The Impulse to Strangle the Object
of Sexual Desire-The Wish to be Strangled-Respiratory
Disturbance the Essential Element in this Group of
Phenomena-The Part Played by Respiratory
Excitement in the Process of Courtship-Swinging
and Suspension-The Attraction Exerted by
the Idea of being Chained and Fettered.
There is another impulse which it
may be worth while to consider briefly here, for the
sake of the light it throws on the relationship between
love and pain. I allude to the impulse to strangle
the object of sexual desire, and to the corresponding
craving to be strangled. Cases have been recorded
in which this impulse was so powerful that men have
actually strangled women at the moment of coitus.
Such cases are rare; but, as a mere idea, the thought
of strangling a woman appears to be not infrequently
associated with sexual emotion. We must probably
regard it as, in the main,-with whatever
subsidiary elements,-an aspect of that physical
seizure, domination, and forcible embrace of the female
which is one of the primitive elements of courtship.
The corresponding idea-the
pleasurable connection of the thought of being strangled
with sexual emotion-appears to occur still
more frequently, perhaps especially in women.
Here we seem to have, as in the case of whipping,
a combination of a physical with a psychic element.
Not only is the idea attractive, but, as a matter
of fact, strangulation, suffocation, or any arrest
of respiration, even when carried to the extent of
producing death, may actually provoke emission, as
is observed after death by hanging. It is noteworthy
that, as Eulenburg remarks, the method of treating
diseases of the spinal cord by suspension-a
method much in vogue a few years ago-often
produced sexual excitement. In brothels, it is
said, some of the clients desire to be suspended vertically
by a cord furnished with pads. A playful attempt
to throttle her on the part of her lover is often
felt by a woman as pleasurable, though it may not
necessarily produce definite sexual excitement.
Sometimes, however, this feeling becomes so strong
that it must be regarded as an actual perversion,
and I have been told of a woman who is indifferent
to the ordinary sexual embrace; her chief longing
is to be throttled, and she will do anything to have
her neck squeezed by her lover till her eyeballs bulge.
“I think if I could be left my
present feelings,” a lady writes, “and
be changed into a male imbecile,-that is,
given a man’s strength, but deprived, to
a large extent, of reasoning power,-I might
very likely act in the apparently cruel way they do.
And this partly because many of their actions
appeal to me on the passive side. The idea
of being strangled by a person I love does.
The great sensitiveness of one’s throat and neck
come in here as well as the loss of breath.
Once when I was about to be separated from a man
I cared for I put his hands on my throat and implored
him to kill me. It was a moment of madness, which
helps me to understand the feelings of a person
always insane. Even now that I am cool and
collected I know that if I were deeply in love with
a man who I thought was going to kill me, especially
in that way, I would make no effort to save myself
beforehand, though, of course, in the final moments
nature would assert herself without my volition.
What makes the horror of such cases in insanity is
the fact of the love being left out. But I
think I find no greater difficulty in picturing
the mental attitude of a sadistic lunatic than
that of a normal man who gets pleasure out of women
for whom he has no love.”
The imagined pleasure of being strangled
by a lover brings us to a group of feelings which
would seem to be not unconnected with respiratory
elements. I refer to the pleasurable excitement
experienced by some in suspension, swinging, restraint,
and fetters. Strangulation is the extreme and
most decided type of this group of imagined or real
situations, in all of which a respiratory disturbance
seems to be an essential element.
In explaining these phenomena we have
to remark that respiratory excitement has always been
a conspicuous part of the whole process of tumescence
and detumescence, of the struggles of courtship and
of its climax, and that any restraint upon respiration,
or, indeed, any restraint upon muscular and emotional
activity generally, tends to heighten the state of
sexual excitement associated with such activity.
I have elsewhere, when studying the
spontaneous solitary manifestation of the sexual
instinct (Auto-erotism, in vol. i of
these Studies), referred to the pleasurably
emotional, and sometimes sexual, effects of swinging
and similar kinds of movement. It is possible
that there is a certain significance in the frequency
with which the eighteenth-century French painters,
who lived at a time when the refinements of sexual
emotion were carefully sought out, have painted
women in the act of swinging. Fragonard mentions
that in 1763 a gentleman invited him into the country,
with the request to paint his mistress, especially
stipulating that she should be depicted in a swing.
The same motive was common among the leading artists
of that time. It may be said that this attitude
was merely a pretext to secure a vision of ankles,
but that result could easily have been attained without
the aid of the swing.
I may here quote, as bearing on this
and allied questions, a somewhat lengthy communication
from a lady to whom I am indebted for many subtle
and suggestive remarks on the whole of this group
of manifestations:-
“With regard to the connection
between swinging and suspension, perhaps the physical
basis of it is the loss of breath. Temporary
loss of breath with me produces excitement.
Swinging at a height or a fall from a height would
cause loss of breath; in a state of suspension
the imagination would suggest the idea of falling and
the attendant loss of breath. People suffering
from lung disease are often erotically inclined,
and anesthetics affect the breathing. Men
also seem to like the idea of suspension, but from
the active side. One man used to put his wife
on a high swinging shelf when she displeased him,
and my husband told me once he would like to suspend
me to a crane we were watching at work, though
I have never mentioned my own feeling on this point
to him. Suspension is often mentioned in
descriptions of torture. Beatrice Cenci was
hung up by her hair and the recently murdered Queen
of Korea was similarly treated. In Tolstoi’s
My Husband and I the girl says she would
like her husband to hold her over a precipice.
That passage gave me great pleasure.
“The idea of slipping off an inclined
plane gives me the same sensation. I always
feel it on seeing Michael Angelo’s ‘Night,’
though the slipping look displeases me artistically.
I remember that when I saw the ‘Night’
first I did feel excited and was annoyed, and
it seemed to me it was the slipping-off look that
gave it; but I think I am now less affected by
that idea. Certain general ideas seem to
excite one, but the particular forms under which
they are presented lose their effect and have to be
varied. The sentence mentioned in Tolstoi
leaves me now quite cold, but if I came across
the same idea elsewhere, expressed differently, then
it would excite me. I am very capricious in the
small things, and I think women are so more than
men. The idea of slipping down a plank formerly
produced excitement with me; now it has a less
vivid effect, though the idea of loss of breath still
produces excitement. The idea of the plank does
not now affect me unless there is a certain amount
of drapery. I think, therefore, that the
feeling must come in part from the possibility
of the drapery catching on some roughness of the surface
of the slope, and so producing pressure on the sexual
organs. The effect is still produced, however,
even without any clothing, if the slope is supposed
to end in a deep drop, so that the idea of falling
is strongly presented. I cannot recollect any
early associations that would tend to explain these
feelings, except that jumping from a height, which
I used frequently to do as a child, has a tendency
to create excitement.
“With me, I may add, it is when
I cannot express myself, or am trying to understand
what I feel is beyond my grasp, that the first
stage of sexual excitement results. For instance,
I never get excited in thinking over sexual questions,
because my ideas, correct or incorrect, are fairly
clear and definite. But I often feel sexually
excited over that question of the inheritance of acquired
characteristics, not because I can’t decide between
the two sets of evidence, but because I don’t
feel confident of having fully grasped the true
significance of either. This feeling of want
of power, mental or physical, always has the same
effect. I feel it if my eyes are blindfolded
or my hands tied. I don’t like to see
the Washington Post dance, in which the man stands
behind the woman and holds her hands, on that account.
If he held her wrists the feeling would be stronger,
as her apparent helplessness would be increased.
The nervous irritability that is caused by being
under restraint seems to manifest itself in that way,
while in the case of mental disability the excitement,
which should flow down a mental channel, being
checked, seems to take a physical course instead.
“Possibly this would help to explain
masochistic sexual feelings. A physical cause
working in the present would be preferable as an explanation
to a psychological cause to be traced back through
heredity to primitive conditions. I believe
such feelings are very common in men as well as
in women, only people do not care to admit them,
as a rule.”
The idea of being chained and fettered
appears to be not uncommonly associated with pleasurable
sexual feelings, for I have met with numerous cases
in both men and women, and it not infrequently coexists
with a tendency to inversion. It often arises
at a very early age, and it is of considerable interest
because we cannot account for its frequency by any
chance association nor by any actual experiences.
It would appear to be a purely psychic fantasia founded
on the elementary physical fact that restraint of
emotion, like suspension, produces a heightening of
emotion. In any case the spontaneous character
of such ideas and emotions in children of both sexes
suffices to show that they must possess a very definite
organic basis.
In one of the histories (X) contained
in Appendix B at the end of the present volume
a lady describes how, as a child, she reveled in
the idea of being chained and tortured, these ideas
appearing to rise spontaneously. In another
case, that of A.N. (for the most part reproduced
in “Erotic Symbolism,” in vol. v of
these Studies), whose ideals are inverted
and who is also affected by boot-fetichism, the
idea of fetters is very attractive. In this case
self-excitement was produced at a very early age, without
the use of the hands, by strapping the legs together.
We can, however, scarcely explain away the idea
of fetters in this case as merely the result of
an early association, for it may well be argued
that the idea led to this method of self-excitement.
“The mere idea of fetters,” this subject
writes, “produces the greatest excitement,
and the sight of pictures representing such things
is a temptation. The reading of books dealing
with prison life, etc., anywhere where physical
restraint is treated of, is a temptation.
The temptation is aggravated when the picture represents
the person booted. I suppose all this will have
been intensified in my case by my practices as
a child. But why should a child of 6 do such
things unless it were a natural instinct in him?
Nobody showed me; I have never mentioned such things
to anyone. I used to read historical romances
for the pleasure of reading of people being put
in prison, in fetters, and tortured, and always
envied them. I feel now that I should like to
undergo the sensation. If I could get anyone
to humor me without losing their self-respect,
I should jump at the opportunity. I have been
most powerfully excited by visiting an old Australian
convict-ship, where all the means of restraint
are shown; I have been attracted to it night after
night, wanting, but not daring to ask, to be allowed
to have a practical experience.”
Stcherbak, of Warsaw, has recorded a
case which resembles that of A.N., but there was
no inversion and the attraction of fetters was
active rather than passive; the subject desired to
fetter and not to be fettered. It is possible
that this difference is not fundamental, though
Stcherbak regards the case as one of fetichism
of sadistic origin ("Contribution a l’Etude des
Perversions Sexuelles,” Archives de Neurologie,
Oct., 1907). The subject was a highly intelligent
though neurasthenic youth, who from the age of
5 had been deeply interested in criminals who were
fettered and sent to prison. The fate of Siberian
prisoners was a frequent source of prolonged meditations.
It was the fettering which alone interested him,
and he spent much time in trying to imagine the
feelings of the fettered prisoners, and he often
imagined that he was himself a prisoner in fetters.
(This seems to indicate that the impulse was in
its origin masochistic as much as sadistic, and
better described as algolagnia than as sadism.)
He delighted in stories and pictures of fettered persons.
At the age of 15 the sex of the fettered person became
important and he was interested chiefly in fettered
women. A new element also appeared; he was
attracted to well-dressed women and especially
to those wearing elegant shoes, delighting to imagine
them fettered. He fastened his own feet together
with chains, attempting to walk about his room
in this condition, but experienced comparatively
little pleasure in this way. At the age of
15 he met a lady 10 years older than himself and of
great intelligence. As he began to know her
more intimately she allowed him to take liberties
with her; he fastened her hands behind her back,
and this caused him a violent but delicious emotion
which he had never experienced before. Next
time he fastened her feet together as well as
her hands; as he did so her shoes slightly touched
his sexual organs; this caused erection and ejaculation,
accompanied by the most acute sexual pleasure he
had ever felt. He had no wish to see her
naked or to uncover himself, and as long as this
relationship lasted he had no abnormal thoughts at
other times, or in connection with other people.
He never masturbated, and his sexual dreams were
of fettered men or women. Stcherbak discusses
the case at length and considers that it is essentially
an example of sadism, on the ground that the impulse
of fettering was prompted by the desire to humiliate.
There is, however, no evidence of any such desire,
and, as a matter of fact, no humiliation was effected.
The primary and fundamental element in this and
similar cases is an almost abstract sexual fascination
in the idea of restraint, whether endured, inflicted,
or merely witnessed or imagined; the feet become
the chief focus of this fascination, and the basis
on which a foot-fetichism or shoe-fetichism tends
to arise, because restraint of the feet produces
a more marked effect than restraint of the hands.