THE MAN WHO SAYS HOW, SAYS HOW
The people who are worried and discouraged
about goodness in this world, one finds when one studies
them a little, are almost always worried in a kind
of general way. They do not worry about anything
in particular. Their religion seems to be a kind
of good-hearted, pained vagueness.
The religion of the people who never
worry at all, the thoughtless optimists, is quite
the same too, except that they have a kind of happy,
rosy-lighted vagueness instead.
For about two thousand years now,
goodness has been in the hands of vague people.
Some of them have used their vagueness to cry with
softly, and some of them have used it to praise God
with and to have many fine, brave, general feelings
about God.
I have tried faithfully, speaking
for one, to be religious with both of these sets of
people.
They make one feel rather lonesome.
If one goes about and takes a grim
happiness, a kind of iron joy in seeing how successful
a locomotive is, or if one watches a great, worshipful
ocean liner with delight, or if, down in New York,
one looks up and sees a new skyscraper going slowly
up, unfolding into the sky before one, lifting up
its gigantic, restless, resistless face to God; there
comes to seem to be something about churches and about
good people and about the way they have of acting
and thinking about goodness and doing things with
goodness, that makes one unhappy.
Perhaps one has just come from it
and one’s soul is filled with the stern, glad
singing of a great foundry, of the religious, victorious
praising spirit of man, dipping up steel in mighty
spoonfuls-the stuff the inside of the earth
is made of, and flinging it together into a great
network or crust for the planet-into mighty
floors or sidewalks all round the earth for cities
to tread on and there comes to seem something so successful,
so manlike, so godlike about it, about the way these
men who do these things do them and do what they set
out to do, that when I find myself suddenly, all in
a few minutes on a Sunday morning, thrown out of this
atmosphere into a Christian church, find myself sitting
all still and waiting, with all these good people about
me, and when I find them offering me their religion
so gravely, so hopefully, it all comes to me with
a great rush sometimes-comes to me as out
of great deeps of resentment, that religion could possibly
be made in a church to seem something so faint, so
beautifully weary, so dreamy, and as if it were humming
softly, absently to itself.
I wonder in the presence of a Christianity
like this whether I am a Christian or not-the
quartet choirs, confections, the little, dainty, faintly
sweet sermons-it is as if-no
I will not say it....
I have this moment crossed the words
out before my eyes. It is as if, after all, religion,
instead of being as I supposed down at the foundry,
the stern and splendid music of man conquering all
things for God, were, after all, some huge, sublime
and holy vagueness, as if the service and the things
I saw about me were not hard true realities-as
if going to Church were like sitting in a cloud-some
soft musical cloud or floating island of goodness
and drifting and drifting....
Not all churches are alike, but I
am speaking of something that must have happened to
many men. I but record this blank space on this
page, as a spiritual fact, as a part of the religious
experience of a man trying to be good.
When this little experience of which
the words have to be crossed out after going to Church-finally
settles down, there is still a grim truth left in
it.
The vagueness of the man who is good,
who locks himself up in a Church and says, “Oh
God! Oh God! Oh God!” and the vigour
and incisiveness of the man who says nothing about
it and who goes out of doors and acts like a god all
the week-these remain with me as a daily
and abiding sense.
And when I find myself myself, I,
who have gloried in cathedrals since I was a little
child, looking ahead for a God upon the earth, and
when I see the foundries, the airships, the ocean
liners beckoning the soul of man upon the skies, and
the victory of the soul over the dust and over the
water and over the air and when I see the Cathedrals
beside them, those vast, faint, grave, happy, floating
islands of the Saved, drifting backward down the years,
it does not seem as if I could bear the foundries
saying one thing about my God and the cathedrals saying
another.
I have tried to see a way out. Why should it
be so?
I have seen that the foundries, the
ocean liners, and the airships are in the hands of
men who say How.
Perhaps we will take goodness and
cathedrals, very soon now, and put them for a while
in the hands of the men who say how. If St. Francis,
for instance, to-day, were to be suddenly more like
Bessemer, or if Dr. Henry Van Dyke were more like
Edison or if the Reverend R.J. Campbell were
more like Sir Joseph Lister or if the Bishop of London
were to go at London the way Marconi goes at the sky,
what would begin to happen to goodness? One likes
to imagine what would happen if that same spirit,
the spirit of “how” were brought to bear
upon a great engineering enterprise like goodness
in this world.
Perhaps the spirit of “how” is the spirit
of God.
Perhaps religion in the twentieth century is Technique.
Technique in the twentieth century is the Holy Ghost.
Technique is the very last thing that
has been thought of in religion. Religion is
being converted before our eyes. It is becoming
touched with the temper of science, with the thoroughness,
the doggedness, the inconsolableness of science until
it is seeing how and until it is saying how.
When the inventors, in our machine
age, get to work on goodness in the way that they
are getting to work on other things, things will begin
to happen to goodness that the vague, sweet saints
of two thousand years have never dreamed of yet.
In London and New York, in this first
quarter of the twentieth century Christianity will
not be put off as a spirit. The right of Christianity
to be a spirit has lapsed.
Christianity is a Method.
What Christ meant when He said He
was the Truth and the Life, has been understood, on
the whole, very well. What He meant by saying
He was the Way, we are now beginning, to work out.
A thousand or two years ago, when
two men stood by the roadside and made a bargain,
it was their affair.
When two men stand on the sidewalk
now and make a bargain, say in New York, they have
to deal and to deal very thoughtfully and accurately
with ninety million people who are not there.
They do this as well as they can by imagining what
the ninety million people would do and say, and how
they would like to be done by, if they were there.
The facilities for finding out what
the ninety million people would do and say, and what
they would want, the general conveniences for assuring
the two men on the sidewalk that they will be able
to conduct their bargain, and to get the other ninety
million in, accurately, that they will be able to
do by them as they would be done by-these
have scarcely been arranged for yet.
In our machine age, with our railroads,
and our telephones suddenly heaping our lives up on
one another’s lives, almost before we have noticed
it, our religious machinery to go with our other machinery,
our machinery that we are going to be Christians with,
has not been invented yet.
Religion two-men size, or man and
woman size, or one family or two family size or village
size has been worked out. Religion as long as
it has been concerned with a few people and was a
matter of love between neighbours, or of skill in
being neighbourly, has had no special or imperative
need for science or the scientific man.
Now that religion is obliged to be
an intimate, a confiding relation between ninety million
people, the spiritual genius, devotion, and holiness
of the scientific man, of the man who says “how”
has come to be the modern man’s almost only
access to his God.
A ninety million man-power religion
is an enterprise of spiritual engineering, a feat
in national and international statesmanship, a gigantic
structural constructive achievement in human nature.
Doing as one would be done by, with a few people,
is a thing that any man can sit down and read his
Bible a few minutes and arrange for himself. He
can manage to do as he would be done by, fairly well
in the next yard. But how about doing as one
would be done by with ninety million people-all
sizes, all climates, all religions, Buffalo, New Orleans,
Seattle? How about doing as one would be done
by three thousand miles?
It is an understatement to say, as
we look about our modern world, that Christianity
has not been tried yet.
Christianity has not been invented yet.
What was invented two thousand years ago was the spirit
of Christianity.
Christianity has been for two thousand years a spirit.
It is almost like a new religion to
me just of itself to think of it. It is like
being presented suddenly with a new world to think
of it, to think that all we have really done with
Christianity as yet is to use it as a breath or spirit.
I look at the vision of the earth
to-day, of the great cities rushing together at last
and running around the world like children running
around a house-great cities shouting on
the seas, suddenly sliding up and down the globe,
playing hopscotch on the equator, scrambling up the
poles-all these colossal children!...
Here we all are!-a whiff of steam from
the Watts’s steam kettle and a wave of Marconi
across the air and we have crept up from our little
separate sunsets, all our little private national
bedrooms of light and darkness into the one single
same cunning dooryard of a world! Our religion,
our politics, our Bibles, kings, millionaires, crowds,
bombs, prophets and railroads all hurling, sweeping,
crashing our lives together in a kind of vast international
collision of intimacy.
All the Christianity we can bring
to bear or that we can use to run this crash of intimacy
with is a spirit, a breath.
We do not well to berate one another
or to berate one another’s motives or to assail
human nature or to grow satirical about God with all
our little battered helpless Christians about us and
our unadjusted religions.
We are a new human race grappling
with a new world. Our Christianity has not been
invented yet and if we want a God, we will work like
chemists, like airmen, turn the inside of the earth
out, dump the sky, move mountains, face cities, love
one another, and find Him!
In the meantime until we have done
this, until we have worked as chemists and airmen
work, Christianity is a spirit.
It explains all this eager jumble
of the world, brushes away our objections, frees our
hearts, gives us our program, makes us know what we
are for, to stop and think a moment of this-that
Christianity is a spirit.
Everything that is passing wonderful
is a spirit at first. God begins building a world
as a world-spirit, out of a spirit brooding upon the
waters. Then for a long while the vague waters,
then for a long while a little vague land or spirit-of-planet
before a real world.
And every real belief that man has
had, has begun as a spirit.
For two thousand years Man has had
the spirit of immortality. Homer had it.
Homer had moments when improvising his mighty song
all alone, of hearing or seeming to hear, faintly,
choruses of men’s voices singing his songs after
him, a thousand years away.
As he groped his way up in his singing,
he felt them in spirit, perhaps, the lonely wandering
minstrels in little closed-in valleys, or on the vast
quiet hills, filling the world with his voice when
he was dead, going about with his singing, breaking
it in upon the souls of children, of the new boys
and girls, and building new worlds and rebuilding old
worlds in the hearts of men. Homer had the spirit
of hearing his own voice forever, but the technique
of it, the important point of seeing how the thing
could really be done, of seeing how people, instead
of listening to imitations or copies or awkward echoes
of Homer, should listen to Homer’s voice itself-the
timbre, the intimacy, the subtlety, the strength of
it-the depth of his heart singing out of
it. All this has had to wait to be thought out
by Thomas A. Edison.
Man has not only for thousands of
years had the spirit of immortality, of keeping his
voice filed away if any one wanted it on the earth,
forever, but he has had all the other spirits or ghosts
of his mightier self. He has had the spirit of
being imperious and wilful with the sea, of faring
forth on a planet and playing with oceans, and now
he has worked out the details in ocean liners, in
boats that fly up from the water, and in boats which
dive and swim beneath the sea. For thousands
of years he has had the spirit of the locomotive working
through, troops of runners or of dim men groping defiantly
with camels through deserts, or sweeping on on horses
through the plains, and now with his banners of steam
at last he has great public trains of cars carrying
cities.
For hundreds of years man has had
the spirit of the motor-car-of having his
own private locomotive or his own special train drive
up to his door-the spirit of making every
road his railway. For a great many years he has
had the spirit of the wireless telegraph and of using
the sky. Franklin tried using the sky years ago
but all he got was electricity. Marconi knew
how better. Marconi has got ghosts of men’s
voices out of the clouds, has made heaven a sounding
board for great congregations of cities, and faraway
nations wrapped in darkness and silence whisper round
the rolling earth. Man has long had the spirit
of defying the seas. Now he has the technique
and the motor-boat. He has had the spirit of
removing oceans and of building huge, underground
cities, the spirit of caves in the ground and mansions
in the sky, and now he has subways and skyscrapers.
For a thousand years he has had the spirit of Christ
and now there is Frederick Taylor, Louis Brandeis,
Westfield Pure Food, Doctor Carrel, Jane Addams, and
Filene’s Store. Vast networks-huge
spiritual machines of goodness are crowding and penetrating
to-day, fifteen pounds to the square inch, the atmosphere
of the gospel into the very core of the matter of
the world, into the everyday things, into the solids
of the lives of men.
It takes two great spirits of humanity
to bring a great truth or a new goodness into this
world; one spirit creates it, the other conceives it,
gathers the earth about it and gives it birth.
These two spirits seem to be the spirits of the poet
and the scientist.
We are taking to-day, many of us,
an almost religious delight in them both. We
make no comparisons.
We note that the poet’s inspiration
comes first and consists in saying something that
is true, that cannot be proved.
A few people with imagination, here
and there, believe it.
The scientist’s inspiration
comes second and consists in seeing ways of proving
it, of making it matter of fact.
He proves it by seeing how to do it.
Crowds believe it.