I
Little Albert’s babyhood kept
his mother a good deal at home and by “home”
I mean the house in which he had been born. His
father’s lessened interest in Europe (and his
diminished deference for it) kept his mother at home
completely and by “home” I now
mean the town in which Albert had been born.
Father, mother, and offspring filled the big house
as well as they could the big, old
house as it was sometimes called by those who cherished
a chronology that was purely American; and Albert
was more than a year and a half along in life before
his grandmother came across to see him and to inspect
the distant ménage. She brought her water-waves
and her sharpened critical sense, and went back leaving
the impression that she was artificial and exacting.
“She missed her Paris,”
said Raymond, “and her drive in the Bois.”
“H’m!” said I, recalling
that the town’s recent chief executive had pronounced
us, not many years back, the equal of Paris in civic
beauty.
“We have no Bois, as yet,”
he added, thoughtfully. “Do you think we
ever shall have one?”
He was revolving the Bois, not as
a definite tract of park land, but as a social institution.
“I think,” said I, “that
we had better be satisfied with developing according
to our own nature and needs.”
“Yes,” he returned; “there
was the Frenchman at the fox-hunt: ’No band,
no promenade, no nossing.’ Well, we must
go on our own tack, as soon as we discover it.”
It need not be imagined that his mother-in-law’s
look-in of a month made his wife more contented.
She kept on wishing for her new friends in another
quarter, and (more strongly) for the familiar scenes
of the other side. Raymond did not wish the expense
involved in either move. His affairs were now
going but tolerably. So far as the bank was concerned a
bank that had once been almost a “family”
institution his influence was naught.
He was only a stockholder, and a smaller stockholder
than once. His interest, in any sense, was but
a brief, periodical interest in dividends. These
were coming with a commendable regularity still.
His rentals came in fairly too; but most of them were
now derived from properties on the edge of the business
district properties with no special future and likely only to hold their own
however favorable general conditions might continue. Travel? No.
A man travels best in his youth, when he is foot-free, care-free, fancy-free.
Go traveling too late, or once too often, and there is a difference. The
final checking-off of something one has always meant to see may result in the
most ashen disappointment of all: even intuition, without the pains of
actual experience, should suffice to warn. Besides, as Raymond said,
“We’ve both had a good deal of it.
Let’s stay at home.”
His wife cast about her. There
is a mood in which a deprivation of high comedy may
drive one to low-down farce. To-day people are
even going farther. A worthy stage is dead, they
say; and they patronize, somewhat willfully and contemptuously
(or with a loose, slack tolerance that is worse),
the moving pictures. Perhaps it was in some such
mood that Raymond’s wife took up with Mrs. Johnny
McComas. They were but three streets apart.
Mrs. McComas was lively, energetic, determined to drive
on; and her ability to assimilate rapidly and light-handedly
her growing opulence made it seem by no means a mere
vulgar external adornment. She knew how to move
among the remarkable furnishings with which she had
surrounded herself in that old-new house, and how to
make the momentum gained there serve her ends in the
world outside.
“It will be a short life here,”
her husband had told her on their taking possession;
“then, a quick sale at a good figure to
some manufacturing concern, and on we go.”
“If it’s to be short,
let’s make it merry,” she had rejoined;
and nothing had been spared that could give liveliness
to their stately old interiors, while those interiors
lasted.
Mrs. Raymond Prince vaguely pronounced
their house “amusing.” It had, like
Adele McComas herself, a provocative dash which fell
in with her present mood, and it pleased her that
its chatelaine was inclined to dress up to its wayward
sofas and hangings. She even went with Mrs. Johnny
on shopping tours and abetted her as her fancies, desires
and expenditures ran riot. It was a mood of irresponsibility almost
of defiant irresponsibility.
Now was the nascent day of the country
club. Several of these welcome institutions had
lately set themselves up in a modest, tentative way.
Acceptance was complete, and all they had to do was
to grow. With one of these McComas cast his lot.
At the start it was a simple enough affair; but Johnny
must have sensed its potentialities and savored its
affinities, its coming congruity with himself.
It was to become, shortly, a club for the suddenly,
violently rich, the flushed with dollars, the congested
with prosperity for newcomers who had met
Success and beaten her at her own game. Stir on
all hands, the reek of sudden felicity in the air.
In later years people with access to better things
of similar sort were known to become indignant when
asked to associate themselves with it. “Why
should I want to join that?” was
the question they put. But it pleased Johnny McComas,
both by its present manifestations and its latent
possibilities. It was richly in unison with his
own nature, and I believe he had a ravishing vision
of its magnificent futurities.
Last year my wife and I were taken
to a Sunday afternoon concert out there. We found
a place of towers and arcades, of endless corridors
planted with columns and numberless chairs in numberless
varieties, of fountained courts, of ball-rooms, of
concert-halls, of gay apparel and cool drinks.
We heard of fairs, horse-shows, tournaments in golf
and tennis. The restaurant, with its acre of
tables, glassed and naperied; the ranges of telephone
booths, all going it together; the cellars, a vast
subterrene, with dusky avenues of lockers, each cluttered
with beverages of individual predilection though
I suppose that, after all, they were a good deal alike....
Well, it was too much for us; and
my Elsie, who is essentially the lady, if woman ever
was, came away feeling a little dowdy and a good deal
out of date.
At that earlier period, however, it
was still simple; the germ was there, but the development
of its possibilities had only begun. When Mrs.
McComas invited Mrs. Prince to drive out with her and
see some tennis, Mrs. Prince was quite ready to accept.
I do not know just what mode of locomotion
they employed. It was in the early days of the
automobile and Johnny McComas was one of the first
men in town to have one. I recall, in fact, some
of his initial experiences with it. On a Sunday
afternoon I encountered him in one of these still
relatively unstudied contraptions on a frequented driveway.
Another man was sitting beside him patiently.
The conveyance was making no progress at all.
Fortunately it had stopped close enough to the curb
not to interfere with the progress of other and more
familiar équipages.
“We’re stuck,” said
Johnny, jovially, as he caught sight of me. “Ran
for three or four miles slick as a whistle and
look at us now!” It entertained him a
kink in a new toy. And he enjoyed the interest
of the people collected about.
“You’re gummed up, I expect,”
said I. In those days nobody knew much about the new
creature and its habits, and one man’s guess
was as good as another’s. Two or three
bystanders eyed me deferentially, as a probable expert.
“Likely enough,” he agreed and
that made me an expert beyond doubt. “But
this will do for to-day. We’ve been here
twenty minutes.”
He had the car pushed to a near-by
stable, amidst the mixed emotions of the little crowd,
and next day he had it hauled home.
“You were right,” he said,
when I met him out again in it, a week later.
“It was gummed up, so to speak; but it’s
working like a charm to-day. Get in and I’ll
take you a few miles. That other fellow got an
awful grouch.”
It may have been by this machine,
or by some more familiar mode of locomotion, that
the two women reached the country club and its tennis
tournament. Gertrude Prince strolled through its
grounds and galleries with the aloof and amused air
of one touring through a foreign town a
town never seen before and likely to be left behind
altogether within an hour or two. It was at once
semi-smart and semi-simple. She took it lightly,
even condescendingly; and when Johnny McComas himself
appeared somewhat later and set them down at a little
marble table near a fountain-jet and offered cocktails
as a preliminary to a variety of sandwiches, she decided,
after looking about and seeing a few other ladies
with glasses before them on other little marble tables,
to accept. It was a lark in some town of the
provinces Meaux or Melun; what difference
did it make?
They formed a little group altogether
to Johnny’s liking. His wife was dressed
dashingly; his wife’s guest made a very fair
second; he himself, although he never lifted a racquet,
was in the tennis garb of that day.
“You both look ripping,”
he declared with hearty satisfaction. To look
thus, before competing items in the throng, was the
object of the place, the reason for its developing
mise en scene.
Johnny himself looked ripping cool,
confident, content, and at the top of his days.
“It was amusing....” said
Gertrude to me, with an upward inflection, a week
later.
And she asked me for more about Johnny McComas.
II
If those were days when people began
to combine for the pursuit of pleasure, they were
also days when people began to gather at the call of
public duty. If clubs were forming on the borders,
other clubs, leagues, societies were forming nearer
the centre organizations to make effective
the scattered good-will of the well-disposed and to
gain some betterment in the local political life.
To initiate and conduct such movements only a few
were needed; but the many were expected to contribute,
if not their zeal and their time, at least their dollars.
It was patriotic righteousness made easy: a man
had only to give his fifty dollars or his five hundred
to feel, without further personal exertion, that he
was a good citizen and was forwarding, as all good
citizens should, a worthy cause. This way of
doing it fell in wonderfully well with Raymond’s
temperament and abilities (or lack of them): the
liberality of his contributions did not remain unknown,
and he was sometimes held up as a favorable specimen
of the American citizen.
Another movement was soon to engage
his attention. If the prosperous were to have
their playgrounds beyond the city’s outskirts,
the less prosperous should have theirs within the
city’s limits. The scheme of a system of
small parks and playgrounds quite took Raymond’s
fancy. It contained, besides the idea of social
amelioration, the even more grateful idea of municipal
beautification. In time, indeed, might not this
same notion, fortified by experience and given a wider
application, end by redeeming the town not merely in
spots but in its entirety? a saved and
graced whole, not only as to its heart, but as to
its liberal and varied borders of water, woodland and
prairie.
“I should be proud of that,”
said Raymond heartily. The name of such a city,
following one’s own name on any hotel-register,
would indeed be a matter for pride.
He attended several of the early meetings
that were designed to get some such project, in its
simpler form, under way. He had friends among
professional men in the arts, and some acquaintances
among newly formed bodies of social workers.
He was not slow in perceiving that the way was likely
to be tedious and hard. It called for organization the
organization of hope, of patience, of hot, untiring
zeal, of finesse against political chicane,
of persistence in the face of indifference and selfishness.
“It will take years of organized endeavor,”
he confessed. He recognized his own ineffectiveness
beyond the narrow pale of hopeful suggestion, and
wished that here too the giving of a substantial sum a
large penny-in-the-slot might produce quick
and facile results.
His wife, it is to be feared, looked
upon these activities of his, however slight, with
a lack-lustre eye. She knew nothing of local
problems and local needs. She was conscious of
a hortatory manner in small matters and of indifference,
which she almost made neglect, in matters that appeared
to her to be larger. If she asked for a fairer
share in his evenings he belonged to a literary
club, a musical society, and so on it was
scant consolation to be told that he objected to some
of her own activities and associations. He did
not much care, for example, to have her “run”
with the McComases and others of that type or to have
her dawdle over glasses, tall, broad, or short, in
places of general democratic assemblage; and he told
her so. I believe it was about here that she
began to find him something of a prig and a doctrinaire;
and she was not incapable, under provocation, of mentioning
her impressions. It was about here, I suspect,
that he told her something of Johnny McComas and his
origins at least he once or twice spoke
of Johnny with a certain sharp scorn to me. He
assuredly spoke of other country clubs on the other
side of town which were more desirable for her and
equally accessible, save in the material sense of mere
miles. Though he took no interest in athletics,
nor even in the lighter out-of-door sports, he was
willing to join one of those clubs, if it was required
of him.
His reference to Johnny McComas was
designed, no doubt, to repel her; but the effect,
as became perfectly apparent, was quite the contrary.
She was interested, even fascinated, by the rise of
a man from so little to so much. She found words
and words to express her admiration of Johnny’s
type, and when English words ran short she found words
in French. He was gaillard; he had elan.
What wasn’t he? What hadn’t he?
Bits of bravado, I still incline to think.
No, the McComases were not to be left
behind all of a sudden. One day she made another
excursion to the outskirts with them; and she reported
it to Raymond, with a little air of suppressed mockery,
as a perfectly unobjectionable jaunt. She had
gone with them to the cemetery. Johnny’s
mother had died the year before, and he had been putting
up a monument in Roselands. This structure, it
developed, was no mere memorial to an individual.
It was a tall shaft, set in the middle of a large lot.
I saw it later myself: a lavish erection (with
all its accessory features taken into account) one
designed, as I felt, to show Johnny himself to posterity
as an ancestor, as the founder of a family line.
Assuredly his own name, aside from the tall obelisk
itself, was the largest thing in view.
Raymond took this account of Johnny’s
latest phase with an admirable seriousness; he thought
the better of him for it. He himself was inclined
to divide human-kind into two classes, those who had
cemetery-lots (with monuments), and those who had not.
The latter, of course, are in a majority everywhere.
One thinks of Naples and of the sad road that winds
up past the Alhambra to Well, yes; in a
majority, of course; and inevitably so in a large
town suddenly thrown together by a heaping up of fortuitous
and miscellaneous elements. In later years, when
things were going rather badly with Raymond, and when
consideration seemed to fail, he could always comfort
himself with thoughts of the Princes’ own monument
in that same cemetery. This was another tall
shaft in a gray granite now no longer to be found,
and had been set up by old Jehiel on the occasion
of the reinterment of some infants by his first wife a
transaction carried out years before Raymond was born.
Some of the dates on the base of the monument went
back to the early thirties. Well, there it stood,
with the subordinated headstones of Jehiel and old
Beulah, of his own parents, and of the half-mythical
babes who, if they had given nothing else to the world,
had furnished a future nephew with a social perspective.
Raymond, reconsidering Johnny’s recent effort,
now began to disparage that improvised background,
and led his wife to view his own lot theirs,
hers only a hundred yards from the other.
But she could not respond to old Jehiel and Beulah though
she tried to be properly sympathetic over their son
and his wife. Still less could she vitalize the
infants who had encountered an epidemic on the prairie
frontier and had succumbed more than three score years
ago. If she thought of any child at all, she
thought doubtless of little Albert (now romping about
in his first tweed knickerbockers), who would not
die for many years, perhaps, and who was like enough
to be buried in quite another spot.
But I think she thought, most of all,
of the manly, cheerful sorrow of Johnny McComas before
the new monument in the other lot.
III
These were also days of panic.
Banks went down and bank officials threw themselves
after. The city was thrilled, even charmed, to
find that its financial perturbations touched, however
slightly, the nerves of London and Paris. I myself
was in Algeria that winter: my Elsie and I had
decided on three months along the Mediterranean.
It was on the white, glaring walls of the casino at
Biskra that the news was first bulletined for our
eyes. It had a glare of its own, I assure you:
for a few days we knew little enough how we ourselves
might be standing.
I thought of the Mid-Continent, with
its cumbersome counters and partitions done in walnut
veneer and its old-fashioned pavement in squares of
black and white. I thought too of Johnny McComas’s
new institution, with so many bright brass handrails
and such a spread of tasteful mosaics underfoot.
How had they fared? Well, they had fared quite
differently. Why should a big, old bank go under,
while a new, little bank continues to float.
I cannot tell you. I was far away at the time.
Perhaps I could not tell you even if I had been on
the spot. And to other questions, more important
still, I may be unable to give, when the pinch comes,
a clearer answer. The Mid-Continent dashed, or
drifted, into the rocky hands of a receiver; and McComas’s
bank, after a fortnight of wobbling, righted itself
and kept on its way.
I saw Raymond again in March.
The receivership was going on languidly. Prospects
were bright for nobody.
“All this puts an end to one
of my plans, anyhow,” he said.
“What plan is that?” I asked.
I was reminded that these were also
the days of a quickened interest in education.
This interest was expressing itself in large new institutions,
and these institutions were generously embodying themselves
in solid stone in mullions, groins,
gargoyles, finials, and the whole volume of approved
scholastic detail. Donors were grouping themselves
in “halls” and dormitories round a certain
inchoate campus, and were putting on the fronts of
their buildings their own names, or the names of deceased
husbands or wives, fathers or mothers so
many bids for a monumental immortality.
“I had hoped for a Prince Hall,”
said Raymond. And he explained that it would
have been in memory of his parents.
I must pause for a moment on this
matter. I do not believe that Raymond had ever
thought, in seriousness, of any such gift. It
must have been at best an errant fancy, and if concerned
with commemorating anybody concerned with commemorating
himself. But I will say this for him: he
never was disposed to try getting things out of people,
for he hated attempts at trickery almost as much as
he detested the exercise of the shrewdness involved
in bargaining and dickering. Per contra,
he often showed himself not averse to giving things
to other people; but the basis for that giving must
be clearly understood all round. He would not
compete; he would not struggle; he would not descend
to a war of wits. His to bestow, from some serene
height; his the rôle, in fact, of the kindly patron.
Let but his own superiority be recognized let
him only be regarded as hors concours and
he would sometimes deign to do the most generous acts.
These acts embraced, now and again, the entertainment
of writers and artists, either at his home or elsewhere:
his fellows for he was a writer and an artist
too. But it was all done with the understanding
that there was a difference: he was a writer and
an artist but he was something more.
Those who failed to feel the difference were not always
bidden a second time.
And his fancy for patronage was developing
just at a time when patronage was becoming more difficult,
awkward, impracticable! But though “Prince
Hall” never saw the light, other and humbler
forms of patronage came to be accepted by him.
Toward the end of April Raymond and
his wife joined one of the clubs which he had brought
to her notice. Though in a formative stage, like
others, it was good (we ourselves joined it some few
years later); and she made it her concern, through
the summer, to give it some of those shaping pats
which for a new club, as for a new vase have
the greater value the earlier they are bestowed.
She was active about the place, and she became conspicuous.
It was soon seen that she was “gay” or
was inclined to be, under favoring conditions.
The conditions were most favoring, it began to be
felt, when her husband was not about. A good many
thought him stiff, and a few who used obsolete dictionary
words pronounced him proud a term stately
enough to constitute somehow a tribute, though a damnatory
one. It was soon seen, too, that just as he irked
her, so she disparaged him an open road
to others.
One day she gave a lunch at the club places
for a dozen. Johnny McComas appeared there for
the first time. It was a plainer place than his
own, but I credit him with perceiving that it was
much more worth while. Adele McComas did not
appear for a good reason. Those obstreperous
twins now had a little sister two weeks old. The
wife was doubtless better at home, but was the husband
better at the club? If I had been a member at
that time, and present, I should have felt like following
him to some corner of the veranda and saying:
“Oh, come, now, Johnny, will this quite do?”
Well, I know what his look would have been it
came later. He would have turned that wide, round
face on me, with the curly hair about the temples
which gave him somehow an expression of abiding youth
and frankness; and he would have directed those hard,
bright blue eyes of his to look straight ahead at
me eyes that seemed to hold back nothing,
yet really told nothing at all; and would have disclaimed
any wrong-doing or any intention of wrong-doing.
And I should have felt myself a foolish meddler.
Well, the innocent informalities of
the summer were resumed by the same set in town next
winter. The memories and the methods of one season
were tided over to another. Gertrude was still
“gay” perhaps gayer and
a little more openly impatient with her husband, and
a little more openly disdainful of him. Young
men swarmed and fluttered, and those who had “never
tried it on” before seemed inclined to try it
on now.
I take, on the whole, a tempered view by
which I mean, a favorable view of our society
and its moral tone. I am assured, and I believe
from my own observations, that this is higher than
in some other of our large cities. I dislike
scandal, and I have no desire to bear tales.
Either is far from being the object of these present
pages. Nothing that I present need be taken as
typical, as tyrannously representative.
Raymond criticized, expostulated.
Friends began to come to him with impressions and
reports. I whether for good or ill was
not one of these. They named names names
which I shall not record here. But it was one
of Raymond’s own impressions, and a vivid one,
which finally prompted him to make a move.
IV
January found the social life of the
town in full swing. We had recovered from last
year’s financial jolt, and entertaining was
constant. Raymond and his wife were invited out
a good deal. He was bored by it all; but his
wife remained interested and indefatigable. Finally
came a dance at one of the great houses. Raymond
rebelled, and refused point-blank to go: an evening
in his library was his mood. His wife protested,
cajoled, and he finally found a reason for giving in.
As I say, they were bidden to one
of the great houses one of the few that
possessed an actual façade, a central court, and a
big staircase: it had too its galleries of paintings
and of Oriental curios before Oriental curios became
too common. Its owner was also, with the rest,
a musical amateur. He was a man of forty-five,
and like Raymond had a wife too many years younger
than himself for his own comfort. This lively
lady lived on fiddles and horns dancing
was an inexhaustible pleasure. At her dancing-parties,
of which she gave three or four a season, her husband
would show himself below for a few moments for civility’s
sake, and then retire to a remote den on an upper
floor, well shut out from the sounds of his wife’s
frivolous measures, but accessible to a few habitues
of age and tastes approximating his own.
The question of music of another quality
and to another purpose was in the air it
was a matter of endowing and housing an orchestra.
Informal pour-parlers were under way in various
quarters, and Raymond felt disposed, and even able,
to contribute in a modest measure. It was his
pride to have been asked, and it was his pride, despite
untoward conditions, to put up a good front and do
as much as he could. An hour’s confab over
cigarettes in that retired little den might clarify
one atmosphere, if not another.
The court and its staircase were set
with palms, as is the ineluctable wont on such occasions
and for such places; and people, between the dances,
or during them, were brushing the fronds aside as they
thronged the galleries round the court to see the
Barbizon masters then in vogue and the Chinese jades.
As Raymond passed down the stairway, he met his wife
coming up on the arm of Johnny McComas.
“She looked self-conscious,”
Raymond said to me, a few days after. I told
him that he had seen only what he was expecting to
see.
“And he looked too beastly self-satisfied.”
I told him that of late I had seldom seen Johnny look
any other way.
“Where was his wife?”
he asked. I told him she might easily be in the
crowd on some other man’s arm.
“Why were they there at all?”
he demanded. And I did not tell him that probably
they were there through his own wife’s good offices.
That meeting on the stairs! he
made a grievance of it, an injury. The earlier
meeting, with Johnny’s own wife on his arm, had
annoyed him as a general assertion of prosperity.
This present meeting, with Raymond Prince’s
wife on Johnny’s arm, exasperated him as a challenging
assertion of power and predominance.
“I shall act,” Raymond declared.
“Nothing rash,” said I. “Nothing
unconsidered, I hope.”
“I shall act,” he repeated.
And he set his jaw more decisively than a strong man
always finds necessary.
V
Raymond’s mind was turning more
and more to a set scene with McComas; some meeting
between them was, to his notion, a scene a faire.
It seemed demanded by a Gallic sense of form:
it must be gone through with as a requisite to his
rôle of offended husband.
One difficulty was that Raymond fluctuated
daily, almost hourly, in his view of his wife of
the wife, I may say. To-day he took the
old view: the wife was her husband’s property
and any attempt on her was a deadly injury to him.
To-morrow he took the newer view: the wife was
an individual human being and a free moral agent;
therefore a lapse, while it meant disgrace for her,
was, for him, but an affront which he must endure
with dignified composure.
Meanwhile the pair saw little of each
other, and Albert, puzzled, began to enter upon his
opportunity (a wide and lingering one it became) for
learning adjustment to awkward and disconcerting conditions.
Well, Raymond had his meeting.
Imagine whether it was agreeable. Imagine whether
it was agreeable to me, in whose office it was held.
Raymond had the difficult part of one who must act
because he has deliberately committed himself to action,
yet has no sure ground to act upon, and therefore
no line to take with real effect. It was here
and now that McComas turned his round face foursquare
to his uncertain accuser, and let loose a steady,
unspeaking stare from those hard blue eyes, and declared
that nothing had occurred upon which an accusation
could justly be based. He was emphatic; and he
was blunt; the son and grandson of a rustic.
Nothing, he said. Had there really
been nothing? You are entitled to ask. And
I might be inclined to answer, if I knew. I simply
don’t. I was in position to know something,
to know much; but everything? no.
Think, if you please, of the many
domestic situations which must pass without the full
light of detailed knowledge knowledge that
comes too late, or never comes at all. Consider
the simple, willful girl who marries impulsively on
the assumption that the new acquaintance is a bachelor.
Cases have been known where it developed that he was
not. Consider the phrase of the marriage service,
“if any of you know just cause or impediment”:
who can declare that, in a given instance, some impediment,
moral if not legal, might not be brought against either
contracting party, however trustful the other?
Consider the story of the anxious American mother
who, alarmed by reports about a fascinating scoundrel
under whom her daughter was studying music somewhere
in mid-Europe, went abroad alone to investigate.
Her letter to the awaiting father, back home, ran
for page after page on non-essentials and dealt with
the real point only in a brief, embarrassed, bewildered
postscript of one line: “Oh, William, I
don’t know!” Neither do I “know.”
But my account of later events may help you to decide
the question for yourselves.
Raymond had set his mind on a divorce.
If grounds could not be found in one quarter, they
must be found in another. If McComas, that prime
figure, was unable to bring aid, then there must be
cooeperation among the other and lesser figures.
Raymond revived and reviewed the tales that had involved
several younger men. The more he dwelt on them,
the more inflamed he became, and the more certain
that he had been wronged.
I did not accompany him through his
proceedings such advice as I had given
him near the beginning was the advice simply of a friend.
My own part of the great field of the law is a relatively
unimpassioned one office-work involving
real-estate, conveyancing, loans, and the like.
I suggested to Raymond the proper counsel for the particular
case, and there, for a while, I left him.
His wife’s parents came on from
the East. The mother, after some years abroad,
had lately resumed her domestic duties in the land
of her birth. The father, who knew all of one
subject, and nothing of any other, detached himself
for a week or two from the one worthy interest in life
and accompanied her. The “street”
was still there when he returned. They seemed
experienced and worldly-wise in their respective fields
and their respective aspects, but they entered upon
this new matter with a poor grace. Here was another
mother who did not quite “know,” and another
father who waited, at a second remove, for definite
knowledge that did not quite come. First there
were maladroit attempts to bring a reconciliation;
and afterwards, and more shrewdly, endeavors to gain
as much as possible for their daughter from the wreck.
Raymond was determined to keep possession
of Albert. Mrs. McComas, mother of three, stoutly
declared that the mother should have her child.
Other women said the same, and maintained the point
regardless of the mother’s course or conduct.
Many women have said the same in many cases, and perhaps
they are right. Perhaps they are completely right
in the case of a boy of six, who surely needs a woman’s
care. But it is not difficult, even when material
is more abundant than definite, to throw an atmosphere
of dubiousness about a woman and to make it appear
that she is not a “proper person....”
So it appeared to the judge in this case, and so he
ruled with a shading, however. Albert
might spend with his mother one month every summer and
some financial concession on Raymond’s part
helped make the time brief. However, she was to
have nothing to say about Albert’s mode of life
through the rest of the year, and nothing (more specifically)
about his education.
“That makes him mine,” said Raymond.
And he set his lips firmly. He
was one of those who set their lips firmly after the
event is determined.
I do not know whether Raymond had
any real affection for Albert. I do not know
whether he realized what it was for a father to undertake,
single handed, the charge of a boy of six. I think
that what moved him chiefly was his determination
to carry a point. However all this may be, I
remember what he said as, after the decree, he walked
out with Albert’s hand in his.
“Well, it’s over!”
Over! as if a separation involving a child
is ever “over”!