LANDING-FIELDS THE IMMEDIATE NEED
The immediate need, to establish aviation
throughout the entire country, is a series of landing-fields
from the Atlantic to the Pacific coast. These
landing-fields should not be designed primarily for
transcontinental flying-stations, but for city-to-city
flying. There is going to be a great amount of
aerial traffic from New York to San Francisco, to
be sure, but the future of flying is in the linking
up of cities a few hundred miles apart. The War
Department has already taken steps, and will establish
thirty-two fields in the country to encourage flying.
Many more are needed.
Atlantic City is apparently the pioneer
air port of the country, and for many reasons this
is natural. There are political and social advantages
which make Atlantic City ideal. Rules have been
laid down for the coming and going of airships, and
a field for land machines and water space for seaplanes
have been laid out. A large aeronautical convention
has already been held there.
Every city in the United States will
have a landing-field and hangars for airplanes, as
well as mechanics to care for them. Whether this
is to be a private or public enterprise lies in the
hands of the people handling such things. Much
could be said for either type of establishment.
The thing must come; it is as logical as one, two,
three. There are some, perhaps, who remember the
roars of derision which went up when the first automobile
garage was established in their town. Such a
thing was visionary-there would never be enough machines
to make it pay!
There are many reasons why it is impossible
to consider the use of city roofs, for the present,
as suitable landing-places for airplanes. In
fact, the first successful landing on a roof made by
Jules Vedrines last January was hailed as a feat of
almost unparalleled daring. He flew and landed
on the roof of the Galeries Lafayette in Paris,
and won a prize of $5,000 for doing it. The police
of Paris refused to allow him to fly off the roof,
and he was compelled to take his machine apart and
lower it in an elevator.
The theory of flight, the laws which
make it possible apparently to defy all laws of gravitation,
make it impossible for us to depend on the roofs of
buildings in large cities and landing-places.
It will be a long time before the dreams of men who
would establish landing-places on hotel roofs can
come true. The progress of aeronautical development
has been great enough so that there is no need to
overemphasize it to set ridiculous tasks
which cannot be accomplished.
We shall not see the business man
flying to his office in the city from his country
estate unless some landing-field is built
on the lower end of Manhattan Island as has been proposed.
The Chamber of Commerce of the State of New York has
taken up the matter of legislation to make landing-fields
possible, and it must go through. The business
man ought, in the near future, to be able to use the
airplane for quick trips to Albany. It would save
hours over rail time, and here the airplane has a
wonderful field of usefulness.
Airplanes have made the trip from
Washington to New York in very quick time, only to
have to go on to Mineola to land on the airdrome there.
It takes nearly an hour to come in from Mineola, but
even at that the saving of time is still considerable.
The speed and efficiency of airplane travel to and
from New York and other cities is materially affected
by the lack of landing-fields close to the business
section of the city.
There must be a large field, broad
in every dimension, to permit the landing and taking-off
of airplanes. A machine must get up flying speed
running across the ground before it gets into the air.
The flying speed varies with the type of machine,
and it may be estimated that most machines take-off
and land at a speed of from forty-five to sixty miles
an hour. The air must be passing through their
planes at this speed before they will begin to fly,
and it takes a little run to get up flying speed.
Similarly, when an airplane lands, it must lose its
flying speed gradually. It may glide to within
a few feet of the ground, and then “flatten
out” just off the ground and run along until
it loses its speed, the air no longer passes over its
planes fast enough to support it, and it drops to
the ground.
Such are the limitations which the
necessity for speed in airplane flight imposes.
Compare the paper dart flying through the air.
As long as it moves quickly it will fly. Or a
kite, that will fly when the wind is strong enough.
The airplane creates its own wind to support itself.
There are four forces acting on an
airplane in flight, and they must be properly overcome
and balanced. There is lift, the upward force
exerted on the planes by the passage of air over their
surfaces; and drift, the resistance to the passing
of an airplane, the retarding force acting opposite
to the direction of motion. Then thrust, the
forward effort of a machine exerted by a propeller
pushing or pulling. And finally gravity.
The primary conditions of flight are
that lift made by the planes shall be equal to the
force of gravity, and that the forward thrust must
be equal to the drift. At that point a machine
will sustain flight a fairly simple thing
on paper. But the times that machines have stalled
in the air, with their motors full on because their
pilots have failed to sustain flight, have let the
force of gravity overcome lift, are too numerous to
mention.
That dart, if pointed at a proper
angle and let loose, will fly; its lift will overcome
the force of gravity, even though it has no motive
power of its own. An airplane without an engine
could be pushed off the Palisades at flying speed,
and a skilful pilot could bring it to a reasonably
safe landing at the foot. Flight does depend on
motion, but motion does not depend on motive power.
Given a sufficiently high altitude, the mere act of
dropping through the air creates motion, and this
motion will sustain flight.
An airplane is in no particular danger
in the air if the motor stops provided
it is in an open stretch of country with plenty of
fields. Instinctively the pilot will nose down
and glide, and on that glide he will find himself
maintaining flying speed. He can turn and maneuver
his machine, and pick out almost any field near at
hand. The only limitations are that he cannot
glide more than five times his height, and when he
comes down to the ground he must stop gliding and
land. He must land on anything that presents itself,
a field if he has good judgment; if not, then a barn
or swamp or woods. He must land when the end
of his glide brings him to the ground.
This is commonly termed a “forced
landing,” and in every sense of the word it
is one. There is no pilot of any extensive flying
experience who has not had to make a forced landing.
Ninety out of a hundred are perfectly orderly safe
landings; the odd ones are occasionally crashes.
Incidentally it may be said that forced-landing practice
by flying pupils is the most beneficial which may
be imagined. It teaches control over a machine
as nothing else will. It may be carried out from
any height, shutting off the motor, picking out a field,
gliding for it, turning and twisting to get into proper
position as regards the wind, and “giving her
the gun” just at the fence and flying on.
A forced landing over the country
is safe, but over a city it is the most deadly thing
imaginable. For a machine caught with a “dud”
engine over New York there is no escape but a terrific
crash in the city streets, against the side of some
building, with danger to the pilot and the people
in the street below. There has been no motor made
by the hand of man which would not let a pilot down
at some unexpected time. The instance of Major
Woods, starting on his flight across the Atlantic,
and forced to come down to the Irish Sea is one example.
The NC-4, American naval seaplane, had a forced landing
at sea, a hundred miles from Chatham, Massachusetts,
on the first leg of the Atlantic flight from this
side. Its engines had been carefully cleaned and
tested, and yet they failed. Harry G. Hawker’s
engine failed him half-way from Newfoundland to Ireland
and let him down into the sea, from which he was picked
up by the greatest good luck.
That is one of the most exasperating
and human things about a gasolene-engine. It
is efficient, but not thoroughly dependable. The
best of them are liable to break down at the most needed
moment, due to a hundred causes outside of the control
of a mechanic or pilot. Care and rigid inspection
will reduce the possibilities, but engine failure
cannot yet be eliminated.
That is one of the principal reasons
why the roofs of buildings around big cities are so
dangerous. The sides of a building drop away from
the roof. An error in judgment and the machine
is over the edge.
It is even more dangerous to take-off.
An airplane motor is ten times as likely to develop
a weakness while it is cold. A motor starting
a flight is never well warmed up, and fifty feet from
the edge of the roof it may give out, with awful consequences.
As a practicable thing, roofs are at present impossible.
There is not a flying-officer in the world who will
not agree.
An interesting series of experiments
has been carried out in England on what has been known
as the helicopter machine. This machine is not
dependent upon speed to fly, but merely on engine power
applied through a propeller of great pitch. The
idea is not new, but is along the lines specified
by Orville Wright when he said that a kitchen table
could fly if it had a good enough engine.
The effort is being made to make a
machine which can hover, can hold itself in the air
by brute force of its propeller blades beating the
air. The thing sounds impossible to adapt, say
some aeronautical engineers. Those who have seen
the experiments, however, express great optimism.
A machine of this sort would land
and take-off in a very small space, and might be adapted
to use around cities. It might even make flying
over cities safe but for the human equation of the
engine again. This machine is dependent on engine
power. Apparently there would be two engines,
or two driving mechanisms, one operating the lifting
propeller and the other the pulling propeller.
For the present the great need is
for landing-fields as near the heart of most American
cities as possible. There should be quick transportation
to the business section provided, as well as hangars
and mechanics. When that is done we may very well
say that aerial transportation for passengers and
freight is an accomplished fact.