Scituate is different: different
from Cohasset, with its superbly bold coast and its
fashionable folk; different from Hingham, with its
air of settled inland dignity. Scituate has a
quaintness, a casualness, the indescribable air of
a land’s-end spot. The fine houses in Scituate
are refreshingly free from pretension; the winds that
have twisted the trees into Rackham-like grotesques
have blown away falsity and formality.
Scituate life has always been along
the shore. It is from the shore that coot-shooting
used to furnish a livelihood to many a Scituate man,
and still lures the huntsmen in the fine fall weather.
It is the peculiar formation of the shore which has
developed a small, clinker-built boat, and made the
town famous for day fishing. It is along the shore
that the unique and picturesque mossing industry is
still carried on, and along the shore that the well-known
colony of literary folk have settled.
Scituate’s history is really
a fishing history, for as early as 1633 a fishing
station was established here, and in course of time
the North River, winding twenty miles through green
meadows to the sea, was once the scene of more shipbuilding
than any other river in New England.
There is nothing more indicative of
the Yankees’ shrewd practicality than the early
settlers’ instant appreciation of the financial
and economic potentialities of the fishing-trade.
The Spaniard sought for gold in the new country, or
contented himself with the fluctuating fur trade with
its demoralizing slack seasons. But the New Englander
promptly applied himself to the mundane pursuit of
cod and mackerel. Everybody fished. As John
Smith, in his “Description of New England,”
says: “Young boyes and girles, salvages
or any other, be they never such idlers, may turne,
carry, and returne fish without shame or either
great pain: he is very idle that is past twelve
years of age and cannot doe so much: and shee
is very old that cannot spin a thread to catch them.”
It began when Squanto the Indian showed
the amazed colonists how he could tread the eels out
of the mud with his feet and catch them with his hands.
This was convenient, to be sure, but the colonists
did not long content themselves with such primitive
methods. They sent to England for cod hooks and
lines; mackerel hooks and lines; herring nets and
seines; shark hooks, bass nets, squid lines, and eel
pots; and in a short time they had established a trade
which meant more money than the gold mines of Guiana
or Potosi. The modern financier who makes a fortune
from the invention of a collar button or the sale of
countless penny packages of gum is the lineal descendant
of that first thrifty New Englander who did not scorn
the humble cod because it was cheap and plentiful
(you remember how these same cod “pestered”
the ships of Gosnold in 1602), but set to work with
the quiet initiative which has distinguished New Englanders
ever since, first to catch, then to barter, and finally
to sell his wares to all the world. For cheap
as all fish was twopence for a twelve-pound
cod, salmon less than a penny a pound, and shad, when
it was finally considered fit to eat at all, at two
fish for a penny yet, when all the world
is ready to buy and the supply is inexhaustible, tremendous
profits are possible. The many fast days of the
Roman Catholic Church abroad opened an immense demand,
and in a short time quantities of various kinds of
fish (Josselyn in 1672 enumerates over two hundred
caught in New England waters) were dried and salted
and sent to England.
This constant and steadily increasing
trade radically affected the whole economic structure
and history of New England for two centuries.
Ships and all the shipyard industries; the farm, on
which fish was used not only as a medium of exchange,
but also as a valuable fertilizer; the home, where
the many operations of curing and salting were carried
on all of those were developed directly
by the growth of this particular trade. Laws
were made and continually revised regarding the fisheries
and safeguarding their rights in every conceivable
fashion; ship carpenters were exempt from military
service, and many special exemptions were extended
to fishermen under the general statutes.
The oyster is now a dish for the epicure
and the lobster for the millionaire. But in the
old days when oysters a foot long were not uncommon,
and lobsters sometimes grew to six feet, every one
had all he wanted, and sometimes more than he wanted,
of these delicacies. The stranger in New England
may notice how certain customs still prevail, such
as the Friday night fish dinner and the Sunday morning
fish-cakes; and also that New Englanders as a whole
have a rather fastidious taste in regard to the preparation
of both salt- and fresh-water products. The food
of any region is characteristic of that region, and
to travel along the Old Coast Road and not partake
of one of the delicious fish dinners, is as absurd
as it would be to omit rice from a menu in China or
roast beef from an English dinner.
While the fishing trade was highly
important in all the South Shore towns, yet it was
especially so in Scituate. In 1770 more than thirty
vessels, principally for mackerel, were fitted out
in this one village, and these vessels not infrequently
took a thousand barrels in a season. In winter
they were used for Southern coasting, carrying lumber
and fish and returning with grain and flour.
The reason why fishing was so persistently and exclusively
followed in this particular spot is not hard to seek.
The sea yielded a far more profitable and ready crop
than the land, and, besides, had a jealous way of
nibbling away at the land wherever it could.
It is estimated that it wastes away from twelve to
fourteen inches of Fourth Cliff every year.
But in spite of the sea’s readily
accessible crop it was natural that the “men
of Kent” who settled the town should demand some
portion of dry land as well. These men of Kent
were not mermen, able to live in and on the water
indefinitely, but decidedly gallant fellows, rather
more courtly than their neighbors, and more polished
than the race which succeeded them. Gilson, Vassal,
Hatherly, Cudworth, Tilden, Hoar, Foster, Stedman,
and Hinckley had all been accustomed to the elegancies
of life in England as their names testify. The
first land they used was on the cliffs, for it had
already been improved by Indian planting; then the
salt marshes, covered with a natural crop of grass,
and then the mellow intervales near the river.
When the sea was forced to the regretful realization
that she could not monopolize the entire attention
of her fellows, she was persuaded to yield up some
very excellent fertilizer in the way of seaweed.
But she still nags away at the cliffs and shore, and
proclaims with every flaunting wave and ripple that
it is the water, not the land, which makes Scituate
what it is.
And, after all, the sea is right.
It is along the shore that one sees Scituate most
truly. Here the characteristic industry of mossing
is still carried on in primitive fashion. The
mossers work from dories, gathering with long-handled
rakes the seaweed from the rocks and ledges along
the shore. They bring it in, a heavy, dark, inert
mass, all sleek and dripping, and spread it out to
dry in the sun. As it lies there, neatly arranged
on beds of smoothest pebbles, the sun bleaches it.
One can easily differentiate the different days’
haul, for the moss which is just spread out is almost
black and that of yesterday is a dark purple.
It shimmers from purple into lavender; the lavender
into something like rose; and by the time of the final
washing and bleaching it lies in fine light white
crinkles, almost like wool. It is a pretty sight,
and the neatness and dispatch of the mossers make
the odd sea-flower gardens attractive patches on the
beach. Sometimes a family working together will
make as much as a thousand dollars in a season gathering
and preparing the moss. One wonders if all the
people in the world could eat enough blancmange to
consume this salty product, and is relieved to be
reminded that the moss is also used for brewing and
dyeing.
It is really a pity to see Scituate
only from a motor. There is real atmosphere to
the place, which is worth breathing, but it takes more
time to breathe in an atmosphere than merely to “take
the air.” Should you decide to ramble about
the ancient town you will surely find your way to
Scituate Point. The old stone lighthouse, over
a century old, is no longer used, and the oil lantern,
hung nightly out at the end of the romantic promontory,
seems a return to days of long ago. You will also
see the place where, in the stirring Revolutionary
days, little Abigail and Rebecca Bates, with fife
and drum marched up and down, close to the shore and
yet hidden from sight, playing so furiously that their
“martial music and other noises” scared
away the enemy and saved the town from invasion.
You will go to Second Cliff where are the summer homes
of many literary people, and you will pass through
Egypt, catching what glimpse you can of the stables
and offices, paddocks and cottages of the
immense estate of Dreamwold. And of course you
will have pointed out to you the birthplace of Samuel
Woodworth, whose sole claim to remembrance is his
poem of the “Old Oaken Bucket.” The
well-sweep is still where he saw it, when, as editor
of the New York Mirror, it suddenly flashed
before his reminiscent vision, but the old oaken bucket
itself has been removed to a museum.
After you have done all these things,
you will, if you are wise, forsake Scituate Harbor,
which is the old section, and Scituate Beach, which
is the newer, summer section, and find the way to
the burial ground, which, after the one in Plymouth,
is the oldest in the State. Possibly there will
be others at the burial ground, for ancestor worshipers
are not confined to China, and every year there springs
up a new crop of genealogists to kneel before the
moss-grown headstones and, with truly admirable patience,
decipher names and dates, half obliterated by the
finger of time. One does not wonder that their
descendants are so eager to trace their connection
back to those men of Kent, whose sturdy title rings
so bravely down the centuries. To be sure, what
is left to trace is very slight in most cases, and
quite without any savor of personality. Too often
it is merely brief and dry recital of dates and number
of progeny, and names of the same. Few have left
anything so quaint as the words of Walter Briggs,
who settled there in 1651 and from whom Briggs Harbor
was named. His will contains this thoughtful
provision: “For my wife Francis, one third
of my estate during her life, also a gentle horse
or mare, and Jemmy the negur shall catch it for her.”
The good people who came later (1634)
from Plymouth and Boston and took up their difficult
colonial life under the pastorate of Mr. Lathrop,
seem to have done their best to make “Satuit”
(as it was first called, from the Indians, meaning
“cold brook”) conform as nearly as possible
to the other pioneer settlements, even to the point
of discovering witches here. But religion and
fasting were not able to accomplish what the ubiquitous
summer influx has, happily, also failed to effect.
Scituate remains different.
Perhaps it was those men of Kent who
gave it its indestructibly romantic bias; perhaps
it is the jealousy of the ever-encroaching sea.
The gray geese flying over the iridescent moss gleaming
upon the pebbled beaches, the solitary lantern on
the point are all parts of that differentness.
And those who love her best are glad that it is so.