THE COLORED INVENTOR
A RECORD OF FIFTY YEARS
By
Henry E. Baker.
(Assistant Examiner United States Patent Office)
The year 1913 marks the close of the
first fifty years since Abraham Lincoln issued that
famous edict known as the emancipation proclamation,
by which physical freedom was vouchsafed to the slaves
and the descendants of slaves in this country.
And it would seem entirely fit and proper that those
who were either directly or indirectly benefited by
that proclamation should pause long enough at this
period in their national life to review the past,
recount the progress made, and see, if possible, what
of the future is disclosed in the past.
That the colored people in the United
States have made substantial progress in the general
spread of intelligence among them, and in elevating
the tone of their moral life; in the acquisition of
property; in the development and support of business
enterprises, and in the professional activities, is
a matter of quite common assent by those who have
been at all observant on the subject. This fact
is amply shown to be true by the many universities,
colleges and schools organized, supported and manned
by the race, by their attractive homes and cultured
home life, found now in all parts of our country; by
the increasing numbers of those of the race who are
successfully engaging in professional life, and by
the gradual advance the race is making toward business
efficiency in many varied lines of business activity.
It is not so apparent, however, to
the general public that along the line of inventions
also the colored race has made surprising and substantial
progress; and that it has followed, even if “afar
off,” the footsteps of the more favored race.
And it is highly important, therefore, that we should
make note of what the race has achieved along this
line to the end that proper credit may be accorded
it as having made some contribution to our national
progress.
Standing foremost in the list of things
that have actually done most to promote our national
progress in all material ways is the item of inventions.
Without inventions we should have had no agricultural
implements with which to till the fertile fields of
our vast continent; no mining machinery for recovering
the rich treasure that for centuries lay hidden beneath
our surface; no steamcar or steamboat for transporting
the products of field and mine; no machinery for converting
those products into other forms of commercial needs;
no telegraph or telephone for the speedy transmission
of messages, no means for discovering and controlling
the various utilitarian applications of electricity;
no one of those delicate instruments which enable the
skilful surgeon of to-day to transform and renew the
human body, and often to make life itself stand erect,
as it were, in the very presence of death. Without
inventions we could have none of those numerous instruments
which to-day in the hands of the scientist enable him
accurately to forecast the weather, to anticipate and
provide against storms on land and at sea, to detect
seismic disturbances and warn against the dangers
incident to their repetition; and no wireless telegraphy
with its manifold blessings to humanity.
All these great achievements have
come to us from the hand of the inventor. He
it is who has enabled us to inhabit the air above us,
to tunnel the earth beneath, explore the mysteries
of the sea, and in a thousand ways, unknown to our
forefathers, multiply human comforts and minimize
human misery. Indeed, it is difficult to recall
a single feature of our national progress along material
lines that has not been vitalized by the touch of
the inventor’s genius.
Into this vast yet specific field
of scientific industry the colored man has, contrary
to the belief of many, made his entry, and has brought
to his work in it that same degree of patient inquisitiveness,
plodding industry and painstaking experiment that
has so richly rewarded others in the same line of
endeavor, namely, the endeavor both to create new
things and to effect such new combinations of old things
as will adapt them to new uses. We know that
the colored man has accomplished something indeed,
a very great deal in the field of invention,
but it would be of the first importance to us now
to know exactly what he has done, and the commercial
value of his productions. Unfortunately for us,
however, this can never be known in all its completeness.
A very recent experiment in the matter
of collecting information on this subject has disclosed
some remarkably striking facts, not the least interesting
of which is the very widespread belief among those
who ought to know better that the colored man has
done absolutely nothing of value in the line of invention.
This is but a reflex of the opinions variously expressed
by others at different times on the subject of the
capacity of the colored man for mental work of a high
order. Thomas Jefferson’s remark that no
colored man could probably be found who was capable
of taking in and comprehending Euclid, and that none
had made any contribution to the civilization of the
world through his art, would perhaps appear somewhat
excusable when viewed in the light of the prevailing
conditions in his day, and on which, of course, his
judgment was based; but even at that time Jefferson
knew something of the superior quality of Benjamin
Banneker’s mental equipment, for it is on record
that they exchanged letters on that subject.
Coming down to a later day, when our
race as a whole had shared, to some extent at least,
in the progress of learning, so well informed an exponent
of popular thought as Henry Ward Beecher is said to
have declared that the whole African race in its native
land could be obliterated from the face of the earth
without loss to civilization, and yet Beecher knew,
or should have known, of the scholarly Dr. Blyden,
of Liberia, who was at one time president of the college
of Liberia at Monrovia, and minister from his country
to the Court of St. James, and whose contributions
to the leading magazines of Europe and America were
eagerly accepted and widely read on both continents.
Less than ten years ago, in a hotly
contested campaign in the State of Maryland, a popular
candidate for Congress remarked, in one of his speeches,
that the colored race should be denied the right to
vote because “none of them had ever evinced
sufficient capacity to justify such a privilege,”
and that “no one of the race had ever yet reached
the dignity of an inventor.” Yet, at that
very moment, there was in the Library of Congress
in Washington a book of nearly 500 pages containing
a list of nearly 400 patents representing the inventions
of colored people.
Only a few years later a leading newspaper
in the city of Richmond, Va., made the bold statement
that of the many thousands of patents annually granted
by our government to the inventors of our country,
“not a single patent had ever been granted to
a colored man.” Of course this statement
was untrue, but what of that? It told its tale,
and made its impression far and wide; and
it is incumbent upon our race now to outrun that story,
to correct that impression, and to let the world know
the truth.
In a recent correspondence that has
reached nearly two-thirds of the more than 12,000
registered patent attorneys in this country, who are
licensed to prosecute applications for patents before
the Patent Office at Washington, it is astonishing
to have nearly 2,500 of them reply that they never
heard of a colored inventor, and not a few of them
add that they never expect to hear of one. One
practising attorney, writing from a small town in
Tennessee, said that he not only has never heard of
a colored man inventing anything, but that he and
the other lawyers to whom he passed the inquiry in
that locality were “inclined to regard the whole
subject as a joke.” And this, remember,
comes from practising lawyers, presumably men of affairs,
and of judgment, and who keep somewhat ahead of the
average citizen in their close observation of the
trend of things.
Now there ought not to be anything
strange or unbelievable in the fact that in any given
group of more than 10,000,000 human beings, of whatever
race, living in our age, in our country, and developing
under our laws, one can find multiplied examples of
every mental bent, of every stage of mental development,
and of every evidence of mental perception that could
be found in any other similar group of human beings
of any other race; and yet, so set has become the traditional
attitude of one class in our country toward the other
class that the one class continually holds up before
its eyes an imaginary boundary line in all things
mental, beyond which it seems unwilling to admit that
it is possible for the other class to go.
Under this condition of the general
class thought in our country it has become the fixed
conviction that no colored man has any well-defined
power of initiative, that the colored man has no originality
of thought, that in his mental operations he is everlastingly
content to pursue the beaten paths of imitation, that
therefore he has made no contribution to the inventive
genius of our country, and so has gained no place for
himself in the ranks of those who have made this nation
the foremost nation of the world in the number and
character of its inventions.
That this conclusion with reference
to the colored man’s inventive faculty is wholly
untrue I will endeavor now to show.
In the world of invention the colored
man has pursued the same line of activity that other
men have followed; he has been spurred by the same
necessity that has confronted other men, namely, the
need for some device by which to minimize the exactions
of his daily toil, to save his time, conserve his
strength and multiply the results of his labor.
Like other men, the colored man sought first to invent
the thing that was related to his earlier occupations,
and as his industrial pursuits became more varied
his inventive genius widened correspondingly.
Thus we find that the first recorded instances of
patents having been granted to a colored man and
the only ones specifically so designated are
the two patents on corn harvesters which were granted
in 1834 and 1836 to one Henry Blair, of Maryland,
presumably a “free person of color,” as
the law was so construed at that time as to bar the
issuance of a patent to a slave.
With the exception of these two instances
the public records of the Patent Office give absolutely
no hint as to whether any one of the more than 1,000,000
patents granted by this government to meritorious
inventors from all parts of the world has been granted
to a colored inventor. The records make clear
enough distinctions as to nationality, but absolutely
none as to race. This policy of having the public
records distinguish between inventors of different
nationalities only is a distinct disadvantage to the
colored race in this country.
If the inventors of England or France
or Germany or Italy, or any other country, desire
to ascertain the number and character of the inventions
patented to the citizens of their respective countries,
it would require but a few hours of work to get exact
statistics on the subject, but not so with the colored
inventor. Here, as elsewhere, he has a hard road
to travel.
In fact, it seems absolutely impossible
to get even an approximately correct answer to that
question for our race. Whatever of statistics
one is able to get on this subject must be obtained
almost wholly in a haphazard sort of way from persons
not employed in the Patent Office, and who must, in
the great majority of cases, rely on their memory to
some extent for the facts they give. Under such
circumstances as these it is easy to see the large
amount of labor involved in getting up such statistics
as may be relied upon as being true.
There have been two systematic efforts
made by the Patent Office itself to get this information,
one of them being in operation at the present time.
The effort is made through a circular letter addressed
to the thousands of patent attorneys throughout the
country, who come in contact often with inventors
as their clients, to popular and influential newspapers,
to conspicuous citizens of both races, and to the
owners of large manufacturing industries where skilled
mechanics of both races are employed, all of whom
are asked to report what they happen to know on the
subject under inquiry.
The answers to this inquiry cover
a wide range of guesswork, many mere rumors and a
large number of definite facts. These are all
put through the test of comparison with the official
records of the Patent Office, and this sifting process
has evolved such facts as form the basis of the showing
presented here.
There is just one other source of
information which, though its yield of facts is small,
yet makes up in reliability what it lacks in numerousness;
and that is where the inventor himself comes to the
Patent Office to look after his invention. This
does not often happen, but it rarely leaves anything
to the imagination when it does happen.
Sometimes it has been difficult to
get this information by correspondence even from colored
inventors themselves. Many of them refuse to
acknowledge that their inventions are in any way identified
with the colored race, on the ground, presumably, that
the publication of that fact might adversely affect
the commercial value of their invention; and in view
of the prevailing sentiment in many sections of our
country, it cannot be denied that much reason lies
at the bottom of such conclusion.
Notwithstanding the difficulties above
mentioned as standing in the way of getting at the
whole truth, something over 1,200 instances have been
gathered as representing patents granted to colored
inventors, but so far only about 800 of these have
been verified as definitely belonging to that class.
These 800 patents tell a wonderful
story of the progress of the race in the mastery of
the science of mechanics. They cover inventions
of more or less importance in all the branches of
mechanics, in chemical compounds, in surgical instruments,
in electrical utilities, and in the fine arts as well.
From the numerous statements made
by various attorneys to the effect that they have
had several colored clients whose names they could
not recall, and whose inventions they could not identify
on their books, it is practically certain that the
nearly 800 verified patents do not represent more
than one-half of those that have been actually granted
to colored inventors, and that the credit for these
must perhaps forever lie hidden in the unbreakable
silence of official records.
But before directing attention specifically
to some of the very interesting details disclosed
by this latest investigation into the subject, let
us consider for a brief moment a few of the inventions
which colored men have made, but for which no patents
appear to be of record.
I should place foremost among these
that wonderful clock constructed by our first astronomer,
Benjamin Banneker, of Maryland. Banneker’s
span of earthly existence covered the 75 years from
1731 to 1806. His parentage was of African and
English origin, and his mental equipment was far above
the average of his day and locality in either race.
Aside from his agricultural pursuits, on which he
relied for a livelihood, he devoted his time mainly
to scientific and mechanical studies, producing two
things by which he will be long remembered: An
almanac and a clock. The latter he constructed
with crude tools, and with no knowledge of any other
timepiece except a watch and a sundial; yet the clock
he made was so perfect in every detail of its mechanical
construction, so accurate in the mathematical calculations
involved, that it struck the hours with faultless
precision for twenty years, and was the mechanical
wonder of his day and locality.
Another instance is that of Mr. James
Forten, of Philadelphia, who is credited with the
invention of an apparatus for managing sails.
He lived from 1766 to 1842, and his biographer says
he amassed a competence from his invention and lived
in leisurely comfort as a consequence.
Still another instance is that of
Robert Benjamin Lewis, who was born in Gardiner, Me.,
in 1802. He invented a machine for picking oakum,
which machine is said to be in use to-day in all the
essential particulars of its original form by the
shipbuilding interests of Maine, especially at Bath.
It is of common knowledge that in
the South, prior to the War of the Rebellion, the
burden of her industries, mechanical as well as agricultural,
fell upon the colored population. They formed
the great majority of her mechanics and skilled artisans
as well as of her ordinary laborers, and from this
class of workmen came a great variety of the ordinary
mechanical appliances, the invention of which grew
directly out of the problems presented by their daily
employment.
There has been a somewhat persistent
rumor that a slave either invented the cotton gin
or gave to Eli Whitney, who obtained a patent for it,
valuable suggestions to aid in the completion of that
invention. I have not been able to find any substantial
proof to sustain that rumor. Mr. Daniel Murray,
of the Library of Congress, contributed a very informing
article on that subject to the Voice of the Negro,
in 1905, but Mr. Murray did not reach conclusions
favorable to the contention on behalf of the colored
man.
It is said that the zigzag fence,
so commonly used by farmers and others, was originally
introduced into this country by African slaves.
We come now to consider the list of
more modern inventions, those inventions from which
the element of uncertainty is wholly eliminated, and
which are represented in the patent records of our
government.
In this verified list of nearly 800
patents granted by our government to the inventors
of our race we find that they have applied their inventive
talent to the whole range of inventive subjects; that
in agricultural implements, in wood and metal-working
machines, in land conveyances on road and track, in
seagoing vessels, in chemical compounds, in electricity
through all its wide range of uses, in aeronautics,
in new designs of house furniture and bric-a-brac,
in mechanical toys and amusement devices, the colored
inventor has achieved such success as should present
to the race a distinctly hope-inspiring spectacle.
Of course it is not possible, in this
particular presentation of the subject, to dwell much
at length upon the merits of any considerable number
of individual cases. This feature will be brought
out more fully in the larger publication on this subject
which the writer now has in course of preparation.
But there are several conspicuous examples of success
in this line of endeavor that should be fully emphasized
in any treatment of this subject. I like to tell
of what has been done by Granville T. Woods and his
brother Lyates, of New York; by Elijah McCoy, of Detroit;
by Joseph Hunter Dickinson, of New Jersey; by William
B. Purvis, of Philadelphia; Ferrell and Creamer, of
New York; by Douglass, of Ohio; Murray, of South Carolina;
Matzeliger, of Lynn; Beard, of Alabama; Richey, of
the District of Columbia; and a host of others that
I could mention.
Foremost among these men in the number
and variety of his inventions, as well as in the commercial
value involved, stands the name of Granville T. Woods.
Six years ago Mr. Woods sent me a list of his inventions
patented up to that time, and there were then about
thirty of them, since which time he has added nearly
as many more, including those which he perfected jointly
with his brother Lyates. His inventions relate
principally to electrical subjects, such as telegraphic
and telephonic instruments, electric railways and
general systems of electrical control, and include
several patents on means for transmitting telegraphic
messages between moving trains.
The records of the Patent Office show
that for valuable consideration several of Mr. Woods’
patents have been assigned to the foremost electrical
corporations of the world, such as the General Electric
Company, of New York, and the American Bell Telephone
Company, of Boston. These records also show that
he followed other lines of thought in the exercise
of his inventive faculty, one of his other inventions
being an incubator, another a complicated and ingenious
amusement device, another a steam-boiler furnace,
and also a mechanical brake.
Mr. Woods is, perhaps, the best known
of all the inventors whose achievements redound to
the credit of our race; and in his passing away he
has left us the rich legacy of a life successfully
devoted to the cause of progress.
In the prolific yield of his inventive
genius, Elijah McCoy, of Detroit, stands next to Granville
T. Woods.
So far as is ascertainable from the
office records Mr. McCoy obtained his first patent
in July, 1872, and the last patent was granted to him
in July, 1912. During the intervening forty years
he continued to invent one thing after another, completing
a record of nearly forty patents on as many separate
and distinct inventions. His inventions, like
those of Woods’, cover a wide range of subjects,
but relate particularly to the scheme of lubricating
machinery. He is regarded as the pioneer in the
art of steadily supplying oil to machinery in intermittent
drops from a cup so as to avoid the necessity for
stopping the machine to oil it. His lubricating
cup was in use for years on stationary and locomotive
machinery in the West, including the great railway
locomotives, the boiler engines of the steamers on
the Great Lakes, on transatlantic steamships, and
in many of our leading factories. McCoy’s
lubricating cups were famous thirty years ago as a
necessary equipment in all up-to-date machinery, and
it would be rather interesting to know how many of
the thousands of machinists who used them daily had
any idea then that they were the invention of a colored
man.
Another inventor whose patents occupy
a conspicuous place in the records of the Patent Office,
and whose achievements in that line stand recorded
as a credit to the colored man, is Mr. William B. Purvis,
of Philadelphia. His inventions also cover a
variety of subjects, but are directed mainly along
a single line of experiment and improvement. He
began, in 1882, the invention of machines for making
paper bags, and his improvements in this line of machinery
are covered by a dozen patents; and a half dozen other
patents granted Mr. Purvis include three patents on
electric railways, one on a fountain pen, another on
a magnetic car-balancing device, and still another
for a cutter for roll holders.
Another very interesting instance
of an inventor whose genius for creating new things
is constantly active, producing results that express
themselves in terms of dollars for himself and others,
is that of Mr. Joseph Hunter Dickinson, of New Jersey.
Mr. Dickinson’s specialty is in the line of
musical instruments, particularly the piano. He
began more than fifteen years ago to invent devices
for automatically playing the piano, and is at present
in the employ of a large piano factory, where his
various inventions in piano-player mechanism are eagerly
adopted in the construction of some of the finest
player pianos on the market. He has more than
a dozen patents to his credit already, and is still
devoting his energies to that line of invention.
The company with which he is identified
is one of the very largest corporations of its kind
in the world, and it is no little distinction to have
one of our race occupy so significant a relation to
it, and to hold it by the sheer force of a trained
and active intellect.
Mr. Frank J. Ferrell, of New York,
has obtained about a dozen patents for his inventions,
the larger portion of them being for improvements in
valves for steam engines.
Mr. Benjamin F. Jackson, of Massachusetts,
is the inventor of a dozen different improvements
in heating and lighting devices, including a controller
for a trolley wheel.
Mr. Charles V. Richey, of Washington,
has obtained about a dozen patents on his inventions,
the last of which was a most ingenious device for
registering the calls on a telephone and detecting
the unauthorized use of that instrument. This
particular patent was only recently taken out by Mr.
Richey, and he has organized a company for placing
the invention on the market, with fine prospects of
success.
Hon. George W. Murray, of South Carolina,
former member of Congress from that State, has received
eight patents for his inventions in agricultural implements,
including mostly such different attachments as readily
adapt a single implement to a variety of uses.
Henry Creamer, of New York, has made
seven different inventions in steam traps, covered
by as many patents, and Andrew J. Beard, of Alabama,
has about the same number to his credit for inventions
in car-coupling devices.
Mr. William Douglass, of Kansas, was
granted about a half dozen patents for various inventions
in harvesting machines. One of his patents, that
one numbered 789,010, and dated May 2, 1905, for a
self-binding harvester, is conspicuous in the records
of the Patent Office for the complicated and intricate
character of the machine, for the extensive drawings
required to illustrate it and the lengthy specifications
required to explain it there being thirty-seven
large sheets of mechanical drawings and thirty-two
printed pages of descriptive matter, including the
166 claims drawn to cover the novel points presented.
This particular patent is, in these respects, quite
unique in the class here considered.
Mr. James Doyle, of Pittsburgh, has
obtained several patents for his inventions, one of
them being for an automatic serving system. This
latter device is a scheme for dispensing with the use
of waiters in dining rooms, restaurants and at railroad
lunch counters. It was recently exhibited with
the Pennsylvania Exposition Society’s exhibits
at Pittsburgh, where it attracted widespread attention
from the press and the public. The model used
on that occasion is said to have cost nearly $2,000.
In the civil service at Washington
there are several colored men who have made inventions
of more or less importance which were suggested by
the mechanical problems arising in their daily occupations.
Mr. Shelby J. Davidson, of Kentucky,
a clerk in the office of the Auditor for the Post
Office Department, operated a machine for tabulating
and totalizing the quarterly accounts which were regularly
submitted by the postmasters of the country. Mr.
Davidson’s attention was first directed to the
loss in time through the necessity for periodically
stopping to manually dispose of the paper coming from
the machine. He invented a rewind device which
served as an attachment for automatically taking up
the paper as it issued from the machine, and adapted
it for use again on the reverse side, thus effecting
a very considerable economy of time and material.
His main invention, however, was a novel attachment
for adding machines which was designed to automatically
include the government fee, as well as the amount
sent, when totalizing the money orders in the reports
submitted by postmasters. This was a distinct
improvement in the efficiency and value of the machine
he was operating and the government granted him patents
on both inventions. His talents were recognized
not only by the office in which he was employed by
promotion in rank and pay, but also in a very significant
way by the large factory which turned out the adding
machines the government was using. Mr. Davidson
has since resigned his position and is now engaged
in the practice of the law in Washington, D.C.
Mr. Robert Pelham, of Detroit, is
similarly employed in the Census Bureau, where his
duties include the compilation of groups of statistics
on sheets from data sent into the office from the thousands
of manufacturers of the country. Unlike most
of the other men in the departmental service, Mr.
Pelham seemed anxious to get through with his job
quickly, for he devised a machine used as an adjunct
in tabulating the statistics from the manufacturers’
schedules in a way that displaced a dozen men in a
given quantity of work, doing the work economically,
speedily and with faultless precision, when operated
under Mr. Pelham’s skilful direction. Mr.
Pelham has also been granted a patent for his invention,
and the proved efficiency of his devices induced the
United States government to lease them from him, paying
him a royalty for their use, in addition to his salary
for operating them.
Mr. Pelham’s mechanical genius
is evidently “running in the family,” for
his oldest son, now a high-school youth, has distinguished
himself by his experiments in wireless telegraphy,
and is one of the very few colored boys in Washington
holding a regular license for operating the wireless.
Mr. W. A. Lavalette, of the Government
Printing Office, the largest printing establishment
in the world, began his career as a printer there
years before the development of that art called into
use the wonderful machines employed in it to-day;
and one of his first efforts was to devise a printing
machine superior to the pioneer type used at that
time. This was in 1879, and he succeeded that
year in inventing and patenting a printing machine
that was a notable novelty in its day, though it has,
of course, long ago been superseded by others.
I have reserved for the last the name
and work of Jan Matzeliger, of Massachusetts.
Although there are barely half a dozen patents standing
in his name on the records of the office, and his name
is little known to the general public, there are,
I think, some points in his career that easily make
him conspicuous above all the rest, and I have found
the story really inspiring.
As a very young man Matzeliger worked
in a shoe shop in Lynn, Mass., serving his apprenticeship
at that trade. Seeking, in the true spirit of
the inventor, to make two blades of grass grow where
only one grew before, he devised the first complete
machine ever invented for performing automatically
all the operations involved in attaching soles to
shoes. Other machines had previously been made
for performing a part of these operations, but Matzeliger’s
machine was the only one then known to the mechanical
world that could simultaneously hold the last in place
to receive the leather, move it forward step by step
so that other co-acting parts might draw the leather
over the heel, properly punch and grip the upper and
draw it down over the last, plait the leather properly
at the heel and toe, feed the nails to the driving
point, hold them in position while being driven, and
then discharge the completely soled shoe from the
machine, everything being done automatically, and
requiring less than a minute to complete a single shoe.
This wonderful achievement marked
the beginning of a distinct revolution in the art
of making shoes by machinery. Matzeliger realized
this, and attempted to capitalize it by organizing
a stock company to market his invention; but his plans
were frustrated through failing health and lack of
business experience, and shortly thereafter, at the
age of 36, he passed away.
He had done his work, however, under
the keen eye of the shrewd Yankees, and these were
quick to see the immense commercial importance of the
step he had accomplished. One of these bought
the patent and all of the stock that he could find
of the company organized by Matzeliger. This fortunate purchase laid the
foundation for the organization of the United Shoe Machinery Company, the
largest and richest corporation of the kind in the world.
Some idea may be had of the magnitude
of this giant industry, which is thus shown to have
grown directly out of the inventions of a young colored
man, by recalling the fact that the corporation represents
the consolidation of forty-one different smaller companies,
that its factories cover twenty-one acres of ground,
that it gives employment daily to 4,200 persons, that
its working capital is quoted at $20,860,000, and
that it controls more than 300 patents representing
improvements in the machines it produces. From
an article published in the Lynn (Mass.) News,
of October 3, 1889, it appears that the United Shoe
Machinery Company, above mentioned, established at
Lynn a school, the only one of its kind in the world,
where boys are taught exclusively to operate the Matzeliger
type of machine; that a class of about 200 boys and
young men are graduated from this school annually and
sent out to various parts of the world to instruct
others in the art of handling this machine.
Some years before his death Matzeliger
became a member of a white church in Lynn, called
the North Congregational Society, and bequeathed to
this church some of the stock of the company he had
organized. Years afterward this church became
heavily involved in debt, and remembering the stock
that had been left to it by this colored member, found,
upon inquiry, that it had become very valuable through
the importance of the patent under the management
of the large company then controlling it. The
church sold the stock and realized from the sale more
than enough to pay off the entire debt of the church,
amounting to $10,860. With the canceled mortgage
as one incentive, this church held a special service
of thanks one Sunday morning, on which occasion a life-sized
portrait of their benefactor looked down from the
platform on the immense congregation below, while
a young white lady, a member of the church, read an
interesting eulogy of the deceased and the pastor,
Rev. A. J. Covell, preached an eloquent sermon on
the text found in Romans 13:8 “Owe
no man anything but to love one another.”
Let us cherish the hope that the spirit and the significance
of that occasion sank deep in the hearts of those
present.
There are those who have tried to
deny to our race the share that is ours in the glory
of Matzeliger’s achievements. These declare
that he had no Negro blood in his veins; but the proof
against this assertion is irrefutable. Through
correspondence with the mayor of Lynn, a certified
copy of the death certificate issued on the occasion
of Matzeliger’s death has been obtained, and
this document designates him a “mulatto.”
Others have tried the same thing with
reference to Granville T. Woods, a too kind biographer,
writing of him in the Cosmopolitan in April,
1895, stating that he had no Negro blood in him.
But those who knew Mr. Woods personally will readily
acquit him of the charge of any such ethnological
errancy.
Another effort to detract from Matzeliger’s
fame comes up in the criticism that his machine was
not perfect, requiring subsequent improvements to
complete it and make it commercially valuable.
Matzeliger was as truly a pioneer, blazing the way
for a great industrial triumph, as was Whitney, or
Howe, or Watt, or Fulton, or any other one of the
scores of pioneers in the field of mechanical genius.
The cotton gin of to-day is, of course, not the cotton
gin first given to the world by Whitney, but the essential
principles of its construction are found clearly outlined
in Whitney’s machine. The complex and intricate
sewing machine of to-day, with its various attachments
to meet the needs of the modern seamstress, is not
the crude machine that came from the brain of Elias
Howe; the giant locomotives that now speedily cover
the transcontinental distance between New York and
San Francisco bear but slight resemblance to the engine
that Stephenson first gave us. In fact, the first
productions of all these pioneers, while they disclosed
the principles and laid the foundations upon which
to build, resemble the later developments only “as
mists resemble rain;” but these pioneers make
up the army of capable men whose toil and trial, whose
brawn and brain, whose infinite patience and indomitable
courage have placed this nation of ours in the very
front rank of the world’s inventors; and, standing
there among them, with his name indelible, is our
dark-skinned brother, the patient, resourceful Matzeliger.
In the credit here accorded our race
for its achievements in the field of invention our
women as well as our men are entitled to share.
With an industrial field necessarily more circumscribed
than that occupied by our men, and therefore with
fewer opportunities and fewer reasons, as well, for
exercising the inventive faculty, they have, nevertheless,
made a remarkably creditable showing. The record
shows that more than twenty colored women have been
granted patents for their inventions, and that these
inventions cover also a wide range of subjects artistic,
utilitarian, fanciful.
The foregoing facts are here presented
as a part only of the record made by the race in the
field of invention for the first half century of our
national life. We can never know the whole story.
But we know enough to feel sure that if others knew
the story even as we ourselves know it, it would present
us in a somewhat different light to the judgment of
our fellow men, and, perhaps, make for us a position
of new importance in the industrial activities of
our country. This great consummation, devoutly
to be wished, may form the story of the next fifty
years of our progress along these specific lines,
so that some one in the distant future, looking down
the rugged pathway of the years, may see this race
of ours coming up, step by step, into the fullest possession
of our industrial, economic and intellectual emancipation.