IMAGINATION
Everyone desires to have a good imagination,
yet not all would agree as to what constitutes a good
imagination. If I were to ask a group of you
whether you have good imaginations, many of you would
probably at once fall to considering whether you are
capable of taking wild flights into impossible realms
of thought and evolving unrealities out of airy nothings.
You would compare yourself with great imaginative writers,
such as Stevenson, Poe, De Quincey, and judge your
power of imagination by your ability to produce such
tales as made them famous.
1. THE PLACE OF IMAGINATION IN MENTAL ECONOMY
But such a measure for the imagination
as that just stated is far too narrow. A good
imagination, like a good memory, is the one which serves
its owner best. If DeQuincey and Poe and Stevenson
and Bulwer found the type which led them into such
dizzy flights the best for their particular purpose,
well and good; but that is not saying that their type
is the best for you, or that you may not rank as high
in some other field of imaginative power as they in
theirs. While you may lack in their particular
type of imagination, they may have been short in the
type which will one day make you famous. The artisan,
the architect, the merchant, the artist, the farmer,
the teacher, the professional man-all need
imagination in their vocations not less than the writers
need it in theirs, but each needs a specialized kind
adapted to the particular work which he has to do.
PRACTICAL NATURE OF IMAGINATION.-Imagination
is not a process of thought which must deal chiefly
with unrealities and impossibilities, and which has
for its chief end our amusement when we have nothing
better to do than to follow its wanderings. It
is, rather, a commonplace, necessary process which
illumines the way for our everyday thinking and acting-a
process without which we think and act by haphazard
chance or blind imitation. It is the process by
which the images from our past experiences are marshaled,
and made to serve our present. Imagination looks
into the future and constructs our patterns and lays
our plans. It sets up our ideals and pictures
us in the acts of achieving them. It enables
us to live our joys and our sorrows, our victories
and our defeats before we reach them. It looks
into the past and allows us to live with the kings
and seers of old, or it goes back to the beginning
and we see things in the process of the making.
It comes into our present and plays a part in every
act from the simplest to the most complex. It
is to the mental stream what the light is to the traveler
who carries it as he passes through the darkness, while
it casts its beams in all directions around him, lighting
up what otherwise would be intolerable gloom.
IMAGINATION IN THE INTERPRETATION
OF HISTORY, LITERATURE, AND ART.-Let us
see some of the most common uses of the imagination.
Suppose I describe to you the battle of the Marne.
Unless you can take the images which my words suggest
and build them into struggling, shouting, bleeding
soldiers; into forts and entanglements and breastworks;
into roaring cannon and whistling bullet and screaming
shell-unless you can take all these separate
images and out of them get one great unified complex,
then my description will be to you only so many words
largely without content, and you will lack the power
to comprehend the historical event in any complete
way. Unless you can read the poem, and out of
the images suggested by the words reconstruct the picture
which was in the mind of the author as he wrote “The
Village Blacksmith” or “Snowbound,”
the significance will have dropped out, and the throbbing
scenes of life and action become only so many dead
words, like the shell of the chrysalis after the butterfly
has left its shroud. Without the power of imagination,
the history of Washington’s winter at Valley
Forge becomes a mere formal recital, and you can never
get a view of the snow-covered tents, the wind-swept
landscape, the tracks in the snow marked by the telltale
drops of blood, or the form of the heartbroken commander
as he kneels in the silent wood to pray for his army.
Without the power to construct this picture as you
read, you may commit the words, and be able to recite
them, and to pass examination upon them, but the living
reality of it will forever escape you.
Your power of imagination determines
your ability to interpret literature of all kinds;
for the interpretation of literature is nothing, after
all, but the reconstruction on our part of the pictures
with their meanings which were in the mind of the
writer as he penned the words, and the experiencing
of the emotions which moved him as he wrote. Small
use indeed to read the history of the centuries unless
we can see in it living, acting people, and real events
occurring in actual environments. Small use to
read the world’s great books unless their characters
are to us real men and women-our brothers
and sisters, interpreted to us by the master minds
of the ages. Anything less than this, and we are
no longer dealing with literature, but with words-like
musical sounds which deal with no theme, or like picture
frames in which no picture has been set. Nor
is the case different in listening to a speaker.
His words are to you only so many sensations of sounds
of such and such pitches and intensities and quality,
unless your mind keeps pace with his and continually
builds the pictures which fill his thought as he speaks.
Lacking imagination, the sculptures of Michael Angelo
and the pictures of Raphael are to you so many pieces
of curiously shaped marble and ingeniously colored
canvas. What the sculptor and the painter have
placed before you must suggest to you images and thoughts
from your own experience, to fill out and make alive
the marble and the canvas, else to you they are dead.
IMAGINATION AND SCIENCE.-Nor
is imagination less necessary in other lines of study.
Without this power of building living, moving pictures
out of images, there is small use to study science
beyond what is immediately present to our senses;
for some of the most fundamental laws of science rest
upon conceptions which can be grasped only as we have
the power of imagination. The student who cannot
get a picture of the molecules of matter, infinitely
close to each other and yet never touching, all in
vibratory motion, yet each within its own orbit, each
a complete unit in itself, yet capable of still further
division into smaller particles,-the student
who cannot see all this in a clear visual image can
never at best have more than a most hazy notion of
the theory of matter. And this means, finally,
that the explanations of light and heat and sound,
and much besides, will be to him largely a jumble
of words which linger in his memory, perchance, but
which never vitally become a possession of his mind.
So with the world of the telescope.
You may have at your disposal all the magnificent
lenses and the accurate machinery owned by modern
observatories; but if you have not within yourself
the power to build what these reveal to you, and what
the books tell you, into the solar system and still
larger systems, you can never study astronomy except
in a blind and piecemeal sort of way, and all the
planets and satellites and suns will never for you
form themselves into a system, no matter what the
books may say about it.
EVERYDAY USES OF IMAGINATION.-But
we may consider a still more practical phase of imagination,
or at least one which has more to do with the humdrum
daily life of most of us. Suppose you go to your
milliner and tell her how you want your spring hat
shaped and trimmed. And suppose you have never
been able to see this hat in toto in your mind,
so as to get an idea of how it will look when completed,
but have only a general notion, because you like red
velvet, white plumes, and a turned-up rim, that this
combination will look well together. Suppose
you have never been able to see how you would look
in this particular hat with your hair done in this
or that way. If you are in this helpless state
shall you not have to depend finally on the taste of
the milliner, or accept the “model,” and
so fail to reveal any taste or individuality on your
own part?
How many times have you been disappointed
in some article of dress, because when you planned
it you were unable to see it all at once so as to
get the full effect; or else you could not see yourself
in it, and so be able to judge whether it suited you!
How many homes have in them draperies and rugs and
wall paper and furniture which are in constant quarrel
because someone could not see before they were assembled
that they were never intended to keep company!
How many people who plan their own houses, would build
them just the same again after seeing them completed?
The man who can see a building complete before a brick
has been laid or a timber put in place, who can see
it not only in its details one by one as he runs them
over in his mind, but can see the building in its
entirety, is the only one who is safe to plan the
structure. And this is the man who is drawing
a large salary as an architect, for imaginations of
this kind are in demand. Only the one who can
see in his “mind’s eye,” before it
is begun, the thing he would create, is capable to
plan its construction. And who will say that
ability to work with images of these kinds is not of
just as high a type as that which results in the construction
of plots upon which stories are built!
THE BUILDING OF IDEALS AND PLANS.-Nor
is the part of imagination less marked in the formation
of our life’s ideals and plans. Everyone
who is not living blindly and aimlessly must have
some ideal, some pattern, by which to square his life
and guide his actions. At some time in our life
I am sure that each of us has selected the person who
filled most nearly our notion of what we should like
to become, and measured ourselves by this pattern.
But there comes a time when we must idealize even the
most perfect individual; when we invest the character
with attributes which we have selected from some other
person, and thus worship at a shrine which is partly
real and partly ideal.
As time goes on, we drop out more
and more of the strictly individual element, adding
correspondingly more of the ideal, until our pattern
is largely a construction of our own imagination,
having in it the best we have been able to glean from
the many characters we have known. How large
a part these ever-changing ideals play in our lives
we shall never know, but certainly the part is not
an insignificant one. And happy the youth who
is able to look into the future and see himself approximating
some worthy ideal. He has caught a vision which
will never allow him to lag or falter in the pursuit
of the flying goal which points the direction of his
efforts.
IMAGINATION AND CONDUCT.-Another
great field for imagination is with reference to conduct
and our relations with others. Over and over again
the thoughtless person has to say, “I am sorry;
I did not think.” The “did not think”
simply means that he failed to realize through his
imagination what would be the consequences of his rash
or unkind words. He would not be unkind, but
he did not imagine how the other would feel; he did
not put himself in the other’s place. Likewise
with reference to the effects of our conduct on ourselves.
What youth, taking his first drink of liquor, would
continue if he could see a clear picture of himself
in the gutter with bloated face and bloodshot eyes
a decade hence? Or what boy, slyly smoking one
of his early cigarettes, would proceed if he could
see his haggard face and nerveless hand a few years
farther along? What spendthrift would throw away
his money on vanities could he vividly see himself
in penury and want in old age? What prodigal
anywhere who, if he could take a good look at himself
sin-stained and broken as he returns to his “father’s
house” after the years of debauchery in the
“far country” would not hesitate long before
he entered upon his downward career?
IMAGINATION AND THINKING.-We
have already considered the use of imagination in
interpreting the thoughts, feelings and handiwork of
others. Let us now look a little more closely
into the part it plays in our own thinking. Suppose
that, instead of reading a poem, we are writing one;
instead of listening to a description of a battle,
we are describing it; instead of looking at the picture,
we are painting it. Then our object is to make
others who may read our language, or listen to our
words, or view our handiwork, construct the mental
images of the situation which furnished the material
for our thought.
Our words and other modes of expression
are but the description of the flow of images in our
minds, and our problem is to make a similar stream
flow through the mind of the listener; but strange
indeed would it be to make others see a situation
which we ourselves cannot see; strange if we could
draw a picture without being able to follow its outlines
as we draw. Or suppose we are teaching science,
and our object is to explain the composition of matter
to someone, and make him understand how light, heat,
etc., depend on the theory of matter; strange
if the listener should get a picture if we ourselves
are unable to get it. Or, once more, suppose
we are to describe some incident, and our aim is to
make its every detail stand out so clearly that no
one can miss a single one. Is it not evident
that we can never make any of these images more clear
to those who listen to us or read our words than they
are to ourselves?
2. THE MATERIAL USED BY IMAGINATION
What is the material, the mental content,
out of which imagination builds its structures?
IMAGES THE STUFF OF IMAGINATION.-Nothing
can enter the imagination the elements of which have
not been in our past experience and then been conserved
in the form of images. The Indians never dreamed
of a heaven whose streets are paved with gold, and
in whose center stands a great white throne.
Their experience had given them no knowledge of these
things; and so, perforce, they must build their heaven
out of the images which they had at command, namely,
those connected with the chase and the forest.
So their heaven was the “happy hunting ground,”
inhabited by game and enemies over whom the blessed
forever triumphed. Likewise the valiant soldiers
whose deadly arrows and keen-edged swords and battle-axes
won on the bloody field of Hastings, did not picture
a far-off day when the opposing lines should kill
each other with mighty engines hurling death from
behind parapets a dozen miles away. Firearms
and the explosive powder were yet unknown, hence there
were no images out of which to build such a picture.
I do not mean that your imagination
cannot construct an object which has never before
been in your experience as a whole, for the work of
the imagination is to do precisely this thing.
It takes the various images at its disposal and builds
them into wholes which may never have existed
before, and which may exist now only as a creation
of the mind. And yet we have put into this new
product not a single element which was not
familiar to us in the form of an image of one kind
or another. It is the form which is new;
the material is old. This is exemplified
every time an inventor takes the two fundamental parts
of a machine, the lever and the inclined
plane, and puts them together in relations new
to each other and so evolves a machine whose complexity
fairly bewilders us. And with other lines of thinking,
as in mechanics, inventive power consists in being
able to see the old in new relations, and so constantly
build new constructions out of old material. It
is this power which gives us the daring and original
thinker, the Newton whose falling apple suggested
to him the planets falling toward the sun in their
orbits; the Darwin who out of the thigh bone of an
animal was able to construct in his imagination the
whole animal and the environment in which it must
have lived, and so add another page to the earth’s
history.
THE TWO FACTORS IN IMAGINATION.-From
the simple facts which we have just been considering,
the conclusion is plain that our power of imagination
depends on two factors; namely, (1) the materials
available in the form of usable images capable of
recall, and (2) our constructive ability,
or the power to group these images into new wholes,
the process being guided by some purpose or end.
Without this last provision, the products of our imagination
are daydreams with their “castles in Spain,”
which may be pleasing and proper enough on occasions,
but which as an habitual mode of thought are extremely
dangerous.
IMAGINATION LIMITED BY STOCK OF IMAGES.-That
the mind is limited in its imagination by its stock
of images may be seen from a simple illustration:
Suppose that you own a building made of brick, but
that you find the old one no longer adequate for your
needs, and so purpose to build a new one; and suppose,
further, that you have no material for your new building
except that contained in the old structure. It
is evident that you will be limited in constructing
your new building by the material which was in the
old. You may be able to build the new structure
in any one of a multitude of different forms or styles
of architecture, so far as the material at hand will
lend itself to that style of building, and providing,
further, that you are able to make the plans.
But you will always be limited finally by the character
and amount of material obtainable from the old structure.
So with the mind. The old building is your past
experience, and the separate bricks are the images
out of which you must build your new structure through
the imagination. Here, as before, nothing can
enter which was not already on hand. Nothing
goes into the new structure so far as its constructive
material is concerned except images, and there is nowhere
to get images but from the results of our past experience.
LIMITED ALSO BY OUR CONSTRUCTIVE ABILITY.-But
not only is our imaginative output limited by the
amount of material in the way of images which
we have at our command, but also and perhaps not less
by our constructive ability. Many persons
might own the old pile of bricks fully adequate for
the new structure, and then fail to get the new because
they were unable to construct it. So, many who
have had a rich and varied experience in many lines
are yet unable to muster their images of these experiences
in such a way that new products are obtainable from
them. These have the heavy, draft-horse kind of
intellect which goes plodding on, very possibly doing
good service in its own circumscribed range, but destined
after all to service in the narrow field with its
low, drooping horizon. They are never able to
take a dash at a two-minute clip among equally swift
competitors, or even swing at a good round pace along
the pleasant highways of an experience lying beyond
the confines of the narrow here and now.
These are the minds which cannot discover relations;
which cannot think. Minds of this type
can never be architects of their own fate, or even
builders, but must content themselves to be hod carriers.
THE NEED OF A PURPOSE.-Nor
are we to forget that we cannot intelligently erect
our building until we know the purpose for which
it is to be used. No matter how much building
material we may have on hand, nor how skillful an
architect we may be, unless our plans are guided by
some definite aim, we shall be likely to end with a
structure that is fanciful and useless. Likewise
with our thought structure. Unless our imagination
is guided by some aim or purpose, we are in danger
of drifting into mere daydreams which not only are
useless in furnishing ideals for the guidance of our
lives, but often become positively harmful when grown
into a habit. The habit of daydreaming is hard
to break, and, continuing, holds our thought in thrall
and makes it unwilling to deal with the plain, homely
things of everyday life. Who has not had the
experience of an hour or a day spent in a fairyland
of dreams, and awakened at the end to find himself
rather dissatisfied with the prosaic round of duties
which confronted him! I do not mean to say that
we should never dream; but I know of no more
pernicious mental habit than that of daydreaming carried
to excess, for it ends in our following every will-o’-the-wisp
of fancy, and places us at the mercy of every chance
suggestion.
3. TYPES OF IMAGINATION
Although imagination enters every
field of human experience, and busies itself with
every line of human interest, yet all its activities
can be classed under two different types. These
are (1) reproductive, and (2) creative
imagination.
REPRODUCTIVE IMAGINATION.-Reproductive
imagination is the type we use when we seek to reproduce
in our minds the pictures described by others, or
pictures from our own past experience which lack the
completeness and fidelity to make them true memory.
The narration or description of the
story book, the history or geography text; the tale
of adventure recounted by traveler or hunter; the account
of a new machine or other invention; fairy tales and
myths-these or any other matter that may
be put into words capable of suggesting images to
us are the field for reproductive imagination.
In this use of the imagination our business is to
follow and not lead, to copy and not create.
CREATIVE IMAGINATION.-But
we must have leaders, originators-else we
should but imitate each other and the world would be
at a standstill. Indeed, every person, no matter
how humble his station or how humdrum his life, should
be in some degree capable of initiative and originality.
Such ability depends in no small measure on the power
to use creative imagination.
Creative imagination takes the images
from our own past experience or those gleaned from
the work of others and puts them together in new and
original forms. The inventor, the writer, the
mechanic or the artist who possesses the spirit of
creation is not satisfied with mere reproduction,
but seeks to modify, to improve, to originate.
True, many important inventions and discoveries have
come by seeming accident, by being stumbled upon.
Yet it holds that the person who thus stumbles upon
the discovery or invention is usually one whose creative
imagination is actively at work seeking to
create or discover in his field. The world’s
progress as a whole does not come by accident, but
by creative planning. Creative imagination is
always found at the van of progress, whether in the
life of an individual or a nation.
4. TRAINING THE IMAGINATION
Imagination is highly susceptible
of cultivation, and its training should constitute
one of the most important aims of education. Every
school subject, but especially such subjects as deal
with description and narration-history,
literature, geography, nature study and science-is
rich in opportunities for the use of imagination.
Skillful teaching will not only find in these subjects
a means of training the imagination, but will so employ
imagination in their study as to make them living
matter, throbbing with life and action, rather than
so many dead words or uninteresting facts.
GATHERING OF MATERIAL FOR IMAGINATION.-Theoretically,
then, it is not hard to see what we must do to cultivate
our imagination. In the first place, we must
take care to secure a large and usable stock of
images from all fields of perception. It
is not enough to have visual images alone or chiefly,
for many a time shall we need to build structures
involving all the other senses and the motor activities
as well. This means that we must have a first-hand
contact with just as large an environment as possible-large
in the world of Nature with all her varied forms suited
to appeal to every avenue of sense; large in our contact
with people in all phases of experience, laughing with
those who laugh and weeping with those who weep; large
in contact with books, the interpreters of the men
and events of the past. We must not only let all
these kinds of environment drift in upon us as they
may chance to do, but we must deliberately seek
to increase our stock of experience; for, after all,
experience lies at the bottom of imagination as of
every other mental process. And not only must
we thus put ourselves in the way of acquiring new
experience, but we must by recall and reconstruction,
as we saw in an earlier discussion, keep our imagery
fresh and usable. For whatever serves to improve
our images, at the same time is bettering the very
foundation of imagination.
WE MUST NOT FAIL TO BUILD.-In
the second place, we must not fail to build.
For it is futile to gather a large supply of images
if we let the material lie unused. How many people
there are who put in all their time gathering material
for their structure, and never take time to do the
building! They look and listen and read, and are
so fully occupied in absorbing the immediately present
that they have no time to see the wider significance
of the things with which they deal. They are like
the students who are too busy studying to have time
to think. They are so taken up with receiving
that they never perform the higher act of combining.
They are the plodding fact gatherers, many of them
doing good service, collecting material which the
seer and the philosopher, with their constructive
power, build together into the greater wholes which
make our systems of thought. They are the ones
who fondly think that, by reading books full of wild
tales and impossible plots, they are training their
imagination. For them, sober history, no matter
how heroic or tragic in its quiet movements, is too
tame. They have not the patience to read solid
and thoughtful literature, and works of science and
philosophy are a bore. These are the persons who
put in all their time in looking at and admiring other
people’s houses, and never get time to do any
building for themselves.
WE SHOULD CARRY OUR IDEALS INTO ACTION.-The
best training for the imagination which I know anything
about is that to be obtained by taking our own material
and from it building our own structure. It is
true that it will help to look through other people’s
houses enough to discover their style of building:
we should read. But just as it is not necessary
for us to put in all the time we devote to looking
at houses, in inspecting doll houses and Chinese pagodas,
so it is not best for us to get all our notions of
imaginative structures from the marvelous and the
unreal; we get good training for the imagination from
reading “Hiawatha,” but so can we from
reading the history of the primitive Indian tribes.
The pictures in “Snowbound” are full of
suggestion for the imagination: but so is the
history of the Puritans in New England. But even
with the best of models before us, it is not enough
to follow others’ building. We must construct
stories for ourselves, must work out plots for our
own stories; we must have time to meditate and plan
and build, not idly in the daydream, but purposefully,
and then make our images real by carrying them
out in activity, if they are of such a character
that this is possible; we must build our ideals and
work to them in the common course of our everyday
life; we must think for ourselves instead of forever
following the thinking of others; we must initiate
as well as imitate.
5. PROBLEMS FOR OBSERVATION AND INTROSPECTION
1. Explain the cause and the
remedy in the case of such errors as the following:
Children who defined mountain
as land 1,000 or more feet in height
said that the factory smokestack
was higher than the mountain
because it “went straight
up” and the mountain did not.
Children often think of the
horizon as fastened to the earth.
Islands are thought of as
floating on the water.
2. How would you stimulate the
imagination of a child who does not seem to picture
or make real the descriptions in reading, geography,
etc.? Is it possible that such inability
may come from an insufficient basis in observation,
and hence in images?
3. Classify the school subjects,
including domestic science and manual training, as
to their ability to train (1) reproductive and (2)
creative imagination.
4. Do you ever skip the descriptive
parts of a book and read the narrative? As you
read the description of a bit of natural scenery, does
it rise before you? As you study the description
of a battle, can you see the movements of the troops?
5. Have you ever planned a house
as you think you would like it? Can you see it
from all sides? Can you see all the rooms in their
various finishings and furnishings?
6. What plans and ideals have
you formed, and what ones are you at present following?
Can you describe the process by which your plans or
ideals change? Do you ever try to put yourself
in the other person’s place?
7. Take some fanciful unreality
which your imagination has constructed and see whether
you can select from it familiar elements from actual
experiences.
8. What use do you make of imagination
in the common round of duties in your daily life?
What are you doing to improve your imagination?