Already mention has been made of the
extraordinary care lavished, as a general rule, by
the Novelist upon the preparation of these Readings
before they were, each in turn, submitted for the first
time to public scrutiny. A strikingly illustrative
instance of this may be here particularised.
It occurred upon the occasion of a purely experimental
Reading of “Doctor Marigold,” which came
off privately, on the evening of the 18th of March,
1866, in the drawing-room of Charles Dickens’s
then town residence, in Southwick Place, Tyburnia.
Including, among those present, the members of his
own home circle, his entire audience numbered no more
than ten persons altogether. Four, at any rate,
of that party may be here identified, each of whom
doubtless still bears the occasion referred to vividly
in his remembrance, Robert Browning the
poet, Charles Fechter the actor, Wilkie Collins the
novelist, and John Forster the historian of the Commonwealth.
Even in private, Dickens had never Read “Doctor
Marigold” until that evening. Often as he
Read it afterwards, he never Read it with a more contagious
air of exhilaration. He hardly ever, in fact,
gave one of his almost wholly comic and but incidentally
pathetic Readings so effectively. In every
sentence there was a zest or relish that was irresistible.
The volubility of the “poor chap in the sleeved-waistcoat”
sped the Reading on with a rapidity quite beyond anticipation,
when the time, which had been carefully marked at
the commencement of the Reading, came to be notified
at its conclusion. That the merest first rehearsal
should have run off thus glibly seemed just simply
incomprehensible. With the sense of this surprise
still fresh upon us, the tentative Reading being at
the time only a few seconds completed, everything
was explained, however, by a half-whispered remark
made, to the present writer, in passing, by the Novelist made
by him half-weariedly, yet half-laughingly “There!
If I have gone through that already to myself once,
I have gone through it two hundred times!”
It was not lightly or carelessly therefore, as may
now be seen, that Charles Dickens, in his later capacity not
pen-in-hand, or through green monthly numbers, but
standing at a reading-desk upon a public platform undertook
the office of a popular entertainer.
Resolved throughout his career as
a Reader to acquit himself of those newly-assumed
responsibilities to the utmost of his powers, to the
fullest extent of his capabilities, both physical and
intellectual, he applied his energies to the task,
with a zeal that, it is impossible not to recognise
now, amounted in the end to nothing less than (literally)
self-sacrifice. But for the devotion of his energies
thus unstintingly to the laborious task upon which
he had adventured a task involving in its
accomplishment an enormous amount of rapid travelling
by railway, keeping him for months together, besides,
in one ceaseless whirl of bodily and mental excitement his
splendid constitution, sustained and strengthened
as it was by his wholesome enjoyment of out-of-door
life, and his habitual indulgence in bathing and pedes-trianism,
gave him every reasonable hope of reaching the age
of an octogenarian.
Bearing in mind in addition to the
wear-and-tear of the Readings in England and America,
the nervous shock of that terrible railway accident
at Staplehurst, on the 9th of June, 1865, the lamentable
catastrophe of exactly five years afterwards to the
very day, that of the 9th of June, 1870, becomes readily
comprehensible. Because of his absorption in his
task, however, all through, he was unconscious for
the most part of the wasting influence of his labours,
or, if he was so at all towards the close of his career,
he was so, even then, only fitfully and at the rarest
intervals. Precisely in the same way, it may be
remarked, in regard to those who watched his whole
course as a Reader, that so facile and so pleasureable
to himself, as well as to them, appeared to be the
novel avocation which had come of late years to be
alternated with his more accustomed toil as an author,
that it rendered even the most observant amongst them
unconscious in their turn of the disastrously exhausting
influence of this unnatural blending together of two
professions. A remorseful sense of this comes
back upon us now, when it is all too late, in our
remembrance of that remark made by the Novelist immediately
after the Private Reading of “Doctor Marigold,”
a remark then regarded as simply curious and interesting,
but now having about it an almost painful significance.
Never was work more thoroughly or more conscientiously
done, from first to last, than in the instance of these
Readings.
In the minute elaboration of the care
with which they were prepared, in the vivacity with
which they were one and all of them delivered, in the
punctuality with which, whirled like a shuttle in a
loom, to and fro, hither and thither, through all
parts of the United Kingdom and of the United States,
the Reader kept, link by link, an immensely-lengthened
chain of appointments, until the first link was broken
suddenly at Preston one can recognise at
length the full force of those simple words uttered
by him upon the occasion of his Farewell Reading, where
he spoke of himself as “a faithful servant of
the public, always imbued with a sense of duty to
them, and always striving to do his best.”
Among the many radiant illustrations that have been
preserved of how thoroughly he did his best, not the
least brilliant in its way was this eminently characteristic
Reading of “Doctor Mari-gold.”
All through it, from the very beginning
down to the very end of his Confidences, the Cheap
Jack, in his belcher neckcloth and his sleeved-waistcoat
with the mother-o’-pearl buttons, was there talking
to us, as only he could talk to us, from the foot-board
of his cart. He remained thus before us from
his first mention of his own father having always
consistently called himself Willum to the moment when
little Sophy the third little Sophy comes
clambering up the steps, and reveals that she at least
is not deaf and dumb by crying out to him, “Grandfather!”
As for the patter of Doctor Marigold, it is among the
humorous revelations of imaginative literature.
Hear him when he is perhaps the best worth listening
to, when he is in his true rostrum, when his bluchers
are on his native foot-board, and his name is, more
intensely than ever, Doctor Marigold! Don’t
we all remember him there, for example, on a Saturday
night in the market-place “Here’s
a pair of razors that’ll shave you closer than
the board of guardians; here’s a flat-iron worth
its weight in gold; here’s a frying-pan artificially
flavoured with essence of beefsteaks to that degree
that you’ve only got for the rest of your lives
to fry bread and dripping in it and there you are
replete with animal food; here’s a genuine chronometer-watch,
in such a solid silver case that you may knock at
the door with it when you come home late from a social
meeting, and rouse your wife and family and save up
your knocker for the postman; and here’s half
a dozen dinner-plates that you may play the cymbals
with to charm the baby when it’s fractious.
Stop! I’ll throw you in another article,
and I’ll give you that, and it’s a rolling-pin;
and if the baby can only get it well into it’s
mouth when its teeth is coming, and rub the gums once
with it, they’ll come through double in a fit
of laughter equal to being tickled.” And
so on, ringing the changes on a thousand wonderful
conceits and whimsicalities that come tumbling out
one after another in inexhaustible sequence and with
uninterrupted volubility.
The very Prince of Cheap Jacks, surely,
is this Doctor Marigold! And, more than that,
one who makes good his claim to the title of wit,
humorist, satirist, philanthropist, and philosopher.
As for his philosophic contentment,
what can equal that as implied in his summing up of
his own humble surroundings? “A roomy cart,
with the large goods hung outside, and the bed slung
underneath it when on the road; an iron-pot and a
kettle, a fireplace for the cold weather, a chimney
for the smoke, a hanging-shelf and a cupboard, a dog
and a horse. What more do you want? You
draw off on a bit of turf in a green lane or by the
roadside, you hobble your old horse and turn him grazing,
you light your fire upon the ashes of the last visitors,
you cook your stew, and you wouldn’t call the
Emperor of France your father.”
As for his wit, hear him describe “What?
Why, I’ll tell you! It’s made of
fine gold, and it’s not broke, though there’s
a hole in the middle of it, and it’s stronger
than any fetter that was ever forged. What else
is it? I’ll tell you. It’s a
hoop of solid gold wrapped in a silver curl-paper
that I myself took off the shining locks of the ever-beautiful
old lady in Threadneedle Street, London city.
I wouldn’t tell you so, if I hadn’t the
paper to show, or you mightn’t believe it even
of me. Now, what else is it? It’s a
man-trap, and a hand-cuff, the parish stocks and a
leg-lock, all in gold and all in one. Now, what
else is it? It’s a wedding-ring!”
As for something far better than any
mere taste of his skill as a satirist, see the whole
of his delectable take off in contradistinction
to himself, the itinerant Cheap Jack of
the political Dear Jack in the public marketplace.
As for his philanthropy, it is unobtrusively
proclaimed by the drift of his whole narrative, and
especially by two or three among the more remarkable
of its closing incidents.
As for his powers as a humorist, they
may be found there passim, being scattered
broadcast all through his autobiographic recollections.
To those recollections are we not
indebted for a whole gallery of inimitable delineations?
The Cheap Jack’s very dog, for instance, who
had taught himself out of his own head to growl at
any person in the crowd that bid as low as sixpence!
Or Pickleson the giant, with a little head and less
in it. Of whom, observes Doctor Marigold, “He
was a languid young man, which I attribute to the
distance betwixt his extremities.” About
whom, when a sixpence is given to him by Doctor Marigold,
the latter remarks in a preposterous parenthesis, “(for
he was kept as short as he was long!)” As for
Dickens’s high falsetto, when speaking in the
person of this same Pickleson, with a voice that, as
Doctor Marigold says, seemed to come from his eyebrows,
it was only just a shade more excruciatingly ridiculous
than his guttural and growling objurgations in the
character of the giant’s proprietor, the fe-rocious
Mim.
With all his modest appetite for the
simpler pleasures of existence, Doctor Marigold betrays
in one instance, by the way, the taste of a gourmet.
“I knocked up a beefsteak-pudding for one,”
he says, “with two kidneys, a dozen oysters,
and a couple of mushrooms thrown in:” adding,
with a fine touch of nature drawn from experience,
“It’s a pudding to put a man in good humour
with everything, except the two bottom buttons of
his waistcoat.”
Incomparably the finest portion of
all this wonderfully original sketch of Doctor Marigold,
both in the Writing and in the Reading, was that in
which the poor Cheap Jack is represented as going through
his customary patter on the foot-board with his poor
little Sophy the first of the three Sophies,
his own by birth, and not simply by adoption the
while she is slowly dying on his shoulder. Thackeray
was right when he said of the humour of Dickens, “It
is a mixture of love and wit.” Laughter
and tears, with him, lay very near speaking
of him as an author, we may say by preference lie
very near indeed together. It is in those passages
in which they come in astonishingly rapid alternation,
and at moments almost simultaneously, that he is invariably
at his very best. The incident here alluded to
is one of these more exquisite descriptions, and it
was one, that, by voice and look and manner, he himself
most exquisitely delineated. When the poor Cheap
Jack, with Sophy holding round his neck, steps out
from the shelter of the cart upon the foot-board,
and the waiting crowd all set up a laugh on seeing
them “one chuckle-headed Joskin (that
I hated for it) making a bid ‘tuppence for her!’” Doctor
Marigold begins his tragi-comic allocution. It
is sown thickly all through with the most whimsical
of his conceits, but it is interrupted also here and
there with infinitely pathetic touches of tenderness.
Fragmentary illustrations of either
would but dimly shadow forth, instead of clearly elucidating,
what is here meant in the recollection of those who
can still recall this Reading of “Doctor Marigold”
to their remembrance. Those who never heard it
as it actually fell from the Author’s lips,
by turning to the original sketch, and running through
that particular portion of it to themselves, may more
readily conjecture than by the aid of mere piecemeal
quotation, all that the writer of those riant and
tearful pages would be capable of accomplishing by
its utterance, bringing to its delivery, as he could,
so many of the rarer gifts of genius, and so many
also of the rarest accomplishments of art.