Letters
Thomas Gray, the poet and author of
the “Elegy written in a Country Churchyard,”
was born on December 26, 1716, in London, and
was the only survivor of twelve children. At Eton
he formed friendships with Horace Walpole, Thomas
Ashton, and Richard West, who were later his
chief correspondents. At Cambridge, where
Gray took no degree, he began to make experiments
in poetry. In 1739 and 1740 he travelled in Europe,
and in 1742 he had established himself at Peterhouse,
Cambridge, without University position or recognition
of any kind. Here he plunged into the study
of classical literature, and began to work on
the “Elegy,” which was published in 1751.
He was a shy, sensitive man of very wide learning.
Couched in graceful language, the letters are
typical of the best in the best age of letter-writing,
and not only are they fascinating for the tender
and affectionate nature they reveal, but also for
the gleam of real humour which Walpole declared was
the poet’s most natural vein. He died
on July 30, 1771.
I.-The Student’s Freedom
TO RICHARD WEST
Peterhouse, December, 1736.
After this term I shall have nothing more of college
impertinences to undergo. I have endured lectures
daily and hourly since I came last, supported by the
hopes of being shortly at liberty to give myself up
to my friends and classical companions, who, poor
souls, though I see them fallen into great contempt
with most people here, yet I cannot help sticking
to them.
Indeed, what can I do else? Must
I plunge into metaphysics? Alas! I cannot
see in the dark. Nature has not furnished me with
the optics of a cat. Must I pore upon mathematics?
Alas! I cannot see in too much light. I
am no eagle. It is very possible that two and
two make four, but I would not give four farthings
to demonstrate this ever so clearly; and if these
be the profits of life, give me the amusements of it.
The people I behold all around me, it seems, know
all this, and more, and yet I do not know one of them
who inspires me with any ambition of being like him.
Surely it was of this place, now Cambridge, but formerly
known by the name of Babylon, that the prophet spoke
when he said, “The wild beasts of the desert
shall dwell there, and their houses shall be full
of doleful creatures, and owls shall build there and
satyrs shall dance there.” You see, here
is a pretty collection of desolate animals, which
is verified in this town to a tittle.
TO HORACE WALPOLE
Burnham, September, 1737. I
have at the distance of half a mile through a green
lane a forest all my own, for I spy no human thing
in it but myself. It is a little chaos of mountains
and precipices; mountains, it is true, that do not
ascend much above the clouds, nor are the declivities
quite so amazing as Dover cliff; but just such hills
as people who love their necks as well as I do may
venture to climb, and crags that give the eye as much
pleasure as if they were more dangerous. Both
vale and hill are covered with most venerable beeches,
and other very reverend vegetables, that, like most
other ancient people, are always dreaming out their
old stories to the winds. At the foot of one
of these squat I, “Il penseroso,”
and there grow to the trunk for a whole morning.
The timorous hare and sportive squirrel gambol around
me like Adam in Paradise, before he had an Eve; but
I do not think he read Virgil, as I commonly do there.
II.-Travels with Horace Walpole
TO HIS MOTHER
Amiens, April, 1739. We left
Dover at noon, and with a pretty brisk gale reached
Calais by five. This is an exceeding old, but
very pretty town, and we hardly saw anything there
that was not so new and so different from England
that it surprised us agreeably. We went the next
morning to the great church, and were at high mass,
it being Easter Monday. In the afternoon we took
a post-chaise for Boulogne, which was only eighteen
miles further.
This chaise is a strange sort of conveyance,
resembling an ill-shaped chariot, only with the door
opening before, instead of the side; three horses
draw it, one between the shafts, and the other two
on each side, on one of which the postillion rides
and drives, too. This vehicle will, upon occasion,
go fourscore miles a day; but Mr. Walpole, being in
no hurry, chooses to make easy journeys of it, and
we go about six miles an hour. They are no very
graceful steeds, but they go well, and through roads
which they say are bad for France, but to me they seem
gravel walks and bowling greens. In short, it
would be the finest travelling in the world were it
not for the inns, which are most terrible places indeed.
The country we have passed through
hitherto has been flat, open, but agreeably diversified
with villages, fields well cultivated, and little
rivers. On every hillock is a windmill, a crucifix,
or a Virgin Mary dressed in flowers and a sarcenet
robe; one sees not many people or carriages on the
road; now and then, indeed, you meet a strolling friar,
a countryman, or a woman riding astride on a little
ass, with short petticoats and a great headdress of
blue wool.
TO THOMAS ASHTON
Paris, April, 1739. Here there
are infinite swarms of inhabitants and more coaches
than men. The women in general dress in sacs,
flat hoops of five yards wide, nosegays of artificial
flowers on one shoulder, and faces dyed in scarlet
up to the eyes. The men in bags, roll-ups, muffs,
and solitaires.
We had, at first arrival, an inundation
of visits pouring in upon us, for all the English
are acquainted, and herd much together, and it is no
easy matter to disengage oneself from them, so that
one sees but little of the French themselves.
To be introduced to people of high quality it is absolutely
necessary to be master of the language. There
is not a house where they do not play, nor is any
one at all acceptable unless he does so, too, a professed
gamester being the most advantageous character a man
can have at Paris. The abbés and men of learning
are of easy access enough, but few English that travel
have knowledge enough to take any great pleasure in
that company.
We are exceedingly unsettled and irresolute;
don’t know our own minds for two moments together,
and try to bring ourselves to a state of perfect apathy.
In short, I think the greatest evil that could have
happened to us is our liberty, for we are not at all
capable to determine our own actions.
TO HIS MOTHER
Lyons, October 13, 1739. We
have been to see a famous monastery, called the Grand
Chartreuse, and had no reason to think our time lost.
After having travelled seven days, very slow (for we
did not change horses, it being impossible for a chaise
to go post in these roads), we arrived at a little
village among the mountains of Savoy, called Échelles;
from thence we proceeded on horses, who are used to
the way, to the mountain of the Chartreuse. It
is six miles to the top; the road runs winding up
it, commonly not six feet broad; on one hand is the
rock, with woods of pine-trees hanging overhead; on
the other, a monstrous precipice, almost perpendicular,
at the bottom of which rolls a torrent, that sometimes
is tumbling among the fragments of stone that have
fallen from on high, and sometimes precipitating itself
down vast descents with a noise like thunder, which
is made still greater by the echo from the mountains
on each side, concurs to form one of the most solemn,
the most romantic, and the most astonishing scenes
I ever beheld. Add to this the strange views
made by the crags and cliffs on the other hand, the
cascades that in many places throw themselves from
the very summit down into the vale and the river below.
This place St. Bruno chose to retire
to, and upon its very top founded the convent, which
is the superior of the whole order. When we came
there, the two fathers who are commissioned to entertain
strangers (for the rest must neither speak to one
another nor to anyone else) received us very kindly,
and set before us a repast of dried fish, eggs, butter,
and fruits, all excellent in their kind, and extremely
neat. They pressed us to spend the night there,
and to stay some days with them; but this we could
not do, so they led us about their house, which is
like a little city, for there are 100 fathers, besides
300 servants, that make their clothes, grind their
corn, press their wine, and do everything among themselves.
The whole is quite orderly and simple; nothing of
finery, but the wonderful decency and the strange situation
more than supply the place of it.
TO THE SAME
Turin, November 7, 1739.
I am this night arrived here, and have just set down
to rest me after eight days tiresome journey.
On the seventh day we came to Lanebourg, the last
town in Savoy; it lies at the foot of the famous Mount
Cenis, which is so situated as to allow no room for
any way but over the very top of it. Here the
chaise was forced to be pulled to pieces, and the
baggage and that to be carried by mules. We ourselves
were wrapped up in our furs, and seated upon a sort
of matted chair without legs, which is carried upon
poles in the manner of a bier, and so began to ascend
by the help of eight men.
It was six miles to the top, where
a plain opens itself about as many more in breadth,
covered perpetually with very deep snow, and in the
midst of that a great lake of unfathomable depth, from
whence a river takes its rise, and tumbles over monstrous
rocks quite down the other side of the mountain.
The descent is six miles more, but infinitely more
steep than the going up; and here the men perfectly
fly down with you, stepping from stone to stone with
incredible swiftness, in places where none but they
could go three places without falling. The immensity
of the precipices, the roaring of the river and torrents
that run into it, the huge crags covered with ice
and snow, and the clouds below you and about you,
are objects it is impossible to conceive without seeing
them. We were but five hours in performing the
whole, from which you may judge of the rapidity of
the men’s motion.
TO THE SAME
Rome, April 2, 1740. The first
entrance of Rome is prodigiously striking. It
is by a noble gate, designed by Michael Angelo, and
adorned with statues; this brings you into a large
square, in the midst of which is a large block of
granite, and in front you have at one view two churches
of a handsome architecture, and so much alike that
they are called the twins; with three streets, the
middle-most of which is one of the longest in Rome.
As high as my expectation was raised, I confess, the
magnificence of this city infinitely surpasses it.
You cannot pass along a street but you have views
of some palace, or church, or square, or fountain,
the most picturesque and noble one can imagine.
III.-The Birth of the “Elegy"
TO HORACE WALPOLE
January, 1747. I am very
sorry to hear you treat philosophy and her followers
like a parcel of monks and hermits, and think myself
obliged to vindicate a profession I honour. The
first man that ever bore the name used to say that
life was like the Olympic games, where some came to
show the strength and agility of their bodies; others,
as the musicians, orators, poets, and historians,
to show their excellence in those arts; the traders
to get money; and the better sort, to enjoy the spectacle
and judge of all these. They did not then run
away from society for fear of its temptations; they
passed their days in the midst of it, conversation
was their business; they cultivated the arts of persuasion,
on purpose to show men it was their interest, as well
as their duty, not to be foolish and false and unjust;
and that, too, in many instances with success; which
is not very strange, for they showed by their life
that their lessons were not impracticable.
TO THE SAME
Cambridge, February 11, 1751.
As you have brought me into a little sort of distress,
you must assist me, I believe, to get out of it as
well as I can. Yesterday I had the misfortune
of receiving a letter from certain gentlemen who have
taken the “Magazine of Magazines” into
their hands. They tell me that an “ingenious”
poem, called “Reflections in a Country Church-
yard,” has been communicated to them, which they
are printing forthwith; that they are informed that
the “excellent” author of it is I by name,
and that they beg not only his “indulgence,”
but the “honour” of his correspondence,
etc.
As I am not at all disposed to be
either so indulgent or so correspondent as they desire,
I have but one bad way left to escape the honour they
would inflict upon me; and therefore am obliged to
desire you would make Dodsley print it immediately
(which may be done in less than a week’s time)
from your copy, but without my name, in what form is
most convenient for him, but on his best paper and
character. He must correct the press himself,
and print it without any interval between the stanzas,
because the sense is in some places continued beyond
them; and the title must be, “Elegy, written
in a Country Churchyard.” If he would add
a line or two to say it came into his hands by accident,
I should like it better.
TO STONEHEWER
Cambridge, August 18, 1758.
I am as sorry as you seem to be that our acquaintance
harped so much on the subject of materialism when I
saw him with you in town. That we are indeed
mechanical and dependent beings, I need no other proof
than my own feelings; and from the same feelings I
learn with equal conviction that we are not merely
such; that there is a power within that struggles
against the force and bias of that mechanism, commands
its motion, and, by frequent practice, reduces it to
that ready obedience which we call “habit”;
and all this in conformity to a preconceived opinion,
to that least material of all agents, a thought.
I have known many in his case who,
while they thought they were conquering an old prejudice,
did not perceive they were under the influence of
one far more dangerous; one that furnishes us with
a ready apology for all our worst actions, and opens
to us a full licence for doing whatever we please;
and yet these very people were not at all the more
indulgent to other men, as they should have been; their
indignation to such as offended them was nothing mitigated.
In short, the truth is, they wished to be persuaded
of that opinion for the sake of its convenience, but
were not so in their heart.
TO HORACE WALPOLE
1760. I am so charmed with the
two specimens of Erse poetry (Macpherson’s)
that I cannot help giving you the trouble to inquire
a little farther about them.
Is there anything known of the author
or authors, and of what antiquity they are supposed
to be? Is there any more to be had of equal beauty,
or at all approaching to it? I have often been
told that the poem called “Hardycanute,”
which I always admired, and still admire, was the work
of somebody that lived a few years ago. This
I do not at all believe, though it has evidently been
retouched in places by some modern hand; but, however,
I am authorised by this report to ask whether the two
poems in question are certainly antique and genuine.
I make this inquiry in quality of an antiquary, and
am not otherwise concerned about it; for, if I were
sure that anyone now living in Scotland had written
them to divert himself, and laugh at the credulity
of the world, I would undertake a journey into the
Highlands only for the pleasure of seeing him.