DECORATION AS AN ART
“Who creates a Home, creates
a potent spirit which in turn doth fashion him that
fashioned.”
Probably no art has so few masters
as that of decoration. In England, Morris was
for many years the great leader, but among his followers
in England no one has attained the dignity of unquestioned
authority; and in America, in spite of far more general
practice of the art, we still are without a leader
whose very name establishes law.
It is true we are free to draw inspiration
from the same sources which supplied Morris and the
men associated with him in his enthusiasms, and in
fact we do lean, as they did, upon English eighteenth-century
domestic art-and derive from the men who
made that period famous many of our articles of faith;
but there are almost no authoritative books upon the
subject of appropriate modern decoration. Our
text books are still to be written; and one must glean
knowledge from many sources, shape it into rules,
and test the rules, before adopting them as safe guides.
Yet in spite of the absence of authoritative
teaching, we have learned that an art dependent upon
other arts, as decoration is upon building and architecture,
is bound to follow the principles which govern them.
We must base our work upon what has already been done,
select our decorative forms from appropriate periods,
conform our use of colour to the principles of colour,
and be able to choose and apply all manufactures in
accordance with the great law of appropriateness.
If we do this, we stand upon something capable of
evolution and the creation of a system.
In so far as the principles of decoration
are derived from other arts, they can be acquired
by every one, but an exquisite feeling in their application
is the distinguishing quality of the true decorator.
There is quite a general impression
that house-decoration is not an art which requires
a long course of study and training, but some kind
of natural knack of arrangement-a faculty
of making things “look pretty,” and that
any one who has this faculty is amply qualified for
“taking up house-decoration.” Indeed,
natural facility succeeds in satisfying many personal
cravings for beauty, although it is not competent for
general practice.
Of course there are people, and many
of them, who are gifted with an inherent sense of
balance and arrangement, and a true eye for colour,
and-given the same materials-such
people will make a room pleasant and cozy, where one
without these gifts would make it positively ugly.
In so far, then, individual gifts are a great advantage,
yet one possessing them in even an unusual degree
may make great mistakes in decoration. What not
to do, in this day of almost universal experiment,
is perhaps the most valuable lesson to the untrained
decorator. Many of the rocks upon which he splits
are down in no chart, and lie in the track of what
seems to him perfectly plain sailing.
There are houses of fine and noble
exterior which are vulgarized by uneducated experiments
in colour and ornament, and belittled by being filled
with heterogeneous collections of unimportant art.
Yet these very instances serve to emphasize the demand
for beautiful surroundings, and in spite of mistakes
and incongruities, must be reckoned as efforts toward
a desirable end.
In spite of a prevalent want of training,
it is astonishing how much we have of good interior
decoration, not only in houses of great importance,
but in those of people of average fortunes-indeed,
it is in the latter that we get the general value
of the art.
This comparative excellence is to
be referred to the very general acquirement of what
we call “art cultivation” among American
women, and this, in conjunction with a knowledge that
her social world will be apt to judge of her capacity
by her success or want of success in making her own
surroundings beautiful, determines the efforts of the
individual woman. She feels that she is expected
to prove her superiority by living in a home distinguished
for beauty as well as for the usual orderliness and
refinement. Of course this sense of obligation
is a powerful spur to the exercise of natural gifts,
and if in addition to these she has the habit of reasoning
upon the principles of things, and is sufficiently
cultivated in the literature of art to avoid unwarrantable
experiment, there is no reason why she should not
be successful in her own surroundings.
The typical American, whether man,
or woman, has great natural facility, and when the
fact is once recognized that beauty-like
education-can dignify any circumstances,
from the narrowest to the most opulent, it becomes
one of the objects of life to secure it. How
this is done depends upon the talent and cultivation
of the family, and this is often adequate for excellent
results.
It is quite possible that so much
general ability may discourage the study of decoration
as a precise form of art, since it encourages the
idea that The House Beautiful can be secured by any
one who has money to pay for processes, and possesses
what is simply designated as “good taste.”
We do not find this impulse toward
the creation of beautiful interiors as noticeable
in other countries as in America. The instinct
of self-expression is much stronger in us than in
other races, and for that reason we cannot be contented
with the utterances of any generation, race or country
save our own. We gather to ourselves what we personally
enjoy or wish to enjoy, and will not take our domestic
environment at second hand. It follows that there
is a certain difference and originality in our methods,
which bids fair to acquire distinct character, and
may in the future distinguish this art-loving period
as a maker of style.
A successful foreign painter who has
visited this country at intervals during the last
ten years said, “There is no such uniformity
of beautiful interiors anywhere else in the world.
There are palaces in France and Italy, and great country
houses in England, to the embellishment of which generations
of owners have devoted the best art of their own time;
but in America there is something of it everywhere.
Many unpretentious houses have drawing-rooms possessing
colour-decoration which would distinguish them as examples
in England or France.”
To Americans this does not seem a
remarkable fact. We have come into a period which
desires beauty, and each one secures it as best he
can. We are a teachable and a studious people,
with a faculty of turning “general information”
to account; and general information upon art matters
has had much to do with our good interiors.
We have, perhaps half unconsciously,
applied fundamental principles to our decoration,
and this may be as much owing to natural good sense
as to cultivation. We have a habit of reasoning
about things, and acting upon our conclusions, instead
of allowing the rest of the world to do the reasoning
while we adopt the result. It is owing to this
conjunction of love for and cultivation of art, and
the habit of materializing what we wish, that we have
so many thoroughly successful interiors, which have
been accomplished almost without aid from professional
artists. It is these, instead of the smaller
number of costly interiors, which give the reputation
of artistic merit to our homes.
Undoubtedly the largest proportion
of successful as well as unsuccessful domestic art
in our country is due to the efforts of women.
In the great race for wealth which characterizes our
time, it is demanded that women shall make it effective
by so using it as to distinguish the family; and nothing
distinguishes it so much as the superiority of the
home. This effort adheres to small as well as
large fortunes, and in fact the necessity is more
pronounced in the case of mediocre than of great ones.
In the former there is something to be made up-some
protest of worth and ability and intelligence that
helps many a home to become beautiful.
As I have said, a woman feels that
the test of her capacity is that her house shall not
only be comfortable and attractive, but that it shall
be arranged according to the laws of harmony and beauty.
It is as much the demand of the hour as that she shall
be able to train her children according to the latest
and most enlightened theories, or that she shall take
part in public and philanthropic movements, or understand
and have an opinion on political methods. These
are things which are expected of every woman who makes
a part of society; and no less is it expected that
her house shall be an appropriate and beautiful setting
for her personality, a credit to her husband, and an
unconscious education for her children.
But it happens that means of education
in all of these directions, except that of decoration,
are easily available. A woman can become a member
of a kindergarten association, and get from books and
study the result of scientific knowledge of child-life
and training. She can find means to study the
ethics of her relations to her kind and become an
effective philanthropist, or join the league for political
education and acquire a more or less enlightened understanding
of politics; but who is to formulate for her the science
of beauty, to teach her how to make the interior aspect
of her home perfect in its adaptation to her circumstances,
and as harmonious in colour and arrangement as a song
without words? She feels that these conditions
create a mental atmosphere serene and yet inspiring,
and that such surroundings are as much her birthright
and that of her children as food and clothing of a
grade belonging to their circumstances, but how is
it to be compassed?
Most women ask themselves this question,
and fail to understand that it is as much of a marvel
when a woman without training or experience creates
a good interior as a whole, as if an amateur
in music should compose an opera. It is not at
all impossible for a woman of good taste-and
it must be remembered that this word means an educated
or cultivated power of selection-to secure
harmonious or happily contrasted colour in a room,
and to select beautiful things in the way of furniture
and belongings; but what is to save her from the thousand
and one mistakes possible to inexperience in this combination
of things which make lasting enjoyment and appropriate
perfection in a house? How can she know which
rooms will be benefited by sombre or sunny tints, and
which exposure will give full sway to her favourite
colour or colours? How can she have learned the
reliability or want of reliability in certain materials
or processes used in decoration, or the rules of treatment
which will modify a low and dark room and make it seem
light and airy, or “bring down” too high
a ceiling and widen narrow walls so as to apparently
correct disproportion? These things are the results
of laws which she has never studied-laws
of compensation and relation, which belong exclusively
to the world of colour, and unfortunately they are
not so well formulated that they can be committed to
memory like rules of grammar; yet all good colour-practice
rests upon them as unquestionably as language rests
upon grammatical construction.
Of course one may use colour as one
can speak a language, purely by imitation and memory,
but it is not absolutely reliable practice; and just
here comes in the necessity for professional advice.
There are many difficulties in the
accomplishment of a perfect house-interior which few
householders have had the time or experience to cope
with, and yet the fact remains that each mistress of
a house believes that unless she vanquishes all difficulties
and comes out triumphantly with colours flying at
the housetop and enjoyment and admiration following
her efforts, she has failed in something which she
should have been perfectly able to accomplish.
But the obligation is certainly a forced one.
It is the result of the modern awakening to the effect
of many heretofore unrecognized influences in our lives
and the lives and characters of our children.
A beautiful home is undoubtedly a great means of education,
and of that best of all education which is unconscious.
To grow up in such a one means a much more complete
and perfect man or woman than would be possible without
that particular influence.
But a perfect home is never created
all at once and by one person, and let the anxious
house-mistress take comfort in the thought. She
should also remember that it is in the nature of beauty
to grow, and that a well-rounded and beautiful
family life adds its quota day by day. Every
book, every sketch or picture-every carefully
selected or characteristic object brought into the
home adds to and makes a part of a beautiful whole,
and no house can be absolutely perfect without all
these evidences of family life.
It can be made ready for them, completely
and perfectly ready, by professional skill and knowledge;
but if it remained just where the interior artist
or decorator left it, it would have no more of the
sentiment of domesticity than a statue.