To Mr. Brookfield
September 16, 1849
Have you read Dickens? Oh,
it is charming! Brave Dickens! “David
Copperfield” has some of his prettiest touches,
and the reading
of the book has done another author a great deal
of good.
W.M.T.
There are certain good old ladies
in every community who wear perennial mourning.
They attend every funeral, carrying black-bordered
handkerchiefs, and weep gently at the right time.
I have made it a point to hunt out these ancient dames
at their homes, and, over the teacups, I have discovered
that invariably they enjoy a sweet peace a
happiness with contentment that is a great
gain. They seem to be civilization’s rudimentary
relic of the Irish keeners and the paid mourners of
the Orient.
And there is just a little of this
tendency to mourn with those who mourn in all mankind.
It is not difficult to bear another’s woe and
then there is always a grain of mitigation, even in
the sorrow of the afflicted, that makes their tribulation
bearable.
Burke affirms, in “On the Sublime,”
that all men take a certain satisfaction in the disasters
of others. Just as Frenchmen lift their hats
when a funeral passes and thank God that they are not
in the hearse, so do we in the presence of calamity
thank Heaven that it is not ours.
Perhaps this is why I get a strange
delight from walking through a graveyard by night.
All about are the white monuments that glisten in
the ghostly starlight, the night-wind sighs softly
among the grassy mounds all else is silent still.
This is the city of the dead, and
of all the hundreds or thousands who have traveled
to this spot over long and weary miles, I, only I,
have the power to leave at will. Their ears are
stopped, their eyes are closed, their hands are folded but
I am alive.
One of the first places I visited
on reaching London was Kensal Green Cemetery.
I quickly made the acquaintance of the First Gravedigger,
a rare wit, over whose gray head have passed full
seventy pleasant summers. I presented him a copy
of “The Shroud,” the organ of the American
Undertakers’ Association, published at Syracuse,
New York. I subscribe for “The Shroud”
because it has a bright wit-and-humor column, and also
for the sweet satisfaction of knowing that there is
still virtue left in Syracuse.
The First Gravedigger greeted me courteously,
and when I explained briefly my posthumous predilections
we grasped hands across an open grave (that he had
just digged) and were fast friends.
“Do you believe in cremation, sir?” he
asked.
“No, never; it’s pagan.”
“Aye, you are a gentleman and about
burying folks in churches?”
“Never! A grave should
be out under the open sky, where the sun by day and
the moon and stars ”
“Right you are. How Shakespeare
can ever stand it to have his grave walked over by
a boy choir is more than I can understand. If
I had him here I could look after him right.
Come, I’ll show you the company I keep!”
Not twenty feet from where we stood
was a fine but plain granite block to the memory of
the second wife of James Russell Lowell.
“Just Mr. Lowell and one friend
stood by the grave when we lowered the coffin just
two men and no one else but the young clergyman who
belongs here. Mr. Lowell shook hands with me
when he went away. He gave me a guinea and wrote
me two letters afterward from America; the last was
sent only a week before he died. I’ll show
’em to you when we go to the office. Say,
did you know him?”
He pointed to a slab, on which I read
the name of Sydney Smith. Then we went to the
graves of Mulready, the painter; Kemble, the actor;
Sir Charles Eastlake, the artist. Next came the
resting-place of Buckle immortal for writing
a preface dead at thirty-seven, with his
history unwrit; Leigh Hunt sleeps near, and above his
dust a column that explains how it was erected by
friends. In life he asked for bread; when dead
they gave him a costly pile of stone.
Here are also the graves of Madame
Tietjens; of Charles Mathews, the actor; and of Admiral
Sir John Ross, the Arctic explorer.
“And just down the hill aways
another big man is buried. I knew him well; he
used to come and visit us often. The last time
I saw him I said as he was going away, ‘Come
again, sir; you are always welcome!’
“‘Thank you, Mr. First
Gravedigger,’ says he; ’I will come again
before long, and make you an extended visit.’
In less than a year the hearse brought him. That’s
his grave push that ivy away and you can
read the inscription. Did you ever hear of him?”
It was a plain, heavy slab placed
horizontally, and the ivy had so run over it that
the white of the marble was nearly obscured. But
I made out this inscription:
William Makepeace Thackeray
Born July 18, 1811 Died De, 1863 Anne
Carmichael Smyth Died De, 1864,
aged 72 his mother by her first marriage
The unpoetic exactness of that pedigree
gave me a slight chill. But here they sleep mother
and son in one grave. She who gave him his first
caress also gave him his last; and when he was found
dead in his bed, his mother, who lived under the same
roof, was the first one called. He was the child
of her girlhood she was scarcely twenty
when she bore him. In life they were never separated,
and in death they are not divided. It is as both
desired.
Thackeray was born in India, and was
brought to England on the death of his father, when
he was six years of age. On the way from Calcutta
the ship touched at the Island of Saint Helena.
A servant took the lad ashore and they walked up the
rocky heights to Longwood, and there, pacing back
and forth in a garden, they saw a short, stout man.
“Lookee, lad, lookee quick that’s
him! He eats three sheep every day and all the
children he can get!”
“And that’s all I had
to do with the Battle of Waterloo,” said “Old
Thack,” forty years after. But you will
never believe it after reading those masterly touches
concerning the battle, in “Vanity Fair.”
Young Thackeray was sent to the Charterhouse
School, where he was considered rather a dull boy.
He was big and good-natured, and read novels when
he should have studied arithmetic. This tendency
to “play off” stuck to him at Cambridge where
he did not remain long enough to get a degree, but
to the relief of his tutors went off on a tour through
Europe.
Travel as a means of education is
a very seductive bit of sophistry. Invalids whom
the doctors can not cure, and scholars whom teachers
can not teach, are often advised to take “a
change.” Still there is reason in it.
In England Thackeray was intent on
law; at Paris he received a strong bent toward art;
but when he reached Weimar and was introduced at the
Court of Letters and came into the living presence
of Goethe, he caught the infection and made a plan
for translating Schiller.
Schiller dead was considered in Germany
a greater man than Goethe living, as if it were an
offense to live and a virtue to die. And young
William Makepeace wrote home to his mother that Schiller
was the greatest man that ever lived and that he was
going to translate his books and give them to England.
No doubt there are certain people
born with a tendency to infectiousness in regard to
certain diseases; so there are those who catch the
literary mania on slight exposure.
“I’ve got it,” said Thackeray, and
so he had.
He went back to England and made groggy
efforts at Blackstone, and Somebody’s Digest,
and What’s-His-Name’s Compendium, but all
the time he scribbled and sketched.
The young man had come into possession
of a goodly fortune from his father’s estate enough
to yield him an income of over two thousand dollars
a year. But bad investments and signing security
for friends took the money the way that money usually
goes when held by a man who has not earned it.
“Talk about riches having wings,”
said Thackeray; “my fortune had pinions like
a condor, and flew like a carrier-pigeon.”
When Thackeray was thirty he was eking
out a meager income writing poems, reviews, criticisms
and editorials. His wife was a confirmed invalid,
a victim of mental darkness, and his sorrows and anxieties
were many.
He was known as a bright writer, yet
London is full of clever, unsuccessful men. But
in Thackeray’s thirty-eighth year “Vanity
Fair” came out, and it was a success from the
first.
In “Yesterdays With Authors,”
Mr. Fields says: “I once made a pilgrimage
with Thackeray to the various houses where his books
had been written; and I remember when we came to Young
Street, Kensington, he said, with mock gravity, ’Down
on your knees, you rogue, for here “Vanity Fair”
was penned; and I will go down with you, for I have
a high opinion of that little production myself.’”
Young Street is only a block from
the Kensington Metropolitan Railway-Station.
It is a little street running off Kensington Road.
At Number Sixteen (formerly Number Thirteen), I saw
a card in the window, “Rooms to Rent to Single
Gentlemen.”
I rang the bell, and was shown a room
that the landlady offered me for twelve shillings
a week if I paid in advance; or if I would take another
room one flight up with a “gent who was studying
hart” it would be only eight and six. I
suggested that we go up and see the “gent.”
We did so, and I found the young man very courteous
and polite.
He told me that he had never heard
Thackeray’s name in connection with the house.
The landlady protested that “no man by the name
o’ Thack’ry has had rooms here since I
rented the place; leastwise, if he has been here he
called hisself by sumpthink else, which was like o’nuff
the case, as most ev’rybody is crooked now’days but
surely no decent person can blame me for that!”
I assured her that she was in no wise to blame.
From this house in Young Street the
author of “Vanity Fair” moved to Number
Thirty-six Onslow Square, where he wrote “The
Virginians.” On the south side of the Square
there is a row of three-storied brick houses.
Thackeray lived in one of these houses for nine years.
They were the years when honors and wealth were being
heaped upon him; and he was worldling enough to let
his wants keep pace with his ability to gratify them.
He was made of the same sort of clay as other men,
for his standard of life conformed to his pocketbook
and he always felt poor.
From this fine house on Onslow Square
he moved to a veritable palace, which he built to
suit his own taste, at Number Two Palace Green, Kensington.
But mansions on earth are seldom for long he
died here on Christmas Eve, Eighteen Hundred Sixty-three.
And Charles Dickens, Mark Lemon, Millais, Trollope,
Robert Browning, Cruikshank, Tom Taylor, Louis Blanc,
Charles Mathews and Shirley Brooks were among the friends
who carried him to his rest.
To take one’s self too seriously
is a great mistake. Complacency is the unpardonable
sin, and the man who says, “Now I’m sure
of it,” has at that moment lost it.
Villagers who have lived in one little
place until they think themselves great, having lost
the sense of proportion through lack of comparison,
are generally “in dead earnest.”
Surely they are often intellectually
dead, and I do not dispute the fact that they are
in earnest. All those excellent gentlemen in the
days gone by who could not contemplate a celestial
bliss that did not involve the damnation of those
who disagreed with them were in dead earnest.
Cotton Mather once saw a black cat
perched on the shoulder of an innocent, chattering
old gran’ma. The next day a neighbor had
a convulsion; and Cotton Mather went forth and exorcised
Tabby with a hymn-book, and hanged gran’ma by
the neck, high on Gallows Hill, until she was dead.
Had the Reverend Mr. Mather possessed
but a mere modicum of humor he might have exorcised
the cat, but I am sure he would never have troubled
old gran’ma. But alas, Cotton Mather’s
conversation was limited to yea, yea, and nay, nay generally,
nay, nay and he was in dead earnest.
In the Boston Public Library is a
book written in Sixteen Hundred Eighty-five by Cotton
Mather, entitled, “Wonders of the Invisible
World.” This book received the endorsement
of the Governor of the Province and also of the President
of Harvard College. The author cites many cases
of persons who were bewitched; and also makes the interesting
statement that the Devil knows Greek, Latin and Hebrew,
but speaks English with an accent. These facts
were long used at Harvard as an argument in favor
of the Classics. And when Greek was at last made
optional, the Devil was supposed to have filed a protest
with the Dean of the Faculty.
The Reverend Francis Gastrell, who
razed New Place, and cut down the poet’s mulberry-tree
to escape the importunities of visitors, was in dead
earnest. Attila, and Herod, and John Calvin were
in dead earnest. And were it not for the fact
that Luther had lucid intervals when he went about
with his tongue in his cheek he surely would have worked
grievous wrong.
Recent discoveries in Egyptian archeology
show that in his lifetime Moses was esteemed more
as a wit than as a lawmaker. His jokes were posted
upon the walls and explained to the populace, who
it seems were a bit slow.
Job was a humorist of a high order,
and when he said to the wise men, “No doubt
but ye are the people, and wisdom shall die with you,”
he struck twelve. When the sons of Jacob went
down into Egypt and Joseph put up the price of corn,
took their money, and then secretly replaced the coin
in the sacks, he showed his artless love of a quiet
joke.
Shakespeare’s fools were the
wisest and kindliest men at court. When the master
decked a character in cap and bells, it was as though
he had given bonds for the man’s humanity.
Touchstone followed his master into exile; and when
all seemed to have forsaken King Lear the fool bared
himself to the storm and covered the shaking old man
with his own cloak. And if Costard, Trinculo,
Touchstone, Jaques and Mercutio had lived in Salem
in Sixteen Hundred Ninety-two, there would have been
not only a flashing of merry jests, but a flashing
of rapiers as well, and every gray hair of every old
dame’s head would have been safe so long as there
was a striped leg on which to stand.
Lincoln, liberator of men, loved the
motley. In fact, the individual who is incapable
of viewing the world from a jocular basis is unsafe,
and can be trusted only when the opposition is strong
enough to laugh him into line.
In the realm of English letters, Thackeray
is prince of humorists. He could see right through
a brick wall, and never mistook a hawk for a hernshaw.
He had a just estimate of values, and the temperament
that can laugh at all trivial misfits. And he
had, too, that dread capacity for pain which every
true humorist possesses, for the true essence of humor
is sensibility.
In all literature that lives there
is mingled like pollen an indefinable element of the
author’s personality. In Thackeray’s
“Lectures on English Humorists” this subtle
quality is particularly apparent. Elusive, delicate,
alluring it is the actinic ray that imparts
vitality.
When wit plays skittles with dulness,
dulness gets revenge by taking wit at his word.
Vast numbers of people taking Thackeray at his word
consider him a bitter pessimist.
He even disconcerted bright little
Charlotte Bronte, who went down to London to see him,
and then wrote back to Haworth that “the great
man talked steadily with never a smile. I could
not tell when to laugh and when to cry, for I did
not know what was fun and what fact.”
But finally the author of “Jane
Eyre” found the combination, and she saw that
beneath the brusk exterior of that bulky form there
was a woman’s tender sympathy.
Thackeray has told us what he thought
of the author of “Jane Eyre,” and the
author of “Jane Eyre” has told us what
she thought of the author of “Vanity Fair.”
One was big and whimsical, the other was little and
sincere, but both were alike in this: their hearts
were wrung at the sight of suffering, and both had
tears for the erring, the groping, and the oppressed.
A Frenchman can not comprehend a joke
that is not accompanied by grimace and gesticulation;
and so M. Taine chases Thackeray through sixty solid
pages, berating him for what he is pleased to term
“bottled hate.”
Taine is a cynic who charges Thackeray
with cynicism, all in the choicest of biting phrase.
It is a beautiful example of sinners calling the righteous
to repentance a thing that is often done,
but seldom with artistic finish.
The fun is too deep for Monsieur,
or mayhap the brand is not the yellow label to which
his palate is accustomed, so he spews it all.
Yet Taine’s criticism is charming reading, although
he is only hot after an aniseed trail of his own dragging.
But the chase is a deal more exciting than most men
would lead, were there real live game to capture.
If pushed, I might suggest several
points in this man’s make-up where God could
have bettered His work. But accepting Thackeray
as we find him, we see a singer whose cage Fate had
overhung with black until he had caught the tune.
The “Ballad of Boullabaisse” shows a tender
side of his spirit that he often sought to conceal.
His heart vibrated to all finer thrills of mercy;
and his love for all created things was so delicately
strung that he would, in childish shame, sometimes
issue a growl to drown its rising, tearful tones.
In the character of Becky Sharp, he
has marshaled some of his own weak points and then
lashed them with scorn. He looked into the mirror
and seeing a potential snob he straightway inveighed
against snobbery. The punishment does not always
fit the crime it is excess. But I still
contest that where his ridicule is most severe, it
is Thackeray’s own back that is bared to the
knout.
The primal recipe for roguery in art
is, “Know Thyself.” When a writer
portrays a villain and does it well make
no mistake, he poses for the character himself.
Said gentle Ralph Waldo Emerson, “I have capacity
in me for every crime.”
The man of imagination knows those
mystic spores of possibility that lie dormant, and
like the magicians of the East who grow mango-trees
in an hour, he develops the “inward potential”
at will. The mere artisan in letters goes forth
and finds a villain and then describes him, but the
artist knows a better way: “I am that man.”
One of the very sweetest, gentlest
characters in literature is Colonel Newcome.
The stepfather of Thackeray, Major Carmichael Smyth,
was made to stand for the portrait of the lovable
Colonel; and when that all-round athlete, F. Hopkinson
Smith, gave us that other lovable old Colonel he paid
high tribute to “The Newcomes.”
Thackeray was a poet, and as such
was often caught in the toils of doubt the
crux of the inquiring spirit. He aspired for better
things, and at times his imperfections stood out before
him in monstrous shape, and he sought to hiss them
down.
In the heart of the artist-poet there
is an Inmost Self that sits over against the acting,
breathing man and passes judgment on his every deed.
To satisfy the world is little; to please the populace
is naught; fame is vapor; gold is dross; and every
love that has not the sanction of that Inmost Self
is a viper’s sting. To satisfy the demands
of the God within is the poet’s prayer.
What doubts beset, what taunting fears
surround, what crouching sorrows lie in wait, what
dead hopes drag, what hot desires pursue, and what
kindly lights do beckon on ah! “’tis
we musicians know.”
Thackeray came to America to get a
pot of money, and was in a fair way of securing it,
when he chanced to pick up a paper in which a steamer
was announced to sail that evening for England.
A wave of homesickness swept over the big boy he
could not stand it. He hastily packed up his effects
and without saying good-by to any one, and forgetting
all his engagements, he hastened to the dock, leaving
this note for the kindest of kind friends: “Good-by,
Fields; good-by, Mrs. Fields God bless
everybody, says W.M.T.”