CONSIDERED AS ONE OF THE EXACT SCIENCES.
Hey, diddle diddle
The cat and the
fiddle
SINCE the world began there have been
two Jeremys. The one wrote a Jeremiad about usury,
and was called Jeremy Bentham. He has been much
admired by Mr. John Neal, and was a great man in a
small way. The other gave name to the most important
of the Exact Sciences, and was a great man in a great
way I may say, indeed, in the very greatest
of ways.
Diddling or the abstract
idea conveyed by the verb to diddle is
sufficiently well understood. Yet the fact, the
deed, the thing diddling, is somewhat difficult to
define. We may get, however, at a tolerably distinct
conception of the matter in hand, by defining not
the thing, diddling, in itself but man,
as an animal that diddles. Had Plato but hit
upon this, he would have been spared the affront of
the picked chicken.
Very pertinently it was demanded of
Plato, why a picked chicken, which was clearly “a
biped without feathers,” was not, according to
his own definition, a man? But I am not to be
bothered by any similar query. Man is an animal
that diddles, and there is no animal that diddles but
man. It will take an entire hen-coop of picked
chickens to get over that.
What constitutes the essence, the
nare, the principle of diddling is, in fact,
peculiar to the class of creatures that wear coats
and pantaloons. A crow thieves; a fox cheats;
a weasel outwits; a man diddles. To diddle is
his destiny. “Man was made to mourn,”
says the poet. But not so: he was
made to diddle. This is his aim his
object his end. And for this reason
when a man’s diddled we say he’s “done.”
Diddling, rightly considered, is a
compound, of which the ingredients are minuteness,
interest, perseverance, ingenuity, audacity, nonchalance,
originality, impertinence, and grin.
Minuteness: Your diddler
is minute. His operations are upon a small scale.
His business is retail, for cash, or approved paper
at sight. Should he ever be tempted into magnificent
speculation, he then, at once, loses his distinctive
features, and becomes what we term “financier.”
This latter word conveys the diddling idea in every
respect except that of magnitude. A diddler may
thus be regarded as a banker in petto a
“financial operation,” as a diddle at Brobdignag.
The one is to the other, as Homer to “Flaccus” as
a Mastodon to a mouse as the tail of a
comet to that of a pig.
Interest: Your diddler
is guided by self-interest. He scorns to diddle
for the mere sake of the diddle. He has an object
in view his pocket and yours.
He regards always the main chance. He looks to
Number One. You are Number Two, and must look
to yourself.
Perseverance: Your diddler
perseveres. He is not readily discouraged.
Should even the banks break, he cares nothing about
it. He steadily pursues his end, and ‘Ut
canis a corio nunquam absterrebitur uncto,’
so he never lets go of his game.
Ingenuity: Your diddler
is ingenious. He has constructiveness large.
He understands plot. He invents and circumvents.
Were he not Alexander he would be Diogenes. Were
he not a diddler, he would be a maker of patent rat-traps
or an angler for trout.
Audacity: Your diddler
is audacious. He is a bold man. He
carries the war into Africa. He conquers all
by assault. He would not fear the daggers of
Frey Herren. With a little more prudence Dick
Turpin would have made a good diddler; with a trifle
less blarney, Daniel O’Connell; with a pound
or two more brains Charles the Twelfth.
Nonchalance: Your diddler
is nonchalant. He is not at all nervous.
He never had any nerves. He is never seduced
into a flurry. He is never put out unless
put out of doors. He is cool cool as
a cucumber. He is calm “calm
as a smile from Lady Bury.” He is easy easy
as an old glove, or the damsels of ancient Baiae.
Originality: Your diddler
is original conscientiously so. His
thoughts are his own. He would scorn to employ
those of another. A stale trick is his aversion.
He would return a purse, I am sure, upon discovering
that he had obtained it by an unoriginal diddle.
Impertinence. Your diddler
is impertinent. He swaggers. He sets his
arms a-kimbo. He thrusts his hands in his trowsers’
pockets. He sneers in your face. He treads
on your corns. He eats your dinner, he drinks
your wine, he borrows your money, he pulls your nose,
he kicks your poodle, and he kisses your wife.
Grin: Your true diddler
winds up all with a grin. But this nobody sees
but himself. He grins when his daily work is done when
his allotted labors are accomplished at
night in his own closet, and altogether for his own
private entertainment. He goes home. He locks
his door. He divests himself of his clothes.
He puts out his candle. He gets into bed.
He places his head upon the pillow. All this done,
and your diddler grins. This is no hypothesis.
It is a matter of course. I reason a priori,
and a diddle would be no diddle without a grin.
The origin of the diddle is referrable
to the infancy of the Human Race. Perhaps the
first diddler was Adam. At all events, we can
trace the science back to a very remote period of
antiquity. The moderns, however, have brought
it to a perfection never dreamed of by our thick-headed
progenitors. Without pausing to speak of the “old
saws,” therefore, I shall content myself with
a compendious account of some of the more “modern
instances.”
A very good diddle is this. A
housekeeper in want of a sofa, for instance, is seen
to go in and out of several cabinet warehouses.
At length she arrives at one offering an excellent
variety. She is accosted, and invited to enter,
by a polite and voluble individual at the door.
She finds a sofa well adapted to her views, and upon
inquiring the price, is surprised and delighted to
hear a sum named at least twenty per cent. lower than
her expectations. She hastens to make the purchase,
gets a bill and receipt, leaves her address, with a
request that the article be sent home as speedily
as possible, and retires amid a profusion of bows
from the shopkeeper. The night arrives and no
sofa. A servant is sent to make inquiry about
the delay. The whole transaction is denied.
No sofa has been sold no money received except
by the diddler, who played shop-keeper for the nonce.
Our cabinet warehouses are left entirely
unattended, and thus afford every facility for a trick
of this kind. Visiters enter, look at furniture,
and depart unheeded and unseen. Should any one
wish to purchase, or to inquire the price of an article,
a bell is at hand, and this is considered amply sufficient.
Again, quite a respectable diddle
is this. A well-dressed individual enters a shop,
makes a purchase to the value of a dollar; finds, much
to his vexation, that he has left his pocket-book
in another coat pocket; and so says to the shopkeeper
“My dear sir, never mind; just
oblige me, will you, by sending the bundle home?
But stay! I really believe that I have nothing
less than a five dollar bill, even there. However,
you can send four dollars in change with the bundle,
you know.”
“Very good, sir,” replies
the shop-keeper, who entertains, at once, a lofty
opinion of the high-mindedness of his customer.
“I know fellows,” he says to himself,
“who would just have put the goods under their
arm, and walked off with a promise to call and pay
the dollar as they came by in the afternoon.”
A boy is sent with the parcel and
change. On the route, quite accidentally, he
is met by the purchaser, who exclaims:
“Ah! This is my bundle,
I see I thought you had been home with it,
long ago. Well, go on! My wife, Mrs. Trotter,
will give you the five dollars I left instructions
with her to that effect. The change you might
as well give to me I shall want some silver
for the Post Office. Very good! One, two,
is this a good quarter? three, four quite
right! Say to Mrs. Trotter that you met me, and
be sure now and do not loiter on the way.”
The boy doesn’t loiter at all but
he is a very long time in getting back from his errand for
no lady of the precise name of Mrs. Trotter is to
be discovered. He consoles himself, however, that
he has not been such a fool as to leave the goods
without the money, and re-entering his shop with a
self-satisfied air, feels sensibly hurt and indignant
when his master asks him what has become of the change.
A very simple diddle, indeed, is this.
The captain of a ship, which is about to sail, is
presented by an official looking person with an unusually
moderate bill of city charges. Glad to get off
so easily, and confused by a hundred duties pressing
upon him all at once, he discharges the claim forthwith.
In about fifteen minutes, another and less reasonable
bill is handed him by one who soon makes it evident
that the first collector was a diddler, and the original
collection a diddle.
And here, too, is a somewhat similar
thing. A steamboat is casting loose from the
wharf. A traveller, portmanteau in hand, is discovered
running toward the wharf, at full speed. Suddenly,
he makes a dead halt, stoops, and picks up something
from the ground in a very agitated manner. It
is a pocket-book, and “Has any gentleman
lost a pocketbook?” he cries. No one can
say that he has exactly lost a pocket-book; but a great
excitement ensues, when the treasure trove is found
to be of value. The boat, however, must not be
detained.
“Time and tide wait for no man,” says
the captain.
“For God’s sake, stay
only a few minutes,” says the finder of the
book “the true claimant will presently
appear.”
“Can’t wait!” replies
the man in authority; “cast off there, d’ye
hear?”
“What am I to do?” asks
the finder, in great tribulation. “I am
about to leave the country for some years, and I cannot
conscientiously retain this large amount in my possession.
I beg your pardon, sir,” [here he addresses
a gentleman on shore,] “but you have the air
of an honest man. Will you confer upon me the
favor of taking charge of this pocket-book I
know I can trust you and of advertising
it? The notes, you see, amount to a very considerable
sum. The owner will, no doubt, insist upon rewarding
you for your trouble
“Me! no, you! it was you
who found the book.”
“Well, if you must have it so I
will take a small reward just to satisfy
your scruples. Let me see why these
notes are all hundreds bless my soul! a
hundred is too much to take fifty would
be quite enough, I am sure
“Cast off there!” says the captain.
“But then I have no change for
a hundred, and upon the whole, you had better
“Cast off there!” says the captain.
“Never mind!” cries the
gentleman on shore, who has been examining his own
pocket-book for the last minute or so “never
mind! I can fix it here is a fifty
on the Bank of North America throw the book.”
And the over-conscientious finder
takes the fifty with marked reluctance, and throws
the gentleman the book, as desired, while the steamboat
fumes and fizzes on her way. In about half an
hour after her departure, the “large amount”
is seen to be a “counterfeit presentment,”
and the whole thing a capital diddle.
A bold diddle is this. A camp-meeting,
or something similar, is to be held at a certain spot
which is accessible only by means of a free bridge.
A diddler stations himself upon this bridge, respectfully
informs all passers by of the new county law, which
establishes a toll of one cent for foot passengers,
two for horses and donkeys, and so forth, and so forth.
Some grumble but all submit, and the diddler goes
home a wealthier man by some fifty or sixty dollars
well earned. This taking a toll from a great
crowd of people is an excessively troublesome thing.
A neat diddle is this. A friend
holds one of the diddler’s promises to pay,
filled up and signed in due form, upon the ordinary
blanks printed in red ink. The diddler purchases
one or two dozen of these blanks, and every day dips
one of them in his soup, makes his dog jump for it,
and finally gives it to him as a bonne bouche.
The note arriving at maturity, the diddler, with the
diddler’s dog, calls upon the friend, and the
promise to pay is made the topic of discussion.
The friend produces it from his escritoire, and is
in the act of reaching it to the diddler, when up
jumps the diddler’s dog and devours it forthwith.
The diddler is not only surprised but vexed and incensed
at the absurd behavior of his dog, and expresses his
entire readiness to cancel the obligation at any moment
when the evidence of the obligation shall be forthcoming.
A very mean diddle is this. A
lady is insulted in the street by a diddler’s
accomplice. The diddler himself flies to her assistance,
and, giving his friend a comfortable thrashing, insists
upon attending the lady to her own door. He bows,
with his hand upon his heart, and most respectfully
bids her adieu. She entreats him, as her deliverer,
to walk in and be introduced to her big brother and
her papa. With a sigh, he declines to do so.
“Is there no way, then, sir,” she murmurs,
“in which I may be permitted to testify my gratitude?”
“Why, yes, madam, there is.
Will you be kind enough to lend me a couple of shillings?”
In the first excitement of the moment
the lady decides upon fainting outright. Upon
second thought, however, she opens her purse-strings
and delivers the specie. Now this, I say, is
a diddle minute for one entire moiety of
the sum borrowed has to be paid to the gentleman who
had the trouble of performing the insult, and who
had then to stand still and be thrashed for performing
it.
Rather a small but still a scientific
diddle is this. The diddler approaches the bar
of a tavern, and demands a couple of twists of tobacco.
These are handed to him, when, having slightly examined
them, he says:
“I don’t much like this
tobacco. Here, take it back, and give me a glass
of brandy and water in its place.” The brandy
and water is furnished and imbibed, and the diddler
makes his way to the door. But the voice of the
tavern-keeper arrests him.
“I believe, sir, you have forgotten
to pay for your brandy and water.”
“Pay for my brandy and water! didn’t
I give you the tobacco for the brandy and water?
What more would you have?”
“But, sir, if you please, I
don’t remember that you paid me for the tobacco.”
“What do you mean by that, you
scoundrel? Didn’t I give you back
your tobacco? Isn’t that your tobacco lying
there? Do you expect me to pay for what I did
not take?”
“But, sir,” says the publican,
now rather at a loss what to say, “but sir-”
“But me no buts, sir,”
interrupts the diddler, apparently in very high dudgeon,
and slamming the door after him, as he makes his escape. “But
me no buts, sir, and none of your tricks upon
travellers.”
Here again is a very clever diddle,
of which the simplicity is not its least recommendation.
A purse, or pocket-book, being really lost, the loser
inserts in one of the daily papers of a large city
a fully descriptive advertisement.
Whereupon our diddler copies the facts
of this advertisement, with a change of heading, of
general phraseology and address. The original,
for instance, is long, and verbose, is headed “A
Pocket-Book Lost!” and requires the treasure,
when found, to be left at N Tom Street. The
copy is brief, and being headed with “Lost”
only, indicates N Dick, or N Harry Street,
as the locality at which the owner may be seen.
Moreover, it is inserted in at least five or six of
the daily papers of the day, while in point of time,
it makes its appearance only a few hours after the
original. Should it be read by the loser of the
purse, he would hardly suspect it to have any reference
to his own misfortune. But, of course, the chances
are five or six to one, that the finder will repair
to the address given by the diddler, rather than to
that pointed out by the rightful proprietor.
The former pays the reward, pockets the treasure and
decamps.
Quite an analogous diddle is this.
A lady of ton has dropped, some where in the street,
a diamond ring of very unusual value. For its
recovery, she offers some forty or fifty dollars reward giving,
in her advertisement, a very minute description of
the gem, and of its settings, and declaring that,
on its restoration at No. so and so, in such and such
Avenue, the reward would be paid instanter, without
a single question being asked. During the lady’s
absence from home, a day or two afterwards, a ring
is heard at the door of No. so and so, in such and
such Avenue; a servant appears; the lady of the house
is asked for and is declared to be out, at which astounding
information, the visitor expresses the most poignant
regret. His business is of importance and concerns
the lady herself. In fact, he had the good fortune
to find her diamond ring. But perhaps it would
be as well that he should call again. “By
no means!” says the servant; and “By no
means!” says the lady’s sister and the
lady’s sister-in-law, who are summoned forthwith.
The ring is clamorously identified, the reward is
paid, and the finder nearly thrust out of doors.
The lady returns and expresses some little dissatisfaction
with her sister and sister-in-law, because they happen
to have paid forty or fifty dollars for a fac-simile
of her diamond ring a fac-simile made out
of real pinch-beck and unquestionable paste.
But as there is really no end to diddling,
so there would be none to this essay, were I even
to hint at half the variations, or inflections, of
which this science is susceptible. I must bring
this paper, perforce, to a conclusion, and this I
cannot do better than by a summary notice of a very
decent, but rather elaborate diddle, of which our own
city was made the theatre, not very long ago, and
which was subsequently repeated with success, in other
still more verdant localities of the Union. A
middle-aged gentleman arrives in town from parts unknown.
He is remarkably precise, cautious, staid, and deliberate
in his demeanor. His dress is scrupulously neat,
but plain, unostentatious. He wears a white cravat,
an ample waistcoat, made with an eye to comfort alone;
thick-soled cosy-looking shoes, and pantaloons without
straps. He has the whole air, in fact, of your
well-to-do, sober-sided, exact, and respectable “man
of business,” Par excellence one of
the stern and outwardly hard, internally soft, sort
of people that we see in the crack high comedies fellows
whose words are so many bonds, and who are noted for
giving away guineas, in charity, with the one hand,
while, in the way of mere bargain, they exact the
uttermost fraction of a farthing with the other.
He makes much ado before he can get
suited with a boarding house. He dislikes children.
He has been accustomed to quiet. His habits are
methodical and then he would prefer getting
into a private and respectable small family, piously
inclined. Terms, however, are no object only
he must insist upon settling his bill on the first
of every month, (it is now the second) and begs his
landlady, when he finally obtains one to his mind,
not on any account to forget his instructions upon
this point but to send in a bill, and receipt,
precisely at ten o’clock, on the first day of
every month, and under no circumstances to put it
off to the second.
These arrangements made, our man of
business rents an office in a reputable rather than
a fashionable quarter of the town. There is nothing
he more despises than pretense. “Where there
is much show,” he says, “there is seldom
any thing very solid behind” an observation
which so profoundly impresses his landlady’s
fancy, that she makes a pencil memorandum of it forthwith,
in her great family Bible, on the broad margin of
the Proverbs of Solomon.
The next step is to advertise, after
some such fashion as this, in the principal business
six-pennies of the city the pennies are
eschewed as not “respectable” and
as demanding payment for all advertisements in advance.
Our man of business holds it as a point of his faith
that work should never be paid for until done.
“WANTED The advertisers,
being about to commence extensive business operations
in this city, will require the services of three or
four intelligent and competent clerks, to whom a liberal
salary will be paid. The very best recommendations,
not so much for capacity, as for integrity, will be
expected. Indeed, as the duties to be performed
involve high responsibilities, and large amounts of
money must necessarily pass through the hands of those
engaged, it is deemed advisable to demand a deposit
of fifty dollars from each clerk employed. No
person need apply, therefore, who is not prepared to
leave this sum in the possession of the advertisers,
and who cannot furnish the most satisfactory testimonials
of morality. Young gentlemen piously inclined
will be preferred. Application should be made
between the hours of ten and eleven A. M., and four
and five P. M., of Messrs.
“Bogs, Hogs Logs, Frogs & Co.,
“N Dog Street”
By the thirty-first day of the month,
this advertisement has brought to the office of Messrs.
Bogs, Hogs, Logs, Frogs, and Company, some fifteen
or twenty young gentlemen piously inclined. But
our man of business is in no hurry to conclude a contract
with any no man of business is ever precipitate and
it is not until the most rigid catechism in respect
to the piety of each young gentleman’s inclination,
that his services are engaged and his fifty dollars
receipted for, just by way of proper precaution, on
the part of the respectable firm of Bogs, Hogs, Logs,
Frogs, and Company. On the morning of the first
day of the next month, the landlady does not present
her bill, according to promise a piece of
neglect for which the comfortable head of the house
ending in ogs would no doubt have chided her severely,
could he have been prevailed upon to remain in town
a day or two for that purpose.
As it is, the constables have had
a sad time of it, running hither and thither, and
all they can do is to declare the man of business most
emphatically, a “hen knee high” by
which some persons imagine them to imply that, in
fact, he is n. e. i. by which again the
very classical phrase non est inventus,
is supposed to be understood. In the meantime
the young gentlemen, one and all, are somewhat less
piously inclined than before, while the landlady purchases
a shilling’s worth of the Indian rubber, and
very carefully obliterates the pencil memorandum that
some fool has made in her great family Bible, on the
broad margin of the Proverbs of Solomon.