PARIS AFTER THE COMMUNE
I well remember Paris emerging from
her trials. It is difficult to-day to realise
the magnitude of the disaster which laid low the beautiful
capital of France. When I arrived within its shattered
walls, the monster conflagration that would have destroyed
the whole city, had it not been for the timely arrival
of the Versailles troops, was all but subdued.
The firemen, however, were still kept busily engaged,
for clouds of smoke and tongues of fire would at intervals
burst forth from the smouldering ruins. Tottering
walls on the one hand, huge façades of masonry
on the other, marked the places where but yesterday
glorious specimens of architecture, ancient and modern,
had stood. There was the shell of what had been
the Tuileries, that palace built in the 16th century,
which had seen so much of the history of France.
Mobs had pillaged and sacked it; within its state-rooms
one crowned head had been forced to wear the cap of
liberty, a humiliation which did not save it from
the knife of the guillotine. Some fifty years
later a bourgeois king had to fly for his life from
the palace; and last, it was an unfortunate Empress
who had to make good her escape, and seek refuge on
the shores of England.
There would be no more pillaging and
sacking now; the venerable specimen of the Renaissance
style was destroyed. To-day the stranger is just
shown the place where the Tuileries stood; then, as
the walls crashed down, burying treasures and relics
of bygone days in their fall, one was appalled by
the tragedy enacted before one’s eyes. I
had my little personal recollections too. I had
danced there more than once with some of the fairest
Parisians; I had drunk the future Emperor’s champagne
with a conviction that it was quite the best of its
kind, and was evidently intended to make us understand
that our host meant business, imperial business, pretty
sure to be settled ere long, whether we liked it or
not.
Well, one fine old building is gone,
I thought, as I turned away from the ruins, but at
least the Louvre is saved. That marvel of architecture
was intact. The principal works of art it contained
had been taken to places of supposed safety, and the
whereabouts of the Venus of Milo were said to be known
only to some few persons, who had dug a hole and therein
buried her. Much else had been providentially
saved; there were large gaps in the Rue de Rivoli,
but the unique old Tour St. Jacques had escaped unscathed.
At the Palais de Justice the fire had stopped short
on the threshold of the exquisite Sainte Chapelle,
one of the most perfect works of the thirteenth century.
I had with some difficulty obtained permission to
roam over the ruins of that Palais de Justice and
the Prefecture de Police, and whilst the firemen were
working to subdue the flames wherever they broke out
afresh, I used my brush to make a sketch of the huge
maze before me. There were bundles of official
papers at my feet; Actes de Naissance and Actes
de Décès, charred only, and quite easy to decipher,
but as I touched them, they crumbled to ashes.
Some seemingly well-preserved parchments I consigned
to my pocket, but a few hours later I found little
more than dust in their place. The Hotel de Ville,
too, which had fallen a prey to the flames, had many
an association for me. Henri Lehmann, during
the time I was studying under him, had been commissioned
to decorate the great hall with a series of pictures.
I had lent an apprentice’s hand, and had seen
them grow under his brush, as, in an incredibly short
space of time, he produced what was thought to be
the best work of his life work destined
to hand down his name to posterity as one of the most
fertile and distinguished painters of the second empire.
Ingres, too, who in those days was considered the
greatest draughtsman since the time of Raphael, had
contributed a masterpiece to the decoration of the
hall, a plafond, “The Apotheosis of Napoleon
I.” This work I had also seen in progress.
On the occasion of a visit to his studio I recollect
a lady asking him, in effusive language, where he
had found the models for the ideally classical horses
attached to the triumphant car of the great conqueror.
Ingres led her straight to the window. “There
are my models, madam,” he said bluntly, pointing
to the cab-stand.
I wandered through Paris day after
day, and everywhere the ghastly traces of war, as
it really is, confronted me; blood-stained flagstones,
broken-down gun-carriages, barricades that had been
stormed, and homes that had been wrecked. Everywhere
the iron shutters of the shops were riddled with shot
or broken open. One climbed as best one could
over a heterogeneous mass of impedimenta, collected
for attack or defence, or thrown away in precipitate
flight. Every effort had been made to prevent
petroleum being poured into the basement of the houses.
The gratings in the streets had been boarded over
and otherwise secured against those female fiends
the Pétroleuses. Some of the wealthiest quarters
of Paris were known to be undermined, and it was only
in the nick of time that the Versailles troops arrived
to prevent the execution of such written orders as,
“Faîtes sauter lé quartier
de la Bourse.”
The fashionable quarters and the suburbs
of Paris had suffered terribly from the bombardment.
I wandered for days over fragments of every mortal
thing that had once been whole, past dismantled batteries,
along the barren wastes of the Bois de Boulogne, and
through avenues of wrecked villas. Costly furniture
and works of art had been shattered to atoms by the
enemy’s bombs. In one place I came across
a Louis Quinze sofa and chairs that had evidently
been carried out for removal, and stood waiting so
placidly, that they seemed to invite you to sit down
and rest; and in one of the gardens there was a cottage
piano, which appeared none the worse for its adventures;
two coffee-cups stood unharmed upon it, showing that
some two persons had taken their demie-tasse
by the side of that piano.
The most striking effects of shot
and shell showed themselves on the ornamental ironwork
which had once enclosed those suburban villas.
It seemed as if they had vented their fiercest passions
on those beautifully designed gates and railings French
art excels in producing. One could not suppress
a feeling of pity as one saw them writhing in anguish
and stretching out their weird iron arms as if in supplication.
Here they were unhinged and started from their sockets;
there their limbs, once so perfectly poised, were
twisted into unsightly shapes, and stood out amongst
the wreckage in fantastic and uncanny figures.
I had wended my way one afternoon
to the revolutionary quarter of Belleville, and had
got into conversation with a workman of more than
average intelligence. Not feeling at our ease
within earshot of the “Mouchards,” as
the growling, spying, myrmidons of the police
are termed, and not liking the looks of the gensdarmes
a cheval with their revolvers at half-cock, we
had adjourned to one of the numerous establishments
kept by the Marchand de Vins, Traiteur, which
take the place of our public-houses. There my
workman became confidential and declared himself a
Communist to the backbone. He scorned the idea
that the German was his enemy.
“If I’m to fight at all,”
he said, “let me find an enemy for myself.
Let me shoot the richard en face, the capitalist
who has been exploiting me and mine. We’ll
make him and the like of him disgorge his plunder,
and then we’ll start a fresh deal. As for
the Germans, my dear sir, I dare say there are a lot
of jolly good fellows amongst them, and plenty who
would take a bumper, a canon de vin, with us,
if they were here now, and drink to the perdition
of the bourgeois.”
“That is all very well,”
I answered, “but I’m pretty sure you were
just like the rest, and went tearing along the boulevards
and shouting ’A Berlin!’ And you would
have been only too jolly glad to get the Rhine, if
you had had a ”
“The Rhine, monsieur!”
he interrupted me, “the Rhine! Do you think
I know what the blessed thing is; and, supposing we
had got it, do you think they’d have given me
any of it?”
That was twenty-eight years ago, and
since then many a workman has learnt that he does
not get his share of the “blessed thing”
he has to fight for. I wonder whether he will
give up fighting, or whether he will see to it that
he gets his share.
It was an impressive sight that met
the eye in the Place Vendome. There was the famous
column lying prostrate in huge fragments like so many
mill-stones, with the bronze legends commemorating
the conqueror’s march, battered and crushed
out of all seeming in their fall. Those gigantic
vertebrae of the mighty pillar made one ponder on the
vicissitudes of greatness, and on the ups and downs
of heroic symbols. One could not help marvelling
at the audacity of the men who had ruptured that spinal
cord of patriotic self-glorification.
It was an artist, and a great one
too, who planned and directed the destruction of the
work of art, Courbet, the most uncompromising of painters
and of demagogues. I was living in Paris at the
time his first great works were exhibited, and I recollect
what a storm of abuse they raised. His “Enterrement
a Ornans,” a large and striking picture, crudely
realistic, depicting, as it did, mourners at the open
grave, with reddened noses and swollen eyes, was considered
a deliberate insult offered to all idealists, romanticists,
and mannerists. His picture, “La Baigneuse,”
was simply derided by the critics; there was no drawing,
no modelling. “C’est un
sac de noix!” A bag of nuts, not
a woman of flesh and blood.
Well, Courbet’s work has outlived
criticism; history remembers him as a chef d’ecole.
The only time I recollect meeting
him was on the occasion of an international gathering
of artists in Antwerp in 1861. He was quite a
boon companion, and had a marked objection to retiring
to rest before daylight. He would sing us jolly
songs, one of which, “C’est l’amour
qui nous mène," was a favourite
of his.
The Commune went to work very systematically
to bring down the huge column. An incision was
made at the base in the shape of a notch; a double
pulley was attached to the balustrade at the top, and
another fixed to the ground in the Rue de la Paix,
a rope passing through both to a capstan. When
this was set in motion, after some preliminary difficulties
had been overcome, the column oscillated for a moment,
and then came crashing down in three colossal sections
on to a bed of sand, fascines, and straw prepared
for it, there to break up into a thousand smaller
fragments. The statue of the great Emperor had
lost its head and one arm.
An act of vandalism, we say.
Yes, but of vandalism with a purpose. We can
fancy Courbet declaring: “The work of art
must be sacrificed as a warning to those who would
honour and perpetuate the memory of selfish aggressors.”
It was History herself he meant to
drag from her pedestal History, ever crowning
herself with wreaths of laurel and halos of virtue.
It was Art too he waged war upon, that Art which he
deemed had too long served to glorify the rule of
Force: sometimes in a picture or in a legion of
pictures, as at Versailles, exalting Imperialism and
inciting us to go forth and emulate the deeds and
misdeeds of our ancestors; sometimes in a statue of
some clever organiser of wholesale slaughter, appropriately
cast in the bronze of cannon taken from the enemy;
or, again, in a barbarous trophy, a triumphal arch in
fact, in a scalp of some kind, that, from generation
to generation, we are taught to gloat over.
This was the wording of the decree
which condemned the column to destruction:
“THE COMMUNE OF PARIS
“Considering that the Imperial
Column of the Place Vendome is a monument of
barbarism, a symbol of brute force, of false glory,
an encouragement of military spirit, a denial
of international rights, a permanent insult offered
by the conquerors to the conquered, a perpetual
conspiracy against one of the great principles
of the French Republic, namely fraternity,
“Decrees:
“Sole article The
Vendome Column is to be demolished.”
One day it was a wretched
day, the rain pouring in torrents I went
to see the ruins of Saint Cloud. People were
discussing the question as to who had really done
the work of destruction there the Germans,
the Versaillais, or the Communards. To the poor
victims who had come forth from their hiding-places,
returning only to find their homes and hearths ruined,
it could really matter little whether the grim work
was done by the six of one or the half-a-dozen of
the other.
Wandering along the streets in ruins,
I was struck by one piece of high wall left standing
out against the grey sky to bear witness to the strange
caprices of the destructive element; a large red
umbrella hung in its place on that wall, and a striped
petticoat bedrizzled with rain was being blown about
by the wind. The fireplace had kept its every-day
appearance, whilst the floor beneath it had gone; on
the mantelpiece stood some little household gods,
bits of china, a clock, and various nick-nacks one
could not distinguish at a distance. Close to
me was a touching little group of victims. A
woman with three girls, their ages ranging from eight
to twelve years, stood gazing at that wall which had
once been part of their home. They did not give
vent to their feelings in tears or loud lamentations,
as so many around me did; the mother was simply dazed,
the children overawed. They had come back to Saint
Cloud from I know not where, and were carrying their
little belongings tied up in cotton handkerchiefs.
I think they would scarcely have been able to identify
their home, if it had not been for the red umbrella
and the striped petticoat.
After a while I spoke to the woman
and elicited with some difficulty that her husband
had been killed early in the campaign, one son was
maimed for life, and the other had not been heard of
for two months. When I gave her a few francs
she put them in her pocket mechanically; her thoughts
were elsewhere. I passed on to witness more destruction
and distress. When I returned, some half-an-hour
later, to where the high wall stood, I found the mother
and the three girls just where I had left them, still
hopelessly gazing at the household gods that were mocking
their misery from on high.
It was not till that day that I quite
realised what we mean when we speak of blank despair.
The recuperative power of the French
people is truly extraordinary, and, from the first
day and hour of his deliverance, the Parisian gave
striking evidence of it. Endowed as he is with
indomitable pluck, infinite resources, and inexhaustible
light-heartedness, he could set to work with a will,
or dance and fiddle with a vengeance, whilst the ashes
of his city were still glowing. It came quite
natural to him to repossess himself of that city,
and to drop unconcernedly into his old ways of life.
There he was once more, the typical
Parisian who must have his daily stroll along the
Boulevards; he must sit somewhere where he can sip
something and see somebody else sipping or strolling.
He must watch his opportunity of saying something
polite to somebody, and, at a given hour, he must
call for an absinthe and concentrate his thoughts
on the importance of an approaching meal.
And there he was again, the expert
diner we all know, devoutly pinning his napkin under
his chin, and thanking the gods that at last the sacred
rites of the dinner-table could be duly performed.
One of the characteristics of the
Parisian, I always thought, is that exquisite politeness
of his. What a lesson to us, who won’t even
make room for a fellow-creature in a ’bus if
we can help it!
In former days I used to say that
I could always tell, if I wanted, to what nationality
any particular man in the motley crowd of loungers
on the Boulevards belonged. I need but tread
on his toes, and he would use strong language in his
mother-tongue. The German would invoke the “holy
thunder-weather,” the Dutchman would be still
more sacrilegious, the Englishman would damn something probably
the eyes I should have made use of; and so on each
would fling his pet wicked word at me. Only the
Frenchman would raise his hat and say, “Pardon,
monsieur.”
Knowing and loving the amiable city
as I did I had spent altogether about six
years there I was deeply interested in her
fortunes and misfortunes, and now warmly welcomed
the first signs of returning prosperity.
The cannon’s roar had ceased,
people were coming from their cellars or other hiding-places,
looking for their friends and congratulating one another
on being alive. Crowds of sightseers filled the
streets and stood gaping at the ruins or commenting
on the unique spectacle before them. Barricades
were being demolished, and squads of men and women
were set to work to clear the roads of broken glass,
splintered wood, and other accumulations of nondescript
rubbish. Shops were being opened, and the Dames
de Comptoir, as correct and business-like as ever,
were getting out their books. Goods and wares
that had been hidden away, were being brought to light.
Shopkeepers were counting up their losses and discounting
their prospects.
Matters political were in abeyance.
Whenever I asked, “What is to come next?
What Government would you vote for?” I got the
answer: “Cela nous est bien
egal, monsieur, pourvu qu’il-y-ait
du travail." One lived in a sort of interregnum,
a period of transition from lawlessness to order.
War had ceased, but peace had only just begun to strike
roots. There was no bragging, no cheap oratory nobody
seemed to think himself particularly “trahi."
There was no show of military rule. Even the
sentries chatted freely with the bourgeois, and there
were no ominous cries of “Passez au large,”
coupled with the significant thrust of the fixed bayonet,
as one used to hear in the days of the Coup d’Etat.
On the contrary, thousands of soldiers, with their
Chassepots slung carelessly across their shoulders,
were sauntering along the streets, most of them evidently
provincials, amazed at the grandeur of the capital
they were visiting for the first time.
Cabs were about, and even the heavy
three-horse omnibuses were resuming their well-regulated
course; but no private carriages were to be seen.
In fact, the upper ten as well as the submerged tenth
seemed to have disappeared, and the odd million about
was made up of the bourgeois, the piou-piou,
the badaud de province, and other sightseers.
I scorned conveyances of any kind,
and tramped along on foot from morning to night, for
it was only thus I felt I was my own master. I
could pull up, stumble, or climb as circumstances required,
or I could turn in, stand, drink, talk, listen, and
argue or, better still, hold my tongue.
In the evening darkness reigned, except
in the neighbourhood of the cafes. There people
were congregating as usual, seeking the light like
so many moths, and settling like flies on the sugar
that was to sweeten their demie-tasse or to
be pocketed for home consumption. At eleven o’clock
the cafes were closed, and nothing remained to do but
to go home in the dark. The moths, by the way,
must have had a dull time of it, for the graceful
lamp-posts had suffered so severely that very few of
them were fit for service.
The Commune had naturally produced
a great quantity of scurrilous literature and vile
caricatures, some quite unmentionable; but they are
interesting historically, throwing, as they do, a lurid
light on the events of those days and the passions
they evoked. I bought whatever I could find of
such papers and drawings, as also a few of the more
respectable publications, and the collection is a pretty
complete one, including, as it does, copies of the
Pere Duchene, La Lanterne, Le National,
La Verite, &c., and some sixty caricatures of the Emperor,
the Empress, Thiers, Jules Favre, and many other leading
men, all furnishing abundant material for recording
and illustrating the politics, hysterics, and erotics
of those troublesome times.
Towards the end of my stay I went
to Saint Denis. Peace and its blessings were
really coming, and welcome signs of their approach
were not wanting; even little twigs of olive branches
were being held out where I least expected to see
them.
Saint Denis was still in the hands
of the Germans, and was not to be evacuated till a
stipulated sum, forming part of the war indemnity,
had been paid. Officers and men quartered there
had made themselves very much at home, and some did
not seem to be on bad terms with the inhabitants,
as in one case, when a bright young fellow on the German
side seemed on particularly good terms with an attractive
young lady on the French side. He and I had got
into conversation; he was evidently pleased to meet
a countryman of his (I can be a German occasionally),
and was disposed to be friendly and confidential.
“Come with me,” he said; “I will
show you the prettiest girl in Saint Denis.”
I went to see “the prettiest girl,” who,
it seemed to me, had been watching for him at the
window, and now came down to the door.
He was a non-commissioned officer
in I forget which regiment. When not in uniform
he was a lawyer for aught I know, a rising
young Rechtsanwalt, with plenty of clients.
I hope so, for the sake of the young lady, who was
charming, and was as much smitten with him as he was
with her. He had taught her a few German words,
which she could not pronounce without laughing and
showing her pretty teeth; she again had lent him some
books from her little library. He spoke French
fluently, and was happy to be put through a course
of French literature by his fair friend.
Love being thicker than blood, I feel
sure they eventually got married; and after so romantic
an opening, their story cannot but have proved interesting.
Should anybody care to write it, I think the line to
be taken should be this: They married, and lived
“happy ever after” as happily
as their children would let them. They had four,
differing widely in their tastes and convictions.
One son enlisted in the German army; the other in
the French. Both were deeply grieved to have fallen
on evil times, when emperors and presidents were ever
proclaiming the blessings of peace, and when even
the people were beginning to question the desirability
of attacking their neighbours.
Of the daughters, one loved the Germans,
and was unhappy because she was to marry a Frenchman
her parents had selected; the other hated the Germans,
and was broken-hearted because she was not to marry
the Frenchman she loved.
It must all end happily, however,
for it is essential that the moral should be pointed:
Love your neighbour, if only to show you are unshackled
by prejudice. Marry him or her, whether he or
she is your hereditary foe or not, and settle down
to a life of peace and happiness, that you may inaugurate,
by your noble example, the blessed era, when the lion
and the lamb shall no longer hesitate to go and do
likewise.
But not often was it my good fortune
to spend a pleasant hour as at Saint Denis and to
imagine little romances built on slight foundations.
The tragedy being enacted around me forced itself on
my view more than once, when I met batches of miserable
prisoners marched off, some to be judged by court-martial,
others already sentenced to be shot. The Parisian
looked on without exhibiting much interest in their
fate. He had seen so much of bloodshed in every
form lately that he had grown callous. The day
of settlement had come, the murder of the hostages
must be avenged, and the canaille must be cleared
away, just as the broken glass and the wrecked barricades
had to be.
The reign of terror continued; it
had only changed its name. Now it was called
Justice. Shocking specimens of depraved humanity
were those ill-fated prisoners, dragged from their
haunts to be tried by the military authorities in
Versailles.
I saw types such as only come to the
surface when conflicting passions of the worst kind
stir up the very dregs of society: dishevelled
viragos, brutalised men, female fiends, men devils hyaenas,
ready to spring and fasten their claws on you, were
they not chained. I heard their howl of despair
and their laugh of defiance, as they were led off
to be shot.
And thus, whilst the beautiful city
was smoothing her ruffled feathers and taking out
a new lease of life, the poor wretches met their doom
at the foot of the blood-spattered wall.
Wild beasts if you like but
men and women our brothers and our sisters alas!
born in squalor, bred in vice, and tainted with hereditary
ugliness of body and mind.
Who made them what they are?
Let us try to find out, and, if we can, let us stand
the guilty ones up against that wall, and clear them
away with the other human wreckage. But no! neither
you nor I would be left to do the clearing away.