In the conduct of life we select,
or have assigned, certain measures of activity upon
which we rely for our support and the self-respect
that follows the doing of our part. This we call
our business, and if we are wise we attend to it and
prosecute it with due diligence and application.
But it is not all of life, and its claim is not the
only call that is made upon us. Exclusive interest
and devotion to it may end in the sort of success
that robs us of the highest value, so that, however
much substance we accumulate, we are failures as men.
On the other hand, we take risks if we slight its
just demands and scatter our powers on miscellaneous
interests. Whatever its value, every man, in
addition to what he primarily produces, turns out some
by-product. If it is worth anything, he may be
thankful and add the amount to total income.
The extracts of which this chapter
is composed are selections from the editorial columns
of The Pacific Unitarian, submitted not as exhibits
in the case of achievement, but as indicating the convictions
I have formed on the way of life.
THE BEGINNING
Thirty years ago, a fairly active
Sunday-school was instigated to publish a monthly
journal, nominally for all the organizations of the
First Unitarian Society. It was not expected to
be of great benefit, except to the school. After
a year and a half it was adopted by the Conference,
its modest name, The Guidon, being expanded
to The Pacific Unitarian. Its number of
pages was increased to thirty-two.
Probably the most remarkable circumstance
connected with it is that it has lived. The fact
that it has enjoyed the opportunity of choice between
life and death is quite surprising. Other journals
have had to die. It has never been easy to live,
or absolutely necessary to die.
Anyhow, we have the thirty years of
life to look back upon and take satisfaction in.
We are grateful for friends far and near, and generous
commendation has been pleasant to receive, whether
it has been justified or not.
CHRISTIANITY
We realize more and more truly that
Christianity in its spirit is a very different thing
from Christianity as a theological structure formulated
by the makers of the creed. The amazing thing
is that such a misconception of the message of Jesus
as has generally prevailed has given us a civilization
so creditable. The early councils were incapable
of being led by the spirit of Jesus. They were
prejudiced by their preconceptions of the character
of God and the nature of religion, and evolved a scheme
of salvation to fit past conceptions instead of accepting
as real the love of God and of man that Jesus added
to the religion of his fathers. Even the Christianity
they fashioned has not been fairly tried. The
Christianity that Jesus proclaimed, a call to trust,
to love, and spiritual life, has hardly been tried
at all. We seem just to be awakening to what
it is, and to its application to the art of living.
THE PRODIGAL’S FATHER
What a difference in the thought of
God and in the joy of life would have followed had
the hearers of Jesus given the parable of the Prodigal
Son its full significance! They would then have
found in the happy, loving father and his full forgiveness
of the son who “came to himself” a type
of the Heavenly Father. The shadow of the olden
fear still persists, chilling human life. We
do not trust the love of God and bear life’s
burdens with cheerful courage. From lurking fear
of the jealous king of Hebrew tradition, we are even
afraid to be happy when we might. We fail of
faith in the reality of God’s love. We forget
the robe, the ring, the overflowing joy of the earthly
father, not earned by the prodigal, but given from
complete love. The thing best worth while is
faith in the love of God.
If it be lacking, perhaps the best
way to gain it is to assume it to act on
the basis of its existence, putting aside our doubts,
and giving whatever love we have in our own hearts
a chance to strengthen.
WHITSUNTIDE
Whitsuntide is a church season that
too often fails to receive due acknowledgment or recognition.
It is, in observance, a poor third. Christmas
is largely diverted to a giving of superfluous gifts,
and is popular from the wide-felt interest in the
happiness of children. Easter we can not forget,
for it celebrates the rising or the risen life, and
is marked by the fresh beauty of a beautiful world.
To appreciate the pentecostal season and to care for
spiritual inspiration appeals to the few, and to those
few on a higher plane. But of all that religion
has to give, it represents the highest gift, and it
has to do with the world’s greatest need.
Spiritual life is the most precious
of possessions, the highest attainment of humanity.
Happy are we if our better spirit be quickened, if
our hearts be lifted up, and our wills be strengthened,
that worthy life may bring peace and joy!
WHY THE CHURCH?
We cannot deny the truth that the
things of the spirit are of first importance; but
when it comes to living we seem to belie our convictions.
We live as though we thought the spirit a doubtful
matter. There are those who take pride in calling
themselves materialists, but they are hardly as hopeless
as those who are so indifferent that they have no
opinion whatever. The man who thinks and cares
is quite apt to come out right, but the mindless animal
who only enjoys develops no recognizable soul.
The seeking first is not in derogation of any true
manhood. It is the full life, the whole life,
that we are to compass but life subordinated
and controlled by the spirit, the spirit that recognizes
the distinction between right and wrong. Those
who choose the right and bend all else to it, are
of the Kingdom. That is all that righteousness
means.
The church has no monopoly of righteousness,
but it is of immense importance in cultivating the
religious spirit, and cannot safely be dispensed with.
And so it must be strongly supported and made efficient.
To those who know true values this is an investment
that cannot safely be ignored. To it we should
give generously of our money, but equally generously
we should give ourselves our presence, our
co-operation, our loyal support of our leaders, our
constant effort to hold it to high ideals. If
it is to give life, it must have life, and whatever
life it has is the aggregation of our collected and
consecrated lives.
The church called Christian cannot
win by holding its old trenches. It must advance
to the line that stretches from our little fortress
where the flag of Reason and Religion defiantly floats.
Shall we retreat? No; it is for us to hold the
fort at all costs, not for our sake alone, but for
the army of humanity.
We believe in God and we believe in
man. As President Eliot lately put it, “We
believe in the principles of a simple, practical, and
democratic religion. We are meeting ignorance,
not with contempt, but with knowledge. We are
meeting dogmatism and superstition, not with impatience,
but with truth. We are meeting sin and injustice,
not with abuse, but with good-will and high idealism.
We have the right message for our time.”
To the church that seems to us to most nearly realize
these ideals, it is our bounden duty, and should be
our glad privilege, to present ourselves a reasonable
sacrifice, that we may do our part in bringing in
God’s Kingdom.
THE CHURCH AND PROGRESS
Reforms depend upon reformed men.
Perhaps the greater need is formed men.
As we survey the majority of men around us, they seem
largely unconscious of what they really are and of
the privileges and responsibilities that appertain
to manhood. It must be that men are better, and
more, than they seem. Visit a baseball game or
a movie. The crowds seem wholly irresponsible,
and, except in the pleasure or excitement sought,
utterly uninterested apparently without
principle or purpose. And yet, when called upon
to serve their country, men will go to the ends of
the world, and place no limit on the sacrifice freely
made for the general good. They are better than
they seem, and in ways we know not of possess a sense
of justice and a love of right which they found we
know not where.
This is encouraging, but must not
relieve us from doing our utmost to inform more fully
every son of man of his great opportunity and responsibility,
and also of inspiring him to use his life to his and
our best advantage.
It is so evident that world-welfare
rests upon individual well-being that we cannot escape
the conviction that the best thing any one of us can
do is to help to make our fellow-men better and happier.
And the part of wisdom is to organize for the power
we gain.
It would seem that the church should
be the most effective agency for promoting individual
worth and consequent happiness. Is it? and
if not, why not? We are apt to say we live in
a new age, forgetting how little change of form matters.
Human nature, with its instincts and desires, love
of self, and the general enjoyment of, and through,
possessions, is so little changed that differences
in condition and circumstance have only a modifying
influence. It is man, the man within, that counts not
his clothing.
But it is true that human institutions
do undergo great changes, and nothing intimate and
important has suffered greater changes than the church.
Religion itself, vastly more important than the church,
has changed and is changing. Martineau’s
illuminating classification helps us to realize this.
The first expression, the pagan, was based on fear
and the idea of winning favor by purchase, giving something
to God it might be burnt-offerings for
his good-will. Then came the Jewish, the ethical,
the thought of doing, rather than giving. Righteousness
earns God’s favor. The higher conception
blossomed into Christianity with its trust in the
love of God and of serving him and fellow-man, self-sacrifice
being the highest expression of harmony with him.
Following this general advance from giving and doing
to being, we have the altar, the temple, and the church.
THE GENUINE UNITARIAN
Unitarians owe first allegiance to
the Kingdom of God on earth. It is of little
consequence through which door it is entered.
If any other is nearer or broader or more attractive,
use it. We offer ours for those who prefer it
or who find others not to be entered without a password
they cannot pronounce.
A Unitarian who merely says he is
one thereby gives no satisfactory evidence that he
is. There are individuals who seem to think they
are Unitarians because they are nothing else.
They regard Unitarianism as the next to nothing in
its requirement of belief, losing all sight of the
fact that even one real belief exceeds, and may be
more difficult than, many half-beliefs and hundreds
of make-beliefs, and that a Unitarian church made
up of those who have discarded all they thought they
believed and became Unitarian for its bald negations
is to be pitied and must be patiently nurtured.
As regards our responsibility for
the growth of Unitarianism, we surely cannot fail
to recognize it, but it should be clearly qualified
by our recognition of the object in view. To
regard Unitarianism as an end to be pursued for its
own sake does not seem compatible with its own true
spirit. The church itself is an instrument, and
we are in right relation when we give the Unitarian
church our preference, as, to us, the best instrument,
while we hold first allegiance to the idealism for
which it stands and to the goodness it seeks to unfold
in the heart of man.
Nor would we seek growth at any sacrifice
of high quality or purpose. We do not expect
large numbers and great popular applause. Unitarians
are pioneers, and too independent and discriminating
to stir the feverish pulse of the multitude.
We seek the heights, and it is our concern to reach
them and hold them for the few that struggle up.
Loaves and fishes we have not to offer, nor can we
promise wealth and health as an attractive by-product
of righteousness.
There is no better service that anyone
can render than to implant higher ideals in the breast
of another. In the matter of religious education
as sought through the ordinary Sunday-school, no one
who has had any practical experience has ever found
it easy, or kept free from doubt as to its being sufficiently
efficacious to make it worth while. But the problem
is to recognize the difficulty, face all doubts, and
stand by. Perfect teachers are impossible, satisfactory
ones are not always to be had. If they are not
dissatisfied with themselves, they are almost always
unfit. But as between doing the best you can and
doing nothing at all, it would seem that self-respect
and a sense of deep responsibility would leave no
recourse. There is no place for a shirker or
a quitter in a real Unitarian church.
HAVE WE DONE OUR WORK?
Now and then some indifferent Unitarian
expresses doubt as to the future value of our particular
church. There are those who say, “Why should
we keep it up? Have we not done our work?”
We have seen our original protests largely effective,
and rejoice that more liberal and generous, and, we
believe, more just and true, religious convictions
prevail; but have we been constructive and strengthening?
And until we have made our own churches fully free
and fruitful in spiritual life are we absolved from
the call to service?
Have we earned our discharge from
the army of life? Shall we be deserters or slackers!
We ask no man to fight with us if his loyalty to any
other corps is stronger, but to fight somewhere to
do his part for God and his fellow-men wherever he
can do the most effective service.
We are not Unitarians first.
We are not even Christians first. We are human
first, seeking the best in humanity, in our appointed
place in a civilization that finds its greatest inspiration
in the leadership of Jesus of Nazareth, we are next
Christians, and we are finally Unitarians because
for us their point of view embodies most truly the
spirit that animated his teachings and his life.
And so we appeal to those who really,
not nominally, are of our household of faith to feel
that it is best worth while to stand by the nearest
church and to support it generously, that it may do
its part in soul service and world welfare, and also
to encourage it and give it more abundant life through
attendance and participation in its activities.
OF FIRST IMPORTANCE
It is well for each soul, in the multiplicity
of questions besetting him, to deliberately face them
and determine what is of first importance. Aspects
are so diverse and bewildering that if we do not reduce
them to some order, giving them rank, we are in danger
of becoming purposeless drifters on the sea of life.
What is the most important thing in
life? What shall be our aim and purpose, as we
look about us, observing our fellows what
they have accomplished and what they are what
commends itself to us as best worth while? And
what course can we pursue to get the most and the best
out of it?
We find a world of infinite diversity
in conditions, in aims, and in results. One of
the most striking differences is in regard to what
we call success. We are prone to conclude that
he who is prosperous in the matter of having is the
successful man. Possessing is the proof of efficiency,
and he who possesses little has measurably failed in
the main object of life. This conclusion has
a measure of truth, but is not wholly true. We
see not a few instances of utter poverty of life concurrent
with great possessions, and are forced to conclude
that the real value of possessions is dependent on
what they bring us. Merely to have is of no advantage.
Indeed it may be a burden or a curse. Happiness
is at least desirable, but it has no necessary connection
with property accumulations. They may make it
possible, but they never insure it. Possession
may be an incident, but seldom is a cause.
If we follow this thought further
we shall find that in the accepted methods of accumulation
arise many of the causes of current misery and unhappiness.
Generally he who is said to succeed pays a price, and
a large one, for the prosperity he achieves.
To be conspicuously successful commonly involves a
degree of selfishness that is almost surely damaging.
Often injustice and unfairness are added to the train
of factors, and dishonesty and absence of decency give
the finishing touch. Every dollar tinged with
doubt is a moral liability. If it has been wrested
from its rightful owner through fraud or force of
opportunity, it would better be at the bottom of the
sea.
THE BEST IN LIFE
The power and practical irresponsibility
of money have ruined many a man, and the misuse of
wealth has left unused immense opportunity for good.
It has coined a word that has become abhorrent, and
“Capitalism” has, in the minds of the
suspicious, become the all-sufficient cause of everything
deplorable in human conditions. No true-hearted
observer can conclude that the first consideration
of life should be wealth. On the other hand,
no right-minded person will ignore the desirability
and the duty of judiciously providing the means for
a reasonable degree of comfort and self-respect, with
a surplus for the furtherance of human welfare in
general, and the relief of misfortune and suffering.
Thrift is a virtue; greed is a vice. Reasonable
possession is a commendable and necessary object.
The unrestrained avarice that today is making cowards
of us all is an unmeasured curse, a world-wide disgrace
that threatens civilization.
In considering ends of life we cannot
ignore those who consider happiness as adequate.
Perhaps there are few who formulate this, but there
are many who seem to give it practical assent.
They apparently conform their lives to this butterfly
estimate, and, in the absence of any other purpose,
rest satisfied. Happiness is indeed a desirable
condition, and in the highest sense, where it borders
on blessedness, may be fairly termed “the end
and aim of being.” But on the lower stretches
of the senses, where it becomes mere enjoyment or pleasure,
largely concerned with amusement and self-indulgence
of various sorts, it becomes parasitic, robbing life
of its strength and flavor and preventing its development
and full growth. It is insidious in its deterioration
and omnivorous in its appetite. It tends to habits
that undermine and to the appropriation of a preponderating
share of the valueless things of life. The danger
is in the unrestrained appetite, in intemperance that
becomes habit. Pleasure is exhausting of both
purse and mind. We naturally crave pleasant experiences,
and we need a certain amount of relaxation. The
danger is in overindulgence and indigestion resulting
in spiritual invalidism. Let us take life sanely,
accepting pleasures gratefully but moderately.
But what is best in life?
Why, life itself. Life is opportunity. Here
it is, around us, offered to us. We are free to
take what we can or what we like. We have the
great privilege of choice, and life’s ministry
to us depends on what we take and what we leave.
We are providentially assigned our
place, whatever it is, but in no fixed sense of its
being final and unalterable. The only obligation
implied is that of acceptance until it can be bettered.
Our moral responsibility is limited
to our opportunity, and the vital question is the
use we make of it. The great fact of life is that
we are spiritual beings. Religion has to do with
soul existence and is the field of its development.
It is concerned primarily with being and secondly
with doing. It is righteousness inspired by love.
It is recognition of our responsibilities to do God’s
will.
Hence the best life is that which
accepts life as opportunity, and faithfully, happily
seeks to make the most of it. It seeks to follow
the right, and to do the best it can, in any circumstances.
It accepts all that life offers, enjoying in moderation
its varied gifts, but in restraint of self-indulgence,
and with kindly consideration of others. It subordinates
its impulses to the apprehended will of God, bears
trials with fortitude, and trusts eternal good.
OVERCOMING OBSTACLES
One of the most impressive sights
in the natural world is the difficulties resisted
and overcome by a tree in its struggle for life.
On the very summit of the Sentinel Dome, over eight
thousand feet above sea-level, there is rooted in
the apparently solid granite a lone pine two feet
in diameter. It is not tall, for its struggle
with the wind and snow has checked its aspirations,
but it is sturdy and vigorous, while the wonder is
that it ever established and maintained life at all.
Where it gains its nourishment is not apparent.
Disintegrated granite seems a hard diet, but it suffices,
for the determined tree makes the best of the opportunities
offered. Like examples abound wherever a crevice
holds any soil whatever. In a niche of El Capitan,
more than a thousand feet from the valley’s
floor, grows a tree a hundred feet high. A strong
glass shows a single tree on the crest of Half Dome.
Such persistence is significant, and it enforces a
lesson we very much need.
Reason should not be behind instinct
in making the most of life. While man is less
rigidly conditioned and may modify his environment,
he, too, may nourish his life by using to the full
whatever nutriment is offered. Lincoln has been
characterized as a man who made the most of his life.
Perhaps his greatness consisted mostly in that.
We are inclined to blame conditions
and circumstances for failures that result from our
lack of effort. We lack in persistence, we resent
disparity in the distribution of talents, we blink
at responsibility, and are slothful and trifling.
Our life is a failure from lack of will.
Who are we that we should complain
that life is hard, or conclude that it is not better
so? Why do we covet other opportunities instead
of doing the best with those we have? What is
the glory of life but to accept it with such satisfaction
as we can command, to enjoy what we have a right to,
and to use all it offers for its upbuilding and fulfillment?
BEING RIGHT
How evident it is that much more than
good intentions is needed in one who would either
maintain self-respect or be of any use in his daily
life! It is not easy to be good, but it is often
less easy to be right. It involves an understanding
that presupposes both ability and effort. Intelligence,
thinking, often studious consideration, are necessary
to give a working hypothesis of what is best.
It is seldom that anything is so simple that without
careful thought we can be sure that one course is
right and another wrong. Perhaps, after we have
weighed all that is ponderable, we can only determine
which seems the better course of action. Being
good may help our judgment. Doing right is the
will of God.
PATRIOTISM
“Let us have faith that right
makes might, and in that faith let us to the end dare
to do our duty as we understand it.” Abraham
Lincoln had a marvelous aptitude for condensed statement,
and in this compact sentence from his Cooper Union
address expresses the very essence of the appeal that
is made to us today. We can find no more fundamental
slogan and no nobler one.
Whatever the circumstances presented
and whatever the immediate result will be, we are
to dare to do our duty as we understand it. And
we are so to dare and so to do in complete faith that
right makes might and in utter disregard of fear that
might may triumph. The only basis of true courage
is faith, and our trust must be in right, in good,
in God.
We live in a republic that sustains
itself through the acceptance by all of the will of
the majority, and to talk of despotism whenever the
authority necessary for efficiency is exercised, and
that with practically unanimous concurrence, is wholly
unreasonable. A man who cannot yield allegiance
to the country in which he lives should either be
silent and inactive or go to some country where his
sympathy corresponds with his loyalty.