For the race is run by one
and one and never by two and two.
Kipling.
“Do you remember the name of
that man we knew,” said Adam one day, “who
wrote a book to prove the immortality of the body?
He did prove that various people had lived well on
to two hundred years. If we were sure of that,
we might get the earth very fairly started.”
Robin laughed. “We are
not apparently growing any older,” she said;
“but we can hardly count on more than a hundred
years each.”
“There is one thing you haven’t
taken into consideration,” said Adam. “Our
children would be several thousand years ahead of the
original children of the Garden; they would be further
along than you and I in a good many ways.”
“No,” she said, “I
haven’t forgotten, but I do not know how much
of a load they would bring with them into the world.
We called it heredity, the Hindoos called it karma,
and, though that is different, educators called it
the recapitulation theory.”
Adam shook his head. “I
understand heredity,” he said, “but karma
and recapitulation are too much for me.”
“Karma is our heritage from
former existences,” she answered, “that
may have been lived here or elsewhere. It is the
sum of our past, good and bad. It is based on
a belief in reincarnation, and it is the law that
whatsoever a man soweth that shall he also reap.
It is justice untempered by mercy, and it is at variance
with the doctrine of vicarious atonement, though one
may believe it and worship Christ as the highest type
of love the world has ever known. Naturally, it
does not appeal to the people who are willing to let
some one bear the cross for them, and yet I have wondered
whether, if we were sure we should not gather figs
from thistles, we should sow the thistles so freely.
The recapitulation theory makes the child pass through
the evolutionary stages of the nation or nations he
represents. It has a kind of seven ages of man
of its own, and brings him down through all phases, the
savage, the hunter, the explorer, the conqueror, the
builder. I don’t pretend fully to understand
it. I heard one of its ablest exponents say once,
’The soul of the German nation is in the German
boy.’ Heredity curses or blesses, sometimes
both. Before any of these theories prospective
parents might well hesitate.”
“Which do you believe?” asked Adam, curiously.
She reflected a moment. “A
little of all three; not all of any of them; one would
have to be a profound student to understand fully what
their adherents claim for them. Heredity plays
strange freaks now and then. It is easier to
account for Abraham Lincoln by the second theory than
by either of the others. His shiftless, untidy
mother and commonplace father do not explain such
a soul as his; nor was there any reversion in his
childhood to the original savage instincts that make
children dismember grasshoppers rather the
reverse. I like better to think that, like that
other Deliverer, who was a man of sorrows and acquainted
with grief, he came to do the will of his and our
Father which art in heaven, came gladly,
freely, knowing the end from the beginning.”
Adam sat up suddenly and looked at
her with startled eyes. “Then you think you
mean you don’t believe surely
you don’t believe we have anything to do with
our coming here?”
She smiled. “Surely I do.
Our coming is sad enough when we do it voluntarily.
It would be quite intolerable to have existence thrust
upon us. Besides, it seems blasphemous to me to
believe that God has given to every human being the
power to bestow an eternal existence. The responsibility
is great enough when it is simply a matter of so living
that noble souls may seek to be born of us, and undertaking
to give them sound minds and bodies.”
Adam looked unconvinced and troubled.
“Where on earth did you get all that?”
he asked.
“Well, it is to my mind only
an elaboration of Descartes’ ’I think,
therefore I am.’ I am, presupposes that
I have been, and will be. If you can’t
destroy one drop of water, you can’t destroy
me. If you drop the water on red-hot iron, it
instantly becomes an imperceptible mist, the mere
ghost of itself, but it will ultimately become fluid
again. It seems to me that the scientific fact
gives a sound basis for the psychologic probability.”
“But think of all the miserable
human beings born daily. Do you think any one
would choose such surroundings?”
“You and I never wanted to go
anywhere badly enough to crowd ourselves under the
cow-catcher, or upon the trucks, but there were those
who did. We didn’t want to see the parade
badly enough to stand on the street corner for hours;
but you worked your way through college, and we have
both sat in the top gallery to hear ‘Tannhaeuser.’
We were willing to put up with the whips and scorns,
which is another way of saying the garlic and tobacco,
for the sake of the music. In any event the experiment
was of brief duration. No one gets more than a
fragment in an ordinary lifetime.”
“If you think that,” said
Adam, “I can’t see that there is any responsibility
about it. We should not thrust life on any one.”
“True,” she assented.
“Your position is unassailable, but still it
seems to me the responsibility remains. In the
first place, granting that my hypothesis is true,
how can we tell whether to live is gain? How
do we know that the next generation would be better
and stronger than we are? Moreover, I only give
this to you as my idea. I do not say it is true;
I believe it to be so, but I do not know anything
whatsoever about it. I can’t prove it, and
it may be transcendental rubbish. I rather imagine
you think it is.”
“Not exactly that,” he
said, coloring and laughing, “but certainly it
is rather amazing when one hears it for the first time.
I daresay I shall come to believe it too. So
far as I can see, you are about as unorthodox as I
am.”
“I have times of relapse,”
she said. “Then I think we are being tempted
like the first Adam and Eve. They were commanded
to multiply and reign. You and I wouldn’t
ask anything better, but as a rule one’s duty
is not attractive. It seems to me just as likely
that we are to prove that the lesson is learned, and
a man and woman may love each other unselfishly and
nobly, foregoing their own desires to save others.
Under the old dispensation it was said, ’Greater
love hath no man than this;’ is it not possible
now that the greatest love is that which lays down
its life untransmitted? If Christ could pray that
the cup of suffering and death might pass from Him,
dare we press the bitter draught of being to other
lips?”
“Dare we dash the full goblet
of joy and opportunity from them?” asked Adam,
gravely.
“I wish I knew,” she said. “I
wish I knew!”
“Have you ever thought what
it will mean,” he said, “if we adopt the
other alternative? Have you thought of the desolation
and loneliness of growing old and helpless and finally ”
He stopped, and she threw out her hands as if to ward
off the thoughts he called before her.
“Oh, yes, yes, I have thought,
and it is terrible. I keep remembering a picture
I saw in the French Exhibit. It was of a man and
a woman; the woman was dead, and he had dug her grave,
his broken sword lay at his side, and he had wrapped
her in his coat, and begun to cover her over.
He could not go on, and knelt, looking at her with
a despair on his face that has haunted me ever since.
The name, Manon Lescaut, meant nothing to me then,
but the story of the picture was enough by itself.
All last year I kept seeing that terrible picture.
Sometimes it was you, sometimes it was I, that dug
the grave and went mad looking into it.”
“I should not bury you,”
said Adam, grimly. “I should carry you to
the cliff and take you in my arms and jump. The
sea is deep and cruel there.”
“Sometimes,” she hesitated
a moment, then went on, “sometimes
I think that would be the best way for us now, I mean
if we decide we have no right to be happy in the old
way; for I should be afraid we could not always be
strong.”
“Very well,” he answered;
“when we decide, it shall be literally life
or death.”