By Timmy’s sixth birthday, only his parents’ adamant attitude had saved him from becoming a side show. Once the initial household uproar had died down and some degree of general sanity been restored, Helen and Jerry had another bad fright. They had grudgingly allowed Clancey, the family sawbones, to call in a psychologist friend, Philip Warwick. The combined efforts of these two to find an explanation for Timmy resulted in complete chaos, with Timmy suffering violent and erratic lapses into complete idiocy for varying lengths of time. Standard tests meant nothing, unless mutually exclusive results could be accepted as meaningful in themselves. At length, Timmy suffered a relapse of such duration that the parents became panic-stricken and quietly rebelled. It was obvious that he needed an atmosphere of peace and quiet. Confusion, excitement, or the concentrated attention of several adults simply threw him into a relapse.

The break came when Clancey called at the house and found it empty, deserted. He traced them to a new neighborhood where they had rented a house with a peaceful, walled garden. They were not pleased to see him, but Clancey was a psychologist of sorts himself and a working agreement was arrived at whereby he and Warwick could drop in frequently as friends and quietly observe Timmy, chatting with him when they could win his confidence and submitting him to whatever tests they could adequately disguise. But under pain of permanent excommunication from the Douglas ménage they were not to discuss him with outsiders in such a way as to either identify him or draw attention to him. Timmy was to be allowed to set his own pace under their obliquely-watching eyes. He was not to become a subject for newspaper comment, for the speculation of strangers, or for the heated discussion of learned gentlemen calling each other liars in six syllables. For Timmy was something new under the sun.

Two years of observation gave Clancey and Warwick an impressive file of notes on him, and they were prone to sit after office hours with it on the desk between them, giving it morose glances. They were not happy. Sometimes, as now, they concluded an evening visit by sitting in Clancey’s or Warwick’s car parked outside the Douglas fence, holding an impromptu post-mortem on an intellectual corpse that had come to life in complete defiance of all the rules. They didn’t notice the stealthy movement of one of the fence-boards, nor the small form that snaked through the shadows of concealing shrubbery until it was near the open window of the car.

“Take word-association, Clancey. I had a few minutes with him this evening before you got here, so I started him on a ‘game’ where we took turns in saying a word and trying to guess what the other would reply. I believe he thought I was rather a simpleton and needed humoring. Anyway, I tried him with ‘home’ and got a delayed response. It’s happened before. Apparently the concept of home is tied to some deeper disturbance.” There was a slight, uneasy movement from the listening figure. “Well, linking home and family, on my next turn I shot ‘mother’ at him. There was an immediate flash of confusion in his eyes and again a delayed response before he blurted ‘Mom.’ Something else had been on the tip of his tongue, but he choked it back and selected what seemed to him a more suitable reply.

“Now, we both know from two years’ systematic observation that Helen is as well-balanced a mother as you’re likely to find. I’m quite sure she has no unsuspected bad habits or traits that are leaving sensitive spots in Timmy’s mind, making him flinch at the association, nor is there some long-standing or unresolved conflict in their relations. Yet ‘home’ and ‘mother’ both invoke blocks that inhibit response until consciously overcome, or invoke images that he wishes to conceal lest they betray a secret. I doubt very much whether anything that happened in his first four years could have left a deep impression on the completely imbecilic mind he is assumed to have had then. That leaves the past two years

(Confirmation) Game/not game.... Should data have predicted test? (Indecision) Possibly ... review later. So much to learn ... confusion inevitable. Next time respond “mother three” (laughter) Invalid frame of reference impossible work with/discard.

“Something else interests me there, Phil. You suggest he selected, deliberately, what seemed an appropriate response to ‘mother.’ Did you take the next logical step and try ‘father?’”

“Yes.”

“And did he anticipate it?”

“I’m sure he did. I see what you mean ... fairly sharp reasoning for a six-year-old supposed to be mentally retarded. When I shot ‘father’ at him he came back promptly with ‘male-Douglas’ almost like one word.”

“Got the sex and identity right. What’s wrong with that?”

“There’s nothing ‘wrong’ or ‘right’ about it. I was hoping for some clue as to how his mind works. Maybe I got it, but I don’t know what to do with it. I didn’t expect a calmly objective cataloguing of the old man as a ‘male-Douglas.’”

(Surprise) Where is error? Semantics? Sociology? Colloquial
nuance? (Decision) Reject further word-games.

“If that’s a clue, Phil, you can have it.” Clancey hauled a notebook from his pocket and held it up. “Open this thing anywhere anywhere at all. It’ll open at an unanswered question. At the age of roughly three and one-half, a congenital idiot suddenly displays flashes of alert intelligence. For forty-two months that child was content to sit on his fanny and vegetate. Never crawled, never spoke, never played, seldom even focused his eyes. Then one day his mother sees him study some alphabet blocks with every appearance of curiosity. Awareness! For the first time!

“Later, he suddenly reaches out his hand and piles the blocks in a neat stack. Purposeful activity and perfect muscular control! No trial-and-error, no baby hesitation with hand poised just a sudden assured, controlled action. Mama leaps for joy, junior relapses into idiocy, and no one including me really believes mama when she says it happened. This sort of thing goes on for several months brief, erratic flashes of extraordinary intelligence, considering the subject. Then, a child who has never spoken a single word says clearly and politely, ‘I want that one, Helen,’ and a child who has never crawled puts his feet under him and stands up steady as a rock. You tell me, Phil how did he do it?”

“Don’t look to me for an answer. I’m only a lousy fifth-rate psychology teacher, as of the day you brought Timmy into my life. And the curse of Freud be on you for that kindly act of professional assassination. The answer is obvious, of course ... Timmy didn’t and couldn’t do what we’ve seen him do with our own wide-open, innocent eyes. We are the victims of a cunning hoax.”

(Amusement) Difficult to experiment unobserved. Action too
precipitate/no choice. (Affection/laughter) “The world is so
people.” (Chill) Danger! Madness!

“How does any child learn to speak?”

“Mainly by hearing others. Maybe Timmy learned the same way. Maybe he listened, absorbing the meaning and sound of words, trying them out in the silence of his otherwise vacant little noggin. Maybe his mind awakened gradually to the realization that it was a prisoner in a paralyzed organ, strait-jacketed by blocks or short circuits. Maybe he spent his forty-two months of vegetating driving against those blocks until he partially broke them down and could speak. Maybe.”

“And without ever having shaped his lips or tongue to intelligent sounds, he speaks fluently at the first try?”

“Why not? Any kid that will start out by addressing its parents chummily as ‘Helen’ and ‘Jerry’ and act naively surprised at the reaction, obviously has rules of its own.”

They ruminated in silence for a moment.

“It’s too easy to talk vaguely about blocks and short circuits, Clancey. How do you account for his completely erratic progress? Totally unpredictable, with alternating periods of complete idiocy and high intelligence?”

“Not totally unpredictable.”

“Oh?”

“At least three things suggest a pattern. One is that his relapses, though erratic, are becoming ever shorter in duration and more widely separated.”

“Yes, they are infrequent now and quickly ended.”

“The second is that his grasp of the social pattern in which he lives his environment, in all its subtleties is constantly improving.”

“Right again. At the age of six he can in many ways match a bright lad twice his age. Not in the subtleties, though I disagree there. You can give him a simple or even a not-so-simple explanation of something he hears on the radio, dealing with it as a general theme in sociology, and he seems to grasp the broad outline with little difficulty, but in trivial matters of social behavior and human relations he’s frequently uncertain, as likely as not to pull a howling bloomer. Seems unusually baffled and exasperated by some of the social mores he runs into, such as the many tabu subjects for conversation, or taking your clothes off whenever or wherever you feel inclined to. Poor Helen. She tries to explain and he keeps doggedly after her with ruthless logic, obviously trying hard to understand, and ... you know ... it’s surprising how few really sound, logical reasons there are for half the accepted conventions that rule our lives.

“He’s pinned me down several times to the conclusion that a certain convention exists solely because people can’t be trusted to behave rationally without restraining rules. It’s rather a dismaying conclusion when it’s dragged out in the open like that, and it seems to horrify him. An ordinary kid learns by experience and accepts the rules with sporadic rebellion, but our boy acts as if they were beyond comprehension. And I think they are ... to him.

“The first crime drama he happened to see on TV turned him white as a sheet, and when he stuck his nose out the gate a few days later and watched some neighborhood kids playing cowboys and Indians with cap pistols, he was sick on the grass. Explaining the ‘glamour’ of the early west made it worse. He drew back from me as though I were contagious. I had the feeling that he pitied me. I wonder, sometimes, whether he makes any real sense at all out of what is said to him. He’s very slow to interpret the shades of expression possible in voice and face. I feel that potentially he has an exceptional mind, but the great difficulty is communication.”

“Like pulling his leg. It’s too easy to be fun.”

“Exactly, unless the little so-and-so is pulling ours, which I sometimes suspect.” Phil winced a little and rubbed his hand across his forehead. “Getting a headache. Well, what’s this third item you had in mind?”

“I can’t pin it down, but I have a feeling there’s a fairly obvious physical factor linking the periods of relapse.”

“Physical tiredness?”

“No ... the contrary, perhaps. At the start he got himself overtired pretty often, as though he overestimated his endurance, but it didn’t seem to do him any harm. But if he awakens early or unexpectedly, there may be an appreciable delay before he orients himself. Then he comes to with a snap.”

“Shock? Confusion of any sort?”

“Confusion, certainly. He didn’t last five minutes when they tried him in school, you remember. Howled for his dog, then sat on the floor and dribbled. The confusion of being chucked into a group of noisy, aggressive six-year-olds was too much for him. You remember he recovered completely almost instantly when his mother packed him out of the school.”

“That reminds me of something else. I think that dog is some sort of a symbol to him. Perhaps it has somehow become associated with security. Try this for size: his mind is struggling to free itself from its strait jacket; the dog captures his attention at a critical moment; the mother screams when he speaks, frightening him, but the dog comes reassuringly to his arms and subsequently or did he see it as a consequence? his parents make much of him. In other words, at the start of his rational life the dog is a friendly element and the parents a frightening one. The details of the association drop soon enough from his conscious memory, but not from his subconscious. When the dog is with him, he feels secure. When they are separated it was not allowed into school with him, of course his symbol is gone and he panics, much as an ordinary child panics if it loses its mother in a crowd.”

“Slick, but not convincing. It touches on another peculiarity, however ... the way he wants that hound with him always, no matter where. Sleeps with it on his bed, eats with it by his chair, even takes it to the bathroom by-the-by, he acquired the dog and bowel-control at the same time, if you recall but does he like the dog? He never pets it to speak of. Plays with it sometimes in a clumsy, disinterested sort of way, but it’s not the classic boy-dog relationship. If the dog is merely a symbol, as you suggest

“I didn’t say ‘merely’ a symbol. If I’m right, an association as strong as this one could be devilish awkward and even dangerous, hooked to a hair-trigger mind like his. What if something happens to the dog before his dependence or whatever can be broken? Dogs get run over, you know, and even their normal life span is short. Maybe we ought to try to break it up ... damn this headache.”

(Regret/Despondency) Degraded to pain ... static/thick tongue.
(Resignation) Delay, delay, delay ... break conversation. Time
wrong.

“You been bothered with headaches lately?”

“Off and on nasty sort of twinges. If I trusted myself with a carpenter, I’d let you give me a check-up. Well, let’s cut this short. What I was going to say ... let’s see ... oh, since Timmy seldom pays any attention to the dog, why does the dog stick to him like a shadow?”

Clancey grunted.

“That dog’s no fool, stupid as he is. Clumsy, homely, and half-witted enough to sit on a tack for five minutes before he howled I’ve seen him do just about that he knows when he needs a protector. If it weren’t for Timmy, the hound would have been destroyed long ago as an act of mercy. Helen and Jerry are resigned to him, of course, for Timmy’s sake, but have you noticed that the dog reacts much the same as Timmy if they get separated? Casts about at once for a way to rejoin him, and the longer he’s delayed the more he panics. Maybe it’s a two-way switch maybe Timmy and his dog are indispensable symbols to each other!”

“You dream up any more lulus like that, you keep them to yourself. Psychopathic dogs I draw the line at. Clancey, there is only one conclusion to be drawn from these here solemn deliberations. Throw out the textbooks and roll with the punches.”

“Amen.”