(Preached also at the Chapel Royal, St. James, Sexagesima Sunday.)
Genesis ii. And they
heard the voice of the Lord God walking in the garden
in the cool of the day.
These words would startle us, if we
heard them for the first time. I do not know
but that they may startle us now, often as we have
heard them, if we think seriously over them.
That God should appear to mortal man, and speak with
mortal man. It is most wonderful. It is
utterly unlike anything that we have ever seen, or
that any person on earth has seen, for many hundred
years. It is a miracle, in every sense of the
word.
When one compares man as he was then,
weak and ignorant, and yet seemingly so favoured by
God, so near to God, with man as he is now, strong
and cunning, spreading over the earth and replenishing
it; subduing it with railroads and steamships, with
agriculture and science, and all strange and crafty
inventions, and all the while never visited by any
Divine or heavenly appearance, but seemingly left
utterly to himself by God, to go his own way and do
his own will upon the earth, one asks with wonder,
Can we be Adam’s children? Can the God
who appeared to Adam, be our God likewise, or has
God’s plan and rule for teaching man changed
utterly?
No. He is one God; the same
God yesterday, to-day, and for ever. His will
and purpose, his care and rule over man, have not changed.
That is a matter of faith. Of
the faith which the holy Church commands us to have.
But it need not be a blind or unreasonable faith.
That our God is the God of Adam; that the same Lord
God who taught him teaches us likewise, need not be
a mere matter of faith: it may be a matter of
reason likewise; a thing which seems reasonable to
us, and recommends itself to our mind and conscience
as true.
Consider, my friends, a babe when
it comes into the world. The first thing of
which it is aware is its mother’s bosom.
The first thing which it does, as its eyes and ears
are gradually opened to this world, is to cling to
its parents. It holds fast by their hand, it
will not leave their side. It is afraid to sleep
alone, to go alone. To them it looks up for
food and help. Of them it asks questions, and
tries to learn from them, to copy them, to do what
it sees them doing, even in play; and the parents
in return lavish care and tenderness on it, and will
not let it out of their sight. But after a while,
as the child grows, the parents will not let it be
so perpetually with them. It must go to school.
It must see its parents only very seldom, perhaps
it must be away from them weeks or months. And
why? Not that the parents love it less:
but that it must learn to take care of itself, to
act for itself, to think for itself, or it will never
grow up to be a rational human being.
And the parting of the child from
the parents does not break the bond of love between
them. It learns to love them even better.
Neither does it break the bond of obedience.
The child is away from its parents’ eye.
But it learns to obey them behind their back; to
do their will of its own will; to ask itself, What
would my parents wish me to do, were they here? and
so learns, if it will think of it, a more true, deep,
honourable and spiritual obedience, than it ever would
if its parents were perpetually standing over it, saying,
Do this, and do that.
In after life, that child may settle
far away from his father’s home. He may
go up into the temptations and bustle of some great
city. He may cross to far lands beyond the sea.
But need he love his parents less? need the bond
between them be broken, though he may never set eyes
on them again? God forbid. He may be settled
far away, with children, business, interests of his
own; and yet he may be doing all the while his father’s
will. The lessons of God which he learnt at
his mother’s knee may be still a lamp to his
feet and a light to his path. Amid all the bustle
and labour of business, his father’s face may
still be before his eyes, his father’s voice
still sound in his ears, bidding him be a worthy son
to him still; bidding him not to leave that way wherein
he should go, in which his parents trained him long,
long since. He may feel that his parents are
near him in the spirit, though absent in the flesh.
Yes, though they may have passed altogether out of
this world, they may be to him present and near at
hand; and he may be kept from doing many a wrong thing
and encouraged to do many a right one, by the ennobling
thought, My father would have had it so, my mother
would have had it so, had they been here on earth.
And though in this world he may never see them again,
he may look forward steadily and longingly to the
day when, this life’s battle over, he shall
meet again in heaven those who gave him life on earth.
My friends, if this be the education
which is natural and necessary from our earthly parents,
made in God’s image, appointed by God’s
eternal laws for each of us, why should it not be the
education which God himself has appointed for mankind?
All which is truly human (not sinful or fallen) is
an image and pattern of something Divine. May
not therefore the training which we find, by the very
facts of nature, fit and necessary for our children,
be the same as God’s training, by which he fashioneth
the hearts of the children of men? Therefore
we can believe the Bible when it tells us that so it
is. That God began the education of man by appearing
to him directly, keeping him, as it were, close to
his hand, and teaching him by direct and open revelation.
That as time went on, God left men more and more
to themselves outwardly: but only that he might
raise their minds to higher notions of religion that
he might make them live by faith, and not merely by
sight; and obey him of their own hearty free will,
and not merely from fear or wonder. And therefore,
in these days, when miraculous appearances have, as
far as we know, entirely ceased, yet God is not changed.
He is still as near as ever to men; still caring
for them, still teaching them; and his very stopping
of all miracles, so far from being a sign of God’s
anger or neglect, is a part of his gracious plan for
the training of his Church.
For consider Man was first
put upon this earth, with all things round him new
and strange to him; seeing himself weak and unarmed
before the wild beasts of the forest, not even sheltered
from the cold, as they are; and yet feeling in himself
a power of mind, a cunning, a courage, which made
him the lord of all the beasts by virtue of his mind,
though they were stronger than he in body. All
that we read of Adam and Eve in the Bible is, as we
should expect, the history of children children
in mind, even when they were full-grown in stature.
Innocent as children, but, like children, greedy,
fanciful, ready to disobey at the first temptation,
for the very silliest of reasons; and disobeying accordingly.
Such creatures with such wonderful powers
lying hid in them, such a glorious future before them;
and yet so weak, so wilful, so ignorant, so unable
to take care of themselves, liable to be destroyed
off the face of the earth by their own folly, or even
by the wild beasts around surely they needed
some special and tender care from God to keep them
from perishing at the very outset, till they had learned
somewhat how to take care of themselves, what their
business and duty were upon this earth. They
needed it before they fell; they needed it still more,
and their children likewise, after they fell:
and if they needed it, we may trust God that he afforded
it to them.
But again. Whence came this
strange notion, which man alone has of all the living
things which we see, of religion? What put
into the mind of man that strange imagination of beings
greater than himself, whom he could not always see,
but who might appear to him? What put into his
mind the strange imagination that these unseen beings
were more or less his masters? That they had
made laws for him which he must obey? That he
must honour and worship them, and do them service,
in order that they might be favourable to him, and
help, and bless, and teach him? All nations
except a very few savages (and we do not know but
that their forefathers had it like the rest of mankind)
have had some such notion as this; some idea of religion,
and of a moral law of right and wrong.
Where did they get it?
Where, I ask again, did they get it?
My friends, after much thought I answer,
there is no explanation of that question so simple,
so rational, so probable, as the one which the text
gives.
“And they heard the voice of the Lord God.”
Some, I know, say that man thought
out for himself, in his own reason, the notion of
God; that he by searching found out God. But
surely that is contrary to all experience. Our
experience is, that men left to themselves forget
God; lose more and more all thought of God, and the
unseen world; believe more and more in nothing but
what they can see and taste and handle, and become
as the beasts that perish. How then did man,
who now is continually forgetting God, contrive to
remember God for himself at first? How, unless
God himself showed himself to man? I know some
will say, that mankind invented for themselves false
gods at first, and afterwards cleared and purified
their own notions, till they discovered the true God.
My friends, there is a homely old proverb which will
well apply here. If there had been no gold guineas,
there would be no brass ones. If men had not
first had a notion of a true God, and then gradually
lost it, they would not have invented false gods to
supply his place. And whence did they get, I
ask again, the notion of gods at all? The simplest
answer is in the Bible: God taught them.
I can find no better. I do not believe a better
will ever be found.
And why not?
Why not? I ask. To say
that God cannot appear to men is simply silly; for
it is limiting God’s Almighty power. He
that made man and all heaven and earth, cannot he
show himself to man, if he shall so please?
To say that God will not appear to man because man
is so insignificant, and this earth such a paltry
little speck in the heavens, is to limit God’s
goodness; nay, it is to show that a man knows not
what goodness means. What grace, what virtue
is there higher than condescension? Then if
God be, as he is, perfectly good, must he not be perfectly
condescending ready and willing to stoop
to man, and all the more ready and the more willing,
the more weak, ignorant, and sinful this man is?
In fact, the greater need man has of God, the more
certain is it that God will help him in that need.
Yes, my friends, the Bible is the
revelation of a God who condescends to men, and therefore
descends to men. And the more a man’s
reason is spiritually enlightened to know the meaning
of goodness and holiness and justice and love, the
more simple, reasonable, and credible will it seem
to him that God at first taught men in the days of
their early ignorance, by the only method by which
(as far as we can conceive) he could have taught them
about himself; namely, by appearing in visible shape,
or speaking with audible voice; and just as reasonable
and credible, awful and unfathomable mystery though
it is, will be the greater news, that that same Lord
at last so condescended to man that he was conceived
by the Holy Ghost; born of the Virgin Mary; suffered
under Pontius Pilate; was crucified, dead, and buried;
and rose the third day, and ascended into heaven.
Credible and reasonable, not indeed to the natural
man who looks only at nature, which he can see and
hear and handle; but credible and reasonable enough
to the spiritual man, whose mind has been enlightened
by the Spirit of God, to see that the things which
are seen are temporal, but the things which are not
seen are eternal; even justice and love, mercy and
condescension, the divine order, and the kingdom of
the Living God.
And now one word on a matter which
is tormenting the minds of many just now. It
is often said that all that I have been saying is
contrary to science. That this science and understanding
of the world around us, which has improved so marvellously
in our days, proves that the apparitions and miracles
spoken of in the Bible cannot be true; that God, or
the angels of God, can never have walked with man
in visible shape.
Now, my friends, I do not believe
this. I believe the very contrary. I entreat
you to set your minds at rest on this point; and to
believe (what is certainly true) there is nothing in
this new science to contradict the good old creed,
that the Lord God of old appeared to his human children.
It would take too much time, of course, to give you
my reasons for saying this: and I must therefore
ask you to take on trust from me when I tell you solemnly
and earnestly that there is nothing in modern science
which can, if rightly understood, contradict the glorious
words of St. Paul, that God at sundry times and in
divers manners spake to the fathers by the prophets,
and hath at last spoken unto us by a Son, whom he hath
appointed heir of all things: by whom also he
made the worlds, who is the brightness of his glory,
and the express image of his person, and upholdeth
all things by the word of his power: even Jesus
Christ, God blessed for ever. Amen.
What then shall we think of these
things? Shall we say, ’How much better
off were our forefathers than we! Ah, that we
were not left to ourselves! Ah, that we lived
in the good old times when God and his angels walked
with men!’
My friends, what says Solomon the
Wise? ’Inquire not why the former
times were better than these, for thou dost not inquire
wisely concerning this.’
It is very natural for us to think
that we could become more easily good men, more certain
of going to heaven, if we saw divine apparitions and
heard divine voices. A very natural thought.
But natural things are not always the best or wisest
things. Spiritual things are surely higher and
deeper than natural things. It is natural to
wish to see Christ, or some heavenly being, with our
natural eyes and senses. But it is spiritual
and therefore better for our souls, to be content
to see him by faith, with the spiritual eyes of our
heart and mind, to love him with all our heart and
mind and soul, to worship him, to put our whole trust
in him, to call upon him, to honour his holy name
and his word, and to serve him truly all the days
of our life.
Natural, indeed, to wish that we were
back again in the old times. But we must recollect
that these old times were not good times, but bad
times, and for that very reason the Lord took pity
on them. That they were times of darkness, and
therefore it was that the people who sat in great
darkness, and in the valley of the shadow of death,
were allowed to see a great light. And that after
that, the fulness of time, the very time which the
Lord chose that he might be incarnate of the Virgin
Mary, and came down upon this earth in human form,
was not a good time. On the contrary, the fulness
of time, 1863 years ago, was the very wickedest, most
faithless, most unjust time that the world had ever
seen a time of which St. Paul said that
there were none who did good, no, not one; that adders’
poison was under all lips, and all feet swift to shed
blood, and that the way of peace none had known.
Better, far better, to live in times
like these, in which there is (among Christian nations
at least) no great darkness, even though there be
no great light; times in which the knowledge of the
true God and his Son Jesus Christ is spreading, slowly
but surely, over all the earth; and with it, the fruit
of the knowledge of the Lord, justice, mercy, charity,
fellow-feeling, and a desire to teach and improve
all mankind, such as the world never saw before.
These are the fruits of the Scriptures of the Lord,
and the Sacraments of the Lord, and of the Holy Spirit
of the Lord; and if that Holy Spirit be in our hearts,
and we yield our hearts to his gracious motions and
obey them, then we are really nearer to the Lord Jesus
Christ than if we saw him, as Adam did, with our bodily
eyes, and yet rebelled against him, as Adam did, in
our hearts, and disobeyed him in our actions.
Of old the Lord treated men as babes, and showed himself
to their bodily eyes, that so they might learn that
he was, and that he was near them. But us he
treats as grown men, who know that he is, and that
he is with us to the end of the world. And if
he treats us as men, my friends, let us behave ourselves
like men, and not like silly children, who cannot
be trusted by themselves for a moment lest they do
wrong or come to harm. Let us obey God, not
with eye-service, just as long as we fancy that his
eye is on us, but with the deeper, more spiritual,
more honourable obedience of faith. Let us obey
him for obedience’ sake, and honour him for very
honour’s sake, as the young emigrant in foreign
lands obeys and honours the parents whom he will never
see again on earth; and let us look forward, like
him, to the day when him whom we cannot see on earth
we may, perhaps, be permitted to see in heaven, as
the reward--and for what higher reward can man wish? of
faith and obedience.