To Thomas Egerton Esq. Lothian College Oxford.
Dear Egerton, Yes, as you
say, Mr. Sidney Colvin’s new “Life of Keats”
has only one fault, it’s too short.
Perhaps, also, it is almost too studiously free from
enthusiasm. But when one considers how Keats
(like Shelley) has been gushed about, and how easy
it is to gush about Keats, one can only thank Mr.
Colvin for his example of reserve. What a good
fellow Keats was! How really manly and, in the
best sense, moral he seems, when one compares his
life and his letters with the vagaries of contemporary
poets who lived longer than he, though they, too, died
young, and who left more work, though not better, never
so good, perhaps, as Keats’s best.
However, it was not of Keats that
I wished to write, but of his friend, John Hamilton
Reynolds. Noscitur a sociis a man
is known by the company he keeps. Reynolds,
I think, must have been excellent company, if we may
judge him by his writings. He comes into Lord
Houghton’s “Life and Letters of Keats”
very early (vol. i. . We find the
poet writing to him in the April of 1817, from the
Isle of Wight. “I shall forthwith begin
my ‘Endymion,’ which I hope I shall have
got some way with before you come, when we will read
our verses in a delightful place I have set my heart
upon, near the castle.” Keats ends “your
sincere friend,” and a man to whom Keats was
a sincere friend had some occasion for pride.
About Reynolds’s life neither
time nor space permits me to say very much, if I knew
very much, which I don’t. He was the son
of a master in one of our large schools. He
went to the Bar. He married a sister of Thomas
Hood. He wrote, like Hood, in the London Magazine.
With Hood for ally, he published “Odes and
Addresses to Great People;” the third edition,
which I have here, is of 1826. The late relations
of the brothers-in-law were less happy; possibly the
ladies of their families quarrelled; that is usually
the way of the belligerent sex.
Reynolds died in the enjoyment of
a judicial office in the Isle of Wight, some thirty
years later than his famous friend, the author of “Endymion.”
“It is to be lamented,” says Lord Houghton,
“that Mr. Reynolds’s own remarkable verse
is not better known.” Let us try to know
it a little better.
I have not succeeded in getting Reynolds’s
first volume of poems, which was published before
“Endymion.” It contained some Oriental
melodies, and won a careless good word from Byron.
The earliest work of his I can lay my hand on is
“The Fancy, a Selection from the Poetical Remains
of the late Peter Corcoran, of Gray’s Inn, Student
at Law, with a brief memoir of his Life.”
There is a motto from Wordsworth:
“Frank are the sports, the
stains are fugitive.”
It was the old palmy time of the Ring.
Every one knows how Byron took lessons from Jackson
the boxer; how Shelley had a fight at Eton in which
he quoted Homer, but was licked by a smaller boy; how
Christopher North whipped the professional pugilist;
how Keats himself never had enough of fighting at
school, and beat the butcher afterwards. His
friend Reynolds, also, liked a set-to with the gloves.
His imaginary character, Peter Corcoran, is a poetical
lad, who becomes possessed by a passion for prize-fighting.
It seems odd in a poet, but “the stains are
fugitive.”
We would liefer see a young man rejoicing
in his strength and improving his science, than loafing
about with long hair and giving anxious thought to
the colour of his necktie. It is a disinterested
preference, as fighting was never my forte,
any more than it was Artemus Ward’s. At
school I was “more remarkable for what I suffered
than for what I achieved.”
Peter Corcoran “fought nearly
as soon as he could walk,” wherein he resembled
Keats, and part of his character may even have been
borrowed from the author of the “Ode to the
Nightingale.” Peter fell in love, wrote
poetry, witnessed a “mill” at the Fives-Court,
and became the Laureate of the Ring. “He
has made a good set-to with Eales, Tom Belcher (the
monarch of the gloves!), and Turner, and it
is known that he has parried the difficult and ravaging
hand even of Randall himself.” “The
difficult and ravaging hand” there
is a style for you!
Reynolds has himself the enthusiasm
of his hero; let us remember that Homer, Virgil, and
Theocritus have all described spirited rallies with
admiration and good taste. From his dissipation
in cider-cellars and coal-holes, this rival of Tom
and Jerry wrote a sonnet that applies well enough
to Reynolds’s own career:
“Were this a feather from
an eagle’s wing,
And thou, my tablet
white! a marble tile
Taken from ancient
Jove’s majestic pile
And might I dip my feather in some
spring,
Adown Mount Ida threadlike wandering:
And were my thoughts
brought from some starry isle
In Heaven’s
blue sea I then might with a smile
Write down a hymn to fame, and proudly
sing!
“But I am mortal: and
I cannot write
Aught that may
foil the fatal wing of Time.
Silent, I look
at Fame: I cannot climb
To where her Temple is Not
mine the might:
I have some glimmering
of what is sublime
But, ah! it is a most inconstant
light.”
Keats might have written this sonnet in a melancholy
mood.
“About this time he (Peter)
wrote a slang description of a fight he had witnessed
to a lady.” Unlucky Peter! “Was
ever woman in this manner wooed?” The lady
“glanced her eye over page after page in hopes
of meeting with something that was intelligible,”
and no wonder she did not care for a long letter “devoted
to the subject of a mill between Belasco and the Brummagem
youth.” Peter was so ill-advised as to
appear before her with glorious scars, “two
black eyes” in fact, and she “was inexorably
cruel.” Peter did not survive her disdain.
“The lady still lives, and is married”!
It is ever thus!
Peter’s published works contain
an American tragedy. Peter says he got it from
a friend, who was sending him an American copy of “Guy
Mannering” “to present to a young lady
who, strange to say, read books and wore pockets,”
virtues unusual in the sex. One of the songs
(on the delights of bull-baiting) contains the most
vigorous lines I have ever met, but they are too
vigorous for our lax age. The tragedy ends most
tragically, and the moral comes in “better late,”
says the author, “than never.” The
other poems are all very lively, and very much out
of date. Poor Peter!
Reynolds was married by 1818, and
it is impossible to guess whether the poems of Peter
Corcoran did or did not contain allusions to his own
more lucky love affair. “Upon my soul,”
writes Keats, “I have been getting more and
more close to you every day, ever since I knew you,
and now one of the first pleasures I look to is your
happy marriage.” Reynolds was urging Keats
to publish the “Pot of Basil” “as
an answer to the attack made on me in Blackwood’s
Magazine and the Quarterly Review.”
Next Keats writes that he himself
“never was in love, yet the voice and shape
of a woman has haunted me these two days.”
On September 22, 1819, Keats sent Reynolds the “Ode
to Autumn,” than which there is no more perfect
poem in the language of Shakespeare. This was
the last of his published letters to Reynolds.
He was dying, haunted eternally by that woman’s
shape and voice.
Reynolds’s best-known book,
if any of them can be said to be known at all, was
published under the name of John Hamilton. It
is “The Garden of Florence, and Other Poems”
(Warren, London, 1821). There is a dedication to
his young wife.
“Thou hast entreated me to ‘write
no more,’” and he, as an elderly “man
of twenty-four,” promises to obey. “The
lily and myself henceforth are two,”
he says, implying that he and the lily have previously
been “one,” a quaint confession from the
poet of Peter Corcoran. There is something very
pleasant in the graceful regret and obedience of this
farewell to the Muse. He says to Mrs. Reynolds:
“I will not tell the world
that thou hast chid
My heart for worshipping
the idol Muse;
That thy dark eye has given its
gentle lid
Tears for my wanderings;
I may not choose
When thou dost speak but do as I
am bid,
And therefore
to the roses and the dews,
Very respectfully I make my bow;
And turn my back upon the tulips
now.”
“The chief poems in the collection,
taken from Boccaccio, were to have been associated
with tales from the same source, intended to have been
written by a friend; but illness on his part and distracting
engagements on mine, prevented us from accomplishing
our plan at the time; and Death now, to my deep sorrow,
has frustrated it for ever!”
I cannot but quote what follows, the
tribute to Keats’s kindness, to the most endearing
quality our nature possesses; the quality that was
Scott’s in such a winning degree, that was so
marked in Moliere,
“He, who is gone, was one of
the very kindest friends I ever possessed, and yet
he was not kinder, perhaps, to me than to others.
His intense mind and powerful feeling would, I truly
believe, have done the world some service had his
life been spared but he was of too sensitive
a nature and thus he was destroyed!
One story he completed, and that is to me now the
most pathetic poem in existence.”
It was “Isabella, or the Pot of Basil.”
The “Garden of Florence”
is written in the couplets of “Endymion,”
and is a beautiful version of the tale once more retold
by Alfred de Musset in “Simone.”
From “The Romance of Youth” let me quote
one stanza, which applies to Keats:
“He read and dreamt of young
Endymion,
Till his romantic
fancy drank its fill;
He saw that lovely shepherd sitting
lone,
Watching his white
flocks upon Ida’s hill;
The Moon adored him and
when all was still,
And stars were
wakeful she would earthward stray,
And linger with her shepherd love,
until
The hooves of
the steeds that bear the car of day,
Struck silver light in the east,
and then she waned away!”
It was on Latmos, not Ida, that Endymion
shepherded his flocks; but that is of no moment, except
to schoolmasters. There are other stanzas of
Reynolds worthy of Keats; for example, this on the
Fairy Queen:
“Her bodice was a pretty sight
to see;
Ye who would know
its colour, be a thief
Of the rose’s muffled bud
from off the tree;
And for your knowledge,
strip it leaf by leaf
Spite of your own remorse or Flora’s
grief,
Till ye have come
unto its heart’s pale hue;
The last, last leaf, which is the
queen, the chief
Of beautiful dim
blooms: ye shall not rue,
At sight of that sweet leaf the
mischief which ye do.”
One does not know when to leave off
gathering buds in the “Garden of Florence.”
Even after Shakespeare, and after Keats, this passage
on wild flowers has its own charm:
“We gathered wood flowers, some
blue as the vein
O’er Hero’s eyelid stealing,
and some as white,
In the clustering grass, as rich
Europa’s hand
Nested amid the curls on Jupiter’s
forehead,
What time he snatched her through
the startled waves;
Some poppies, too, such as in Enna’s
meadows
Forsook their own green homes and
parent stalks,
To kiss the fingers of Proserpina:
And some were small as fairies’
eyes, and bright
As lovers’ tears!”
I wish I had room for three or four
sonnets, the Robin Hood sonnets to Keats, and another
on a picture of a lady. Excuse the length of
this letter, and read this:
“Sorrow hath made thine eyes
more dark and keen,
And set a whiter
hue upon thy cheeks,
And round thy
pressed lips drawn anguish-streaks,
And made thy forehead fearfully
serene.
Even in thy steady hair her work
is seen,
For its still
parted darkness till it breaks
In heavy curls
upon thy shoulders speaks
Like the stern
wave, how hard the storm hath been!
“So looked that hapless lady
of the South,
Sweet Isabella!
at that dreary part
Of all the passion’d hours
of her youth;
When her green
Basil pot by brother’s art
Was stolen away; so look’d
her pained mouth
In the mute patience
of a breaking heart!”
There let us leave him, the gay rhymer
of prize-fighters and eminent persons let
us leave him in a serious hour, and with a memory of
Keats.