Read MR. MUNDEN of The Works of Charles and Mary Lamb‚ Volume 2, free online book, by Charles Lamb, on

Not many nights ago we had come home from seeing this extraordinary performer in Cockletop; and when we retired to our pillow, his whimsical image still stuck by us, in a manner as to threaten sleep.  In vain we tried to divest ourselves of it by conjuring up the most opposite associations.  We resolved to be serious.  We raised up the gravest topics of life; private misery, public calamity.  All would not do.

   ­There the antic sate
  Mocking our state ­

his queer visnomy ­his bewildering costume ­all the strange things which he had raked together ­his serpentine rod swagging about in his pocket ­Cleopatra’s tear, and the rest of his relics ­O’Keefe’s wild farce, and his wilder commentary ­till the passion of laughter, like grief in excess, relieved itself by its own weight, inviting the sleep which in the first instance it had driven away.

But we were not to escape so easily.  No sooner did we fall into slumbers, than the same image, only more perplexing, assailed us in the shape of dreams.  Not one Munden, but five hundred, were dancing before us, like the faces which, whether you will or no, come when you have been taking opium ­all the strange combinations, which this strangest of all strange mortals ever shot his proper countenance into, from the day he came commissioned to dry up the tears of the town for the loss of the now almost forgotten Edwin.  O for the power of the pencil to have fixed them when we awoke!  A season or two since there was exhibited a Hogarth gallery.  We do not see why there should not be a Munden gallery.  In richness and variety the latter would not fall far short of the former.

There is one face of Farley, one face of Knight, one face (but what a one it is!) of Liston; but Munden has none that you can properly pin down, and call his.  When you think he has exhausted his battery of looks, in unaccountable warfare with your gravity, suddenly he sprouts out an entirely new set of features, like Hydra.  He is not one, but legion.  Not so much a comedian, as a company.  If his name could be multiplied like his countenance, it might fill a play-bill.  He, and he alone, literally makes faces:  applied to any other person, the phrase is a mere figure, denoting certain modifications of the human countenance.  Out of some invisible wardrobe he dips for faces, as his friend Suett used for wigs, and fetches them out as easily.  We should not be surprised to see him some day put out the head of a river horse; or come forth a pewit, or lapwing, some feathered metamorphosis.

We have seen this gifted actor in Sir Christopher Curry ­in Old Dornton ­diffuse a glow of sentiment which has made the pulse of a crowded theatre beat like that of one man; when he has come in aid of the pulpit, doing good to the moral heart of a people.  We have seen some faint approaches to this sort of excellence in other players.  But in what has been truly denominated “the sublime of farce,” Munden stands out as single and unaccompanied as Hogarth.  Hogarth, strange to tell, had no followers.  The school of Munden began, and must end, with himself.

Can any man wonder, like him? can any man see ghosts, like him? or fight with his own shadow ­sessa ­as he does in that strangely-neglected thing, the Cobler of Preston ­where his alternations from the Cobler to the Magnifico, and from the Magnifico to the Cobler, keep the brain of the spectator in as wild a ferment, as if some Arabian Night were being acted before him, or as if Thalaba were no tale!  Who like him can throw, or ever attempted to throw, a supernatural interest over the commonest daily-life objects?  A table, or a joint stool, in his conception, rises into a dignity equivalent to Cassiopeia’s chair.  It is invested with constellatory importance.  You could not speak of it with more deference, if it were mounted into the firmament.  A beggar in the hands of Michael Angelo, says Fuseli, rose the Patriarch of Poverty.  So the gusto of Munden antiquates and ennobles what it touches.  His pots and his ladles are as grand and primal as the seething-pots and hooks seen in old prophetic vision.  A tub of butter, contemplated by him, amounts to a Platonic idea.  He understands a leg of mutton in its quiddity.  He stands wondering, amid the commonplace materials of life, like primaeval man, with the sun and stars about him.