The Confessions of St. Augustine
are the first autobiography, and they have this to
distinguish them from all other autobiographies, that
they are addressed directly to God. Rousseau’s
unburdening of himself is the last, most effectual
manifestation of that nervous, defiant consciousness
of other people which haunted him all his life.
He felt that all the men and women whom he passed
on his way through the world were at watch upon him,
and mostly with no very favourable intentions.
The exasperation of all those eyes fixed upon him,
the absorbing, the protesting self-consciousness which
they called forth in him, drove him, in spite of himself,
to set about explaining himself to other people, to
the world in general. His anxiety to explain,
not to justify, himself was after all a kind of cowardice
before his own conscience. He felt the silent
voices within him too acutely to keep silence.
Cellini wrote his autobiography because he heard within
him such trumpeting voices of praise, exultation,
and the supreme satisfaction of a violent man who
has conceived himself to be always in the right, that
it shocked him to think of going down into his grave
without having made the whole world hear those voices.
He hurls at you this book of his own deeds that it
may smite you into acquiescent admiration. Casanova,
at the end of a long life in which he had tasted all
the forbidden fruits of the earth, with a simplicity
of pleasure in which the sense of their being forbidden
was only the least of their abounding flavours, looked
back upon his past self with a slightly pathetic admiration,
and set himself to go all over those successful adventures,
in love and in other arts, firstly, in order that
he might be amused by recalling them, and then because
he thought the record would do him credit. He
neither intrudes himself as a model, nor acknowledges
that he was very often in the wrong. Always passionate
after sensations, and for their own sake, the writing
of an autobiography was the last, almost active, sensation
that was left to him, and he accepted it energetically.
Probably St. Augustine first conceived
of the writing of an autobiography as a kind of penance,
which might be fruitful also to others. By its
form it challenges the slight difficulty that it appears
to be telling God what God knew already. But that
is the difficulty which every prayer also challenges.
To those we love, are we not fond of telling many
things about ourselves which they know already?
A prayer, such confessions as these, are addressed
to God by one of those subterfuges by which it is
necessary to approach the unseen and infinite, under
at least a disguise of mortality. And the whole
book, as no other such book has ever been, is lyrical.
This prose, so simple, so familiar, has in it the
exaltation of poetry. It can pass, without a
change of tone, from the boy’s stealing of pears:
’If aught of those pears came within my mouth,
what sweetened it was the sin’; to a tender
human affection: ’And now he lives in Abraham’s
bosom: whatever that be which is signified by
that bosom, there lives my Nebridius, my sweet friend’;
and from that to the saint’s rare, last ecstasy:
’And sometimes Thou admittedst me to an affection,
very unusual, in my inmost soul, rising to a strange
sweetness, which if it were perfected in me, I know
not what in it would not belong to the life to come.’
And even self-analysis, of which there is so much,
becoming at times a kind of mathematics, even those
metaphysical subtleties which seem, to sharpen thought
upon thought to an almost invisible fineness of edge,
become also lyrical, inter-penetrated as they are
with this sense of the divine.
To St. Augustine all life is seen
only in its relation to the divine; looked at from
any other side, it has no meaning, and, looked at even
with this light upon it, is but for the most part seen
as a blundering in the dark, a wandering from the
right path. In so far as it is natural, it is
evil. In so far as it is corrected by divine grace,
it leaves the human actors in it without merit; since
all virtue is God’s, though all vice is man’s.
This conception of life is certainly
valuable in giving harmony to the book, presenting
as it does a sort of background. It brings with
it a very impressive kind of symbolism into its record
of actual facts, to all of which it gives a value,
not in themselves, if you please to put it so, or,
perhaps more properly, their essential value.
When nothing which happens, happens except under God’s
direct responsibility, when nothing is said which
is not one of your ‘lines’ in the drama
which is being played, not so much by as through you,
there can be no exteriorities, nothing can be trivial,
in a record of life so conceived. And this point
of view also helps the writer to keep all his details
in proportion; the autobiographer’s usual fault,
artistically at least, being an inordinate valuation
of small concerns, because they happened to him.
To St. Augustine, while not the smallest human event
is without significance, in its relation to eternity,
not the greatest human event is of importance, in
its relation to time; and his own share in it would
but induce a special, it may seem an exaggerated, humility
on his part. Thus, speaking of his early studies,
his triumphs in them, not without a certain naïveté:
’Whatever was written, either in rhetoric or
logic, geometry, music, and arithmetic, by myself
without much difficulty or any instruction, I understood,
Thou knowest, O Lord my God; because both quickness
and understanding and acuteness in discerning is Thy
gift.’ Or, again, speaking of the youthful
excellences (’excellently hadst Thou made him’)
of that son who was the son of his beloved mistress:
’I had no part in that boy, but the sin.’
Intellectual pride, one sees in him
indeed, at all times, by the very force with which
it is repressed into humility; and, in all that relates
to that mistress, in the famous cry: ‘Give
me chastity, but not yet!’ in all those insurgent
memories of ‘these various and shadowy loves,’
we see the force of the flesh, in one who lived always
with so passionate a life, alike of the spirit and
the senses. Now, recalling what was sinful in
him, in his confessions to God, he is reluctant to
allow any value to the most honourable of human sentiments,
to so much as forgive the most estimable of human
weaknesses. ’And now, Lord, in writing I
confess it unto Thee. Read it who will, and interpret
it how he will: and if any finds sin therein,
that I wept my mother for a small portion of an hour
(the mother who for the time was dead to mine eyes,
who had for many years wept for me that I might live
in Thine eyes), let him not deride me; but rather,
if he be one of large charity, let him weep for himself
for my sins unto Thee, the Father of all the brethren
of Thy Christ.’ And yet it is of this mother
that he writes his most tender, his most beautiful
pages. ’The day was now approaching whereon
she was to depart this life (which day Thou well knewest,
we knew not), it came to pass, Thyself, as I believe,
by Thy secret ways so ordering it, that she and I
stood alone, leaning in a certain window, which looked
into the garden of the house where we now lay, at
Ostia....’ It is not often that memory,
in him, is so careful of ’the images of earth,
and water, and air,’ as to call up these delicate
pictures. They too had become for him among the
desirable things which are to be renounced for a more
desirable thing.
That sense of the divine in life,
and specially of the miracles which happen a certain
number of times in every existence, the moments which
alone count in the soul’s summing-up of itself,
St. Augustine has rendered with such significance,
with such an absolute wiping out from the memory of
everything else, just because he has come to that,
it might seem, somewhat arid point of spiritual ascent.
That famous moment of the Tolle, lège:
’I cast myself down I know not how, under a
certain fig-tree, giving full vent to my tears ...
when lo! I heard from a neighbouring house a
voice, as of boy or girl, I know not, chanting, and
oft repeating, “Take up and read, take up and
read"’; the Bishop’s word to Monnica (’as
if it had sounded from heaven’), ’It is
not possible that the son of those tears should perish’;
the beggar-man, ‘joking and joyous,’ in
the streets of Milan: it is by these, apparently
trifling, these all-significant moments that his narrative
moves, with a more reticent and effective symbolism
than any other narrative known to me. They are
the moments in which the soul has really lived, or
has really seen; and the rest of life may well be
a blindness and a troubled coming and going.
I said that the height from which
St. Augustine apprehends these truths may seem a somewhat
arid one. That is perhaps only because it is nearer
the sky, more directly bathed in what he calls, beautifully,
’this queen of colours, the light.’
There is a passage in the tenth book which may almost
be called a kind of aesthetics. They are aesthetics
indeed of renunciation, but a renunciation of the
many beauties for the one Beauty, which shall contain
as well as eclipse them; ’because those beautiful
patterns which through men’s souls are conveyed
into their cunning hands, come from that Beauty, which
is above our souls.’ And it is not a renunciation
by one who had never enjoyed what he renounces, or
who feels himself, even now, quite safe from certain
forms of its seduction. He is troubled especially
by the fear that ’those melodies which Thy words
breathe soul into, when sung with a sweet and attuned
voice,’ may come to move him ’more with
the voice than with the words sung.’ Yet
how graciously he speaks of music, allowing ’that
the several affections of our spirit, by a sweet variety,
have their own proper measures in the voice and singing,
by some hidden correspondence wherewith they are stirred
up.’ It is precisely because he feels so
intimately the beauty of all things human, though it
were but ’a dog coursing in the field, a lizard
catching flies,’ that he desires to pass through
these to that passionate contemplation which is the
desire of all seekers after the absolute, and which
for him is God. He asks of all the powers of
the earth: ’My questioning them, was my
thoughts on them; and their form of beauty gave the
answer.’ And by how concrete a series of
images does he strive to express the inexpressible,
in that passage of pure poetry on the love of God!
’But what do I love, when I love thee? not beauty
of bodies, nor the fair harmony of time, nor the brightness
of the light, so gladsome to our eyes, nor sweet melodies
of varied songs, nor the fragrant smell of flowers,
and ointments, and spices, not manna and honey, not
limbs acceptable to embracements of flesh. None
of these I love, when I love my God; and yet I love
a kind of light, and melody, and fragrance, and meat,
and embracement, when I love my God, the light, melody,
fragrance, meat, embracement of my inner man:
where there shineth unto my soul what space cannot
contain, and there soundeth what time beareth not
away, and there smelleth what breathing disperseth
not, and there tasteth what eating diminisheth not,
and there clingeth what satiety divorceth not.
This is it which I love when I love my God.’
Mentioning in his confessions only
such things as he conceives to be of import to God,
it happens, naturally, that St. Augustine leaves unsaid
many things that would have interested most men, perhaps
more. ’What, then, have I to do with men,
that they should hear my confessions-as
if they could heal my infirmities,-a race
curious to know the lives of others, slothful to amend
their own?’ Finding, indeed, many significant
mentions of things and books and persons, Faustus the
Manichee, the ‘Hortensius’ of Cicero,
the theatre, we shall find little pasture here for
our antiquarian, our purely curious, researches.
We shall not even find all that we might care to know,
in St. Augustine himself, of the surface of the mind’s
action, which we call character, or the surface emotions,
which we call temperament. Here is a soul, one
of the supreme souls of humanity, speaking directly
to that supreme soul which it has apprehended outside
humanity. Be sure that, if it forgets many things
which you, who overhear, would like it to have remembered,
it will remember everything which it is important
to remember, everything which the recording angel,
who is the soul’s finer criticism of itself,
has already inscribed in the book of the last judgment.
1897.