Francis Brett Harte was born at Albany
in the State of New York, on August twenty-fifth,
1836. By his relatives and early friends he was
called Frank; but soon after beginning his career
as an author in San Francisco he signed his name as
“Brett,” then as “Bret,” and
finally as “Bret Harte.” “Bret
Harte,” therefore, is in some degree a nom
de guerre, and it was commonly supposed at first,
both in the Eastern States and in England, to be wholly
such. Our great New England novelist had a similar
experience, for “Nathaniel Hawthorne” was
long regarded by most of his readers as an assumed
name, happily chosen to indicate the quaint and poetic
character of the tales to which it was signed.
Bret Harte’s father was Henry Hart; but before
we trace his ancestry, let us endeavor to see how
he looked. Fanny Kemble met him at Lenox, in the
year 1875, and was much impressed by his appearance.
In a letter to a relative she wrote: “He
reminded me a good deal of our old pirate and bandit
friend, Trelawney, though the latter was an almost
orientally dark-complexioned man, and Mr. Bret Harte
was comparatively fair. They were both tall,
well-made men of fine figure; both, too, were handsome,
with a peculiar expression of face which suggested
small success to any one who might engage in personal
conflict with them.”
In reality Bret Harte was not tall,
though others beside Mrs. Kemble thought him to be
so; his height was five feet, eight and a half inches.
His face was smooth and regular, without much color;
the chin firm and well rounded; the nose straight
and rather large, “the nose of generosity and
genius”; the under-lip having what Mr. Howells
called a “fascinating, forward thrust.”
The following description dates from
the time when he left California: “He was
a handsome, distinguished-looking man, and although
his oval face was slightly marred by scars of small-pox,
and his abundant dark hair was already streaked with
gray, he carried his slight, upright figure with a
quiet elegance that would have made an impression,
even when the refinement of face, voice and manner
had not been recognized.”
Mr. Howells says of him at the same
period: “He was, as one could not help
seeing, thickly pitted, but after the first glance
one forgot this, so that a lady who met him for the
first time could say to him, ’Mr. Harte, aren’t
you afraid to go about in the cars so recklessly when
there is this scare about small-pox?’ ‘No!
madam!’ he said, in that rich note of his, with
an irony touched by pseudo-pathos, ‘I bear a
charmed life.’”
Almost every one who met Bret Harte
was struck by his low, rich, well-modulated voice.
Mr. Howells speaks of “the mellow cordial of
a voice that was like no other.” His handwriting
was small, firm and graceful.
Chance acquaintances made in England
were sometimes surprised at Bret Harte’s appearance.
They had formed, writes Mme. Van de Velde, “a
vague, intangible idea of a wild, reckless Californian,
impatient of social trammels, whose life among the
Argonauts must have fashioned him after a type differing
widely from the reality. These idealists were
partly disappointed, partly relieved, when their American
writer turned out to be a quiet, low-voiced, easy-mannered,
polished gentleman, who smilingly confessed that precisely
because he had roughed it a good deal in his youth
he was inclined to enjoy the comforts and avail himself
of the facilities of an older civilization, when placed
within his reach.”
Bret Harte’s knowledge of these
disappointed expectations may have suggested the plot
of that amusing story Their Uncle from California,
the hero of which presents a similar contrast to the
barbaric ideal which had been formed by his Eastern
relatives.
The photographs of Bret Harte, taken
at various periods in his life, reveal great changes,
apart from those of age. The first one, at seventeen,
shows an intellectual youth, very mature for his age,
with a fine forehead, the hair parted at one side,
and something of a rustic appearance. In the
next picture, taken at the age of thirty-five or thereabout,
we see a determined-looking man, with slight side-whiskers,
a drooping mustache, and clothes a little “loud.”
Five years afterward there is another photograph in
which the whiskers have disappeared, the hair seems
longer and more curly, the clothes are unquestionably
“loud,” and the picture, taken altogether,
has a slight tinge of Bohemian-like vulgarity.
In the later photographs the hair is shorter, and parted
in the middle, the mustache subdued, the dress handsome
and in perfect taste, and the whole appearance is
that of a refined, sophisticated, aristocratic man
of the world, dignified, and yet perfectly simple,
unaffected and free from self-consciousness.
In a measure Bret Harte seems to have
undergone that process of development which Mr. Henry
James has described in “The American.”
The Reader may remember how the American (far from
a typical one, by the way) began with sky-blue neckties
and large plaids, and ended with clothes and adornments
of the most chastened, correct and elegant character.
Actors are apt to go through a similar process.
The first great exponent of the “suppressed
emotion” school began, and in California too,
as it happened, by splitting the ears of the groundlings
and sawing the air with both arms.
Bret Harte had something of a Hebrew
look, and not unnaturally so, for he came of mixed
English, Dutch and Hebrew stock. To be exact,
he was half English, one quarter Dutch, and one quarter
Hebrew. The Hebrew strain also was derived from
English soil, so that with the exception of a Dutch
great-grandmother, all his ancestors emigrated from
England, and not very remotely.
The Hebrew in the pedigree was his
paternal grandfather, Bernard Hart. Mr. Hart
was born in London, on Christmas Day, 1763 or 1764,
but as a boy of thirteen he went out to Canada, where
his relatives were numerous. These Canadian Harts
were a marked family, energetic, forceful, strong-willed,
prosperous, given to hospitality, warm-hearted, and
pleasure-loving. One of Bernard Hart’s
Canadian cousins left behind him at his death no less
than fourteen families, all established in the world
with a good degree of comfort, and with a sufficient
degree of respectability. Now the impropriety,
to say nothing about the extravagance, of maintaining
fourteen separate families is so great that no Reader
of this book (the author feels confident) need be
warned against it; and yet it indicates a large, free-handed,
lordly way of doing things. It was no ordinary
man, and no ordinary strain of blood that could produce
such a record.
Bernard Hart remained but three years
in Canada, and in 1780 moved to New York where, although
scarcely more than a boy, he acted as the business
representative of his Canadian kinsfolk. The Canadian
Harts had many commercial and social relations with
the metropolis, and there was much “cousining,”
much going back and forth between the two places.
Bernard Hart lived in New York for the rest of his
life, and attained a high rank in the community.
“Towering aloft among the magnates of the city
of the last and present century,” writes a local
historian, “is Bernard Hart.” He
was successful in business, very active in social and
charitable affairs, and prominent in the synagogue.
In 1802 he formed a partnership with Leonard Lispenard,
under the name of Lispenard and Hart. They were
commission merchants and auctioneers, and did a large
business. In 1803 the firm was dissolved, and
Mr. Hart continued in trade by himself. In 1831
he became Secretary to the New York Stock Exchange
Board, and held that office for twenty-two years,
resigning at the age of eighty-nine. In 1795,
the year of the yellow fever plague, Bernard Hart rendered
heroic service, as is testified by a contemporary
annalist. “Mr. Hart and Mr. Pell, who kept
store at 108 Market Street, a few doors from Mr. Hart,
were unceasing in their exertions. Night and
day, hardly giving themselves time to sleep or eat,
they were among the sick and dying, relieving their
wants. They were angels of mercy in those awful
days of the first great pestilence.”
Bernard Hart was also a military man,
and in 1797 became quartermaster of a militia regiment,
composed wholly of citizens of New York. That
he was a “clubable” man, too, is very
apparent. It was an era of clubs, and Bernard
Hart founded the association known as “The Friary.”
It met on the first and third Sundays of every month
at 56 Pine Street. He was also President of The
House of Lords, a merchants’ club, which met
at Baker’s City Tavern every week-day night,
at 7 o’clock, adjourning at 10 o’clock.
Each member was allowed a limited quantity of liquor,
business was discussed, contracts were made, and sociability
was promoted. He was, too, a member of the St.
George Society, and is said, also, to have been a Mason,
belonging to Holland Lodge N, of which John Jacob
Astor was master in 1798. Bernard Hart was a
devout Jew, and his name frequently appears in the
records of the Spanish and Portuguese Synagogue, known
as the Congregation Shearith Israel, the first synagogue
established in New York. He lived in various
houses, at 86 Water Street, at 24 Cedar
Street, at 12 Lispenard Street, at 20 Varick Street,
and finally at 23 White Street. A picture of
him still hangs in the counting-room of Messrs. Arthur
Lipper and Co., in Broad Street.
How came it that this orthodox Jew,
this pillar of the synagogue, married a Christian
woman? The romance, if there was one, is imperfectly
preserved even in the family traditions. It is
known only that in 1799 Bernard Hart married Catharine
Brett, a woman of good family; that after living together
for a year or less, they separated; that there was
one son, Henry Hart, born February 1, 1800, who lived
with his mother, and who became the father of Bret
Harte.
A few years later, in 1806, Bernard
Hart married Zipporah Seixas, one of the sixteen children,
eight sons and eight daughters, born to Benjamin Mendez
Seixas. These young women were noted for their
beauty and amiability, and so strong was the impression
which they produced that it lasted even until the
succeeding generation. The marriage ceremony was
performed by Gershom Mendez Seixas, a brother of the
bride’s father, and rabbi of the synagogue already
mentioned. From this marriage came numerous sons
and daughters, whose careers were honorable. Emanuel
B. Hart was a merchant and broker, an alderman, a
member of Congress in 1851 and 1852, and Surveyor
of the Port of New York from 1859 to 1861. Benjamin
I. Hart was a broker in New York. David Hart,
a teller in the Pacific Bank, fought gallantly at
the battle of Bull Run and was badly wounded there.
Theodore and Daniel Hart were merchants in New York.
One of Bernard Hart’s sons by
the Hebrew wife was named Henry. He was born
in 1817, and died of consumption in his father’s
house in White Street on November 16, 1850. He
was unmarried. Bernard Hart himself died in 1855,
at the age of ninety-one. His wife was then living
at the age of seventy-nine.
None of his descendants on the Hebrew
side knew of his marriage to Catharine Brett or of
the existence of his son, the first Henry Hart, until
some years after Bret Harte’s death. It
seems almost incredible that this Hebrew merchant,
prominent as he was in business and social life, in
clubs and societies, in the militia and the synagogue,
should have been able to keep the fact of his first
marriage so secret that it remained a secret for a
hundred years; it seems very unlikely that a woman
of good English birth and family should in that era
have married a Jew; it is highly improbable that a
father should give to a son by a second marriage the
same name already given to his son by a former marriage.
And yet all these things are indisputable facts.
There are members of Bret Harte’s family still
living who remember Bernard Hart, and his occasional
visits to the family of Henry Hart, his son by Catharine
Brett, whom he assisted with money and advice so long
as he lived. Bret Harte himself remembered being
taken to the New York Stock Exchange by his father,
who there pointed out to him his grandfather, Bernard
Hart. It may be added that between the descendants
of Bernard Hart and Catharine Brett and those of Bernard
Hart and Zipporah Seixas there is a marked resemblance.
How far was the venerable Jew from
suspecting that the one fact in his life which he
was so anxious to conceal was the very fact which would
rescue his name from oblivion, and preserve it so long
as English literature shall exist! Even if the
marriage to Catharine Brett, a Christian woman, had
been known it would not, according to Jewish law,
have invalidated the second marriage, but it would
doubtless have prevented that marriage. What
rendered the long concealment possible was, of course,
the deep gulf which then separated Jew from Gentile.
Catharine Brett had been warned by her father that
he would cast her off if she married the Jew; and
this threat was fulfilled. Thenceforth, she lived
a lonely and secluded life, supported, it is believed,
by her husband, but having no other relation with
him. The marriage was so improbable, so ill-assorted,
so productive of unhappiness, and yet so splendid in
its ultimate results, that it seems almost atheistic
to ascribe it to chance. Is the world governed
in that haphazard manner!
But who was this unfortunate Catharine
Brett? She was a granddaughter of Roger Brett,
an Englishman, and, it is supposed, a lieutenant in
the British Navy, who first appears in New York, about
the year 1700, as a friend of Lord Cornbury, then
Governor of the Province. The coat of arms which
Roger Brett brought over, and which is still preserved
on a pewter placque, is identical with that borne
by Judge, Sir Balliol Brett, before his elevation
to the peerage as Viscount Esher. Roger Brett
was a vestryman of Trinity Church from 1703 to 1706.
In November, 1703, he married Catharyna Rombout, daughter
of Francis Rombout, who was one of the early and successful
merchants in the city of New York. Her mother,
Helena Teller, daughter of William Teller, a captain
in the Indian wars, was married three times, Francis
Rombout being her third husband. Schuyler Colfax,
once Vice-President of the United States, was descended
from her. Francis Rombout was born at Hasselt
in Belgium, and came to New Amsterdam while it still
belonged to the Dutch. He was an elder in the
Dutch Church, served as lieutenant in an expedition
against the Swedes, was Schepen under the Dutch municipal
government, alderman under the reorganized British
government, and, in 1679, became the twelfth Mayor
of New York.
Francis Rombout left to his daughter, Roger Bretts wife, an immense estate
on the Hudson River, which included the Fishkills, and consisted chiefly of
forest land. There, in 1709, the young couple built for their home a manor
house, which is still standing and is occupied by a descendant of Roger Brett,
to whom it has come down in direct line through the female branch. A few
years later, at least before 1720, Roger Brett was drowned at the mouth of
Fishkill Creek in the Hudson River. Catharyna, his widow, survived him for
many years. She was a woman of marked character and ability, known through
all that region as Madame Brett. She administered her large estate, leased
and sold much land to settlers, controlled the Indians who were numerous,
superintended a mill to which both Dutchess County and Orange County sent their
grist, owned the sloops which were the only carriers between this outpost of the
Colony and the city of New York, and was one of the founders of the Fishkill
Dutch Church. In that church, a tablet to her memory was recently erected
by the Rombout-Brett Association, formed a few years ago by her descendants.
The tablet is inscribed as follows:
In memory of Catharyna Brett, widow
of Lieutenant Roger Brett, R.N., and daughter
of Francis Rombout, a grantee of Rombout patent, born
in the city of New York 1687, died in Rombout
Precinct, Fishkill, 1764. To this church
she was a liberal contributor, and underneath its
pulpit her body is interred. This tablet
was erected by her descendants and others interested
in the Colonial history of Fishkill, A. D. 1904.
Roger Brett had four sons, of whom
two died young and unmarried, and two, Francis and
Robert, married, and left many children. Whether
the Catharine Brett who married Bernard Hart was descended
from Francis or from Robert is not certainly known.
Francis Brett’s wife was a descendant of Cornelius
Van Wyck, one of the earliest settlers on Long Island.
Robert Brett’s wife was a Miss Dubois.
Such was the ancestry of Bret Harte’s
paternal grandmother. Her son, Henry Hart,
lived with her until, on May 5, 1817, he entered Union
College, Schenectady, as a member of the class of
1820. He remained in college until the end of
his Senior year, and passed all his examinations for
graduation, but failed to receive his degree because
a college bill amounting to ninety dollars had not
been paid. The previous bills were paid by his
mother, “Catharine Hart.” Alas! the
non-payment of this bill was an omen of the future.
Henry Hart and his illustrious son were both the reverse
of thrifty or economical. Money seemed to fly
away from them; they had no capacity for keeping it,
and no discretion in spending it. Unpaid bills
were the bane of their existence. Henry Hart’s
improvidence is ascribed, in part, by those who knew
him, to the irregular manner in which his father supplied
him with money, Bernard Hart being sometimes very
lavish and sometimes very parsimonious with his son.
Henry Hart was a well-built, athletic-looking
man, with rather large features, and dark hair and
complexion. His height was five feet ten inches,
and his weight one hundred and seventy pounds.
He was an accomplished scholar, speaking French, Spanish
and Italian, and being well versed in Greek and Latin.
He passed his short life as school-teacher, tutor,
lecturer and translator.
On May 16, 1830, he married Elizabeth
Rebecca, daughter of Henry Philip Ostrander, an “upstate”
surveyor and farmer, who belonged to a prominent Dutch
family which settled at Kingston on the Hudson in 1659.
It will be remembered that the hero of Bret Harte’s
story, Two Americans, is Major Philip Ostrander.
The mother of Elizabeth Ostrander, Henry Hart’s
wife, was Abigail Truesdale, of English descent.
Henry Hart was brought up by his mother in the Dutch
Reformed faith, but soon after leaving college, owing
to what influence is unknown, he became a Catholic,
and remained such until his death. His wife was
an Episcopalian, and his children were of that, if
of any persuasion.
In 1833 we find Henry Hart at Albany,
and there he remained until 1836, the year of Bret
Harte’s birth. In 1833 and 1834, he was
instructor in the Albany Female Academy, a girls’
school, famous in its day, where he taught reading
and writing, rhetoric and mathematics. Early in
1835 he left the Academy, and for two years he conducted
a private school of his own at 15 Columbia Street,
but this appears not to have been successful, for he
ceased to be a resident of the city in the latter part
of 1836, or early in 1837. One event in Henry
Hart’s life at Albany is significant. In
December, 1833, a meeting was held in the Mayor’s
Court Room to organize a Young Men’s Association,
which proved to be a great success, and which has
played an important part in the life of the city down
to the present day. Henry Hart, though a comparative
stranger in Albany, was chosen to explain the objects
of the Association at this meeting, and at the next
meeting he was elected one of the Managers. When
Bret Harte came East from California, he went to Albany
and addressed the Association, upon the invitation
of its members.
After leaving Albany the family led
an unsettled, uncomfortable life, going from place
to place, with occasional returns to the home of an
Ostrander relative in Hudson Street in the city of
New York. The late Mr. A. V. S. Anthony, the
well-known engraver, was a neighbor of Bret Harte in
Hudson Street, and played and fought with him there,
when they were both about seven or eight years old.
Afterward they met in California, and again in London.
From Albany the Henry Hart family went to Hudson, where
Mr. Hart acted as principal of an academy; and subsequently
they lived in New Brunswick, New Jersey; in Philadelphia;
in Providence, Rhode Island; in Lowell, Massachusetts;
in Boston and elsewhere.
A few years before her death Mrs.
Hart read the life of Bronson Alcott, and when she
laid down the book she remarked that the troubles and
privations endured by the Alcott family bore a striking
resemblance to those which she and her children had
undergone. Some want of balance in Henry Hart’s
character prevented him, notwithstanding his undoubted
talents, his enthusiasm, and his accomplishments, from
ever obtaining any material success in life, or even
a home for his family and himself. But he was
a man of warm impulses and deep feeling. When
Henry Clay was nominated for the Presidency in 1844,
Henry Hart espoused his cause almost with fury.
He gave up all other employment to electioneer in behalf
of the Whig candidate, and the defeat of his idol
was a crushing blow from which he never recovered.
It was the first time that a really great man, as Clay
certainly was, had been outvoted in a contest for the
Presidency by a commonplace man, like Polk; and Clay’s
defeat was regarded by his adherents not only as a
hideous injustice, but as a national calamity.
It is not given to every one to take any impersonal
matter so seriously as Henry Hart took the defeat
of his political chieftain; and his death a year later,
in 1845, may justly be regarded as a really noble ending
to a troubled and unsuccessful life.