PENN’S SECOND VISIT TO THE PROVINCE: CLOSING YEARS
The thoughts with which Penn’s
mind was occupied during the years of hiding appear
in his book, “Some Fruits of Solitude.”
Robert Louis Stevenson found a copy of it in a book-shop
in San Francisco, and carried it in his pocket many
days, reading it in street-cars and ferry-boats.
He found it, he says, “in all places a peaceful
and sweet companion;” and he adds, “there
is not a man living, no, nor recently dead, that could
put, with so lovely a spirit, so much honest, kind
wisdom into words.”
“The author blesseth God for
his retirement,” so the book begins, “and
kisses the gentle hand which led him into it; for though
it should prove barren to the world, it can never
do so to him. He has now had some time he can
call his own; a property he was never so much master
of before; in which he has taken a view of himself
and the world, and observed wherein he hath hit and
missed the mark. And he verily thinks, were he
to live his life over again, he could not only, with
God’s grace, serve him, but his neighbor and
himself, better than he hath done, and have seven
years of his life to spare.”
Government and Religion have the longest
chapters in this volume of reflections, as being the
matters in which William was most interested.
“Happy that king,” he says, “who
is great by justice, and that people who are free
by obedience.” “Where example keeps
pace with authority, power hardly fails to be obeyed,
and magistrates to be honoured.” “Let
the people think they govern, and they will be governed.”
“Religion is the fear of God, and its demonstration
good works; and faith is the root of both.”
“To be like Christ, then, is to be a Christian.”
“Some folk think they may scold, rail, hate,
rob, and kill too: so it be but for God’s
sake. But nothing in us, unlike him, can please
him.” So the book goes, page after page,
always serious and sensible, full of simplicity and
kindliness, cheerful and brotherly and unfailingly
religious. It is the work of one who is trying
his best to live for his brethren and in Christ’s
spirit.
Another significant writing of this
period is Penn’s “Plan for the Peace of
Europe.” The calamities of the war then
in progress on the Continent gave him arguments enough
for the desirableness of peace. The means of
peace is justice, and the means of justice is government.
It is plain to all that a state wherein any private
citizen might avenge himself upon his neighbor would
be a place of confusion and distress. “For
this cause they have sessions, terms, assizes, and
parliaments, to overrule men’s passions and
resentments, that they may not be judges in their own
cause, nor punishers of their own wrongs.”
Penn proposes that the same relation between peace
and justice which is enforced between citizen and
citizen be also enforced between nation and nation.
“Now,” he says, “if the sovereign
princes of Europe ... for love of peace and order [would]
agree to meet by their stated deputies in a general
Diet, Estates or Parliament and there establish rules
of justice for sovereign princes to observe one to
another; and thus to meet yearly, or once in two or
three years at the farthest, or as they shall see
cause, and to be stiled, The Sovereign or Imperial
Diet, Parliament or State of Europe: before which
Sovereign Assembly should be brought all differences
depending between one sovereign and another that cannot
be made up by private embassies before the sessions
begin; and that if any of the sovereignties that constitute
these imperial states shall refuse to submit their
claim or pretensions to them, or to abide and perform
the judgment thereof and seek their remedy by arms,
or delay their compliance beyond the time prefixt
in their resolutions, all the other sovereignties,
united as one strength, shall compel the submission
and performance of the sentence, with damages to the
suffering party, and charges to the sovereignties
that obliged their submission; ... peace would be procured
and continued in Europe.” The principle
of international arbitration, the Conference at the
Hague, and all like meetings which shall be held hereafter,
are thus foreshadowed.
These two productions of Penn’s
season of retirement the “Fruits of
Solitude,” and the “Plan for the Peace
of Europe” illustrate again the two
qualities which make him singularly eminent among the
founders of commonwealths. He was at once a philosopher
and a statesman; he was interested alike in religion
and in politics. There have been many politicians
to whom religion has been of no concern. There
have been many religious persons in high positions
who have been so shut in by church walls that they
have been incapable of a wider outlook; they have
accordingly been narrow, prejudiced, and often unpractical
people; they have been blind to the elemental social
fact of difference; they have hated the thought of
toleration. Penn was almost alone among the good
men of our era of colonization in being at the same
time a man of the world and a man of the other world.
Penn came out of his exile in 1693
burdened with misfortune. He had been deprived
of his government; he was sadly in debt; he had lost
many of his friends. His colonists in Pennsylvania
declined to lend him money. His brethren in England
drew up a confession of wrong-doing for him to sign:
“If in any things during those late revolutions
I have concerned myself either by words or writings,
in love, pity or good will to any in distress [meaning
the king] further than consisted with Truth’s
honor or the Church’s peace, I am sorry for
it.” But he would not sign. To these
troubles was added a greater grief in the death of
his wife. “An excellent wife and mother,”
he said of her, “an entire and constant friend,
of a more than common capacity, and greater modesty
and humility; yet most equal and undaunted in danger.”
A brave soul, no doubt, as befitted her parentage,
and of a devout and consecrated spirit.
But William was ever of a serene and
cheerful disposition. Neither loss, nor disappointment,
nor bereavement could shut out the sun. His religious
faith strengthened him. “We must needs disorder
ourselves,” he had written in his “Fruits
of Solitude,” “if we only look at our losses.
But if we consider how little we deserve what is left,
our passions will cool, and our murmurs will turn
into thankfulness.” “Though our Saviour’s
passion is over, his compassion is not. That never
fails his humble, sincere disciples; in him they find
more than all that they lose in the world.”
During the six years which followed,
this strong confidence was justified. He regained
his government and his good name. He also married
a second wife, Hannah Callowhill, a strong, sensible,
and estimable Quaker lady of some means, living in
Bristol.
The only satisfactory information
as to the personal appearance of Penn in mature life
is that which is given by Sylvanus Bevan. Bevan
was a Quaker apothecary in London, who had a remarkable
gift for carving portraits in ivory. After Penn’s
death, he made such a portrait of him from memory.
The men who had known William liked it greatly.
Lord Cobham, to whom Bevan sent it, said, “It
is William Penn himself.” It represents
him in a curled wig, with full cheeks and a double
chin a pleasant, masterful, and serious
person. Clarkson says that in his attire he was
“very neat, though plain.” Penn advised
his children to choose clothes “neither unshapely
nor fantastical;” and he illustrated to King
James the difference between the Roman Catholic and
the Quaker religions by the difference between his
hat and the king’s. “The only difference,”
he said, “lies in the ornaments that have been
added to thine.” His dress was probably
that which was common to gentlemen in his day, but
without extremes of color or adornment. For some
time after becoming a Quaker he wore his sword, having
consulted Fox, who said, “I advise thee to wear
it as long as thou canst.” Presently Fox,
seeing him without it, said, “William, where
is thy sword?” To which Penn replied, “I
have taken thy advice: I wore it as long as I
could.”
The sober cheerfulness of Penn’s
attire comported well with his conversation.
It is true that Bishop Burnet, who did not like him,
says that “he had a tedious, luscious way of
talking, not apt to overcome a man’s reason,
though it might tire his patience.” But
Dean Swift enjoyed him, and testified that “he
talked very agreeably and with great spirit.”
The Friends of Reading Meeting even noted that he was
“facetious in conversation,” and there
is a tradition of a venerable Friend who spoke of
him “as having naturally an excess of levity
of spirit for a grave minister.” A handsome,
graceful, and even a merry gentleman it was who married
Hannah Callowhill.
For a time he devoted himself again
to the work of the ministry. He went about, as
in former days, preaching, sometimes in the market-hall,
sometimes in the fields. Once, in Ireland, the
bishop sent an officer to disperse the meeting, complaining
that Penn had left him “nobody to preach to
but the mayor, church-wardens, a few of the constables,
and the bare walls.”
His heart, however, was in his province.
The affairs of Pennsylvania had been going badly.
There had been a hot contention between the council
and the assembly, and another between the province
and the territory. The officials, too, whom Penn
had appointed, had quarreled among themselves.
William complained that they were excessively “governmentish;”
meaning that they liked authority and that they took
details very seriously. The situation, however,
was inevitably difficult. In his relation to
the king, the governor was a feudal sovereign; in
his relation to the people he was, by Penn’s
arrangement, the executive of a democracy. Penn
himself reconciled the two positions by his own tact
and unselfishness, as well as by a certain masterfulness
to which those about him instinctively and willingly
yielded. He proved the motto of his book-plate,
Dum Clavum Teneam; all went well while he with
his own hands held the helm. But his deputies
were not so competent. The colony fell into two
parties, the proprietary and the popular, representing
these two ideas. Then the governor whom the king
had appointed during Penn’s retirement was a
soldier, and his un-Quakerlike notions as to the right
conduct of a colony brought a new element of confusion
into affairs which were already sufficiently confounded.
At last, in 1699, it became possible
for the founder to make another visit to his province.
He brought his family with him, evidently intending
to stay. Philadelphia was now a city of some seven
hundred houses, and had nearly seven thousand inhabitants.
The people were at that moment in deep depression,
having just been visited with a plague of yellow fever.
The pestilence, however, had abated, and Penn was
received with sober rejoicings. He took up his
residence in the “slate-roof house,” a
modest mansion which stood on the corner of Second
Street and Norris Alley; it was pulled down in 1867.
Now began a season of good government.
The business of piracy had for some time been merrily
carried on by various enterprising persons, some of
whom lived very respectably in Philadelphia. William
put a stop to it. The importing of slaves from
Africa was at that time considered by most persons
to be a good thing both for the planters and for the
slaves. Already, however, at the Pennsylvania
yearly meeting of Friends in 1688, some who came from
Kriesheim, in Germany, had protested against it,
“Who first of all their testimonial
gave
Against the oppressor, for the outcast
slave.”
And, in consequence, though slaves
were still imported, they were humanely treated.
Penn interested himself in the improvement of their
condition. He was also concerned in the progress
of the prison reforms which he had proposed in the
original establishment of the colony. He employed
a watchman to cry the news, the weather, and the time
of day in the Philadelphia streets. Regarding
the Constitution, about which there had been so much
contention, he addressed the council and the assembly
in terms of characteristic friendliness. “Friends,”
he said, “if in the Constitution by charter
there be anything that jars, alter it. If you
want a law for this or that, prepare it.”
He advised them, however, not to trifle with government,
and wished there were no need to have any government
at all. In general, he said, the fewer laws, the
better. The result was a new Constitution.
It provided that the council should be appointed by
the governor, and that the assembly should have the
right to originate laws. It was more simple and
workable than the previous legislation, and lasted
until the Revolution.
Meanwhile, Penn was journeying about
the country in his old way, preaching. At Merion,
a small boy of the family where he was entertained,
being much impressed with the great man’s looks
and speech, peeped through the latchet-hole of his
chamber door, and both saw and heard him at his prayers.
Near Haverford, a small girl, walking along the country
road, was overtaken by the governor, who took her up
behind him on his horse, and so carried her on her
way, her bare feet dangling by the horse’s side.
Clarkson, the chief of the biographers
of Penn, who collected these and other incidents,
gives us a glimpse of him as he appeared at this time
at Quaker meetings. “He was of such humility
that he used generally to sit at the lowest end of
the space allotted to ministers, always taking care
to place above himself poor ministers, and those who
appeared to him to be peculiarly gifted.”
He liked to encourage young men to speak. When
he himself spoke, it was in the simplest words, easy
to be understood, and with many homely illustrations.
At the same time, on state occasions, as the proprietor
of Pennsylvania and representative of the sovereign,
he used some ceremony, marching through the Philadelphia
streets to the opening of the assembly with a mace-bearer
before him, and having an officer standing at his
gate on audience days, with a long staff tipped with
silver. Acquainted with affairs, and with a knowledge
of the relations between government and human nature
drawn from a wide experience, he knew the distinction,
at which some of his Quaker brethren stumbled, between
personal humility and the proper dignity of official
station.
In the intervals left him by the demands
of church and state, he busied himself with the improvement
of his place at Pennsbury. Here he had a considerable
house in the midst of pleasant gardens. He took
great pleasure in personal superintendence of the
grounds and buildings, planting vines and cutting
vistas through the trees. “The country is
to be preferred,” he wrote in “Fruits
of Solitude.” “The country is both
the philosopher’s garden and library, in which
he reads and contemplates the power, wisdom, and goodness
of God.” “The knowledge and improvement
of it,” he declared, is “man’s oldest
business and trade, and the best he can be of.”
Within were silver plate and satin
curtains, and embroidered chairs and couches.
The proprietor’s bed was covered with a “quilt
of white Holland quilted in green silk by Letitia,”
his daughter. “Send up,” he writes
to James Logan, at Philadelphia, “our great
stewpan and cover, and little soup dish, and two or
three pounds of coffee if sold in town, and three
pounds of wicks ready for candles.” Mrs.
Penn asks Logan to provide “candlesticks, and
great candles, some green ones, and pewter and earthen
basins, mops, salts, looking-glass, a piece of dried
beef, and a firkin or two of good butter.”
Penn rode a large white horse, and
had a coach, with a black man to drive it, and a “rattling
leathern conveniency,” probably smaller, and
a sedan chair for Mrs. Penn. In the river lay
the barge, of which William was so fond that he wrote
from England to charge that it be carefully looked
after. Somebody expressed surprise one day when
Penn went out in it against wind and tide. “I
have been sailing all my life against wind and tide,”
he said.
Much of the work of the estate was
done by slaves. The fact troubled the proprietor’s
conscience. He laid it upon his own soul, as he
did upon the souls of his brethren in the colony,
“to be very careful in discharging a good conscience
towards them in all respects, but more especially
for the good of their souls, that they might, as frequent
as may be, come to meeting on first-days.”
A special meeting was appointed for slaves once a
month, and their masters were expected to come with
them. Finally, Penn liberated all his slaves.
In his will of 1701, “I give,” he says,
“to my blacks their freedom, as is under my hand
already, and to old Sam 100 acres, to be his children’s
after he and his wife are dead, forever.”
The Pennsbury house had a great hall
in the midst, where the governor in an oak armchair
received his neighbors, the Indians. Here they
came, in paint and feathers, “Connoondaghtoh,
king of the Susquehannah Indians; Wopaththa, king
of the Shawanese; Weewinjough, chief of the Ganawese;
and Ahookassong, brother of the emperor of the five
nations;” and many other humbler braves.
John Richardson, a Yorkshire Quaker, visited Penn
at Pennsbury and saw them. William gave them match-coats,
he says, and “some other things,” including
a reasonable supply of rum, which the chiefs dispensed
to the warriors severally in small portions: “So
they came quietly, and in a solid manner, and took
their draws.” He did not smoke, a fact
which the Indians must have noted as a curious eccentricity.
Then they made a small fire out of doors, and the men
sat about it in a ring, singing “a very melodious
hymn,” beating the ground between the verses
with short sticks, and, after a circling dance, departed.
Penn got on most happily with the Indians. The
peaceful Quakers went about unarmed and were never
in danger. The only disorderly folk thereabout
were white men.
In the midst of these rural joys,
news came that a movement was on foot to put an end
to proprietary governments, thereby bringing all colonies
under the immediate control of the crown. Penn
felt that it was necessary for him to return to England
to block this inconvenient legislation. On the
28th of October, he assembled the citizens of Philadelphia,
and presented them with a charter for their city.
In the Friends’ meeting, he said that he “looked
over all infirmities and outwards, and had an eye
to the regions of the spirit, wherein was our sweetest
tie.” Then, says Norris, “in true
love he took his leave of us.” Thus, after
two years wherein peace and quietness prevailed over
all misunderstanding and opposition, he set sail in
1701, and never saw Pennsylvania again.
His house at Pennsbury fell into ruins, due
in large part to the leakage of a leaden reservoir
on the roof, and was taken down before
the Revolution. The furniture was gradually dispersed.
For some years it was “deemed a kind of pious
stealth,” among those who were most loyal to
the proprietor, to carry away something out of the
house when they chanced to visit its empty halls.
One gentleman rejoiced in the possession of the mantelpiece;
another had a pair of Penn’s plush breeches.
William Penn’s four years of
actual residence gave him all the satisfaction which
he ever got from his colonial possessions. All
else was worry, labor, and expense. The province
was a sore financial burden. As proprietor he
was charged with the payment, in large part, of the
expenses of government. The returns from rents
and sales were slow and uncertain. The taxes
on imports and exports, to which he had a charter
right, he had generously declined. When he asked
the assembly, in remembrance of that liberality, to
send him money in his financial straits, they were
not minded to respond. Penn belonged to that high
fraternity of noble souls who do not know how to make
bargains. His impulses were generous to a fault,
and he had an invincible confidence that his neighbors
would deal with him in the same spirit. The consequence
was that year by year the expenses grew, and there
was but a slender income. “O Pennsylvania,”
he cries, “what hast thou cost me? Above
thirty thousand pounds more than I ever got by it;
two hazardous and most fatiguing voyages, my straits
and slavery here, and my child’s soul, almost.”
The last allusion is to Guli’s
son, William, whose dissipation Penn always attributed
to a lack of fatherly care during his first visit to
the province. Penn finally sent the boy to Pennsbury,
hoping that the quiet, the absence of temptation,
and the wholesome joys of a country life, might amend
him. But William went from bad to worse, was arrested
in Philadelphia in a tavern brawl, was formally excommunicated
by the Quakers, and came home to England to give his
father further pain.
To the financial burdens of the province
were added the difficulties of government. Penn
succeeded very well in keeping his colony, he
defended his boundaries against Lord Baltimore, and
he defeated those who would have taken away his rule
and given it to the king; but the governing of the
colony across three thousand miles of sea was another
matter. The moment he withdrew the restraining
influence of his personal presence, all manner of
contentions came into the light of day.
The question of the prudence of bearing
arms was vigorously debated. James Logan, secretary
of the province, and Penn’s ablest counselor,
urged the need of military defenses. Conservative
Friends opposed it.
Churchmen had been settling in the
province. One of William’s oldest friends,
George Keith, who had accompanied him on his religious
mission to Holland, had gone into the Episcopal ministry.
Logan says, in a letter to Penn, that “not suffering
them to be superior” was accounted by the churchmen
as the equivalent of persecution.
Colonel Quarry, a judge of the admiralty,
appointed by the British government to enforce the
navigation laws in the colony, was responsible to
the Board of Trade in London, and independent of the
governor and of the assembly. He exercised his
office of critic and censor to the annoyance of Penn.
To these various sources of trouble
was added an unending strife between the governor’s
deputy and the people. Penn’s habit of looking
always on the best side made him a bad judge of men,
and the deputies whom he sent were few of them competent;
some were not even respectable. Penn, with his
characteristic invincible blindness, took their part.
Finally, the disputations, protests,
and complaints, with direct attacks upon Penn’s
interests, and even upon his character, got to such
a pass that he addressed a letter of expostulation
to the people. “When it pleased God to
open a way for me to settle that colony,” he
wrote, “I had reason to expect a solid comfort
from the services done to many hundreds of people....
But, alas! as to my part, instead of reaping the like
advantages, some of the greatest of my troubles have
sprung from thence. The many combats I have engaged
in, the great pains and incredible expense for your
welfare and ease, to the decay of my former estate
... with the undeserved opposition I have met with
from thence, sink into me with sorrow, that, if not
supported by a superior hand, might have overwhelmed
me long ago. And I cannot but think it hard measure,
that, while it has proved a land of freedom and flourishing,
it should become to me, by whose means it was principally
made a country, the cause of grief, trouble, and poverty.”
So heavy was the financial burden,
and so vexatious and disheartening the bickering and
ingratitude, that Penn thought seriously of selling
his governorship; and it was in the market for several
years awaiting a purchaser. Indeed, in 1712,
he had so far perfected a bargain to transfer his
proprietary rights to the crown for L12,000, that nothing
remained to be done save the affixing of his signature.
Before his name was signed, he fell suddenly ill,
and the transaction went no farther.
In the midst of these many troubles,
in themselves serious enough, there came another.
Penn’s business manager for his estates in England
and Ireland was Philip Ford. For a long time,
Ford’s payments had been less and less; Penn
was continually complaining that he got so little from
his property. Still, Ford’s accounts went
without examination, and some of his financial reports
were not so much as opened. William had his customary
confidence in his agent’s honesty. At last,
when things got so bad that something had to be done,
it appeared by Ford’s books that, instead of
Ford’s being in debt to Penn, Penn was in debt
to him for more than ten thousand pounds. This
was the result of long, ingenious, and unmolested
bookkeeping. And Penn had made himself liable
by his careless silence. Then Ford died, and
his widow and children claimed everything which stood
in Penn’s name. Penn, it appeared, had borrowed
money of Ford, and had given him a mortgage on his
Pennsylvania estates as security. When the loan
was paid, the mortgage had not been returned.
Not only did Mrs. Ford retain it, but she sued Penn
for three thousand pounds rent, which was due, she
said, from the property of which William was once
owner, but which he now held as tenant of the Fords.
So far was this iniquitous business pursued, that
Penn was arrested as he was at a religious meeting
in Gracechurch Street, and was imprisoned for debt
in the Fleet, or its precincts.
This was the turn in the tide.
Everybody disapproved of treatment so unjust and extortionate.
William’s friends raised money, and made a compromise
with the Fords, and got him free. In Pennsylvania,
too, the contentions were quieted by a good governor.
And as the wars came to an end, trade so increased
that the province presently yielded a substantial
income.
Penn retired to Ruscombe, in Berkshire,
in the pleasant country. Here he had his family
about him. He was now a grandfather, his son William
having a son and a daughter. “So that now
we are major, minor, and minimus. I bless the
Lord mine are pretty well, Johnny lively;
Tommy a lovely, large child; and my grandson, Springett,
a mere Saracen; his sister, a beauty.”
Of his second marriage there were six children, four
of whom John, Thomas, Margaret, and Richard became
proprietors of Pennsylvania. Thomas had two sons,
John and Granville; Richard had two, John and Richard.
When the proprietary government ended, in 1776, it
was in the hands of the heirs of William Penn.
In 1711, Penn wrote a preface to John
Banks’s Journal, dictating it, as his custom
was, walking to and fro with his cane in his hand,
thumping the floor to mark the emphasis. “Now
reader,” he concludes, “before I take
leave of thee, let me advise thee to hold thy religion
in the spirit, whether thou prayest, praisest or ministerest
to others, ... which, that all God’s people
may do, is, and hath long been the earnest desire
and fervent supplication of theirs and thy faithful
friend in the Lord Jesus Christ, W. Penn.”
This is the last word of his writing which remains.
The next year he had a paralytic stroke,
and another, and another. This impaired his memory
and his mind. Thus he continued for six years,
as happily as was possible under the circumstances.
He went often to meeting, where he frequently spoke,
briefly, but with “sound and savory expressions.”
He walked about his gardens, saw his friends, and
delighted in the company of his wife and children.
Each year left him weaker than the year before; but
his days were filled with serenity. He was surrounded
with all the comforts which a generous income, an
affectionate family, the respect of his neighbors,
and the approval of God, could give him.
“He that lives to live forever,”
he had written in his “Fruits of Solitude,”
“never fears dying. Nor can the means be
terrible to him, that heartily believes the end.
For though death be a dark passage, it leads to immortality;
and that is recompense enough for suffering of it....
And this is the comfort of the good, that the grave
cannot hold them, and that they live as soon as they
die.”
Into the fullness of this life he
entered on the 30th of July, 1718, being seventy-four
years old.