By N. P. Willis
The ancient fable of two antagonistic
spirits imprisoned in one body, equally powerful and
having the complete mastery by turns-of one man, that
is to say, inhabited by both a devil and an angel seems
to have been realized, if all we hear is true, in
the character of the extraordinary man whose name
we have written above. Our own impression of
the nature of Edgar A. Poe, differs in some important
degree, however, from that which has been generally
conveyed in the notices of his death. Let us,
before telling what we personally know of him, copy
a graphic and highly finished portraiture, from the
pen of Dr. Rufus W. Griswold, which appeared in a
recent number of the “Tribune”:
“Edgar Allen Poe is dead.
He died in Baltimore on Sunday, October 7th.
This announcement will startle many, but few will be
grieved by it. The poet was known, personally
or by reputation, in all this country; he had readers
in England and in several of the states of Continental
Europe; but he had few or no friends; and the regrets
for his death will be suggested principally by the
consideration that in him literary art has lost one
of its most brilliant but erratic stars.
“His conversation was at times
almost supramortal in its eloquence. His voice
was modulated with astonishing skill, and his large
and variably expressive eyes looked repose or shot
fiery tumult into theirs who listened, while his own
face glowed, or was changeless in pallor, as his imagination
quickened his blood or drew it back frozen to his heart.
His imagery was from the worlds which no mortals can
see but with the vision of genius. Suddenly starting
from a proposition, exactly and sharply defined, in
terms of utmost simplicity and clearness, he rejected
the forms of customary logic, and by a crystalline
process of accretion, built up his ocular demonstrations
in forms of gloomiest and ghastliest grandeur, or
in those of the most airy and delicious beauty, so
minutely and distinctly, yet so rapidly, that the
attention which was yielded to him was chained till
it stood among his wonderful creations, till he himself
dissolved the spell, and brought his hearers back to
common and base existence, by vulgar fancies or exhibitions
of the ignoblest passion.
“He was at all times a dreamer-dwelling
in ideal realms-in heaven or hell-peopled with the
creatures and the accidents of his brain. He
walked-the streets, in madness or melancholy, with
lips moving in indistinct curses, or with eyes upturned
in passionate prayer (never for himself, for he felt,
or professed to feel, that he was already damned,
but) for their happiness who at the moment were objects
of his idolatry; or with his glances introverted to
a heart gnawed with anguish, and with a face shrouded
in gloom, he would brave the wildest storms, and all
night, with drenched garments and arms beating the
winds and rains, would speak as if the spirits that
at such times only could be evoked by him from the
Aidenn, close by whose portals his disturbed soul sought
to forget the ills to which his constitution subjected
him –close by the Aidenn where were
those he loved-the Aidenn which he might never see,
but in fitful glimpses, as its gates opened to receive
the less fiery and more happy natures whose destiny
to sin did not involve the doom of death.
“He seemed, except when some
fitful pursuit subjugated his will and engrossed his
faculties, always to bear the memory of some controlling
sorrow. The remarkable poem of ‘The Raven’
was probably much more nearly than has been supposed,
even by those who were very intimate with him, a reflection
and an echo of his own history. He was that
bird’s
“’Unhappy
master whom unmerciful Disaster
Followed fast and followed
faster till his songs one burden bore
Till the dirges of his
Hope that melancholy burden bore
Of
‘Never-never more.’
“Every genuine author in a greater
or less degree leaves in his works, whatever their
design, traces of his personal character: elements
of his immortal being, in which the individual survives
the person. While we read the pages of the ‘Fall
of the House of Usher,’ or of ’Mesmeric
Revelations,’ we see in the solemn and stately
gloom which invests one, and in the subtle metaphysical
analysis of both, indications of the idiosyncrasies
of what was most remarkable and peculiar in the author’s
intellectual nature. But we see here only the
better phases of his nature, only the symbols of his
juster action, for his harsh experience had deprived
him of all faith in man or woman. He had made
up his mind upon the numberless complexities of the
social world, and the whole system with him was an
imposture. This conviction gave a direction to
his shrewd and naturally unamiable character.
Still, though he regarded society as composed altogether
of villains, the sharpness of his intellect was not
of that kind which enabled him to cope with villany,
while it continually caused him by overshots to fail
of the success of honesty. He was in many respects
like Francis Vivian in Bulwer’s novel of ‘The
Caxtons.’ Passion, in him, comprehended many
of the worst emotions which militate against human
happiness. You could not contradict him, but
you raised quick choler; you could not speak of wealth,
but his cheek paled with gnawing envy. The astonishing
natural advantages of this poor boy his
beauty, his readiness, the daring spirit that breathed
around him like a fiery atmosphere had raised
his constitutional self-confidence into an arrogance
that turned his very claims to admiration into prejudices
against him. Irascible, envious bad
enough, but not the worst, for these salient angles
were all varnished over with a cold, repellant cynicism,
his passions vented themselves in sneers. There
seemed to him no moral susceptibility; and, what was
more remarkable in a proud nature, little or nothing
of the true point of honor. He had, to a morbid
excess, that, desire to rise which is vulgarly called
ambition, but no wish for the esteem or the love of
his species; only the hard wish to succeed-not shine,
not serve succeed, that he might have the
right to despise a world which galled his self-conceit.
“We have suggested the influence
of his aims and vicissitudes upon his literature.
It was more conspicuous in his later than in his earlier
writings. Nearly all that he wrote in the last
two or three years-including much of his best poetry-was
in some sense biographical; in draperies of his imagination,
those who had taken the trouble to trace his steps,
could perceive, but slightly concealed, the figure
of himself.”
Apropos of the disparaging portion
of the above well-written sketch, let us truthfully
say:
Some four or five years since, when
editing a daily paper in this city, Mr. Poe was employed
by us, for several months, as critic and sub-editor.
This was our first personal acquaintance with him.
He resided with his wife and mother at Fordham, a
few miles out of town, but was at his desk in the
office, from nine in the morning till the evening
paper went to press. With the highest admiration
for his genius, and a willingness to let it atone
for more than ordinary irregularity, we were led by
common report to expect a very capricious attention
to his duties, and occasionally a scene of violence
and difficulty. Time went on, however, and he
was invariably punctual and industrious. With
his pale, beautiful, and intellectual face, as a reminder
of what genius was in him, it was impossible, of course,
not to treat him always with deferential courtesy,
and, to our occasional request that he would not probe
too deep in a criticism, or that he would erase a passage
colored too highly with his resentments against society
and mankind, he readily and courteously assented-far
more yielding than most men, we thought, on points
so excusably sensitive. With a prospect of taking
the lead in another periodical, he, at last, voluntarily
gave up his employment with us, and, through all this
considerable period, we had seen but one presentment
of the man-a quiet, patient, industrious, and most
gentlemanly person, commanding the utmost respect and
good feeling by his unvarying deportment and ability.
Residing as he did in the country,
we never met Mr. Poe in hours of leisure; but he frequently
called on us afterward at our place of business, and
we met him often in the street-invariably the same
sad mannered, winning and refined gentleman, such
as we had always known him. It was by rumor only,
up to the day of his death, that we knew of any other
development of manner or character. We heard,
from one who knew him well (what should be stated
in all mention of his lamentable irregularities),
that, with a single glass of wine, his whole nature
was reversed, the demon became uppermost, and, though
none of the usual signs of intoxication were visible,
his will was palpably insane. Possessing his
reasoning faculties in excited activity, at such times,
and seeking his acquaintances with his wonted look
and memory, he easily seemed personating only another
phase of his natural character, and was accused, accordingly,
of insulting arrogance and bad-heartedness. In
this reversed character, we repeat, it was never our
chance to see him. We know it from hearsay, and
we mention it in connection with this sad infirmity
of physical constitution; which puts it upon very nearly
the ground of a temporary and almost irresponsible
insanity.
The arrogance, vanity, and depravity
of heart, of which Mr. Poe was generally accused,
seem to us referable altogether to this reversed phase
of his character. Under that degree of intoxication
which only acted upon him by demonizing his sense
of truth and right, he doubtless said and did much
that was wholly irreconcilable with his better nature;
but, when himself, and as we knew him only, his modesty
and unaffected humility, as to his own deservings,
were a constant charm to his character. His letters,
of which the constant application for autographs has
taken from us, we are sorry to confess, the greater
portion, exhibited this quality very strongly.
In one of the carelessly written notes of which we
chance still to retain possession, for instance, he
speaks of “The Raven” that extraordinary
poem which electrified the world of imaginative readers,
and has become the type of a school of poetry of its
own-and, in evident earnest, attributes its success
to the few words of commendation with which we had
prefaced it in this paper. It will throw
light on his sane character to give a literal copy
of the note:
“Fordham,
April 20, 1849
“My dear Willis The
poem which I inclose, and which I am so vain as to
hope you will like, in some respects, has been just
published in a paper for which sheer necessity compels
me to write, now and then. It pays well as times
go-but unquestionably it ought to pay ten prices; for
whatever I send it I feel I am consigning to the tomb
of the Capulets. The verses accompanying
this, may I beg you to take out of the tomb, and bring
them to light in the ‘Home journal?’ If
you can oblige me so far as to copy them, I do not
think it will be necessary to say ’From the
, that would be too bad; and, perhaps,
‘From a late paper,’
would do.
“I have not forgotten how a
‘good word in season’ from you made ’The
Raven,’ and made ‘Ulalume’ (which
by-the-way, people have done me the honor of attributing
to you), therefore, I would ask you (if I dared) to
say something of these lines if they please you.
“Truly
yours ever,
“EdgarA. Poe.”
In double proof of his earnest disposition
to do the best for himself, and of the trustful and
grateful nature which has been denied him, we give
another of the only three of his notes which we chance
to retain:
“Fordham,
January 22, 1848.
“My dear Mr. Willis I
am about to make an effort at re-establishing myself
in the literary world, and feel that I may depend
upon your aid.
“My general aim is to start
a Magazine, to be called ‘The Stylus,’
but it would be useless to me, even when established,
if not entirely out of the control of a publisher.
I mean, therefore, to get up a journal which shall
be my own at all points. With this end
in view, I must get a list of at least five hundred
subscribers to begin with; nearly two hundred I have
already. I propose, however, to go South and West,
among my personal and literary friends old
college and West Point acquaintances and
see what I can do. In order to get the means of
taking the first step, I propose to lecture at the
Society Library, on Thursday, the 3d of February,
and, that there may be no cause of squabbling,
my subject shall not be literary at all.
I have chosen a broad text: ‘The Universe.’
“Having thus given you the
facts of the case, I leave all the rest to the
suggestions of your own tact and generosity. Gratefully,
most gratefully,
"Your friend
always,
"EDGAR
A. POE.”
Brief and chance-taken as these letters
are, we think they sufficiently prove the existence
of the very qualities denied to Mr. Poe-humility,
willingness to persevere, belief in another’s
friendship, and capability of cordial and grateful
friendship! Such he assuredly was when sane.
Such only he has invariably seemed to us, in all we
have happened personally to know of him, through a
friendship of five or six years. And so much
easier is it to believe what we have seen and known,
than what we hear of only, that we remember him but
with admiration and respect; these descriptions of
him, when morally insane, seeming to us like portraits,
painted in sickness, of a man we have only known in
health.
But there is another, more touching,
and far more forcible evidence that there was goodness
in Edgar A. Poe. To reveal it we are obliged
to venture upon the lifting of the veil which sacredly
covers grief and refinement in poverty; but we think
it may be excused, if so we can brighten the memory
of the poet, even were there not a more needed and
immediate service which it may render to the nearest
link broken by his death.
Our first knowledge of Mr. Poe’s
removal to this city was by a call which we received
from a lady who introduced herself to us as the mother
of his wife. She was in search of employment for
him, and she excused her errand by mentioning that
he was ill, that her daughter was a confirmed invalid,
and that their circumstances were such as compelled
her taking it upon herself. The countenance of
this lady, made beautiful and saintly with an evidently
complete giving up of her life to privation and sorrowful
tenderness, her gentle and mournful voice urging its
plea, her long-forgotten but habitually and unconsciously
refined manners, and her appealing and yet appreciative
mention of the claims and abilities of her son, disclosed
at once the presence of one of those angels upon earth
that women in adversity can be. It was a hard
fate that she was watching over. Mr. Poe wrote
with fastidious difficulty, and in a style too much
above the popular level to be well paid. He was
always in pecuniary difficulty, and, with his sick
wife, frequently in want of the merest necessaries
of life. Winter after winter, for years, the
most touching sight to us, in this whole city, has
been that tireless minister to genius, thinly and
insufficiently clad, going from office to office with
a poem, or an article on some literary subject, to
sell, sometimes simply pleading in a broken voice that
he was ill, and begging for him, mentioning nothing
but that “he was ill,” whatever might
be the reason for his writing nothing, and never, amid
all her tears and recitals of distress, suffering
one syllable to escape her lips that could convey
a doubt of him, or a complaint, or a lessening of
pride in his genius and good intentions. Her daughter
died a year and a half since, but she did not desert
him. She continued his ministering angel living
with him, caring for him, guarding him against exposure,
and when he was carried away by temptation, amid grief
and the loneliness of feelings unreplied to, and awoke
from his self abandonment prostrated in destitution
and suffering, begging for him still. If
woman’s devotion, born with a first love, and
fed with human passion, hallow its object, as it is
allowed to do, what does not a devotion like this-pure,
disinterested and holy as the watch of an invisible
spirit-say for him who inspired it?
We have a letter before us, written
by this lady, Mrs. Clemm, on the morning in which
she heard of the death of this object of her untiring
care. It is merely a request that we would call
upon her, but we will copy a few of its words sacred
as its privacy is to warrant the truth
of the picture we have drawn above, and add force to
the appeal we wish to make for her:
“I have this morning heard of
the death of my darling Eddie.... Can you give
me any circumstances or particulars?... Oh! do
not desert your poor friend in his bitter affliction!...
Ask Mr. to come, as I must deliver
a message to him from my poor Eddie.... I need
not ask you to notice his death and to speak well
of him. I know you will. But say what an
affectionate son he was to me, his poor desolate mother...”
To hedge round a grave with respect,
what choice is there, between the relinquished wealth
and honors of the world, and the story of such a woman’s
unrewarded devotion! Risking what we do, in delicacy,
by making it public, we feel other reasons
aside that it betters the world to make
known that there are such ministrations to its erring
and gifted. What we have said will speak to some
hearts. There are those who will be glad to know
how the lamp, whose light of poetry has beamed on their
far-away recognition, was watched over with care and
pain, that they may send to her, who is more darkened
than they by its extinction, some token of their sympathy.
She is destitute and alone. If any, far or near,
will send to us what may aid and cheer her through
the remainder of her life, we will joyfully place
it in her bands.