The first man-made craft which floated
on the waters of what is now Fore River was probably
a little dugout, a crude boat made by an Indian, who
burned out the center of a pine log which he had felled
by girdling with fire. After he had burned out
as much as he could, he scraped out the rest with
a stone tool called a “celt.” The
whole operation probably took one Indian three weeks.
The Rivadavia which slid down the ways of the Fore
River Shipbuilding Corporation in August, 1914, weighed
13,400 tons and had engaged the labor of 2000 men
for fifty months.
Between these two extremes flutter
all the great sisterhood of shallops, sloops, pinks,
schooners, snows, the almost obsolete batteau
and periagua, the gundelow with its picturesque lateen
sail, and all the winged host that are now merely
names in New England’s maritime history.
We may not give in this limited space
an account of the various vessels which have sailed
down the green-sea aisles the last three hundred years.
But of the very first, “a great and strong shallop”
built by the Plymouth settlers for fishing, we must
make brief mention, and of the Blessing of the Bay,
the first seaworthy native craft to be built and launched
on these shores the pioneer of all New England
commerce. Built by Governor Winthrop, he notes
of her in his journal on August 31, 1631, that “the
bark being of thirty tons went to sea.”
That is all he says, but from that significant moment
the building of ships went on “gallantly,”
as was indeed to be expected in a country whose chief
industry was fishing and which was so admirably surrounded
by natural bays and harbors. In 1665 we hear
of the Great and General Court of Massachusetts which
distinctive term is still applied to the Massachusetts
Legislature forbidding the cutting of any
trees suitable for masts. The broad arrow of
the King was marked on all white pines, twenty-four
inches in diameter, three feet from the ground.
Big ships and little ships swarmed into existence,
and every South Shore town made shipbuilding history.
The ketch, a two-masted vessel carrying from fifteen
to twenty tons, carried on most of the coasting traffic,
and occasionally ventured on a foreign voyage.
When we recall that the best and cheapest ships of
the latter half of the seventeenth century were built
here in the new country, we realize that shipyards,
ports, docks, proper laws and regulations, and the
invigorating progress which marks any thriving industry
flourished bravely up and down the whole New England
coast.
It is rather inspiring to stand here
on the bridge which spans the Fore River, and picture
that first crude dugout being paddled along by the
steady stroke of the red man, and then to look at the
river to-day. Every traveler through Quincy is
familiar with the aerial network of steel scaffolding
criss-crossing the sky, with the roofs of shops and
offices and glimpses of vessels visible along the water-front.
But few travelers realize that these are merely the
superficial features of a shipyard which under the
urge of the Great War delivered to the Navy, in 1918,
eighteen completed destroyers, which was as many as
all the other yards in the country put together delivered
during this time. A shipyard which cut the time
of building destroyers from anywhere between eighteen
and thirty-two months to an average of six months and
a half; a shipyard which made the world’s record
of one hundred and seventy-four days from the laying
of the keel to the delivering of a destroyer.
It is difficult to grasp the meaning
of these figures. Difficult, even after one has
obtained entrance into this city within a city, and
seen with his own eyes twenty thousand men toiling
like Trojans. Seen a riveting crew which can
drive more than twenty-eight hundred rivets in nine
hours; battleships that weigh thirty thousand tons;
a plate yard piled with steel plates and steel bars
worth two million dollars; cranes that can lift from
five tons up to others of one hundred tons capacity;
single buildings a thousand feet long and eighty feet
high.
Perhaps the enormousness of the plant
is best comprehended, not when we mechanically repeat
that it covers eighty acres and comprises eighty buildings,
and that four full-sized steam locomotives run up and
down its yard, but when we see how many of the intimate
things of daily living have sprung up here as little
trees spring up between huge stones. For the
Fore River Plant is more than an industrial organization.
It is a social center, an economic entity. It
has its band and glee club, ball team and monthly
magazine. There are refreshment stands, and a
bathing cove; a brand-new village of four hundred and
thirty-eight brand-new houses; dormitories which accommodate
nearly a thousand men and possess every convenience
and even luxuries. The men work hard here, but
they are well paid for their work, as the many motor-cycles
and automobiles waiting for them at night testify.
It is a scene of incredible industry, but also of
incredible completeness.
To look down upon the village and
the yard from the throbbing roof of the steel mill,
seven hundred and seventy feet long and a hundred and
eighty-eight wide, is a thrilling sight. Within
the yard, confined on three sides by its high fences
and buildings and on the fourth by Weymouth Fore River,
one sees, far below, locomotives moving up and down
on their tracks; great cranes stalking long-leggedly
back and forth; smoke from foundry, blacksmith shop,
and boiler shop; men hurrying to and fro. Whistles
blow, and whole buildings tremble. The smoke and
the grayness might make it a gloomy scene if it were
not for the red sides of the immense submarines gleaming
in their wide slips to the water. Everywhere
one sees the long gray sides of freighters, destroyers,
merchant ships, and oil tankers heaving like the mailed
ribs of sea animals basking on the shore. Practically
every single operation, from the most stupendous to
the most delicate, necessary for the complete construction
of these vessels, is carried on in this yard.
The eighty acres look small when we realize the extent
and variety of the work achieved within its limits.
Yes, the solitary Indian, working
with fire and celt on his dugout, would not recognize
this once familiar haunt, nor would he know the purpose
of these vast vessels without sail or paddle.
And yet, were this same Indian standing on the roof
with us, he would see a wide stream of water he knew
well, and he would see, too, above the smoke of the
furnace, shop, and boiler room, the friendly green
of the trees.
Perhaps there is nothing which makes
us realize the magical rapidity of growth so much
as to look from this steel city and to see the woods
close by. For instead of being surrounded by the
sordid congestion of an industrial center, the Fore
River Shipyard is in the midst of practically open
country.
While we are speaking of rapidity
we must look over toward the Victory Plant at Squantum,
that miraculous marsh which was drained with such
expedition that just twelve months from the day ground
was broken for its foundation, it launched its first
ship, and less than two years after completed its
entire contract. Surely never in the history of
shipbuilding have brain and brawn worked so brilliantly
together!
In this way, then, the history of
the ships that have sailed the seven seas has been
built up at Quincy a dramatic history and
one instinct with the beauty which is part of gliding
canoe and white sails, and part, too, of the huge
smooth-slipping monsters of a modern day, sleek and
swift as leviathans. But all the while the building
of these ships has been going on, there has been slowly
rising within the selfsame radius another ship, vaster,
more inspiring, calling forth initiative even more
intense, idealism even more profound the
Ship of State.
We who journey to-day over the smooth
or troubled waters of national or international affairs
are no more conscious of the infinite toil and labors
which have gone into the intricate making of the vessel
that carries us, than are travelers conscious of the
cogs and screws, the engines and all the elaboration
of detail which compose an ocean liner. Like
them we sometimes grumble at meals or prices, at some
discourtesy or incompetence, but we take it for granted
that the engine is in commission, that the bottom
is whole and the chart correct. The great Ship
of State of this country may occasionally run into
rough weather, but Americans believe that, in the
last analysis, she is honestly built. And it
is to Quincy that we owe a large initial part of this
building.
It is astonishing to enumerate the
notable public men, who have been influential in establishing
our national policy, who have come from Quincy.
There is no town in this entire country which can equal
the record. What other town ever produced two
Presidents of the United States, an Ambassador to
Great Britain, a Governor of the Commonwealth, a Mayor
of Boston, two presidents of Harvard University, and
judges, chief justices, statesmen, and orators in
such quantity and of such quality? Truly this
group of eminent men of brilliance, integrity, and
public feeling is unique in our history. To read
the biographies of Quincy’s great men would
comprise a studious winter’s employment, but
we, passing through the historic city, may hold up
our fragment of a mirror and catch a bit of the procession.
First and foremost, of course, will
come President John Adams, he who, both before and
after his term of high office, toiled terrifically
in the public cause, being at the time of his election
to Congress a member of ninety committees and a chairman
of twenty-five! We see him as the portraits have
taught us to see him, with strong, serious face, austere,
but not harsh, velvet coat, white ruffles,
and white curls. He stands before us as the undisputed
founder of what is now recognized as American diplomacy.
Straightforward, sound to the core, unswerving, veracious,
exemplifying in every act the candor of the Puritan,
so congruous with the new simple life of a nation of
common people. I think we shall like best to
study him as he stands at the door of the little house
in which he was born, and which, with its pitch roof,
its antique door and eaves, is still preserved, close
to the street, for public scrutiny.
Next to President John Adams comes
his son, John Quincy Adams, also a President of the
United States. Spending much of his time abroad,
the experience of those diplomatic years is graven
upon features more subtly refined than those of his
sire. But for all his foreign residence, he was,
like his father, a Puritan in its most exalted sense;
like him toiled all his life in public service, dying
in the harness when rising to address the Speaker
of the House. Him, too, we see best, standing
at the door of his birthplace, a small cottage a stone’s
throw from the other cottage, separated only by a
turnstile. Fresh white curtains hang in the small-paned
windows; the grass is neatly trimmed, and like its
quaint companion it is now open to the public and worth
the tourist’s call. Both these venerable
cottages have inner walls, one of burnt, the other
of unburnt brick; and both are unusual in having no
boards on the outer walls, but merely clapboards fastened
directly on to the studding with wrought-iron nails.
Still another Adams follows, Charles
Francis Adams. Although a little boy when he
first comes into public view, a little boy occupying
the conspicuous place as child of one President and
grandchild of another, yet he was to win renown and
honor on his own account as Ambassador to England
during the critical period of our Civil War. America
remembers him best in this position. His firm
old face with its white chin whiskers is a worthy
portrait in the ancestral gallery.
Although the political history of
this country may conclude its reference to the Adamses
with these three famous figures, yet all New Englanders
and all readers of biography would be reluctant to
turn from this remarkable family without mention of
the sons of Charles Francis Adams, two of whom have
written, beside valuable historical works, autobiographies
so entertaining and so truly valuable for their contemporaneous
portraits as to win a place of survival in our permanent
literature.
A member of the Adams family still
lives in the comfortable home where the three first
and most famous members all celebrated their golden
weddings. This broad-fronted and hospitable house,
built in 1730 by Leonard Vassal, a West India planter,
for his summer residence, with its library finished
in panels of solid mahogany, was confiscated when its
Royalist owner fled at the outbreak of the Revolution,
and John Adams acquired the property and left the
pitch-roofed cottage down the street. The home
of two Presidents, what tales it could tell of notable
gatherings! One must read the autobiography of
Charles Francis Adams and “The Education of
Henry Adams” to appreciate the charm of the succeeding
mistresses of the noble homestead, and to enjoy in
retrospect its many illustrious visitors.
To have produced one family like the
Adamses would surely be sufficient distinction for
any one place, but the Adams family forms merely one
unit in Quincy’s unique procession of great men.
The Quincy family, for which the town
was named, and which at an early date intermarried
with the Adamses, presents an almost parallel distinction.
The first Colonel Quincy, he who lived like an English
squire, a trifle irascible, to be sure, but a dignified
and commanding figure withal, had fourteen children
by his first wife and three by his second, so the
family started off with the advantage of numbers as
well as of blood. At the Quincy mansion house
were born statesmen, judges, and captains of war.
The “Dorothy Q.” of Holmes’s poem
first saw the light in it, and the Dorothy who became
the bride of the dashing John Hancock blossomed into
womanhood in it. Here were entertained times
without number Sir Harry Vane, quaint Judge Sewall,
Benjamin Franklin, and that couple who gleam through
the annals of New England history in a never-fading
flame of romance, Sir Harry Frankland and beautiful
Agnes Surriage. The Quincy mansion, which was
built about 1635 by William Coddington of Boston and
occupied by him until he was exiled for his religious
opinions, was bought by Edmund Quincy. His grandson,
who bore his name, enlarged the house, and lived in
it until his death when it descended to his son Edmund,
the eminent jurist and father of Dorothy. The
old-fashioned furniture, utensils and pictures, the
broad hall, fine old stairway with carved balustrades,
and foreign wall-paper supposed to have been hung
in honor of the approaching marriage of Dorothy to
John Hancock, are still preserved in their original
place. Of the Quincy family, whose sedate jest
it was that the estate descended from ’Siah to
’Siah, so frequent was the name “Josiah,”
the best known is perhaps the Josiah Quincy who was
Mayor of Boston for six years and president of Harvard
for sixteen. The portrait of his long, thin face
is part of every New England history, and his busy,
serene life, “compacted of Roman and Puritan
virtues,” is still upheld to all American children
as a model of high citizenship.
But not even the long line of the
Quincy family completes the list of the town’s
great men. Henry Hope, one of the most brilliant
financiers of his generation, and founder of a European
banking house second only to that of the Rothchilds,
was a native of Quincy. John Hull who,
as every school-child knows, on the day of his daughter’s
marriage to Judge Sewall, placed her in one of his
weighing scales, and heaped enough new pine-tree shillings
into the other to balance, and then presented both
to the bridegroom held the first grant of
land in the present town of Braintree (which originally
included Quincy, Randolph, and Holbrook).
From the picturesque union of John
Hull’s bouncing daughter Betsy and Judge Sewall
sprang the extraordinary family of Sewalls which has
given three chief justices to Massachusetts, and one
to Canada, and has been distinguished in every generation
for the talents and virtues of its members. In
passing, we may note that it was this same John Hull
who named Point Judith for his wife, little dreaming
what a bête noir the place would prove to mariners
in the years to come.
There is another Quincy man whom it
is pleasant to recall, and that is Henry Flynt, a
whimsical and scholarly old bachelor, who was a tutor
at Harvard for no less than fifty-three years, the
one fixed element in the flow of fourteen college
generations. One of the most accomplished scholars
of his day, his influence on the young men with whom
he came in contact was stimulating to a degree, and
they loved to repeat bits of his famous repartee.
A favorite which has come down to us was on an occasion
when Whitefield the revivalist declared in a theological
discussion: “It is my opinion that Dr. Tillotson
is now in hell for his heresy.” To which
Tutor Flynt retorted dryly: “It is my opinion
that you will not meet him there.”
The procession of Quincy’s great
men which we have been watching winds its way, as
human processions are apt to do, to the old graveyard.
Most of the original settlers are buried here, although
not a few were buried on their own land, according
to the common custom. Probably this ancient burying
ground, with its oldest headstone of 1663, has never
been particularly attractive. The Puritans did
not decorate their graveyards in any way. Fearing
that prayers or sermons would encourage the “superstitions”
of the Roman Catholic Church, they shunned any ritual
over the dead or beautifying of their last resting-place.
However, neglected as the spot was, the old stone church,
whose golden belfry is such a familiar and pleasant
landmark to all the neighboring countryside, still
keeps its face turned steadfastly toward it. The
congested traffic of the city square presses about
its portico, but those who knew and loved it best
lie quietly within the shadow of its gray walls.
Under the portico lies President John Adams, and “at
his side sleeps until the trump shall sound, Abigail,
his beloved and only wife.” In the second
chamber is placed the dust of his illustrious son,
with “His partner for fifty years, Louisa Catherine” she
of whom Henry Adams wrote, “her refined figure;
her gentle voice and manner; her vague effect of not
belonging there, but to Washington or Europe, like
her furniture and writing-desk with little glass doors
above and little eighteenth-century volumes in old
binding.”
It has been called the “church
of statesmen,” this dignified building, and
so, indeed, might Quincy itself be called the “city
of statesmen.” It would be extremely interesting
to study the reasons for Quincy’s peculiar productiveness
of noble public characters. The town was settled
(as Braintree) exclusively by people from Devonshire
and Lincolnshire and Essex. The laws of the Massachusetts
Colony forbade Irish immigration probably
more for religious than racial reasons. On reading
the ancient petition for the incorporation of the town
one is struck by the fact that practically every single
name of the one hundred and fifty signers is English
in origin, the few which were not having been anglicized.
All of these facts point to a homogeneous stock, with
the same language, traditions, and social customs.
Obviously there is a connection between the governmental
genius displayed by Quincy’s sons and the singular
purity of the original English stock.
Little did Wampatuck, the son of Chickatawbut,
realize what he was doing when he parted with his
Braintree lands for twenty-one pounds and ten shillings.
The Indian deed is still preserved, with the following
words on its back: “In the 17th reign of
Charles 2. Braintry Indian Deeds. Given
1665. Au: Take great care of it.”
Little did the Indian chief realize
that the surrounding waters were to float hulks as
mighty as a city; that the hills were to furnish granite
for buildings and monuments without number; and that
men were to be born there who would shape the greatest
Ship of State the world has ever known. And yet,
if he had known, possibly he would have accepted the
twenty-one pounds and ten shillings just the same,
and departed quietly. For the ships that were
to be built would never have pleased him as well as
his own canoe; the granite buildings would have stifled
him; and the zealous Adamses and the high-minded Quincys
and Sewalls and all the rest would have bored him
horribly. Probably the only item in the whole
history of Quincy which would have appealed to Wampatuck
in the least would have been the floating down on
a raft of the old Hollis Street Church of Boston,
to become the Union Church of Weymouth and Braintree
in 1810. This and the similar transportation of
the Bowditch house from Beacon Street in Boston to
Quincy a couple of years later would have fascinated
the red man, as the recital of the feat fascinates
us to-day.
Those who care to learn more of Quincy
will do well to read the autobiography of Charles
Francis Adams and “The Education of Henry Adams.”
Those who care more for places than for descriptions
of them may wander at will, finding beneath the surface
of the modern city many landmarks of the old city
which underlies it. They may see the scaffolding
of the great shipyards latticing themselves against
the sky, and the granite quarries against the hills.
They may see the little cottages and the great houses
made famous by those who have passed over their thresholds;
they may linger in the old burial ground and trace
out the epitaphs under the portico of the golden-belfried
church. But after they have touched and handled
all of these things, they will not understand Quincy
unless they look beyond and recognize her greatest
contribution to this country the noble statesmen
who so bravely and intelligently toiled to construct
America’s Ship of State.