Stephen took Mercy’s letter
from the post-office at night. It was one week
past the time at which it would have reached him, if
it had been written immediately on the receipt of
his. Only too well he knew what the delay meant.
He turned the letter over and over in his hand, and
noted without surprise it was very light. The
superscription was written with unusual care.
Mercy’s handwriting was free and bold, but illegible,
unless she made a special effort to write with care;
and she never made that effort in writing to Stephen.
How many times he had said to her: “Never
mind how you write to me, dear. I read your sentences
by another sense than the sense of sight.”
This formally and neatly written, superscription smote
him, as a formal bow and a chilling glance from Mercy
would, if he had passed her on the street.
He carried the letter home unopened.
All through the evening it lay like a leaden weight
in his bosom, as he sat by his mother’s side.
He dared not read it until he was sure of being able
to be alone for hours. At last he was free.
As he went upstairs to his room, he thought to himself,
“This is the hour at which I used to fly to
her, and find such welcome. A year ago to-night
how happy we were!” With a strange disposition
to put off the opening of the letter, he moved about
his room, rearranged the books, lighted an extra lamp,
and finally sat down in an arm-chair, and leaning
both his arms on the table looked at the letter lying
there so white, so still. He felt a preternatural
consciousness of what was in it; and he shrank from
looking at the words, as a condemned prisoner might
shrink from reading his own death-warrant. The
room was bitterly cold. Fires in bed-rooms were
a luxury Stephen had never known. As he sat there,
his body and heart seemed to be growing numb together.
At last he said, “I may as well read it,”
and took the letter up. As he opened it and read
the first words, “My darling Stephen,”
his heart gave a great bound. She loved him still.
What a reprieve in that! He had yet to learn that
love can be crueller than any friendship, than any
indifference, than any hate: nothing is so exacting,
so inexorable, as love. The letter was full of
love; but it was, nevertheless, hard and pitiless in
its tone. Stephen read it again and again:
then he held it in the flame of the lamp, and let
it slowly burn, until only a few scorched fragments
remained. These he folded in a small paper, and
put into his pocket-book. Why he did this, he
could not tell, and wondered at himself for doing it.
Then he walked the room for an hour or two, revolving
in his mind what he should say to Mercy. His
ideas arranged themselves concisely and clearly.
He had been stung by Mercy’s letter into a frame
of feeling hardly less inexorable than her own.
He said to himself, “She never truly loved me,
or nothing under heaven could make her believe me
capable of a dishonesty;” and, in midst of all
his pain at this thought, he had an indignant resentment,
as if Mercy herself had been in some way actively
responsible for all this misery.
His letter was shorter than Mercy’s.
They were sad, strange letters to have passed between
lovers. Mercy’s ran as follows:-
“My darling Stephen,-Your
letters have shocked me so deeply that I find myself
at a loss for words in which to reply. I cannot
understand your present position at all. I have
waited all these days, hoping that some new light
would come to me, that I could see the whole thing
differently; but I cannot. On the contrary, each
hour that I think of it (and I have thought of nothing
else since your second letter came) only makes my
conviction stronger. Darling, that money is Mrs.
Jacobs’s money, by every moral right. You
may be correct in your statement as to the legal rights
of the case. I take it for granted that you are.
At any rate, I know nothing about that; and I rest
no argument upon it at all. But it is clear as
daylight to me that morally you are bound to give her
the money. Suppose you had had permission from
her to make those changes in the house, while you
were still her tenant, and had found the money, then
you would have handed it to her unhesitatingly.
Why? Because you would have said, ’This
woman’s husband built this house. No one
except his brother who could possibly have deposited
this money here has lived in the house. One of
those two men was the owner of that gold. In either
case, she is the only heir, and it is hers. I
am sure you would have felt this, had we chanced to
discover the money on one of those winter nights you
refer to. Now in what has the moral obligation
been changed by the fact that the house has come into
your hands? Not by ordinary sale, either; but
simply by foreclosure of a mortgage, under conditions
which were certainly very hard for Mrs. Jacobs, inasmuch
as one-half the interest has always been paid.
This money which you have found would have paid nearly
the whole of the original loan. It was hers,
only she did not know where it lay. O Stephen,
my darling, I do implore you not to do this great wrong.
You will certainly come to see, sooner or later, that
it was a dishonest act; and then it will be too late
to undo it. If I thought that by talking with
you I could make you see it as I do, I would come
to you at once. But I keep clinging to the hope
that you will see it of yourself, that a sudden realization
of it will burst upon you like a great light.
Don’t speak so angrily to me of calling you
a thief. I never used the word. I never
could. I know the act looks to you right, or you
would not commit it. But it is terrible to me
that it should look so to you. I feel, darling,
as if you were color-blind, and I saw you about to
pick a most deadly fruit, whose color ought to warn
every one from touching it; but you, not seeing the
color, did not know the danger; and I must save you
at all hazards, at all costs. Oh, what shall
I say, what shall I say! How can I make you see
the truth? God help us if I do not; for such an
act as this on your part would put an impassable gulf
between our souls for ever. Your loving,
“Mercy.”
Stephen’s letter was in curter
phrase. Writing was not to him a natural form
of expression. Even of joyous or loving words
he was chary, and much more so of their opposites.
His life-long habit of repression of all signs of
annoyance, all complaints, all traces of suffering,
told still more on his written words than on his daily
speech and life. His letter sounded harder than
it need for this reason; seemed to have been written
in antagonism rather than in grief, and so did injustice
to his feeling.
“My dear mercy,-It
is always a mistake for people to try to impose their
own standards of right and wrong on others. It
gives me very great pain to wound you in any way,
you know that; and to wound you in such a way as this
gives me the greatest possible pain. But I cannot
make your conscience mine. If this money had
not seemed to me to be justly my own, I should never
have thought of taking it. As it does seem to
me to be justly my own, your believing it to be another’s
ought not to change my action. If I had only
my own future to consider, I might give it up, for
the sake of your peace of mind. But it is not
so. I have a helpless invalid dependent on me;
and one of the hardest things in my life to bear has
always been the fear that I might lose my health, and
be unable to earn even the poor living we now have.
This sum, small as it is, will remove that fear, will
enable me to insure for my mother a reasonable amount
of comfort as long as she lives; and I cannot give
it up. I do not suppose, either, that it would
make any difference in your feeling if I gave it up
solely to please you, and not because I thought it
wrong to keep it. How any act which I honestly
believe to be right, and which you know I honestly
believe to be right, can put ’an impassable gulf
between our souls for ever,’ I do not understand.
But, if’ it seems so to you, I can only submit;
and I will try to forget that you ever said to me,
’I shall trust you till I die!’ O Mercy,
Mercy, ask yourself if you are just!
“Stephen.”
Mercy grasped eagerly at the intimation
in this letter that Stephen might possibly give the
money up because she desired it.
“Oh, if he will only not keep
it, I don’t care on what grounds he gives it
up!” she exclaimed. “I can bear his
thinking it was his, if only the money goes where
it belongs. He will see afterwards that I was
right.” And she sat down instantly, and
wrote Stephen a long letter, imploring him to do as
he had suggested.
“Darling,” she said, “this
last letter of yours has given me great comfort.”
As Stephen read this sentence, he uttered an ejaculation
of surprise. What possible comfort there could
have been in the words he remembered to have written
he failed to see; but it was soon made clear to him.
“You say,” she continued,
“that you might possibly give the money up for
sake of my peace of mind, if it were not for the fear
that your mother might suffer. O Stephen, then
give it up! give it up! Trust to the future’s
being at least as kind as the past. I will not
say another word about the right or wrong of the thing.
Think that my feeling is all morbid and overstrained
about it, if you will. I do not care what you
think of me, so that I do not have to think of you
as using money which is not your own. And, darling,
do not be anxious about the future: if any thing
happens to you, I will take care of your mother.
It is surely my right next to yours. I only wish
you would let me help you in it even now. I am
earning more and more money. I have more than
I need. Oh, if you would only take some of it,
darling! Why should you not? I would take
it from you, if you had it and I had not. I could
give you in a very few years as much as this you have
found and never miss it. Do let me atone to you
in this way for your giving up what you think is your
right in the matter of this ill-fated money.
O Stephen, I could be almost happy again, if you would
do this! You say it would make no difference in
my feeling about it, if you gave the money up only
to please me, and not because you thought it wrong
to keep it. No, indeed! that is not so. I
would be happier, if you saw it as I do, of course;
but, if you cannot, then the next best thing, the
only thing left for my happiness, is to have you yield
to my wish. Why, Stephen, I have even felt so
strongly about it as this: that sometimes, in
thinking it over, I have had a wild impulse to tell
you that if you did not give the money to Mrs. Jacobs
I would inform the authorities that you had it, and
so test the question whether you had the right to
keep it or not. Any thing, even your humiliation,
has at times seemed to me better than that you should
go on living in the possession of stolen money.
You can see from this how deeply I felt about the thing.
I suppose I really never could have done this.
At the last moment, I should have found it impossible
to array myself against you in any such public way;
but, oh, my darling, I should always have felt as if
I helped steal the money, if I kept quiet about it.
You see I use a past tense already, I feel so certain
that you will give it up now. Dear, dear Stephen,
you will never be sorry: as soon as it is done,
you will be glad. I wish that gold had been all
sunk in the sea, and never seen light again, the sight
of it has cost us so dear. Darling, I can’t
tell you what a load has rolled off my heart.
Oh, if you could know what it has been to me to have
this cloud over my thoughts of you! I have always
been so proud of you, Stephen,-your patience,
your bravery. In my thought, you have stood always
for my ideal of the beautiful alliance of gentleness
and strength. Darling, we owe something to those
who love us: we owe it to them not to disappoint
them. If I were to be tempted to do some dishonorable
thing, I should say to myself: ’No, for
I must be what Stephen believes me. It is not
only that I will not grieve him: still more, I
will not disappoint him.’”
Mercy wrote on and on. The reaction
from the pent-up grief, the prolonged strain, was
great. In her first joy at any, even the least,
alleviation of the horror she had felt at the thought
of Stephen’s dishonesty, she over-estimated
the extent of the relief she would feel from his surrendering
the money at her request. She wrote as buoyantly,
as confidently, as if his doing that would do away
with the whole wrong from the beginning. In her
overflowing, impetuosity, also, she did not consider
what severe and cutting things were implied as well
as said in some of her sentences. She closed
the letter without rereading it, hastened to send it
by the first mail, and then began to count the days
which must pass before Stephen’s answer could
reach her.
Alas for Mercy! this was a sad preparation
for the result which was to follow her hastily written
words. It seems sometimes as if fate delighted
in lifting us up only to cast us down, in taking us
up into a high mountain to show us bright and goodly
lands, only to make our speedy imprisonment in the
dark valley the harder to bear.
Stephen read this last letter of Mercy’s
with an ever-increasing sense of resentment to the
very end. For the time being it seemed to actually
obliterate every trace of his love for her. He
read the words as wrathfully as if they had been written
by a mere acquaintance.
“Good heavens!” he exclaimed.
“‘Stolen money! Inform the authorities!’
Let her do it if she likes and see how she would come
out at the end of that.’ And Stephen wrote
Mercy very much such a letter as he would have written
to a man under the same circumstances. Luckily,
he kept it a day, and, rereading it in a cooler moment
was shocked at its tone, destroyed it, and wrote another.
But the second one was no less hard, only more courteous,
than the first. It ran thus:-
“Mercy,-I am
sorry that any thing in my last letter should have
led you to suppose that under the existing circumstances
you could control my actions. All I said was
that I might, for the sake of your peace of mind,
give up this money, if it were not for my obligations
to my mother. It was a foolish thing to say,
since those obligations could not be done away with.
I ought to have known that in your overwrought frame
of mind you would snatch at the suggestion, and make
it the basis of a fresh appeal.
“Now let me say, once for all,
that my mind is firmly made up on this subject, and
that it must be dropped between us. The money
is mine, and I shall keep it. If you think it
your duty to ‘inform the authorities,’
as you say, you must do so; and I would not say one
word to hinder you. I would never, as you do
in this case, attempt to make my own conscience the
regulator of another’s conduct. If you do
regard me as the possessor of ‘stolen money,’
it is undoubtedly your duty to inform against me.
I can only warn you that all you would gain by it
would be a most disagreeable exposure of your own
and my private affairs, and much mortification to
both of us. The money is mine beyond all question.
I shall not reply to any more letters from you on
this subject. There is nothing more to be said;
and all prolonging of the discussion is a needless
pain, and is endangering the very foundations of our
affection for each other. I want to say one thing
more, however; and I hope it will impress you as it
ought. Never forget that the strongest proof that
my conscience was perfectly clear in regard to that
money is that I at once told you of its discovery.
It would have been perfectly easy for me to have accounted
to you in a dozen different ways for my having come
into possession of a little money, or even to have
concealed from you the fact that I had done so; and,
if I had felt myself a thief, I should certainly have
taken good care that you did not know it.
“I must also thank you for your
expressions of willingness to take care of my mother,
in case of any thing’s happening to me.
Until these last letters of yours, I had often thought,
with a sense of relief, that, if I died, you would
never see my mother suffer; but now any such thought
is inseparably associated with bitter memories.
And my mother will not, in any event, need your help;
for the money I shall have from the sale of the house,
together with this which I have found, will give her
all she will require.
“You must forgive me if this
letter sounds hard, Mercy. I have not your faculty
of mingling endearing epithets with sharp accusations
and reproaches. I cannot be lover and culprit
at once, as you are able to be lover and accuser,
or judge. I love you, I think, as deeply and tenderly
as ever; but you yourself have made all expression
of it impossible. Stephen.”
This letter roused in Mercy most conflicting
emotions. Wounded feeling at its coldness, a
certain admiration for its tone of immovable resolution,
anger at what seemed to her Stephen’s unjustifiable
resentment of her effort to influence his action,-all
these blended in one great pain which was well-nigh
unbearable. For the time being, her distress in
regard to the money seemed cast into shadow and removed
by all this suffering in her personal relation with
Stephen; but the personal suffering had not so deep
a foundation as the other. Gradually, all sense
of her own individual hurts in Stephen’s words,
in his acts, in the weakening of the bond which held
them together, died out, and left behind it only a
sense of bereavement and loss; while the first horror
of Stephen’s wrong-doing, of the hopeless lack
in his moral nature, came back with twofold intensity.
This had its basis in convictions,-in convictions
which were as strong as the foundations of the earth:
the other had its basis in emotions, in sensibilities
which might pass away or be dulled.
Spite of Stephen’s having forbidden
all reference to the subject, Mercy wrote letter after
letter upon it, pleading sometimes humbly, sometimes
vehemently. It seemed to her that she was fighting
for Stephen’s very life, and she could not give
way. To all these out-pourings Stephen made no
reply. He answered the letters punctually, but
made no reference to the question of the money, save
by a few short words at the end of his letter, or
in a postscript: such as, “It grieves me
to see that you still dwell on that matter of which
I said we must speak no more;” or, “Pray,
dear Mercy, do not prolong that painful discussion.
I have nothing more to say to you about it.”
For the rest, his letters were faithful
transcripts of the little events of his uneventful
life, warm comments on any of Mercy’s writings
which he read, and gentle assurances of his continued
affection. The old longings, broodings, and passionate
yearnings, which he used to pour out, ceased.
Stephen was wounded to the very quick; and the wound
did not heal. Yet he felt no withdrawal from
Mercy: probably nothing she could do would ever
drive him from her. He would die, if worst came
to worst, lying by her side and looking up in her
eyes, like a dog at the feet of its master who had
shot him.
Mercy was much moved by this tone
of patience in his letters: it touched her, as
the look of patient endurance on his face used to touch
her. It also irritated her, it was so foreign
to her own nature.
“How can he help answering these
things I say?” she would exclaim. “He
has no right to refuse to talk with me about such
a vital matter.” If any one had said to
Mercy, “He has as much right to refuse to discuss
the question as you have to force it upon him,”
she could not have seen the point fairly.
But all Stephen’s patience,
gentleness, and firmness did not abate one jot or
tittle of Mercy’s conviction that he was doing
a dishonest thing. Oh the contrary, his quiet
appeared to her more and more like a callous satisfaction;
and his occasional cheerfulness, like an exultation
over his ill-gotten gains. Slowly there crept
into her feeling towards him a certain something which
was akin to scorn,-the most fatal of deaths
to love. The hateful word “thief”
seemed to be perpetually ringing in her ears.
When she read accounts of robberies, of défalcations,
of breaches of trust, she found herself always drawing
parallels between the conduct of these criminals and
Stephen’s. The secrecy, the unassailable
safety of his crime, seemed to her to make it inexpressibly
more odious.
“I do believe,” she thought
to herself again and again, “that if he had
been driven by his poverty to knocking men down on
the highway, and robbing them of their pocket-books,
I should not have so loathed it!”
As the weeks went on, Mercy’s
unhappiness increased rather than diminished.
There seemed an irreconcilible conflict between her
love and every other emotion in her soul. She
seemed to herself to be, as it were, playing the hypocrite
to her own heart in thinking thus of a man and loving
him still; for that she still loved Stephen, she did
not once doubt. At this time, she printed a little
poem, which set many of her friends to vondering from
what experience of hers it could possibly have been
drawn. Mercy’s poems were so largely subjective
in tone that it was hard for her readers to believe
that they were not all drawn from her own individual
experience.
A woman’s battle.
Dear foe, I know thou’lt
win the fight;
I know thou hast the stronger
bark,
And thou art sailing in the
light,
While I am creeping in the
dark.
Thou dost not dream that I am crying,
As I come up with colors flying.
I clear away my wounded, slain,
With strength like frenzy
strong and swift;
I do not feel the tug and
strain,
Though dead are heavy, hard
to lift.
If I looked on their faces dying,
I could not keep my colors flying.
Dear foe, it will be short,-our
fight,-
Though lazily thou train’st
thy guns:
Fate steers us,-me
to deeper night,
And thee to brighter seas
and suns;
But thou’lt not dream that I am
dying,
As I sail by with colors flying!
There was great injustice to Stephen
in this poem. When he read it, he groaned, and
exclaimed aloud, “O Mercy! O Mercy!”
Then, as he read it over again, he said, “Surely
she could not have meant herself in this: it is
only dramatic. She could never call me her foe.”
Mercy had often said to him of some of her most intense
poems, “Oh, it was purely dramatic. I just
fancied how anybody would feel under such circumstances;”
and he clung to the hope that it was true in this
case. But it was not. Already Mercy had
a sense of antagonism, of warfare, with Stephen, or
rather with her love for him. Already her pride
was beginning to array itself in reticence, in withdrawal,
in suppression. More than once she had said to
herself “I can live without him! I could
bear that pain better than this.” More than
once she had asked herself with a kind of terror,
“Do I really wish ever to see Stephen again?”
and had been forced to own in her secret thought that
she shrank from meeting him. She began even to
consider the possibility of deferring the visit to
Lizzy Hunter, which she had promised to make in the
spring. As the time drew nearer, her unwillingness
to go increased, and she would no doubt have discovered
some way of escape; but one day early in March a telegram
came to her, which left her no longer any room for
choice.
It ran:-
“Uncle Dorrance is not expected
to live. He wishes to see you. He is at my
house. Come immediately.
“Lizzy Hunter.”