CHAPTER VIII - THE SOCIAL WAR
In a previous chapter the relations
now existing between Rome and her dependents have
been described. For two centuries the Italians
had remained faithful to Rome through repeated temptations,
and even through the fiery trial of Hannibal’s
victorious occupation. But the loyalty, which
no external or sudden shock could snap, had been slowly
eaten away by corrosives, which the arrogance or negligence
of the government supplied.
It is clear from the episode of Drusus that there
was as wide a breach between Italian capitalists and
cultivators, as there had been between Roman occupiers
and the first clamourers for agrarian laws. So,
at the outbreak of the war, Umbria and Etruria, whence
Philippus had summoned his supporters, because
the farmer class had been annihilated and large land-owners
held the soil, remained faithful to Rome. But
where the farmer class still flourished, as among
the Marsi, Marrucini, and the adjacent districts,
discontent had been gathering volume for many years.
No doubt the demoralisation of the metropolis contributed
to this result; and, as intercourse with Rome became
more and more common, familiarity with the vices of
their masters would breed indignation in the minds
of the hardier dependents. Who, they would ask
themselves, were these Scauri, these Philippi, men
fit only to murder patriots and sell their country
and themselves for gold, that they should lord it over
Italians? Why should a Roman soldier have the
right of appeal to a civil tribunal, and an Italian
soldier be at the mercy of martial law? Why should
two Italians for every one Roman be forced to fight
Rome’s battles? Why should insolent young
Romans and the fine ladies of the metropolis insult
Italian magistrates and murder Italians of humbler
rank? This was the reward of their long fidelity.
If here and there a statesman was willing to yield
them the franchise, the flower of the aristocracy,
the Scaevolae and the Crassi, expelled them by
an Alien Act from Rome. They had tried all parties,
and by all been disappointed, for Roman factions were
united on one point, and one only in obstinate
refusal to give Italians justice. The two glorious
brothers had been slain because they pitied their wrongs.
So had Scipio. So had the fearless Saturninus.
And now their last friend, this second Scipio, Drusus,
had been struck down by the same cowardly hands.
Surely it was time to act for themselves and avenge
their benefactors. They were more numerous, they
were hardier than their tyrants; and if not so well
organized, still by their union with Drusus they were
in some sort welded together, and now or never was
the time to strike. For the friends of Drusus
were marked men. Let them remain passive, and
either individual Italians would perish by the dagger
which had slain Drusus, or individual communities by
the sentence of the Senate which had exterminated
Fregellae.
It is easier to get a general idea
of the war than of its details, though the latter
are not without interest. The results of the first
year were, in spite of some victories, most unfavourable
to Rome. The insurgents were encouraged.
The insurrection had spread to Umbria and Etruria,
and the Romans had at one time almost despaired. But in council they retrieved
what they had lost in the camp. A most politic
concession of the franchise checked all further disaffection
in the very nick of time. The revolt in Umbria
and Etruria was speedily suppressed, and at the close
of the second year of the war, B.C. 89, the insurrection
itself was virtually at an end. For, though the
Sulpician revolution at Rome prevented its absolute
extinction, and some embers of it still lingered for
five years more, and though Roman forces were still
required after 89 B.C. among the Sabines in Samnium,
in Lucania, and at Nola, the war as a war ended in
that year. Consequently we may divide it into two periods,
each well defined and each consisting of a year, the
first in which the confederate cause triumphed and
Marius lost credit; the second in which the cause of
Rome triumphed, and Sulla enhanced his reputation and
became the foremost man at Rome.
Leaving Nola behind him, he crossed
the Hirpinian frontier and marched on Aeclanum.
The townsmen, who were expecting a Lucanian reinforcement
that day, asked for time to deliberate. Sulla
gave them an hour, and occupied the hour in heaping
vine osiers round the wooden walls.
Not choosing to be burnt the townsmen surrendered,
and Sulla sacked the place. He then marched northwards
into Samnium. The mountain-passes were held by
Mutilus, who hemmed in Sulla near Aesernia.
Sulla pretended to treat for peace, and, when the
enemy were off their guard, marched away in the night,
leaving a trumpeter to sound all the watches as if
the army was still in position. He seems to have
defeated Mutilus after this, and, leaving Aesernia
behind as he had left Nola, finally, before going
home to sue for the consulship of 88 B.C., stormed
Bovianum. He had managed the campaign in a bold
and able way, where less daring generalship might
have failed.