America may be defined as the country
where there are no railway porters. You begin
a journey without ceremony; you end it without a welcome.
No zealot, eager to find you a corner seat and to dispose
of your luggage, meets you when you depart. You
must carry your own bag when you stumble unattended
from the train. This enforced dependence upon
yourself is doubtless a result of democracy. The
spirit of freedom, which permits a stealthy nigger
to brush your hat, does not allow another to handle
your luggage. To the enchained and servile mind
of an Englishman these distinctions axe difficult
to understand. A training in transatlantic liberty
is necessary for their appreciation. However,
no great evil is inflicted on the traveller.
The ritual of checking your baggage may easily be
learned, and the absence of porters has, by a natural
process, evolved the “grip.” The “grip,”
in fact, is the universal mark of America. It
is as intimate a part of the citizen’s equipment
as a hat or coat, and it is not without its advantages.
It is light to carry, it fills but a small space,
and it ensures that the traveller shall not be separated
from all his luggage. A far greater hardship
than the carriage of a “grip” is the enforced
publicity of an American train. The Englishman
loves to travel in seclusion. The end of his
ambition is a locked compartment to himself. Mr
Pullman has ordained that his clients shall endure
the dust and heat of a long journey in public; and
when the voyager, wearied out by the rattle of the
train, seeks his uncomfortable couch, he is forced
to seek it under the general gaze.
These differences of custom are interesting,
because they correspond to differences of temperament.
There is a far deeper difference in the character
of the country through which you travel. A journey
in Europe is like a page of history. You pass
from one century to another. You see a busy world
through the window. As you sit in your corner
a living panorama is unfolded before your eyes.
The country changes with the sky. Town and mountain
and cornfield follow one another in quick succession.
At every turn you see that wonderful symbol of romance,
the white road that winds over the hill, flecked perhaps
by a solitary traveller. But it is always the
work of man, not the beauty of nature, that engrosses
you. You would, if you could, alight at every
point to witness the last act of comedy, which is
just beginning. Men and women, to whom you are
an episode or an obstruction, flash by. Here is
a group of boys bathing. There peasants gaze
at the train as something inhuman. At the level
crossing a horse chafes in his shafts. In an instant
you are whizzed out of sight, and he remains.
Then, as night falls, the country-side leaves its
work; the eyes of the cottages gleam and flicker through
the trees. Round the corner you catch sight of
a village festival. The merry-go-rounds glint
and clank under the shadow of a church. The mountains
approach and recede; streams grow into mighty rivers.
The grey sky is dark blue and inlaid with stars.
And you sit still, tired and travel-stained, having
shared in a day the life of hundreds.
Such is a journey in Europe.
How different the experience in America! On the
road to Chicago you pass through a wilderness.
The towns are infrequent; there are neither roads
nor hedges; and the rapidly changing drama of life
escapes you. The many miles of scrub and underwood
are diversified chiefly by crude advertisements.
Here you are asked to purchase Duke’s Mixture;
there Castoria Toilet Powder is thrust upon your unwilling
notice. In the few cities which you approach the
frame-houses and plank-walks preserve the memory of
the backwoods. In vain you look for the village
church, which in Europe is never far away. In
vain you look for the incidents which in our land lighten
the tedium of a day’s journey. All is barren
and bleak monotony. The thin line of railway
seems a hundred miles from the life of man. At
one station I caught sight of an “Exposition
Car,” which bore the legend, “Cuba on
Wheels,” and I was surprised as at a miracle.
Outside Niles, a little country town, a battered leather-covered
shay was waiting to take wayfarers to the Michigan
Inn; and the impression made by so simple a spectacle
is the best proof of the railroad’s isolation.
There is but one interlude in the desolate expanse Niagara.
Before he reaches the station called
Niagara Falls, the tourist has a foretaste of what
is in store for him. He is assailed in the train
by touts, who would inveigle him into a hotel or let
him a carriage, and to touts he is an unwilling prey
so long as he remains within sight or hearing of the
rapids. The trim little town which has grown up
about the falls, and may be said to hang upon the
water, has a holiday aspect. The sightseers,
the little carriages, the summer-hotels, all wear the
same garb of gaiety and leisure. There is a look
of contented curiosity on the faces of all, who are
not busy defacing the landscape with mills and power-stations,
as of those about to contemplate a supreme wonder.
And yet the sight of it brings the same sense of disappointment
which the colossal masterpieces of nature always inspire.
Not to be amazed at it would be absurd. To pretend
to appreciate it is absurd also. “The Thunder
of the Waters” can neither be painted upon canvas
nor described in words. It is composed on a scale
too large for human understanding. A giant might
find some amusement in its friendly contemplation.
A man can but stand aghast at its sound and size,
as at some monstrous accident. He may compare
the Fall on the American side with the Horse-shoe on
the Canadian. He has no other standard of comparison,
since Niagara not only transcends all other phenomena
of its kind, but also our human vision and imagination.
When you see the far-tossed spray lit up with a flash
of iridescence, you catch at something which makes
a definite impression; and you feel the same relief
that a man may feel when he finds a friend in a mob
of strangers. To heap up epithets upon this mysterious
force is the idlest sport. Are you nearer to it
when you have called it x “deliberate, vast,
and fascinating”? You might as well measure
its breadth and height, or estimate the number of gallons
which descend daily from the broad swirling river
above. A distinguished playwright once complained
of Sophocles that he lacked human interest, and the
charge may be brought with less injustice against Niagara.
It is only through daring and danger that you can
connect it with the human race; and you find yourself
wondering where it was that Captain Webb was hurled
to his death, or by what route the gallant little “Maid
of the Mist” shot the rapids to escape the curiosity
of the excise officer.
Nothing is more curious in the history
of taste than the changed view which is taken to-day
of natural scenery. Time was when the hand and
mind of man were deemed necessary for a beautiful effect,
A wild immensity of mountain or water was thought
a mere form of ugliness; a garden was a waste if it
were not trimmed to formality; and a savage moorland
was fit only for the sheep to crop. The admiration
of Father Hennepin, the companion of La Salle, and
the first white man who ever gazed upon Niagara, was
tempered by affright. “This wonderful Downfal,”
said he in 1678, “is compounded of Cross-streams
of Water, and two Falls, with an Isle sloping along
the middle of it. The Waters which fall from
this horrible Precipice do foam and boyl after the
most hideous manner imaginable, making an Outrageous
Noise, more terrible than that of Thunder; for when
the wind blows out of the South, their dismal roaring
may be heard more than Fifteen Leagues off.”
These are the epithets of the seventeenth century, “horrible,”
“hideous,” “outrageous,” “dismal.”
Now take the modern view, eloquently expressed in
1879 by the United States Commissioners, whose noble
object was to preserve the Falls untouched for ever.
“The value of Niagara to the world,” they
wrote, “and that which has obtained for it the
homage of so many men whom the world reveres, lies
in its power of appeal to the higher emotional and
imaginative faculties, and this power is drawn from
qualities and conditions too subtle to be known through
verbal description. To a proper apprehension
of these, something more than passing observation
is necessary; to an enjoyment of them, something more
than an instantaneous act of will.” It is
the old dispute between beauty and wonder, between
classic and romantic. Who is in the right of
it, the old priest or the modern commissioners?
Each man will answer according to his temperament.
For my part, I am on the side of Father Hennepin.
Niagara is not an inappropriate introduction
to Chicago. For Chicago also is beyond the scale
of human comprehension and endeavour. In mere
size both are monstrous; it is in size alone that they
are comparable. Long before he reaches “the
grey city,” as its inhabitants fondly call it,
the traveller is prepared for the worst. At Pullman
a thick pall already hangs over everything. The
nearer the train approaches Chicago the drearier becomes
the aspect. You are hauled through mile after
mile of rubbish and scrap-heap. You receive an
impression of sharp-edged flints and broken bottles.
When you pass the “City Limits” you believe
yourself at your journey’s end. You have
arrived only at the boundary of Chicago’s ambition,
and Chicago is forty minutes’ distant. The
station, which bears the name “102nd St.,”
is still in the prairies.
A little more patience and you catch
a first glimpse of the lake vast, smooth,
and grey in the morning light. A jolt, and you
are descending, grip in hand, upon the platform.
The first impression of Chicago, and
the last, is of an unfinished monstrosity. It
might be a vast railway station, built for men and
women twenty feet high. The sky-scrapers, in
which it cherishes an inordinate pride, shut out the
few rays of sunlight which penetrate its dusky atmosphere.
They have not the excuse of narrow space which their
rivals in New York may plead. They are built
in mere wantonness, for within the City Limits, whose
distance from the centre is the best proof of Chicago’s
hopefulness, are many miles of waste ground, covered
only with broken fences and battered shanties.
And, as they raise their heads through the murky fog,
these sky-scrapers wear a morose and sullen look.
If they are not mere lumps, their ornament is hideously
heavy and protrusive. They never combine, as
they combine in New York, into an impressive whole.
They clamour blatantly of their size, and that is
all. And if the city be hideously aggressive,
what word of excuse can be found for the outskirts,
for the Italian and Chinese quarters, for the crude,
new districts which fasten like limpets upon the formless
mass of Chicago? These, to an enduring ugliness
add a spice of cruelty and debauch, which are separate
and of themselves.
In its suggestion of horror Chicago
is democratic. The rich and the poor alike suffer
from the prevailing lack of taste. The proud “residences”
on the Lake Shore are no pleasanter to gaze upon than
the sulky sky-scrapers. Some of them are prison-houses;
others make a sad attempt at gaiety; all are amazingly
unlike the dwelling-houses of men and women.
Yet their owners are very wealthy. To them nothing
is denied that money can buy, and it is thus that
they prefer to express themselves and their ambitions.
What, then, is tolerable in Chicago? Lincoln Park,
which the smoke and fog of the city have not obscured,
and the grandiose lake, whose fresh splendour no villainy
of man can ever deface. And at one moment of
the day, when a dark cloud hung over the lake, and
the sun set in a red glory behind the sky-scrapers,
each black, and blacker for its encircling smoke,
Chicago rose superior to herself and her surroundings.
After ugliness, the worst foe of Chicago
is dirt. A thick, black, sooty dust lies upon
everything. It is at the peril of hands begrimed
that you attempt to open a window. In the room
that was allotted to me in a gigantic hotel I found
a pair of ancient side-spring boots, once the property,
no doubt, of a prominent citizen, and their apparition
intensified the impression of uncleanness. The
streets are as untidy as the houses; garbage is dumped
in the unfinished roadways; and in or out of your
hotel you will seek comfort in vain. The citizens
of Chicago themselves are far too busy to think whether
their city is spruce or untidy. Money is their
quest, and it matters not in what circumstances they
pursue it. The avid type is universal and insistent.
The energy of New York is said to be mere leisure
compared to the hustling of Chicago. Wherever
you go you are conscious of the universal search after
gold. The vestibule of the hotel is packed with
people chattering, calculating, and telephoning.
The clatter of the machine which registers the latest
quotations never ceases. In the street every one
is hurrying that he may not miss a lucrative bargain,
until the industry and ambition of Chicago culminate
in the Board of Trade.
The dial of the Board of Trade, or
the Pit as it is called, is the magnet which attracts
all the eyes of Chicago, for on its face is marked
the shifting, changing price of wheat. And there
on the floor, below the Strangers’ Gallery,
the gamblers of the West play for the fortunes and
lives of men. They stand between the farmers,
whose waving cornfields they have never seen, and
the peasants of Europe, whose taste for bread they
do not share. It is more keenly exciting to bet
upon the future crop of wheat than upon the speed
of a horse; and far larger sums may be hazarded in
the Pit than on a racecourse. And so the livelong
day the Bulls and Bears confront one another, gesticulating
fiercely, and shouting at the top of their raucous
voices. If on the one hand they ruin the farmer,
or on the other starve the peasant, it matters not
to them. They have enjoyed the excitement, and
made perchance a vast fortune at another’s expense.
They are, indeed, the true parasites of commerce;
and in spite of their intense voices and rapid gestures,
there is an air of unreality about all their transactions.
As I watched the fury of the combatants, I found myself
wondering why samples of corn were thrown upon the
floor. Perhaps they serve to feed the pigeons.
Materialism, then, is the frank end
and aim of Chicago. Its citizens desire to get
rich as quickly and easily as possible. The means
are indifferent to them. It is the pace alone
which is important. All they want is “a
business proposition” and “found money.”
And when they are rich, they have no other desire
than to grow richer. Their money is useless to
them, except to breed more money. The inevitable
result is a savagery of thought and habit. If
we may believe the newspapers of Chicago, peaceful
men of business are “held up” at noon in
crowded streets. The revolver is still a potent
instrument in this city of the backwoods. But
savagery is never without its reaction. There
has seldom been a community of barbarians which did
not find relief in an extravagant sentimentality,
and Chicago, in its hours of ease, is an enthusiastic
patron of the higher life. As I have said, in
culture it is fast outstripping Boston itself.
It boasts more societies whose object is “the
promotion of serious thought upon art, science, and
literature” than any other city in the world.
The clubs which it has established for the proper
study of Ibsen and Browning are without number, It
is as eager for the enlightenment of women as for
sending up or down the price of corn. The craze,
which is the mark of a crude society, will pass like
many others, and, though it may appear sincere while
it lasts, it is not characteristic. The one triumph
of Chicago is its slang. It has invented a lingo
more various and fuller of fancy than any known to
man, and if it will forget Ibsen and exercise its
invention after its own fashion, why should it not
invent a new literature? Mr George Ade, the Shakespeare
of Chicago, has already shown us what can be done with
the new speech in his masterly ‘Fables in Slang,’
to read which is almost as good as a journey to the
West; and there is no reason why he should not found
a school.
Yet with all its faults and absurdities
upon its face, Chicago is the happiest city in America.
It is protected by the triple brass of pride against
all the assaults of its enemies. Never in history
was so sublime a vanity revealed; and it is hard for
a stranger to understand upon what it is based.
Chicago is Chicago that is what its citizens
say, with a flattered smile, which makes argument
useless. Its dirt and dust do not disconcert
its self-esteem. The oversized ugliness of its
buildings are no disappointment to its candid soul,
and if its peculiar virtue escape your observation,
so much the worse for you. “The marvellous
city of the West” that is its own
name, and it lives up to it without an effort.
Its history, as composed by its own citizens, is one
long pæan of praise. One chronicler, to whose
unconscious humour I am infinitely indebted, dedicates
his work to “the children of Chicago, who, if
the Lord spares them until they shall have attained
the allotted span of life, will see this city the
greatest metropolis on the globe.” That
is a modest estimate, and it makes us feel the inadequacy
of our poor speech to hymn the glories of Chicago.
And if you suggest a fault, its panegyrists are always
ready with a counterstroke. Having no taste for
slaughter, I did not visit Packing Town, but, without
admitting all the grave charges brought against Chicago’s
grandest industry, one might have supposed that the
sudden translation of herds of cattle into potted
meat was not unattended with some inconvenience.
This suspicion, you are told, is an insult to the
city. What might disgust the traveller elsewhere
has no terrors in Chicago. “This Packing-Town
odor,” we are told by a zealot, “has been
unjustly criticised. To any one accustomed to
it there is only a pleasant suggestion of rich, ruddy
blood and long rows of tempting ‘sides’
hung up to cool.” I prefer not to be tempted.
I can only bow before the ingenuity of this eulogy.
And if, more seriously, you reproach the cynicism
of the Pit, which on this side or that may compel
ruin, you are met with a very easy rejoinder.
“The Chicago Board of Trade” it
is the same apologist who speaks “is
a world-renowned commercial organisation. It
exercises a wider and a more potential influence over
the welfare of mankind than any other institution
of its kind in existence.” This assurance
leaves you dumb. You might as well argue with
a brass band as with a citizen of Chicago; and doubtless
you would wave the flag yourself if you stayed long
enough in the wonderful West.
But the panegyrist of the Pit, already
quoted, helps us to explain Chicago’s vanity.
“The fortunes made and lost within the walls
of the great building,” says he proudly, “astonish
the world.” If Chicago can only astonish
the world, that is enough. Its citizens fondly
hope that everything they do is on the largest scale.
Size, speed, and prominence are the three gods of
their idolatry. They are not content until they the
citizens are all prominent, and their buildings
are all the largest that cumber the earth. It
is a great comfort to those who gamble away their
substance in the Board of Trade to reflect that the
weathercock that surmounts its tower is the biggest
ever seen by human eye. There is not one of them
that will not tell you, with a satisfied smile, that
the slowest of their fire-engines can go from one end
of the city to the other in five seconds. There
is not one of them who, in the dark recesses of his
mind, is not sure that New York is a “back number.”
They are proud of the senseless height of their houses,
and of the rapidity with which they mount towards
the sky. They are proud of the shapeless towns
which spring up about them like mushrooms in a single
night. In brief, they are proud of all the things
of which they should feel shame; and even when their
buildings have been measured and their pace has been
recognised, their vanity is still a puzzle. For,
when all the world has been satisfactorily amazed,
what boast is left to the citizens of Chicago?
They cannot take delight in the soil, since the most
of them do not belong to it. The patriotism of
the cosmopolitan horde which is huddled together amid
their lofty Cliffs must perforce be an artificial
sentiment. They cannot look with satisfaction
upon the dishevelled suburbs in which they live.
They need not suppose the slaughtering of pigs and
beeves is the highest duty of man. But wherever
they dwell and whatever they do, they are convinced
of their own superiority. Their pride is not
merely revealed in print; it is evident in a general
familiarity of tone and manner. If your cabman
wishes to know your destination, he prefaces his question
with the immortal words, “Say, boys,”
and he thinks that he has put himself on amiable terms
with you at once. Indeed, the newly-arrived stranger
is instantly asked to understand that he belongs to
a far meaner city than that in which he sojourns;
and, even with the evidence of misapplied wealth before
his eyes, he cannot believe it.
And what amiable visions do you carry
away from Chicago besides the majesty of the lake,
ever changing in colour and aspect, and the beauty
of Lincoln Park? A single memory lingers in my
mind. At sunset I saw a black regiment marching
along Michigan Avenue, marching like soldiers;
and by its side on the pavement a laughing, shouting
mob of negresses danced a triumphant cake-walk.
They grinned and sang and chattered in perfect happiness
and pride. They showed a frank pleasure in the
prowess of their brothers and their friends.
But, animated as the spectacle was, there was a sinister
element in this joyous clatter. To an English
eye it seemed a tragic farce a veritable
danse macabre.
Unhappy is the city which has no history;
and what has Chicago to offer of history or tradition?
What has it to tell the traveller? Once she was
consumed, though she was not purified, by fire, and
she still lives in the recollection. A visitor
to a European city goes forth to admire a castle,
a cathedral, a gallery of pictures. In Chicago
he is asked to wonder at the shapeless residences
of “prominent” citizens. And when
the present civilisation fades and dies, what will
be Chicago’s ruins? Neither temple nor
tower will be brought to the ground. There will
be nothing to show the wandering New Zealander but
a broken city, which was a scrap-heap before it was
built; and the wandering New Zealander may be forgiven
if he proclaim the uselessness of size and progress,
if he ask how it has profited a city to buy and sell
all the corn in the world, and in its destruction
to leave not a wrack of comeliness behind.