remained in existence) had denied that his Hirsch business was in any way concerned with Steuer; - and must have been a good deal struck, when document second came to light; though what could he do but still deny!  Hirsch asserts himself to have objected the ‘illegality, the King’s anger;’ but that Voltaire answered in hints about his favor with the King; ’about his power to make one a Court - Jeweller,’ if he liked; and so at last tempted the baby innocence of Hirsch; - for the rest, admits that the Steuer - Notes were expected to yield a Profit - of 35 per cent: - and, in fact, a dramatic reader can imagine to himself dialogue enough, at different times, going on, partly by words, partly by hint, innuendo and dumb - show, between this Pair of Stage - Beauties.  But, for near a fortnight after document first, there is nothing dated, or that can be clearly believed, - till,

“Monday, 23d November, 1750.  It is credibly certain the Jew Hirsch came again, this day, to the Royal Schloss of Potsdam, to Voltaire’s apartment there [right overhead of King Friedrich’s, it is!] - where, after such dialogue as can be guessed at, there was handed to Hirsch by Voltaire, in the form of Two negotiable Bills, a sum of about 2,250 pounds; with which the Jew is to make at once for Dresden, and buy Steuer - Scheine. [Hirsch’s Narrative, in Preface to - Tantale en Procès, - .] Steuer - Scheine without fail:  ’but in talking or corresponding on the matter, we are always to call them furs or diamonds,’ - mystery of mysteries being the rule for us.  This considerable sum of 2,250 pounds may it not otherwise, contrives Voltaire, be called a Loan to Jeweller Hirsch, so obliging a Jeweller, to buy Furs or Diamonds with?  At a gain of 35 per 100 Pieces, there will be above 800 pounds to me, after all expenses cleared:  a very pretty stroke of business do - able in few days! -

“Monday, 23d November:”  The beautiful Wilhelmina, one remarks, is just making her packages; right sad to end such a Visit as this had been!  Thursday night, from her first sleeping - place, there is a touching Farewell to her Brother; - tender, melodiously sorrowful, as the Song of the Swan. [Wilhelmina to Friedrich, “Brietzen, 26th November, jour funeste pour moi” ( - OEuvres de Frederic, - xxvii. .] To Voltaire she was always good; always liked Voltaire.  Voltaire would be saying his Adieus, in state, among the others, to that high Being, - just in the hours while such a scandalous Hirsch - Concoction went, on underground!

“As to the Two Bills and Voltaire’s security for them, readers are to note as follows.  Bill first is a Draft, on Voltaire’s Paris Banker for 40,000 livres (about 1,600 pounds), not payable for some weeks:  ’This I lend you, Monsieur Hirsch; mind, lend you, - to buy Furs!’ ’Yes, truly, what we call Furs; - and before the Bill falls payable, there will be effects for it in Monseigneur de Voltaire’s hand; which is security enough for Monseigneur.’  The second Bill, again” - Truth is, there were in succession two Second Bills, an intended - Second (of this same Monday 23d), which did not quite suit, and an actual - Second (two days later), which did.  Intended - Second Bill was one for 4,000 thalers (about 600 pounds), drawn by Voltaire on the Sieur Ephraim, - a very famous Jew of Berlin now and henceforth, with whom as money - changer, if not yet otherwise (which perhaps Ephraim thinks unlucky), Voltaire, it would seem, is in frequent communication.  This Bill, Ephraim would not accept; told Hirsch he owed M. de Voltaire nothing; “turned me rudely away,” says Hirsch (two of a trade, and no friends, he and I!) - so that there is nothing to be said of this Ephraim Bill; and except as it elucidates some dark portions of the whirlpools, need not have been noticed at all.  “Hirsch,” continues my Authority, “got only Two available Bills; the first on Paris for 1,600 pounds, payable in some weeks; and, after a day or two, this other:  The actual bill second; which is a Draft for 4,430 thalers (about 650 pounds), by old Father Hirsch, head of the Firm, on Voltaire himself: - ’Furs too with that, Monsieur Hirsch, at the rate of 35 per piece, you understand?’ ’Yea, truly, Monseigneur!’ - Draft accepted by Voltaire, and the cash for it now handed to Hirsch Son:  the only absolutely ready money he has yet got towards the affair.

“For these Two Bills, especially for this Second, I perceive, Voltaire holds borrowed jewels (borrowed in theatrical times, or partly bought, from the Hirsch Firm, and not paid for), which make him sure till he see the Steuer Papers themselves. - (And now off, my good Sieur Hirsch; and know that if you please me, there are - things in my power which would suit a man in the Jeweller and Hebrew line!) Hirsch pushes home to Berlin; primed and loaded in this manner; Voltaire naturally auxious enough that the shot may hit.  Alas, the shot will not even go off, for some time:  an ill omen!

“Sunday, 29th November, Hirsch, we hear, is still in Berlin.  Fancy the humor of Voltaire, after such a week as last! (Tuesday, December 1st) Hirsch still is not off:  ‘Go, you son of Amalek!’ urges Voltaire; and sends his Servant Picard, a very sharp fellow, for perhaps the third time, - who has orders now, as Hirsch discovers, to stay with him, not quit sight of him till he do go. [Hirsch’s Narrative; see Voltaire’s Letter to D’Arget ( - OEuvres, - lxi.] Hirsch’s hour of departure for Dresden is not mentioned in the acts; but I guess he could hardly get over Wednesday, with Picard dogging him on these terms; and must have taken the diligence on Wednesday night:  to arrive in Dresden about December 4th.  ’Well; at least, our shot is off; has not burst out, and lodged in our person here, - thanked be all the gods!’

“Off, sure enough: - and what should we say if the whole matter were already oozing out; if, on this same Sunday evening, November 29th) not quite a week’s time yet, the matter (as we learn long afterwards) had been privately whispered to his Majesty:  ’That Voltaire has sent off a Jew to buy Steuer - Scheine, and has promised to get him made Court - Jeweller!’ [Voltaire, - OEuvres, - lxxi ("Letter to Friedrich, February, 1751,” - After Catastrophe).], So; within a week, and before Hirsch is even gone!  For men are very porous; weighty secrets oozing out of them, like quicksilver through clay jars.  I could guess, Hirsch, by way of galling insolent Ephraim, had blabbed something:  and in the course of five days, it has got to the very King, - this Kammerherr Voltaire being such a favorite and famous man as never was; the very bulls - eye of all kinds of Berlin gossip in these days.  Hm, Steuer - Scheine, and the Jew Hirsch to be Court - Jeweller, you say? thinks the King, that Sunday night; but locks the rumor in his Royal mind, he, for his part; or dismisses it as incredible:  There ought to be impervious vessels too, among the porous! Voltaire notices nothing particular, or nothing that he speaks of as particular.  This must have been a horrid week to him, till Hirsch got away.  Hirsch is away (December 2d); in Dresden, safe enough; but -

“But, the fortnight that follows is conceivable as still worse.  Hirsch writing darkly, nothing to the purpose; Voltaire driving often into Berlin, hearing from Ephraim hints about, ’No connection with that House;’ ’If Monseigneur have intrusted Hirsch with money, - may there be a good account of it!’ and the like.  Black Care devouring Monseigueur; but nothing definite; except the fact too evident, That Hirsch does not send or bring the smallest shadow of Steuer - Scheine, - ’Peltries,’ or ‘Diamonds,’ we mean, - or any value whatever for that Paris Bill of ours, payable shortly, and which he has already got cashed in Dresden.  Nothing but excuses, prvarications; stupid, incoherently deceptive jargon, as of a mule intent on playing fox with you.  Vivid Correspondence is conceivable; but nothing of it definite to us, except this sample (which we give translated): -

Document third (torn fraction in Voltaire’s hand:  To Hirsch, doubtless; early in December)....  “Not proper (il ne fallait pas) to negotiate Bills of Exchange, and never produce a single diamond” - bit of peltry, or ware of any kind, you son of Amalek!  “Not proper to say:  I have got money for your bills of exchange, and I bring you nothing back; and I will repay your money when you shall no longer be here [in Germany at all].  Not proper to promise at 35 louis, and then say 30.  To say 30, and then next morning 25.  You should at least have produced goods (il fallait en donner) at the price current; very easy to do when one was on the spot.  All your procedures have been faults hitherto. [Klein, .]

“These are dreadful symptoms.  Steuer - Notes, promised at 35 discount, are not to be had except at 30.  Say 30 then, and get done with it, mule of a scoundrel!  Next day the 30 sinks to 25; and not a Steuer - Note, on any terms, comes to hand.  And the mule of a scoundrel has drawn money, in Dresden yonder, for my Bill on Paris, - excellent to him for trade of his own!  What is to be done with such an Ass of Balaam?  He has got the bit in his teeth, it would seem.  Heavens, he too is capable of stopping short, careless of spur and cudgel; and miraculously speaking to a new Prophet [strange new “Revealer of the Lord’s Will,” in modern dialect], in this enlightened Eighteenth Century itself! - One thing the new Prophet, can do:  protest his Paris Bill.

“December 12th [our next bit of certainty], Voltaire writes, haste, haste, to Paris, ‘Don’t pay;’ and intimates to Hirsch, ’You will have to return your Dresden Banker his money for that Paris Bill.  At Paris I have protested it, mark me; and there it never will be paid to him or you.  And you must come home again instantly, job undone, lies not untold, you !’ Hirsch, with money in hand, appears not to have wanted for a briskish trade of his own in the Dresden marts.  But this of cutting off his supplies brings him instantly back:” - and at Berlin, December 16th, new facts emerge again of a definite nature.

“Wednesday, 16th December, 1750.  ’To - day the King with Court and Voltaire come to Berlin for the Carnival;’ [Rodenbeck, .] to - day also Voltaire, not in Carnival humor, has appointed his Jew to meet him.  In the Royal Palace itself, - we hope, well remote from Friedrich’s Apartment! - this sordid conference, needing one’s choicest diplomacy withal, and such exquisite handling of bit and spur, goes on.  And probably at great length.  Of which, as the finale, and one clear feature significant to the fancy, here is, - for record of what they call complete settlement, which it was far from turning out to be: -

Document fourth (in Hirsch’s hand, First Piece of it).

“’Account all settled; I promising to return M. de Voltaire all Letters, Orders and Bills of Exchange given me to this day, 16th December, 1750.

[Hirsch signs.  But you have forgotten something, Monsieur Hirsch!  Whereupon] - et promets de donner a Mr. de Voltaire dans lé jour de demain où âpres au plustard deux cent guatre - vingt frederics d’or au lieu de deux cent quatre - vingt louis d’or, que je lui aï payez, lé tout pour quittance generale, ce 16 Décembre, 1750, a berlin - And promise to give M. de Voltaire, in the course of to - morrow, or the day after to - morrow at latest, 280 frederics d’or, instead of 280 louis d’or [gold frederics the preferabe coin, say experts] which I have now paid him; whereby All will be settled.

[Hirsch again signs; but has again forgotten something, most important thing.  And] - je lui remettrai surtout les 40,000 livres de billets de change sur paris qu’il mavoit donnez et fiez’ - I will especially return him the Bill on Paris for 40,000 livres (1,600 pounds) which he had given and trusted to me,’ - but has since protested, as is too evident.

[And Hirsch signs for the last time]. [Klein, p, 260.] -

Symptomatic, surely, of a haggly settlement, these three shots instead of one! - Voltaires return is: -

[which Second Piece, we perceive, is to lie in Hirsch’s hand, to keep, if he find it valuable].

“This ’complete settlement,’ - little less than miraculous to Voltaire and us, - one finds, after sifting, to have been the fruit of Voltaire’s exquisite skill in treating and tuning his Hirsch (no harshness of rebuke, rather some gleam of hope, of future bargains, help at Court):  (Your expenses; compensation for protesting of that Bill on Paris?  Tush, cannot we make all that good!  In the first place, I will buy of you these Jewels [this one discovers to have been the essence of the operation!], all or the best part of them, which I have here in pawn for Papa’s Bill:  650 pounds was it not?  Well, suppose I on the instant take 450 pounds worth, or so, of these Jewels (I want a great many jewels); and you to pay me down a 200 or so of gold louis as balance, - gold louis, no, we will say frederics rather.  There now, that is settled.  Nothing more between us but settles itself, if we continue friends!’ Upon which Hirsch walked home, thankful for the good job in Jewels; wondering only what the Allowance for Expenses and Compensation will be.  And Voltaire steps out, new - burnished, into the Royal Carnival splendors, with a load rolled from his mind.

“This complete settlement, meanwhile, rests evidently on two legs, both of which are hollow.  ‘What will the handsome Compensation be, I wonder?’ thinks Hirsch; - and is horror - struck to find shortly, that Voltaire considers 60 thalers (about 9 pounds) will be the fair sum!  ’More than ten times that!’ is Hirsch’s privately fixed idea.  On the other hand, Voltaire has been asking himself, ’My 450 pounds worth of Jewels, were they justly valued, though?’ Jew Ephraim (exaggerative and an enemy to this Hirsch House) answers, ’Justly?  I would give from 300 pounds to 250 pounds for them!’ - So that the legs both crumbling to powder, Complete Settlement crashes down into chaos:  and there ensues,” - But we must endeavor to be briefer!

There ensues, for about a week following, such an inextricable scramble between the Sieur Hirsch and M. de Voltaire as, - as no reader, not himself in the Jew - Bill line, or paid for understanding it, could consent to have explained to him.  Voltaire, by way of mending the bad jewel - bargain, will buy of Hirsch 200 pounds worth more jewels; gets the new 200 pounds worth in hand, cannot quite settle what articles will suit:  “This, think you?  That, think you?” And intricately shuffles them about, to Hirsch and back.  Hirsch, singular to notice, holds fast by that Protested Paris Bill; on frivolous pretexts, always forgets to bring that:  “May have its uses, that, in a Court of Justice yet!” Meetings there are, almost daily, in the Voltaire Palace - Apartment; December 19th and December 24th) there are Two documents (which we must spare the reader, though he will hear of them again, as highly notable, especially of one of them, as notable in the extreme!) - indicating the abstrusest jewel - bargainings, scramblings, re - bargainings.

“My Jewels are truly valued!” asseverates Hirsch always:  “Ephraim is my enemy; ask Herr Reklam, chief Jeweller in Berlin, an impartial man!” The meetings are occasionally of stormy character; Voltaire’s patience nearly out:  “But did n’t I return you that Topaz Ring, value 75 pounds?  And you have not deducted it; you !” “One day, Picard and he pulled a Ring [doubtless this Topaz] off my finger,” says the pathetic Hirsch, “and violently shoved me out of the room, slamming their door,” - and sent me home, along the corridors, in a very scurvy humor!  Thus, under a skin of second settlement, there are two galvanic elements, getting ever more galvanic, which no skin of settlement can prevent exploding before long.

Explosion there accordingly was; most sad and dismal; which rang through all the Court circles of Berlin; and, like a sound of hooting and of weeping mixed, is audible over seas to this day.  But let not the reader insist on tracing the course of it henceforth.  Klein, though faithful and exact, is not a Pitaval; and we find in him errors of the press.  The acutest Actuary might spend weeks over these distracted Money - accounts, and inconsistent Lists of Jewels bought and not bought; and would be unreadable if successful.  Let us say, The business catches fire at this point; the Voltaire - Hirsch theatre is as if blown up into mere whirlwinds of igneous rum and smoky darkness.  Henceforth all plunges into Lawsuit, into chaos of conflicting lies, - undecipherable, not worth deciphering.  Let us give what few glimpses of the thing are clearly discernible at their successive dates, and leave the rest to picture itself in the reader’s fancy.

It appears, that Meeting of December 24th, above alluded to, was followed by another on Christmas - day, which proved the final one.  Final total explosion took place at this new meeting; - which, we find farther, was at Chasot’s Lodging (the chapeau of Hanbury), who is now in Town, like all the world, for Carnival.  Hirsch does not directly venture on naming Chasot:  but by implication, by glimmers of evidence elsewhere, one sufficiently discovers that it is he:  Lieutenant - Colonel, King’s Friend, a man glorious, especially ever since Hohenfriedberg, and that haul of the “sixty - seven standards” all at once.  In the way of Arbitration, Voltaire thinks Chasot might do something.  In regard to those 450 pounds worth of bought Jewels, there is not such a judge in the world!  Hirsch says:  “Next morning [December 25th, morrow after that jumbly Account, with probable slamming of the door, and still worse!], Voltaire went to a Lieutenant - Colonel in the King’s service; and ask him to send for me.” [Duvernet (Second), ; Hirsch’s Narrative (in - Tantale, - .] This is Chasot; who knows these jewels well.  Duvernet, - who had talked a good deal with D’Arget, in latter years, and alone of Frenchmen sometimes yields a true particle of feature in things Prussian, - Duvernet tells us, these Jewels were once Chasot’s own:  given him by a fond Duchess of Mecklenburg, - musical old Duchess, verging towards sixty; HONI soit, my friend!  What Hirsch gave Chasot for these Jewels is not a doubtful quantity; and may throw conviction into Hirsch, hopes Voltaire.

December 25th, 1750.  The interview at Chasot’s was not lengthy, but it was decisive.  Hirsch never brings that Paris Bill; privately fixed, on that point.  Hirsch’s claims, as we gradually unravel the intricate mule - mind of him, rise very high indeed.  “And as to the value of those Jewels, and what I allowed you for them, Monsieur Chasot; that is no rule:  trade - profits, you know” - Nay, the mule intimates, as a last shift, That perhaps they are not the same Jewels; that perhaps M. de Voltaire has changed some of them!  Whereupon the matter catches fire, irretrievably explodes.  M. de Voltaire’s patience flies quite done; and, fire - eyed fury now guiding, he springs upon the throat of Hirsch like a cat - o’ - mountain; clutches Hirsch by the windpipe; tumbles him about the room:  “Infamous canaille, do you know whom you have got to do with?  That it is in my power to stick you into a hole underground for the rest of your life?  Sirrah, I will ruin and annihilate you!” - and “tossed me about the room with his fist on my throat,” says Hirsch; “offering to have pity nevertheless, if I would take back the Jewels, and return all writings.” [Narrative (in - Tantale - ).] Eyes glancing like a rattlesnake’s, as we perceive; and such a phenomenon as Hirsch had not expected, this Christmas!  In short, the matter has here fairly exploded, and is blazing aloft, as a mass of intricate fuliginous ruin, not to be deciphered henceforth.  Such a scene for Chasot on the Christmas - day at Berlin!  And we have got to

PART II.  THE LAWSUIT ITSELF (30th December, 1750 - 18th and 26th February, 1751).

Hirsch slunk hurriedly home, uncertain whether dead or alive.  Old Hirsch, hearing of such explosion, considered his house and family ruined; and, being old and feeble, took to bed upon it, threatening to break his heart.  Voltaire writes to Niece Denis, on the morrow; not hinting at the Hirsch matter, far from that; but in uncommonly dreary humor:  “My splendor here, my glory, never was the like of it; Mais, Mais,” But, and ever again but, at each new item, - in fact, the humor of a glorious Phoenix - Peacock suddenly douched and drenched in dirty water, and feeling frost at hand! ["To Madame Denis” (lxxi, “Berlin Palace, 26th December, 1750;” - and i, 257, &c. of other dates).] Humor intelligible enough, when dates are compared.

Better than that, Voltaire is applying, on all points of the compass, to Legal and Influential Persons, for help in a Court of Law.  To Chancellor Cocceji; to Jarriges (eminent Prussian Frenchman), President of Court; to Maupertuis, who knows Jarriges, but “will not meddle in a bad business;” - at last, even to dull reverend Formey, whom he had not called on hitherto.  Cocceji seems to have answered, to the effect, “Most certainly:  the Courts are wide open;” - but as to “help”!  December 30th, the Suit, Voltaire versus Hirsch, “comes to Protocol,” - that is, Cocceji, Jarriges, Loper, three eminent men, have been named to try it; and Herr Hofrath Bell, Advocate for Voltaire Plaintiff, hands in his First Statement that day.  Berlin resounds, we may fancy how!  Rumor, laughter and wonder are in all polite quarters; and continue, more or less vivid, for above two months coming.  Here is one direct glimpse of Plaintiff, in this interim; which we will give, though the eyes are none of the best:  “The first visit I,” Formey, “had from Voltaire was in the afternoon of January 8th) 1751 [Suit begun ten days ago].  I had, at the time, a large party of friends.  Voltaire walked across the Apartment, without looking at anybody; and, taking me by the hand, made me lead him to a cabinet adjoining.  His Lawsuit with a Jew was the matter on hand.  He talked to me at large about his Lawsuit, and with the greatest vehemence; he wound up by asking me to speak to Law - President M. de Jarriges (since Chancellor):  I answered what was suitable;” - probably did speak to Jarriges, but might as well have held my tongue.  “Voltaire then took his leave:  stepping athwart the former Apartment with some precipitation, he noticed my eldest little girl, then in her fourth year, who was gazing at the diamonds on his Cross of the Order of Merit.  ‘Bagatelles, bagatelles, mon enfant!’ said he, and disappeared.” [Formey, .]

On New - Year’s day, Friday, 1st January, 1751, Voltaire had legally applied to Herr Minister von Bismark, for Warrant to arrest Hirsch, as a person that will not give up Papers not belonging to him.  Warrant was granted, and Hirsch lodged in Limbo.  Which worsens the state of poor old Father Hirsch; threatening now really to die, of heart - break and other causes.  Hirsch Son, from the interior of Limbo, appeals to Bismark, “Lord Chancellor Cocceji is seized of my Plea, your gracious Lordship!” - “All the same,” answers Bismark; “produce caution, or you can’t get out.”  Hirsch produces caution; and gets out, after a day or two; - and has been “brought to Protocol January 4th.”  No delay in this Court:  both parties, through their Advocates, are now brought to book; the points they agree in will be sifted out, and laid on this side as truth; what they differ in, left lying on that side, as a mixture of lies to be operated on by farther processes and protocols.

We will not detail the Lawsuit; - what I chiefly admire in it is its brevity.  Cocceji has not reformed in vain.  Good Advocates, none other allowed; and no Advocate talks; he merely endeavors to think, see and discover; holds his tongue if he can discover nothing:  that doubtless is one source of the brevity! - Many lies are stated by Hirsch, many by Voltaire:  but the Judges, without difficulty, shovel these aside; and come step by step upon the truth.  Hirsch says plainly, He was sent to buy Steuer - Scheine at 35 per cent discount; Voltaire entirely denies the Steuer - Notes; says, It was an affair of Peltries and Jewelries, originating in loans of money to this ungrateful Jew.  Which necessitates much wriggling on the part of M. de Voltaire; - but he has himself written in a Lawyer’s Office, in his young days, and knows how to twist a turn of expression.  The Judges are not there to judge about Steuer - Notes; but they give you to understand that Voltaire’s Peltry - and - Jewelry story is moonshine.  Hirsch produces the Voltaire Scraps of Writing, already known to our readers; Voltaire says, “Mere extinct jottings; which Hirsch has furtively picked out of the grate,” - or may be said to have picked; Papers annihilated by our Bargain of December 16th, and which should have been in the grate, if they were not; this felon never having kept his word in that respect.  Peltries and Jewelries, I say:  he will not give me back that Paris Bill which was protested; pays me the other 3,000 crowns (Draft of 650 pounds) in Jewels overvalued by half. - “Jewels furtively changed since Plaintiff had them of me!” answers Hirsch; - and the steady Judges keep their sieves going.

The only Documents produced by Voltaire are Two; of 19th December and of 24th December; - which the reader has not yet seen, but ought now to gain some notion of, if possible.  They affect once more, as that of December 16th had done, to be “Final Settlements” (or Final Settlement of 19th, with codicil of 24th); and turn on confused Lists of Jewels, bought, returned, re - bought (that “Topaz ring” torn from one’s hand, a conspicuous item), which no reader would have patience to understand, except in the succinct form.  Let all readers note them, however, - at least the first of them, that of December 19th; especially the words we mark in Italics, which have merited a sad place for it in the history of human sin and misery.  Klein has given both Documents in engraved fac - simile; we must help ourselves by simpler methods.  Berlin, December 19th, 1750; Voltaire writes, Hirsch signs; - and the Italics are believed to be words foisted in by M. de Voltaire, weeks after, while the Hirsch pleadings were getting stringent!  Read, - a very sad memorial of M. de Voltaire, -

Document fifth (in Voltaire’s hand, written at two times; and the old writing mended in parts, to suit the new!). - “For payment of 3,000 thalers by me due, I have sold to M. de Voltaire, at the price costing by estimation and tax, with 2 per cent for my commission ["Or gratification,” written above], the following Diamonds, taxed [blotted into “Taxable"], as here adjoined; viz.” - seven pieces of jewelry, pendeloques, &c., with price affixed, among which is the violated Topaz, - “the whole estimated by him ["him” crossed out, and “Me” written over it], being 3,640 thalers.  Whereupon, received from Monsieur de Voltaire [what is very strange; not intelligible without study!] the sum of 2,940 thalers, and he has given me back the Topaz, with 60 crowns for my trouble. - Berlin, 19th December, 1750.” (Hitherto in Voltaire’s hand; after which Hirsch writes:) “APROUVE, A. Hirschel.” [Sic:  that is always his signature; “Abraham HirschEL,” so given by Klein, while Klein and everybody call him Hirsch (stag), as we have done, - if only to save a syllable on the bad bargain.] And between these two lines ("... 1750” and “Approved..."), there is crushed in, as afterthought, “Valued by myself [Hirsch’s self], 2,940, add 60, is 3,000.”  And, in fine, below the Hirsch signature, on what may be called the bottom margin, there is, - I think, avowedly Voltaire’s and subsequent, - this:  “N.B. that Hirsch’s valuing of all the jewels [present lot and former lot] is, by real estimation, between twice and thrice too high;” of which, it is hoped, your Lordships will take notice!

Was there ever seen such a Paper; one end of it contradicting the other?  Payment to M. de Voltaire, and payment by M. de Voltaire; - with other blottings and foistings, which print and italics will not represent!  Hirsch denies he ever signed this Paper.  Is not that your writing, then:  “APROUVE, A. Hirschel"? - “No!” and they convict him of falsity in that respect:  the signature is his, but the Paper has been altered since he signed it.  That is what the poor dark mortal meant to express; and in his mulish way, he has expressed into a falsity what was in itself a truth.  There is not, on candid examination of Klein’s Fac - similes and the other evidence, the smallest doubt but Voltaire altered, added and intercalated, in his own privacy, those words which we have printed in italics; taxes changed into taxables ("estimated at” into “estimable at"), Him for me, and so on; and above all, the now first line of the Paper, for payment of 3,000 thalers by me due, and in last line the words valued by myself, &c., are palpable interpolations, sheer falsifications, which Hirsch is made to continue signing after his back is turned!

No fact is more certain; and few are sadder in the history of M. de Voltaire.  To that length has he been driven by stress of Fortune.  Nay, when the Judges, not hiding their surprise at the form of this Document, asked, Will you swear it is all genuine?  Voltaire answered, “Yes, certainly!” - for what will a poor man not do in extreme stress of Fortune?  Hirsch, as a Jew, is not permitted to make oath, where a Quasi - Christian will swear to the contrary, or he gladly would; and might justly.  The Judges, willing to prevent chance of perjury, did not bring Voltaire to swearing, but contrived a way to justice without that.

February 18th, 1751, the Court arrives at a conclusion.  Hirsch’s Diamonds, whatever may have been written or forged, are not, nor were, worth more than their value, think the Judges.  The Paris Bill is admitted to be Voltaire’s, not Hirsch’s, continue they; - and if Hirsch can prove that Voltaire has changed the Diamonds, not a likely fact, let him do so.  The rest does not concern us.  And to that effect, on the above day, runs their Sentence:  “You, Hirsch, shall restore the Paris Bill; mutual Papers to be all restored, or legally annihilated.  Jewels to be valued by sworn Experts, and paid for at that price.  Hirsch, if he can prove that the Jewels were changed, has liberty to try it, in a new Action.  Hirsch, for falsely denying his Signature, is fined ten thalers (thirty shillings), such lie being a contempt of court, whatever more.”

“Ha, fined, you Jew Villain!” hysterically shrieks Voltaire:  “in the wrong, weren’t you, then; and fined thirty shillings?” hysterically trying to believe, and make others believe, that he has come off triumphant.  “Beaten my Jew, haven’t I?” says he to everybody, though inwardly well enough aware how it stands, and that he is a Phoenix douched, and has a tremor in the bones!  Chancellor Cocceji was far from thinking it triumphant to him.  Here is a small Note of Cocceji’s, addressed to his two colleagues, Jarriges and Loper, which has been found among the Law Papers: 

“Berlin, 20th February, 1751.  The Herr President von Jarriges and Privy - Councillor Loper are hereby officially requested to bring the remainder of the Voltaire Sentence to its fulfilment:  I am myself not well, and can employ my time much better.  The Herr von Voltaire has given in a desperate Memorial (ein DESPERATES memorial) to this purport:  ’I swear that what is charged to me [believed of me] in the Sentence is true; and now request to have the Jewels valued.’  I have returned him this Paper, with notice that it must be signed by an Advocate. - Cocceji.” [Klein, 256.]

So wrote Chancellor Cocceji, on the Saturday, washing his hands of this sorry business.  Voltaire is ready to make desperate oath, if needful.  We said once, M. de Voltaire was not given to lying; far the reverse.  But yet, see, if you drive him into a corner with a sword at his throat, - alas, yes, he will lie a little!  Forgery lay still less in his habits; but he can do a stroke that way, too (one stroke, unique in his life, I do believe), if a wild boar, with frothy tusks, is upon him.  Tell it not in Gath, - except for scientific purposes!  And be judicial, arithmetical, in passing sentence on it; not shrieky, mobbish, and flying off into the Infinite!

Berlin, of course, is loud on these matters.  “The man whom the King delighted to honor, this is he, then!” King Friedrich has quitted Town, some while ago; returned to Potsdam “January 30th.”  Glad enough, I suppose, to be out of all this unmusical blowing of catcalls and indecent exposure.  To Voltaire he has taken no notice; silently leaves Voltaire, in his nook of the Berlin Schloss, till the foul business get done.  “Voltaire filoute les juifs (picks Jew pockets),” writes he once to Wilhelmina:  “will get out of it by some gambade (summerset),” writes he another time; “but” ["31st December, 1750” ( - OEuvres de Frederic, - xxvii, ; “3d February, 1751” (i.] - And takes the matter with boundless contempt, doubtless with some vexation, but with the minimum of noise, as a Royal gentleman might.  Jew Hirsch is busy preparing for his new desperate Action; getting together proof that the Jewels have been changed.  In proof Jew Hirsch will be weak; but in pleading, in public pamphlets, and keeping a winged Apollo fluttering disastrously in such a mud - bath, Jew Hirsch will be strong.  Voltaire, “out of magnanimous pity to him,” consents next week to an Agreement.  Agreement is signed on Thursday, 26th February, 1751: - Papers all to be returned, Jewels nearly all, except one or two, paid at Hirsch’s own price.  Whereby, on the whole, as Klein computes, Voltaire lost about 150 pounds; - elsewhere I have seen it computed at 187 pounds:  not the least matter which.  Old Hirsch has died in the interim ("Of broken heart!” blubbers the Son); day not known.

And, on these terms, Voltaire gets out of the business; glad to close the intolerable rumor, at some cost of money.  For all tongues were wagging; and, in defect of a times Newspaper, it appears, there had Pamphlets come out; printed Satires, bound or in broadside; - sapid, exhilarative, for a season, and interesting to the idle mind.  Of which, tantale en Procès may still, for the sake of that preface to it, be considered to have an obscure existence.  And such, reduced to its authenticities, was the Adventure of the Steuer - Notes.  A very bad Adventure indeed; unspeakably the worst that Voltaire ever tried, who had such talent in the finance line.  On which poor History is really ashamed to have spent so much time; sorting it into clearness, in the disgust and sorrow of her soul.  But perhaps it needed to be done.  Let us hope, at least, it may not now need to be done again. [Besides the Klein, the tantale en Procès and the Voltaire letters cited above, there is (in - OEuvres de Voltaire, - lxiv. p - 106, as supplement there), written off - hand, in the very thick of the Hirsch Affair, a considerable set of notes to D’ARGET, which might have been still more elucidative; but are, in their present dateless topsy - turvied condition; a very wonder of confusion to the studious reader!]

This is the first act of Voltaire’s Tragic - Farce at the Court of Berlin:  readers may conceive to what a bleared frost - bitten condition it has reduced the first Favonian efflorescence there.  He considerably recovered in the second act, such the indelible charm of the Voltaire genius to Friedrich.  But it is well known, the First Act rules all the others; and here, accordingly, the Third Act failed not to prove tragical.  Out of First Act into Second the following extracts of correspondence will guide the reader, without commentary of ours.

Voltaire, left languishing at Berlin, has fallen sick, now that all is over; - no doubt, in part really sick, the unfortunate Phoenix - Peafowl, with such a tremor in his bones; - and would fain be near Friedrich and warmth again; fain persuade the outside world that all is sunshine with him.  Voltaire’s Letters to Friedrich, if he wrote any, in this Jew time, are lost; here are Friedrich’s Answers to Two, - one lost, which had been written from Berlin after the Jew affair was out of Court; and to another (not lost) after the Jew affair was done.

1.  King Friedrich to Voltaire at berlin.

“Potsdam, 24th February, 1751.  “I was glad to receive you in my house; I esteemed your genius, your talents and acquirements; and I had reason to think that a man of your age, wearied with fencing against Authors, and exposing himself to the storm, came hither to take refuge as in a safe harbor.

“But, on arriving, you exacted of me, in a rather singular manner, Not to take Freron to write me news from Paris; and I had the weakness, or the complaisance, to grant you this, though it is not for you to decide what persons I shall take into my service.  D’Arnaud had faults towards you; a generous man would have pardoned them; a vindictive man hunts down those whom he takes to hating.  In a word, though to me D’Arnaud had done nothing, it was on your account that he had to go.  You were with the Russian Minister, speaking of things you had no concern with [Russian Excellency Gross, off home lately, in sudden dudgeon, like an angry sky - rocket, nobody can guess why!  Adelung, vi (about 1st December, 1750).] - and it was thought I had given you Commission.”  “You have had the most villanous affair in the world with a Jew.  It has made a frightful scandal all over Town.  And that Steuer - Schein business is so well known in Saxony, that they have made grievous complaints of it to me.

“For my own share, I have preserved peace in my house till your arrival:  and I warn you, that if you have the passion of intriguing and caballing, you have applied to the wrong hand.  I like peaceable composed people; who do not put into their conduct the violent passions of Tragedy.  In case you can resolve to live like a Philosopher, I shall be glad to see you; but if you abandon yourself to all the violences of your passions, and get into quarrels with all the world, you will do me no good by coming hither, and you may as well stay in Berlin.” [Preuss, xxi (Wanting in the French Editions).] - F.

To which Voltaire sighing pathetically in response, “Wrong, ah yes, your Majesty; - and sick to death” (see farther down), - here is Friedrichs Second in Answer: -

2.  Friedrich to Voltaire again.

“Potsdam, 28th February, 1751.  “If you wish to come hither, you can do so.  I hear nothing of Lawsuits, not even of yours.  Since you have gained it, I congratulate you; and I am glad that this scurvy affair is done.  I hope you will have no more quarrels, neither with the old nor with the New testament.  Such worryings (ces SORTES de compromis) leave their mark on a man; and with the talents of the finest genius in France, you will not cover the stains which this conduct would fasten on your reputation in the long - run.  A Bookseller Gosse [read Jore, your Majesty?  Nobody ever heard of Gosse as an extant quantity:  Jore, of Rouen, you mean, and his celebrated Lawsuit, about printing the HENRIADE, or I know not what, long since] [Unbounded details on the Jore Case, and from 1731 to 1738 continual letters on it, in - OEuvres de Voltaire; - came to a head in 1736 (ib. lxi; Jore penitent, 1738 (ib. , &c. &c.], a Bookseller Jore, an Opera Fiddler [poor Travenol, wrong dog pincered by the ear], and a Jeweller Jew, these are, of a surety, names which in no sort of business ought to appear by the side of yours.  I write this Letter with the rough common - sense of a German, who speaks what he thinks, without employing equivocal terms, and loose assuagements which disfigure the truth:  it is for you to profit by it. - F.” [ - OEuvres de Frederic, - xxi.]

So that Voltaire will have to languish:  “Wrong, yes; - and sick, nigh dead, your Majesty!  Ah, could not one get to some Country Lodge near you, ‘the marquisat’ for instance?  Live silent there, and see your face sometimes?” [In - OEuvres de Frederic - (xxi - 261, 263 - 266) are Four lamenting and repenting, wheedling and ultimately whining, letters from Voltaire, none of them dated, which have much about “my dreadful state of health,” my passion” for reposing in that marquisat,” &c.; - to one of which Four, or perhaps to the whole together, the above N of Friedrich seems to have been Answer.  Of that indisputable “Marquisat” no Nicolai says a word; even careful Preuss passes “Gosse” and it with shut lips.] Languishing very much; - gives cosy little dinners, however.  Here are two other Excerpts; and these will suffice: -

Voltaire to Formey ("Berlin Palace;” Datable, first days of march):  “Will you, Monsieur, come and eat the King’s roast meat (rot du roi), to - day, Thursday, at two o’clock, in a philosophic, warm and comfortable manner (philosophiquement et chaudement et doucement).  A couple of philosophers, without being courtiers, may dine in the Palace of a Philosopher - King:  I should even take the liberty of sending one of his Majesty’s Carriages for you, - at two precise.  After dinner, you would be at hand for your Academy meeting.” [Formey, .] - V.  How cosy! - And King Friedrich has relented, too; grants me the Marquisat; can refuse me nothing!

Voltaire to D’ARGENTAL (potsdam, 15th march 1751)....  “I could not accompany our Chamberlain [Von Ammon, gone as Envoy to Paris, on a small matter ["Commercial Treaty;” which he got done.  See Longchamp, if any one is curious otherwise about this Gentleman:  “D’Hamon” they call him, and sometimes “Damon", - to whom Niece Denis wanted to be Phyllis, according to Longchamp.]], through the muds and the snows, - where I should have been buried; I was ill,” and had to go to the marquisat.  “D’Arnaud and the pack of Scribblers would have been too glad.  D’Arnaud, animated with the true love of glory, and not yet grown sufficiently illustrious by his own immortal Works, has done one of that kind,” - by his behavior here.  Has behaved to me - oh, like a miserable, envious, intriguing, lying little scoundrel; and made Berlin too hot for him:  seduced Tinois my Clerk, stole bits of the Pucelle (brief sight of bits, for Prince Henri’s sake) to ruin me.

“D’Arnaud sent his lies to Freron for the Paris meridian [that is his real crime]; delightful news from canaille to canaille:  ’How Voltaire had lost a great Lawsuit, respectable Jew Banker cheated by Voltaire; that Voltaire was disgraced by the King,’ who of course loves Jews; ’that Voltaire was ruined; was ill; nay at last, that Voltaire was dead.’” To the joy of Freron, and the scoundrels that are printing one’s Pucelle.  “Voltaire is still in life, however, my angels; and the King has been so good to me in my sickness, I should be the ungratefulest of men if I didn’t still pass some months with him.  When he left Berlin [30th January, six weeks ago], and I was too ill to follow him, I was the sole animal of my species whom he lodged in his Palace there [what a beautiful bit of color to lay on!] - He left me équipages, cooks et cetera; and his mules and horses carted out my temporary furniture (MEUBLES de passade) to a delicious House of his, close by Potsdam [marquisat to wit, where I now stretch myself at ease; Niece Denis coming to live with me there, - talks of coming, if my angels knew it], - and he has reserved for me a charming apartment in his Palace of Potsdam, where I pass a part of the week.

“And, on close view, I still admire this Unique Genius; and he deigns to communicate himself to me; - and if I were not 300 leagues from you, and had a little health, I should be the happiest of men.” [ - OEuvres de Voltaire, - lxxi.]...  Oh, my angels -

And, in short, better or worse, my second act is begun, as you perceive! - And certain readers will be apt to look in again, before all is over.