THE UNITED STATES AND LATIN AMERICA
[1905-1906]
Looking toward the completion of the
Panama Canal, there has been a revival of interest
on the part of the United States in the republics of
South America. From the time of the promulgation
of the Monroe Doctrine, there has been a distant friendship
on our part for these nations. The plan inaugurated
by James G. Blaine when Secretary of State is much
better understood to-day than in his time. In
1881, with the desire of emphasizing the leadership
of the United States in the western hemisphere, he
proposed a congress of all the American nations.
Nothing came of the proposal at the time, but in 1888
Congress passed a resolution providing for such an
international conference. The meeting was in
Washington the following year, and Secretary Blaine,
as chairman, exercised great influence. While
the direct results of the meeting were not great-principally
a declaration in favor of the arbitration of all disputes
among these nations-the indirect benefits
were considerable. In 1901 a second Pan-American
congress was held in the city of Mexico.
In the meantime the trade with these
countries has been largely monopolized by England,
France, and Germany. During the year 1905, the
total exports and imports of the Latin-American countries
amounted to $2,000,000,000. Of this foreign trade
the United States bought 35 per cent of the exports
and sold to these countries only 27 per cent of their
imports, producing an unfavorable balance of trade
amounting to $200,000,000. Of the goods imported
from this country, over one-fourth went to Mexico
and Cuba. In that year Brazil bought from the
United States only 11 per cent of its imports.
Argentina, with a larger foreign trade than either
Japan or China, bought only 14 per cent of its imports
from the United States. With the exception of
Mexico, the foreign commerce of the Latin-American
states with European countries has increased more
rapidly than with the United States. Various reasons
have been given for this situation. The sensitive
South American resents the air of superiority assumed
toward them by the people of the United States.
In our newspapers there is a seeming disregard for
the real evidences of their national development.
Revolutions and boundary disputes have been exaggerated.
In general, citizens of the United States have no
comprehension of the advancement of these countries
within recent times and appreciate but slightly that
their economic future is as fully assured as our own.
Argentina constitutes an excellent example of this
progress. This country has an area of 1,135,840
square miles. Splendid rivers water the immense
plains. The chief of these, the Parana, which
flows 2,000 miles through the country, carries a volume
of water to the sea one and one-half times that of
the Mississippi, and is capable of floating ships
having a draught of 18 feet for 600 miles into the
interior. Buenos Ayres, with a population of
1,000,000, in 1906 had a volume of foreign trade amounting
to $562,000,000, constituting it the twelfth port
in the world. In 1905 over 10,000,000 acres of
land were cultivated in Argentina, an increase of
fourfold within fifteen years. The cereals, cotton,
fruits, and meats produced amounted to $350,000,000.
That the volume of trade between this
country and the South American states has been so
small has been due also to the fact that so few vessels
flying the stars and stripes are engaged in this trade.
According to the report of Secretary Root, in 1906,
there were in the harbor of Rio Janeiro the previous
year, 1,785 ships flying the flag of Great Britain;
657 the flag of Germany; 349 the French; 142 the Norwegian,
and 7 sailing vessels (two of them in distress) the
flag of the United States. The bulk of goods
from this country to South America goes by the way
of European ports and on foreign ships.
July 4, 1906, the third Pan-American
conference was opened at Rio Janeiro. Among the
leading questions discussed were: (1) the right
of creditor nations to enforce by war on the debtor
nations contractual obligations, or the right to use
gun-boats as collection agents; and (2) those relating
to commercial intercourse. Besides the regular
delegates from the United States, Elihu Root, Secretary
of State, was present at the opening session.
His address at this meeting, together with his visit
to the leading cities, served to inaugurate a new understanding
between these countries and the United States.
The true American policy was set forth by Secretary
Root in the following toast: “May the independence,
the freedom, and the rights of the least and weakest
be ever respected equally with the rights of the strongest,
and may we all do our share toward the building up
of a sound and enlightened public opinion of the Americas
which shall everywhere, upon both continents, mightily
promote the reign of peace, of order, and of justice
in every American republic.” He went as
Ambassador Extraordinary representing the President
of the United States. In order to emphasize his
official position, he travelled on an American war-ship.
His addresses made in the various cities were intended
to be an official declaration from the government
of the United States, and that position was outlined
in his formal address before the congress. “We
wish for no victories,” he said, “but
those of peace; for no territory except our own; for
no sovereignty except the sovereignty over ourselves.
We deem the independence and equal rights of the smallest
and weakest member of the family of nations entitled
to as much respect as those of the greatest empire,
and we deem the observance of that respect the chief
guaranty of the weak against the oppression of the
strong. We neither claim nor desire any rights
or privileges or powers that we do not freely concede
to every American republic. We wish to increase
our prosperity, to expand our trade, to grow in wealth,
in wisdom, and in spirit, but our conception of the
true way to accomplish this is not to pull down others
and profit by their ruin, but to help all friends
to a common prosperity and a common growth, that we
may all become greater and stronger together.”
The International Bureau of American
Republics was founded as a result of the first Pan-American
conference. The original plans of the founders
were not carried out owing to a lack of interest on
the part of the Department of State as well as in
the foreign offices of the South American countries.
Secretary Root determined to make this bureau an efficient
agency for bringing about better relations between
the two continents. He defined the main purpose
to be not only to build up trade and commerce among
all American nations, but to promote more friendly
relations, a better understanding of each other, and
the general prosperity and well-being of all the countries
of the American continents. Through gifts from
Andrew Carnegie and contributions from the different
South American states a splendid modern building, costing
$1,000,000, was erected in Washington, 1908, as the
home of the Bureau of the Pan-American Republics.
Besides other enterprises, the Bureau publishes a
monthly periodical which contains information on the
commerce, new enterprises, and general development
of each republic.
With these new relationships came
a new interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine.
At various times European nations have engaged in
controversies with South American states over the payment
of debts due the citizens of the former. The
question has then arisen, to what extent shall the
United States permit the use of force against the debtor
nations? The wider application of the Monroe Doctrine
under President Cleveland looking toward the maintenance
of the rights of the weaker American nations, has
been followed by recognition of our obligation to
secure the performance of duties by those nations.
Said President Roosevelt (1905): “We cannot
permanently adhere to the Monroe Doctrine unless we
succeed in making it evident, in the first place, that
we do not intend to treat it in any shape or way as
an excuse for aggrandizement on our part at the expense
of the republics to the south of us; second, that
we do not intend to permit it to be used by any of
these republics as a shield to protect that republic
from the consequences of its own misdeeds against
foreign nations; third, that inasmuch as by this doctrine
we prevent other nations from interfering on this
side of the water, we shall ourselves in good faith
try to help those of our sister republics, which need
such help, upward toward peace and order.”
The immediate cause for this statement
by President Roosevelt was the problem confronting
our government on account of the bankrupt condition
of the Republic of Santo Domingo. Debts had accumulated
for over thirty years until by the beginning of 1905
they amounted to more than $32,000,000. Each
successive ruler became a more reckless borrower and
new loans were secured upon harsher terms.
Finally affairs were brought to a
crisis on account of the pressure on the part of the
French and Italian governments for the payment of the
claims of their citizens. The republic was on
the verge of dissolution when President Roosevelt
intervened. European governments were satisfied,
for it signified the payment of their claims.
An agreement was signed by representatives of the
government of Santo Domingo and of the United States
whereby the United States was to undertake the task
of collecting and apportioning the revenues of Santo
Domingo. The stipulation was made that no plan
of annexation, purchase, or permanent control on the
part of the United States should ensue. Agents
were to be appointed by the United States who should
take charge of the customhouses. Forty-five per
cent of the total receipts were to be used in carrying
on the affairs of the republic and the balance was
to go to pay the indebtedness. In his message,
February, 1905, President Roosevelt, pressing upon
the Senate the urgent need for the ratification of
this agreement, said: “The state of things
in Santo Domingo has become hopeless unless the United
States or some other strong government shall interpose
to bring order out of chaos. . . . If the United
States declines to take action and other foreign governments
resort to action to secure payment of their claims,
the latter would be entitled, according to the decision
of the Hague Tribunal in the Venezuela cases, to the
preferential payment of their claims; and this would
absorb all the Dominican revenues and would be a virtual
sacrifice of American claims and interests in the
island. If, moreover, any such action should
be taken by them, the only method to enable the payment
of their claims would be to take possession of the
custom-houses, and, considering the state of the Dominican
finances, this would mean a definite and very possibly
permanent occupation of Dominican territory, for no
period could be set to the time which would be necessarily
required for the payment of their obligations and
unliquidated claims.” The Senate, in special
session, shirked responsibility and refused either
to ratify or reject the treaty.
With the revolutionists on the island
growing stronger and the European Powers becoming
more insistent, President Roosevelt, disregarding the
attitude of the Senate, appointed an American as receiver
of customs. The move proved immediately successful.
The insurrection died out, trade revived, smuggling
ceased, and the people were infused with a new spirit.
There was also a remarkable increase in the customs
receipts, those of 1906 showing an increase of 44
per cent over the receipts of 1905 and 72 per cent
over those of 1904. Although only 45 per cent
of the revenues collected were turned over to the
Dominican government, this sum was almost double the
amount which they had received when they had control
of the collection themselves.
After two years of discussion, the
treaty was ratified by the Senate, February 25, 1907,
and by the Dominican Congress, May 3. The terms
were practically those which had been carried out
by order of President Roosevelt. The United States,
in a sense, became the trustee of Santo Domingo, and
thus established a new relation between this country
and the smaller republics of the western hemisphere.