Although Scott was hard upon his thirty-fifth year when the Lay appeared, and although he had already a considerable literary reputation in Edinburgh, and some in London, the amount of his original publications was then but small.  Indeed, on the austere principles of those who deny ‘originality’ to such things as reviews, or as the essays in the Minstrelsy, it must be limited to a mere handful, though of very pleasant delights, the half-dozen of ballads made up by ‘Glenfinlas,’ ‘The Eve of St. John,’ the rather inferior ‘Fire King,’ the beautiful ‘Cadzow Castle’ (not yet mentioned, but containing some of its author’s most charming topic lines), the fragment of ’The Grey Brother,’ and a few minor pieces.

With the Lay he took an entirely different position.  The mere bulk of the poem was considerable; and, putting for the instant entirely out of question its peculiarities of subject, metre, and general treatment, it was a daring innovation in point of class.  The eighteenth century had, even under its own laws and conditions, distinctly eschewed long narrative poems, the unreadable epics of Glover, for instance, belonging to that class of exception which really does prove the rule.  Pope’s Rape had been burlesque, and his Dunciad, satire; hardly the ghost of a narrative had appeared in Thomson and Young; Shenstone, Collins, Gray, had nothing de longue haleine; the entire poetical works of Goldsmith probably do not exceed in length a canto of the Lay; Cowper had never attempted narrative; Crabbe was resting on the early laurels of his brief Village, etc., and had not begun his tales. Thalaba, indeed, had been published, and no doubt was not without effect on Scott himself; but it was not popular, and the author was still under the sway of the craze against rhyme.  To all intents and purposes the poet was addressing the public, in a work combining the attractions of fiction with the attractions of verse at considerable length, for the first time since Dryden had done so in his Fables, a hundred and five years before.  And though the mastery of the method might be less, the stories were original, they were continuous, and they displayed an entirely new gust and seasoning both of subject and of style.

There can be no doubt at all, for those who put metre in its proper place, that a very large, perhaps the much larger, part of the appeal of the Lay was metrical.  The public was sick of the couplet ­had indeed been sickened twice over, if the abortive revolt of Gray and Collins be counted.  It did not take, and was quite right in not taking, to the rhymeless, shortened Pindaric of Sayers and Southey, as to anything but an eccentric ‘sport’ of poetry.  What Scott had to offer was practically new, or at least novel.  It is universally known ­and Scott, who was only too careless of his own claims, and the very last of men to steal or conceal those of others, made no secret of it ­that the suggestion of the Lay in metre came from a private recitation or reading of Coleridge’s Christabel, written in the year of Scott’s marriage, but not published till twenty years later, and more than ten after the appearance of the Lay.  Coleridge seems to have regarded Scott’s priority with an irritability less suitable to his philosophic than to his poetical character. But he had, in the first place, only himself, if anybody, to blame; in the second, Scott more than made the loan his own property by the variations executed on its motive; and in the third, Coleridge’s original right was far less than he seems to have honestly thought, and than most people have guilelessly assumed since.

For the iambic dimeter, freely altered by the licences of equivalence, anacrusis, and catalexis, though not recently practised in English when Christabel and the Lay set the example, is an inevitable result of the clash between accented, alliterative, asyllabic rhythm and quantitative, exactly syllabic metre, which accompanied the transformation of Anglo-Saxon into English.  We have distinct approaches to it in the thirteenth century Genesis; it attains considerable development in Spenser’s The Oak and the Brere; anybody can see that the latter part of Milton’s Comus was written under the breath of its spirit.  But it had not hitherto been applied on any great scale, and the delusions under which the eighteenth century laboured as to the syllabic restrictions of English poetry had made it almost impossible that it should be.  At the same time, that century, by its lighter practice on the one hand in the octosyllable, on the other in the four-footed anapaestic, was making the way easier for those who dared a little:  and Coleridge first, then Scott, did the rest.

We have seen that in some of his early ballad work Scott had a little overdone the licence of equivalence, but this had probably been one of the formal points on which, as we know, the advice of Lewis, no poet but a remarkably good metrist, had been of use to him.  And he acquitted himself now in a manner which, if it never quite attains the weird charm of Christabel itself at its best, is more varied, better sustained, and, above all, better suited to the story-telling which was, of course, Scott’s supremest gift.  It is very curious to compare Coleridge’s remarks on Scott’s verse with those of Wordsworth, in reference to the White Doe of Rylstone.  Neither in Christabel, nor in the White Doe, is there a real story really told.  Coleridge, but for his fatal weaknesses, undoubtedly could have told such a story; it is pretty certain that Wordsworth could not.  But Scott could tell a story as few other men who have ever drawn breath on the earth could tell it.  He had been distinguished in the conversational branch of the art from his youth up, and though it was to be long before he could write a story in prose, he showed now, at the first attempt, how he could write one in verse.

Construction, of course, was not his forte; it never was.  The plot of the Lay, if not exactly non-existent, is of the simplest and loosest description; the whole being in effect a series of episodes strung together by the loves of Margaret and Cranstoun and the misdeeds of the Goblin Page.  Even the Book supplies no real or necessary nexus.  But the romance proper has never required elaborate construction, and has very rarely, if ever, received it.  A succession of engaging or exciting episodes, each plausibly joined to each, contents its easy wants; and such a succession is liberally provided here.  So, too, it does not require strict character-drawing ­a gift with which Scott was indeed amply provided, but which he did not exhibit, and had no call to exhibit, here.  If the personages will play their parts, that is enough.  And they all play them very well here, though the hero and heroine do certainly exhibit something of that curious nullity which has been objected to the heroes nearly always, the heroines too frequently, of the later prose novels.

But even those critics who, as too many critics are wont to do, forgot and forget that ‘the prettiest girl in the world’ not only cannot give, but ought not to be asked to give, more than she has, must have been, and must be, very unreasonable if they find fault with the subject and stuff of the Lay.  Jeffrey’s remark about ’the present age not enduring’ the Border and mosstrooping details was contradicted by the fact, and was, as a matter of taste, one of those strange blunders which diversified his often admirably acute critical utterances.  When he feared their effects on ‘English readers,’ he showed himself, as was not common with him, actually ignorant of one of the simplest general principles of the poetic appeal, that is to say, the element of strangeness.  But we must not criticise criticism here, and must only add that another great appeal, that of variety, is amply given, as well as that of unfamiliarity.  The graceful and touching, if a little conventional, overture of the Minstrel introduces with the truest art the vigorous sketch of Branksome Tower.  The spirits of flood and fell are allowed to impress and not allowed to bore us; for the quickest of changes is made to Deloraine’s ride ­a kind of thing in which Scott never failed, even in his latest and saddest days.  The splendid Melrose opening of the Second Canto supports itself through the discovery of the Book, and finds due contrast in the description (or no-description) of the lovers’ meeting; the fight and the Goblin Page’s misbehaviour and punishment (to all, at least, but those, surely few now, who are troubled by the Jeffreyan sense of ’dignity’), the decoying and capture of young Buccleuch, and the warning of the clans are certainly no ungenerous provision for the Third; nor the clan anecdotes (especially the capital episode of the Beattisons), the parley, the quarrel of Howard and Dacre, and the challenge, for the Fourth.  There is perhaps less in the Fifth, for Scott seems to have been afraid of another fight in detail; but the description of the night before, and the famous couplet ­

    ’I’d give the lands of Deloraine     Dark Musgrave were alive again’ ­

would save it if there were nothing else, as there is much.  And if the actual conclusion has no great interest (Scott was never good at conclusions, as we shall find Lady Louisa Stuart telling him frankly later), the Sixth Canto is full, and more than full, of brilliant things ­the feast, the Goblin’s tricks, his carrying-off, the pilgrimage, and, above all, the songs, especially ‘Rosabelle’ and the version of the ‘Dies Irae.’

The mention of these last may fairly introduce a few words on the formal and metrical characteristics of the poem, remarks which perhaps some readers resent, but which must nevertheless be made, inasmuch as they are to my mind by far the most important part of poetical criticism.  Scott evidently arranged his scheme of metre with extreme care here, though it is possible that after this severe exercise he let it take care of itself to some extent later.  His introduction is in the strict octosyllable, with only such licences of slur or elision ­

    ‘The pi | tying Duch | ess praised its chime,’     ’He had played | it to King Charles the Good’ ­

as the greatest precisians might have allowed themselves.  But the First Canto breaks at once into the full licence, not merely of equivalence, ­that is to say, of substituting an anapaest or a trochee for an iamb, ­but of shifting the base and rhythm of any particular verse, or of set batches of verses, between the three ground-feet, and, further, of occasionally introducing sixes, as in the ballad metre, and even fours ­

    ’Bards long | shall tell     How Lord Wal | ter fell,’

instead of the usual eights.

In similar fashion he varies the rhymes, passing as the subject or the accompaniment of the word-music may require, from the couplet to the quatrain, and from the quatrain to the irregularly rhymed ‘Pindaric’; always, however, taking care that, except in the set lyric, the quatrain shall not fall too much into definite stanza, but be interlaced in sense or sound sufficiently to carry on the narrative.  The result, to some tastes, is a medium quite unsurpassed for the particular purpose.  The only objection to it at all capable of being maintained, that I can think of, is that the total effect is rather lyrical than epic.  And so much of this must be perhaps allowed as comes to granting that Scott’s verse-romance is rather a long and cunningly sustained and varied ballad than an epic proper.

The Lay, though not received with quite that eager appetite for poetry which Scott was ‘born to introduce,’ and of which he lived long enough to see the glutting, had a large and immediate sale.  The author, not yet aware what a gold mine his copyrights were, parted with this after the first edition, and received in all rather less than L770, a sum trifling in comparison with his after gains; but probably the largest that had as yet been received by any English poet for a single volume not published by subscription.  It is curious that, at the estimated rate of three for one in comparing the value of money at the end of the seventeenth and the beginning of the nineteenth century, the sum almost exactly equals that paid by Tonson for Dryden’s Fables, the last book, before the Lay itself, which had united popularity, merit, and bulk in English verse.  But Dryden was the acknowledged head of English literature at the time, and Scott was a mere beginner.  He was probably even better pleased with the quality of the praise than with the quantity of the pudding.  For though professional criticism, then in no very vigorous state, said some silly things, it was generally favourable; and a saying of Pitt (most indifferent, as a rule, of all Prime Ministers to English literature) is memorable not merely as summing up the general impression, but as defining what that impression was in a fashion quite invaluable to the student of literary history.  The Pilot that Weathered the Storm, it seems, said of the description of the Minstrel’s hesitation before playing, ’This is a sort of thing I might have expected in painting, but could never have fancied capable of being given by poetry.’  To the present generation and the last, the reverse expression would probably seem more natural.  We say, of Mr. Watts or of Sir Edward Burne-Jones, that they have put, in ‘Love and Death’ or in ‘Love among the Ruins,’ what we might have expected from poetry, but could hardly have thought possible in painting.  But a hundred years of studious convention and generality, of deliberate avoidance of the poignant, and the vivid, and the detailed, and the coloured in poetry had made Pitt’s confession as natural as another hundred years of contrary practice from Coleridge to Rossetti have made ours.

The publication of the Lay immediately preceded, and perhaps its success had no small share in deciding, the most momentous and unfortunate step of Scott’s life, his entry into partnership with James Ballantyne.  The discussion of the whole of this business will best be postponed till the date of its catastrophe is reached, but a few words may be said on the probable reasons for it.  Much, no doubt, was the result of that combination of incalculable things which foolish persons of one kind call mere chance, of which foolish persons of another kind deny the existence, and which wise men term, from different but not irreconcilable points of view, Providence, or Luck, or Fate.  But a little can be cleared up.  Scott had evidently made up his mind that he should not succeed at the Bar, and had also persuaded himself that the very success of the Lay had made failure certain.  The ill success of his brother Thomas, with the writer’s business inherited from their father, perhaps inconvenienced and no doubt frightened him.  In fact, though his harsher judges are wrong in attributing to him any undue haste to be rich, he certainly does seem to have been under a dread of being poor; a dread no doubt not wholly intelligible and partly morbid in a young man still under thirty-five, with brilliant literary and some legal prospects, who had, independently of fees, literary or legal, a secured income of about a thousand a year.  He probably thought, and was right in thinking, that the book trade was going to ‘look up’ to a degree previously unknown; he seems throughout to have been under one of those inexplicable attractions towards the Ballantynes which now and then exist, as Hobbes says, ’in the greater towards the meaner, but not contrary’; and perhaps there was another cause which has not been usually allowed for enough.  Good Christian and good-natured man as he was, Scott was exceedingly proud; and though joining himself with persons of dubious social position in mercantile operations seems an odd way of pride, it had its temptations.  I do not doubt but that from the first Scott intended, more or less vaguely and dimly, to extend the printing business into a publishing one, and so to free himself from any necessity of going cap-in-hand to publishers.

However, for good or for ill, ­I think it was mainly for ill, ­for this reason or for that, the partnership was formed, at first indirectly by way of loan, then directly by further advance on security of a share in the business, and finally so that Scott became, though he did not appear, the leading partner.  And the very first letter that we have of his about business shows the fatal flaw which he, the soul of honour, seems never to have detected till too late, if even then.  The scheme for an edition of Dryden was already afloat, and the first editor proposed was a certain Mr. Foster, who ‘howled about the expense of printing.’  ’I still,’ says Scott to Ballantyne, ’stick to my answer that I know nothing of the matter, but that, settle it how he and you will, it must be printed by you or be no concern of mine.  This gives you an advantage in driving the bargain.’ Perhaps; but how about the advantage to Mr. Foster of being advised by Ballantyne’s partner to employ Ballantyne, while he was innocent of the knowledge of the identity of partner and adviser, and was even told that Scott ’knew nothing of the matter’?

Even before the quarrel which soon occurred with Constable established the Ballantynes ­nominally the other brother John ­as publishers, Scott had begun, and was constantly pressing upon the different publishing houses with which he was connected, a variety of literary schemes of the most ambitious and costly character.  All these books were to be printed by Ballantyne, and many of them edited by himself; while, when the direct publishing business was added, there was no longer any check on this dangerous proceeding.  It is most curious how Scott, the shrewdest and sanest of men in the vast majority of affairs, seems to have lost his head wherever books or lands were concerned.  Himself both an antiquary and an antiquarian, as well as a lover of literature, he seems to have taken it for granted that the same combination of tastes existed in the public to an extent which would pay all expenses, however lavishly incurred.  To us, nowadays, who know how cold a face publishers turn on what we call really interesting schemes, and how often these schemes, even when fostered, miscarry or barely pay expenses, ­who are aware that even the editors of literary societies, where expenses are assured beforehand, have to work for love or for merely nominal fees, simply because the public will not buy the books, ­it is not so wonderful that some of Scott’s schemes never got into being at all, and that others were dead losses, as that any ‘got home.’  His Dryden, an altogether admirable book, on which he lavished labour, and great part of which appealed to a still dominant prestige, may just have carried the editor’s certainly not excessive fee of forty guineas a volume, or about L750 for the whole.  But when one reads of twice that sum paid for the Swift, of L1300 for the thirteen quartos of the Somers Papers, and so forth, the feeling is not that the sums paid were at all too much for the work done, but that the publishers must have been very lucky men if they ever saw their money again.  The two first of these schemes certainly, the third perhaps, deserved success; and still more so did a great scheme for the publication of the entire British Poets, to be edited by Scott and Campbell, which indeed fell through in itself, but resulted indirectly in Campbell’s excellent Specimens and Chalmers’s invaluable if not very comely Poets.  Even another project, a Corpus Historicorum, would have been magnificent, though it could hardly have been bookselling war.  But the Somers Tracts themselves, the Memoirs and papers of Sadler, Slingsby, Carleton, Cary, etc., were of the class of book which requires subvention of some kind to prevent it from being a dead loss; and when the preventive check of the unwillingness of publishers was removed by the fatal establishment of ’John Ballantyne & Co.,’ things became worse still.  There are few better instances of the eternal irony of fate than that the author of the admirable description of the bookseller’s horror at Mr. Pembroke’s Sermons should have permitted, should have positively caused, the publishing at what was in effect his own risk, or rather his own certainty of loss, not merely of Weber’s ambitious Beaumont and Fletcher, but of collections of Tixall Poetry, Histories of the Culdees, Wilson’s History of James the First, and the rest.

As the beginning of 1805 saw the first birth of his real books, so the end of it saw that of the last of his children according to the flesh.  His firstborn, as has been said, did not live.  But Walter (born November 1799), Sophia (born October 1801), Anne (born February 1803), and Charles (born December 1805) survived infancy; and it is quite probable that these regular increases to his family, by suggesting that he might have a large one, stimulated Scott’s desire to enlarge his income.  As a matter of fact, however, the quartette of two boys and two girls was not exceeded.  The domestic life at Castle Street and Ashestiel, from the publication of the Lay to that of Marmion in 1808, ­indeed to that of The Lady of the Lake in May 1810, ­ran smoothly enough; and there can be little doubt that these five years were the happiest, and in reality the most prosperous, of Scott’s life.  He had at once attained great fame, and was increasing it by each successive poem; his immense intellectual activity found vent besides in almost innumerable projects, some of which were in a way successful, and some of which, if they did himself no very great good pecuniarily, did good to more or less deserving friends and proteges.  His health had, as yet, shown no signs whatever of breaking down; he was physically in perfect condition for, and at Ashestiel he had every opportunity of indulging in, the field sports in which his soul delighted at least as much as in reading and writing; he had pleasant intervals of wandering; and, to crown it all, he was, during this period, established in reversionary prospect, if not yet in actual possession, of an income which should have put even his anxieties at rest, and which certainly might have made him dissociate himself from the dangerous and doubtful commercial enterprises in which he had engaged.  This reversion was that of a Clerkship of Session, one of an honourable, well-paid, and by no means laborious group of offices which seems to have been accepted as a comely and comfortable set of shelves for advocates of ability, position, and influence, who, for this reason or that, were not making absolutely first-rate mark at the Bar.  The post to which Scott was appointed was in the possession of a certain Mr. Hope, and as no retiring pension was attached to these places, it was customary to hold them on the rather uncomfortable terms of doing the work till the former holder died, without getting any money.  But before many years a pension scheme was put in operation; Mr. Hope took his share of it, and Scott entered upon thirteen hundred a year in addition to his Sheriffship and to his private property, without taking any account at all of literary gains.  The appointment had not actually been completed, though the patent had been signed, when the Fox and Grenville Government came in, and it so happened that the document had been so made out as to have enabled Scott, if he chose, to draw the whole salary and leave his predecessor in the cold.  But this was soon set right.

In the visit to London which he paid (apparently for the purpose of getting the error corrected), he made the acquaintance of the unlucky Princess of Wales, who was at this time rather a favourite with the Tories.  And when he came back to Scotland, the trial of Lord Melville gave him an opportunity of distinguishing himself by a natural and very pardonable partisanship, which made his Whig friends rather sore.  Politics in Edinburgh ran very high during this short break in the long Tory domination, and from it dates a story, to some minds, perhaps, one of the most interesting of all those about Scott, and connected indelibly with the scene of its occurrence.  It tells how, as he was coming down the Mound with Jeffrey and another Whig, after a discussion in the Faculty of Advocates on some proposals of innovation, Jeffrey tried to laugh the difference off, and how Scott, usually stoical enough, save in point of humour, broke out with actual tears in his eyes, ’No, no! it is no laughing matter.  Little by little, whatever your wishes may be, you will destroy and undermine until nothing of what makes Scotland Scotland shall remain!’ He would probably have found no great reason at the other end of the century to account himself a false prophet; and he might have thought his prophecies in fair way of fulfilment not in Scotland only.

During 1806 and 1807 the main occupations of Scott’s leisure (if he can ever be said to have had such a thing) were the Dryden and Marmion.  The latter of these appeared in February and the former in April 1808, a perhaps unique example of an original work, and one of criticism and compilation, both of unusual bulk and excellence, appearing, with so short an interval, from the same pen.

As for Marmion, it is surely by far the greatest, taking all constituents of poetical greatness together, of Scott’s poems.  It was not helped at the time, and probably never has been helped, by the author’s plan of prefixing to each canto introductions of very considerable length, each addressed to one or other of his chief literary friends, and having little or nothing at all to do with the subject of the tale.  Contemporaries complained that the main poem was thereby intolerably interrupted; posterity, I believe, has taken the line of ignoring the introductions altogether.  This is a very great pity, for not only do they contain some of Scott’s best and oftenest quoted lines, but each is a really charming piece of occasional verse, and something more, in itself.  The beautiful description of Tweedside in late autumn, the dirge on Nelson, Pitt, and Fox (which last, of course, infuriated Jeffrey), and, above all, the splendid passage on the Morte d’Arthur (which Scott had at this time thought of editing, but gave up to Southey) adorn the epistle to Rose; the picture of Ettrick Forest in that to Marriott is one of the best sustained things the poet ever did; the personal interest of the Erskine piece is of the highest, though it has fewer ‘purple’ passages, and it is well-matched with that to Skene; while the fifth to Ellis and the sixth and last to Heber nobly complete the batch.  Only, though the things in this case are both rich and rare,

    ‘We wonder what the devil they do there’;

and Lockhart unearthed, what Scott seems to have forgotten, the fact that they were originally intended to appear by themselves.  It is a pity they did not; for, excellent as they are, they are quite out of place as interludes to a story, the serried range of which not only does not require but positively rejects them.

For here, while Scott had lost little, if anything, of the formal graces of the Lay, he had improved immensely in grip and force.  Clare may be a bread-and-butter heroine, and Wilton a milk-and-water lover, but the designs of Marmion against both give a real story-interest, which is quite absent from the Lay.  The figure of Constance is really tragic, not melodramatic merely, and makes one regret that Scott, in his prose novels, did not repeat and vary her.  All the accessories, both in incident and figure, are good, and it is almost superfluous to praise the last canto.  It extorted admiration from the partisan rancour and the literary prudishness of Jeffrey; it made the disturbed dowagers of the Critical Review, who thought, with Rymer, that ’a hero ought to be virtuous,’ mingle applause with their fie-fies; it has been the delight of every reader, not a milksop, or a faddist, or a poetical man-of-one-idea, ever since.  The last canto of Marmion and the last few ‘Aventiuren’ of the Nibelungen Lied are perhaps the only things in all poetry where a set continuous battle (not a series of duels as in Homer) is related with unerring success; and the steady crescendo of the whole, considering its length and intensity, is really miraculous.  Nay, even without this astonishing finale, the poem that contained the opening sketch of Norham, the voyage from Whitby to Holy Island, the final speech of Constance, and the famous passage of her knell, the Host’s Tale, the pictures of Crichton and the Blackford Hill view, the ‘air and fire’ of the ‘Lochinvar’ song, the phantom summons from the Cross of Edinburgh, and the parting of Douglas and Marmion, could spare half of these and still remain one of the best of its kind, while every passage so spared would be enough to distinguish any poem in which it occurred.

The considerable change in the metre of Marmion as compared with the Lay is worth noticing.  Here, as there, the ‘introductions’ are, for the most part, if not throughout, in continuous octosyllabic couplets.  But, in the text, the couplet plays also a much larger part than it does in the Lay, and where it is dropped the substitute is not usually the light and extremely varied medley of the earlier poem, so much as a sort of irregular (and sometimes almost regular) stanza arrangement, sets of (usually three) octosyllables being interspersed with sixes, rhyming independently.  The batches of monorhymed octosyllables sometimes extend to even four in number, with remarkably good effect, as, for instance, in the infernal proclamation from the Cross.  Altogether the metrical scheme is of a graver cast than that of the Lay, and suits the more serious and tragical colour of the story.

It has been mentioned above in passing that Jeffrey reviewed Marmion on the whole unfavourably.  The story of this review is well known:  how the editor-reviewer (with the best intentions doubtless) sent the proof with a kind of apology to Scott on the morning of a dinner-party in Castle Street; how Scott showed at least outward indifference, and Mrs. Scott a not unamiable petulance; and how, though the affair caused no open breach of private friendship, it doubtless gave help to the increasing Whiggery of the Review and its pusillanimous policy in regard to the Spanish War in severing Scott’s connection with it, and determining him to promote, heart and soul, the opposition venture of the Quarterly.  Of this latter it was naturally enough proposed by Canning that Scott should be editor; but, as naturally, he does not seem to have even considered the proposal.  He would have hated living in London; no salary that could have been offered him could have done more than equal, if so much, the stipends of his Sheriffship and the coming Clerkship, which he would have had to give up; and the work would have interfered much more seriously than his actual vocations with his literary avocations.  Besides, it is quite certain that he would not have made a good editor.  In the first place, he was fitted neither by education nor by temperament for the troublesome and ‘meticulous’ business of knocking contributions into shape.  And, in the second, he would most assuredly have fallen into the most fatal of all editorial errors ­that of inserting articles, not because they were actually good or likely to be popular, but because the subjects were interesting, or the writers agreeable, to himself.  But he backed the venture manfully with advice, by recruiting for it, and afterwards by contributing to it.

It so happened, too, that about the same time he had dissensions with the publisher as well as with the editor of the Edinburgh.  Constable, though he had not entered into the intimate relations with Scott and the Ballantynes that were afterwards so fatal, had made the spirited bid of a thousand pounds for Marmion, and the much more spirited and (it is to be feared) much less profitable one of fifteen hundred for the Swift.  He had, however, recently taken into partnership a certain Mr. Hunter of Blackness.  This Hunter must have had some merits ­he had at any rate sufficient wit to throw the blame of the fact that sojourn in Scotland did not always agree with Englishmen on their disgusting habit of ‘eating too much and not drinking enough.’  But he was a laird of some family, and he seems to have thought that he might bring into business the slightly hectoring ways which were then tolerated in Scotland from persons of quality to persons of none or less.  He was a very bitter Whig, and, therefore, ill disposed towards Scott.  And, lastly, he had, or thought he had, a grievance against his distinguished ‘hand’ in respect of the Swift, to wit, that the editor of that well-paid compilation did not devote himself to it by any means exclusively enough.  Now Scott, though the most good-natured of men and only too easy to lead, was absolutely impossible to drive; and his blood was as ready as the ‘bluid of M’Foy’ itself to be set on fire at the notion of a cock-laird from Fife not merely treating a Scott with discourtesy, but imputing doubtful conduct to him.  He offered to throw up the Swift, and though this was not accepted, broke for a time all other connection with Constable ­an unfortunate breach, as it helped to bring about the establishment of the Ballantyne publishing business, and so unquestionably began Scott’s own ruin.  It is remarkable that a similar impatience of interference afterwards broke Scott’s just-begun connection with Blackwood, which, could it have lasted, would probably have saved him.  For that sagacious person would certainly never have plunged, or, if he could have helped it, let anyone else plunge, into Charybdis.

Between the publication of Marmion and that of The Lady of the Lake Scott was very busy in bookmaking and bookselling projects.  It was characteristic of the mixture of bad luck and bad management which hung on the Ballantynes from the first that even their Edinburgh Annual Register, published as it was in the most stirring times, and written by Scott, by Southey, and others of the very best hands, was a failure.  He made some visits to London, and (for the scenery of the new poem) to the Trossachs and Loch Lomond; and had other matters of concern, the chief of which were the death of his famous bull-terrier Camp, and two troublesome affairs connected with his brothers.  One of these, the youngest, Daniel, after misconduct of various kinds, had, as mentioned above, shown the white feather during a negro insurrection in Jamaica, and so disgusted his brother that when he came home to die, Scott would neither see him, nor, when he died, go to his funeral.  The other concerned his brother Thomas, who, after his failure as a writer, had gone from prudential motives to the Isle of Man, where he for a time was an officer in the local Fencibles.  But before leaving Edinburgh, and while he was still a practising lawyer, his brother had appointed him to a small post in his own gift as Clerk.  Not only was there nothing discreditable in this according to the idea of any time, ­for Thomas Scott’s education and profession qualified him fully for the office, ­but there were circumstances which, at that time, showed rather heroic and uncommon virtue.  For the actual vacancy had occurred in a higher and more valuable post, also in Scott’s gift, and he, instead of appointing his brother to this, promoted a deserving subordinate veteran, and gave the lower and less valuable place to Thomas.  The latter’s circumstances, however, obliged him to perform his duties by deputy, and a Commission then sitting ultimately abolished the office altogether, with a retiring allowance of about half the salary.  Certain Whig peers took this up as a job, and Lord Lauderdale, supported by Lord Holland, made in the House of Lords very offensive charges against Scott personally for having appointed his brother to a place which he knew would be abolished, and against Thomas for claiming compensation in respect of duties which he had never performed.  The Bill was, however, carried; but Scott was indignant at the loss threatened to his brother and the imputation made on himself, and ‘cut’ Lord Holland at a semi-public dinner not long afterwards.  For this he was and has since been severely blamed, and his behaviour was perhaps a little ‘perfervid.’  But everybody knows, or should know, that there are few things more trying to humanity than to be accused of improper conduct when a man is hugging himself on having behaved with unusual and saint-like propriety.

The Lady of the Lake appeared in May 1810, being published by Ballantyne and Miller, and at once attained enormous popularity.  Twenty thousand copies were sold within the year, two thousand of which were costly quartos; and while there can be no doubt that this was the highest point of Scott’s poetical vogue, there is, I believe, not much doubt that the poem has always continued to be a greater favourite with the general than any other of his.  It actually, more than any other, created the furore for Scottish scenery and touring, which has never ceased since; it supplied in the descriptions of that scenery, in the fight between Roderick and Fitz-James, and in other things, his most popular passages; and it has remained probably the type of his poetry to the main body of readers.

Yet there are some who like it less than any other of the major divisions of that poetry, and this is by no means necessarily due either to a desire to be eccentric or to the subtler but almost equally illegitimate operation of the want of novelty ­of the fact that its best effects are but repetitions of those of Marmion and the Lay.  For, fine as it is, it seems to me to display the drawbacks of Scott’s scheme and method more than any of the longer poems.  Douglas, Ellen, Malcolm, are null; Roderick and the king have a touch of theatricality which I look for in vain elsewhere in Scott; there is nothing fantastic in the piece like the Goblin Page, and nothing tragical like Constance.  There is something teasing in what has been profanely called the ‘guide-book’ character ­the cicerone-like fidelity which contrasts so strongly with the skilfully subordinated description in the two earlier and even in the later poems.  Moreover, though Ellis ought not to have called the octosyllable ‘the Hudibrastic measure’ (which is only a very special variety of it), he was certainly right in objecting to its great predominance in unmixed form here.

The critics, however, sang the praises of the poem lustily.  Even Jeffrey ­perhaps because it was purely Scottish (he had thought Marmion not Scottish enough), perhaps because its greater conventionality appealed to him, perhaps because he wished to make atonement ­was extremely complimentary.  And certainly no one need be at a loss for things to commend positively, whatever may be his comparative estimate.  The fine Spenserian openings (which Byron copied almost slavishly in the form of the stanza he took for Harold), the famous beginning of the stag, the description of the pass (till Fitz-James begins to soliloquise), some of the songs (especially the masterly ’Coronach’), the passage of the Fiery Cross, the apparition of the clan (not perhaps so great as some have thought it, but still great), the struggle, the guard-room (which shocked Jeffrey dreadfully) ­these are only some of the best things.  But I own that I turn from the best of them to the last stand of the spearmen at Flodden, and the unburying of the Book in the Lay.

It may, perhaps, not be undesirable to anticipate somewhat, in order to complete the sketch of the verse romances in this chapter; for not very long after the publication of the Lady of the Lake, Scott resumed the writing of Waverley, which effected an entire change in the direction of his literature; and it was not a twelvemonth later that he planned the establishment at Abbotsford, which was thenceforward the headquarters of his life.

The first poem to follow was one which lay out of the series in subject, scheme, and dress, and which perhaps should rather be counted with his minor and miscellaneous pieces ­The Vision of Don Roderick.  It was written with rapidity, even for him, and with a special purpose; the profits being promised beforehand to the Committee of the Portuguese Relief Fund, formed to assist the sufferers from Massena’s devastations.  It consists of rather less than a hundred Spenserian stanzas, the story of Roderick merely ushering in a magical revelation, to that too-amorous monarch, of the fortunes of the Peninsular War and its heroes up to the date of writing.  The Edinburgh Review, which hated the war, was very angry because Scott did not celebrate Sir John Moore (whether as a good Whig or a bad general it did not explain); but even Jeffrey was not entirely unfavourable, and the piece was otherwise well received.  The description of the subterranean hall beneath the Cathedral of Toledo is as good as we should expect, and the verses on Saragossa and on the forces of the three kingdoms are very fine.  But the whole was something of a torso, and it is improbable that Scott could ever have used the Spenserian stanza to good effect for continuous narrative.  Even in its individual shape, that great form requires the artistic patience as well as the natural gift of men like its inventor, or like Thomson, Shelley, and Tennyson, in other times and of other schools, to get the full effect out of it; while to connect it satisfactorily with its kind and adjust it to narrative is harder still.

The true succession, however, after this parenthesis, was taken up by Rokeby, which was dated on the very last day of 1812.  Its reception was not exceedingly enthusiastic; for Byron, borrowing most of his technique and general scheme from Scott, and joining with these greater apparent passion and a more novel and unfamiliar local colour, had appeared on the scene as a ‘second lion.’  The public, a ’great-sized monster of ingratitudes,’ had got accustomed to Scott, if not weary of him.  The title was not very happy; and perhaps some harm was really done by one of the best of Moore’s many good jokes in the Twopenny Postbag, where he represented Scott as coming from Edinburgh to London

    ‘To do all the gentlemen’s seats by the way’

in romances of half a dozen cantos.

The poem, however, is a very delightful one, and to some tastes at least very far above the Lady of the Lake.  Scott, indeed, clung to the uninterrupted octosyllable more than ever; but that verse, if a poet knows how to manage it, is by no means so unsuited for story-telling as Ellis thought; and Scott had here more story to tell than in any of his preceding pieces, except Marmion.  The only character, indeed, in which one takes much interest is Bertram Risingham; but he is a really excellent person, the cream of Scott’s ruffians, whether in prose or verse; appearing well, conducting himself better, and ending best of all.  Nor is Oswald, the contrasted villain, by any means to be despised; while the passages ­on which the romance, in contradistinction to the classical epic, stands or falls ­are equal to all but the very best in Marmion or the Lay.  Bertram’s account of the first and happier events at Marston Moor, as well as of his feelings as to his comradeship with Mortham; the singularly beautiful opening of the second canto ­

    ‘Far in the chambers of the west’;

with the description of Upper Teesdale; Bertram’s clamber on the cliff, with its reminiscences of the ’Kittle Nine Steps,’ ­these lead on to many other things as good, ending with that altogether admirable bit of workmanship, Bertram’s revenge on Oswald and his own death.  Matilda is one of the best of Scott’s verse-heroines, except Constance ­that is to say, the best of his good girls ­and she has the interest of being avowedly modelled on ‘Green Mantle.’  Nor in any of the poems do the lyrics give more satisfactory setting-off to the main text.  Indeed, it may be questioned whether any contains such a garland as ­to mention only the best ­is formed by

    ‘O, Brignall banks are wild and fair’;

the exquisite

    ‘A weary lot is thine, fair maid,’

adapted from older matter with a skill worthy of Burns himself; the capital bravura of Allen-a-Dale; and that noble Cavalier lyric ­

    ‘When the dawn on the mountain was misty and grey.’

The Bridal of Triermain was published in 1813, not long after Rokeby, and, like that poem, drew its scenery from the North of England; but in circumstances, scale, and other ways it forms a pair with Harold the Dauntless, and they had best be noticed together.

The Lord of the Isles, the last of the great quintet, appeared in December 1814.  Scott had obtained part of the scenery for it in an earlier visit to the Hebrides, and the rest in his yachting voyage (see below) with the Commissioners of Northern Lights, which also gave the decor for The Pirate.  The poem was not more popular than Rokeby in England, and it was even less so in Scotland, chiefly for the reason, only to be mentioned with all but silent amazement, that it was ’not bitter enough against England.’  Its faults are, of course, obvious enough.  Central story there is simply none; the inconvenience that arises to the hero from his being addressed by two young ladies cannot awake any very sympathetic tear, nor does either Edith of Lorn or Isabel Bruce awaken any violent desire to offer to relieve him of one of them.  The versification, however, is less uniform than that of Rokeby or The Lady of the Lake, and there are excellent passages ­the best being, no doubt, the Abbot’s extorted blessing on the Bruce; the great picture of Loch Coruisk, which, let people say what they will, is marvellously faithful; part of the voyage (though one certainly could spare some of the ’merrilys’); the landing in Carrick; the rescue of the supposed page; and, finally, Bannockburn, which even Jeffrey admired, though its want of ‘animosity’ shocked him.

The two last of the great poems ­there was indeed a third, The Field of Waterloo, written hastily for a subscription, and not worthy either of Scott or of the subject ­have not by any means the least interest, either intrinsic or that of curiosity.  Indeed, as a matter of liking, not quite disjoined from criticism, I should put them very high indeed.  Both were issued anonymously, and with indications intended to mislead readers into the idea that they were by Erskine; the intention being, it would seem, partly to ascertain how far the author’s mere name counted in his popularity, partly also to ‘fly kites’ as to the veering of the public taste in reference to the verse romance in general.  By the time of the publication of Harold the Dauntless in 1817, Scott could hardly have had any intention of deserting the new way ­his own exclusive right ­in which he was already walking firmly.  But the Bridal of Triermain appeared very shortly after Rokeby, and was, no doubt, seriously intended as a test.

In both pieces the author fell back upon his earlier scheme of metre, the Christabel blend of iambic with anapaestic passages, instead of the nearly pure iambs of his middle poems.  The Bridal, partly to encourage the Erskine notion, it would seem, is hampered by an intermixed outline-story, told in the introductions, of the wooing and winning of a certain Lucy by a certain Arthur, both of whom may be very heartily wished away.  But the actual poem is more thoroughly a Romance of Adventure than even the Lay, has much more central interest than that poem, and is adorned by passages of hardly less beauty than the best of the earlier piece.  It is astonishing how anyone of the slightest penetration could have entertained the slightest doubt about the authorship of

    ’Come hither, come hither, Henry my page,     Whom I saved from the sack of Hermitage’;

still more of that of the well-known opening of the Third Canto, one of the triumphs of that ‘science of names’ in which Scott was such a proficient ­

    ’Bewcastle now must keep the Hold,       Speir-Adam’s steeds must bide in stall,     Of Hartley-burn the bowmen bold       Must only shoot from battled wall;     And Liddesdale may buckle spur,       And Teviot now may belt the brand,     Tarras and Ewes keep nightly stir,       And Eskdale foray Cumberland!’

But these are only the most unmistakable, not the best.  The opening specification of the Bride; the admirable ‘Lyulph’s Tale,’ with the first appearance of the castle, and the stanza (suggested no doubt by a famous picture) of the damsels dragging Arthur’s war-gear; the courtship, and Guendolen’s wiles to retain Arthur, and the parting; the picture of the King’s court; the tournament; all these are good enough.  But I am not sure that the description of Sir Roland’s tantalised vigil in the Vale of St. John, with the moonlit valley (itself a worthy pendant even to the Melrose), and the sudden and successful revelation of the magic hold when the knight flings his battle-axe, does not even surpass the Tale.  Nor do I think that the actual adventures of this Childe Roland in the dark towers are inferior.  The trials and temptations are of stock material, but all the best matter is stock, and this is handled with a rush and dash which more than saves it.  I hope the tiger was only a magic tiger, and went home comfortably with the damsels of Zaharak.  It seems unfair that he should be actually killed.  But this is the only thing that disquiets me; and it is impossible to praise too much De Vaux’s ingenious compromise between tasteless asceticism and dangerous indulgence in the matter of ’Asia’s willing maids.’

Harold the Dauntless is much slighter, as indeed might be expected, considering that it was finished in a hurry, long after the author had given up poetry as a main occupation.  But the half burlesque Spenserians of the overture are very good; the contrasted songs, ’Dweller of the Cairn’ and ‘A Danish Maid for Me,’ are happy.  Harold’s interview with the Chapter is a famous bit of bravura; and all concerning the Castle of the Seven Shields, from the ballad introducing it, through the description of its actual appearance (in which, by the way, Scott shows almost a better grasp of the serious Spenserian stanza than anywhere else) to the final battle of Odin and Harold, is of the very best Romantic quality.  Perhaps, indeed, it is because (as the Critical Review, the Abdiel of ‘classical’ orthodoxy among the reviews of the time, scornfully said), ’both poems are romantic enough to satisfy all the parlour-boarders of all the ladies’ schools in England,’ that they are so pleasant.  It is something, in one’s grey and critical age, to feel genuine sympathy with the parlour-boarder.

The chapter has already stretched to nearly the utmost proportions compatible with the scale of this little book, and we must not indulge in very many critical remarks on the general character of the compositions discussed in it.  But I have never carried out the plan (which I think indispensable) of reading over again whatever work, however well known, one has to write about, with more satisfaction.  The main defects lie on the surface.  Despite great felicities of a certain kind, these poems have no claim to formal perfection, and occasionally sin by very great carelessness, if not by something worse.  The poet frankly shows himself as one whose appeal is not that of ’jewels five words long,’ set and arranged in phrases of that magical and unending beauty which the very greatest poets of the world command.  His effect, even in description, is rather of mass than of detail.  He does not attempt analysis in character, and only skirts passion.  Although prodigal enough of incident, he is very careless of connected plot.  But his great and abiding glory is that he revived the art, lost for centuries in England, of telling an interesting story in verse, of riveting the attention through thousands of lines of poetry neither didactic nor argumentative.  And of his separate passages, his patches of description and incident, when the worst has been said of them, it will remain true that, in their own way and for their own purpose, they cannot be surpassed.  The already noticed comparison of any of Scott’s best verse-tales with Christabel, which they formally imitated to some extent, and with the White Doe of Rylstone, which followed them, will no doubt show that Coleridge and Wordsworth had access to mansions in the house of poetry where Scott is never seen.  But in some respects even their best passages are not superior to his; and as tales, as romances, his are altogether superior to theirs.