The Back of Miss Bathwick and George Boon
Section - 1
It is quite probable that the reader
does not know of the death of George Boon, and that
“remains” before his name upon the title-page
will be greeted with a certain astonishment. In
the ordinary course of things, before the explosion
of the war, the death of George Boon would have been
an event oh! a three-quarters of a column
or more in the Times event, and articles in
the monthlies and reminiscences. As it is, he
is not so much dead as missing. Something happened
at the eleventh hour I think it was chiefly
the Admiralty report of the fight off the Falkland
Islands that blew his obituary notices clean
out of the papers. And yet he was one of our most
popular writers, and in America I am told he was in
the “hundred thousand class.” But
now we think only of Lord Kitchener’s hundred
thousands.
It is no good pretending about it.
The war has ended all that. Boon died with his
age. After the war there will be a new sort of
book-trade and a crop of new writers and a fresh tone,
and everything will be different. This is an
obituary, of more than George Boon.... I regard
the outlook with profound dismay. I try to keep
my mind off it by drilling with the Shrewsbury last
line of volunteers and training down the excrescences
of my physical style. When the war is over will
be time enough to consider the prospects of a superannuated
man of letters. We National Volunteers are now
no mere soldiers on paper; we have fairly washable
badges by way of uniform; we have bought ourselves
dummy rifles; we have persuaded the War Office to give
us a reluctant recognition on the distinct understanding
that we have neither officers nor authority.
In the event of an invasion, I understand, we are
to mobilize and ... do quite a number of useful things.
But until there is an invasion in actual progress,
nothing is to be decided more precisely than what
this whiff of printer’s shrapnel, these four
full stops, conveys....
Section - 2
I must confess I was monstrously disappointed
when at last I could get my hands into those barrels
in the attic in which Boon had stored his secret writings.
There was more perhaps than I had expected; I do not
complain of the quantity, but of the disorder, the
incompleteness, the want of discipline and forethought.
Boon had talked so often and so convincingly
of these secret books he was writing, he had alluded
so frequently to this or that great project, he would
begin so airily with “In the seventeenth chapter
of my ‘Wild Asses of the Devil,’”
or “I have been recasting the third part of
our ‘Mind of the Race,’” that it
came as an enormous shock to me to find there was
no seventeenth chapter; there was not even a completed
first chapter to the former work, and as for the latter,
there seems nothing really finished or settled at all
beyond the fragments I am now issuing, except a series
of sketches of Lord Rosebery, for the most part in
a toga and a wreath, engaged in a lettered retirement
at his villa at Epsom, and labelled “Patrician
Dignity, the Last Phase” sketches
I suppress as of no present interest and
a complete gallery of imaginary portraits (with several
duplicates) of the Academic Committee that has done
so much for British literature (the Polignac prize,
for example, and Sir Henry Newbolt’s professorship)
in the last four or five years. So incredulous
was I that this was all, that I pushed my inquiries
from their original field in the attic into other
parts of the house, pushed them, indeed, to the very
verge of ransacking, and in that I greatly deepened
the want of sympathy already separating me from Mrs.
Boon. But I was stung by a thwarted sense of duty,
and quite resolved that no ill-advised interference
should stand between me and the publication of what
Boon has always represented to me as the most intimate
productions of his mind.
Yet now the first rush of executorial
emotion is over I can begin to doubt about Boon’s
intention in making me his “literary executor.”
Did he, after all, intend these pencilled scraps,
these marginal caricatures, and what seems
to me most objectionable annotated letters
from harmless prominent people for publication?
Or was his selection of me his last effort to prolong
what was, I think, if one of the slightest, one also
of the most sustained interests of his life, and that
was a prolonged faint jeering at my expense? Because
always it was never hidden from me in
his most earnest moments Boon jeered at me. I
do not know why he jeered at me, it was always rather
pointless jeering and far below his usual level, but
jeer he did. Even while we talked most earnestly
and brewed our most intoxicating draughts of project
and conviction, there was always this scarce perceptible
blossom and flavour of ridicule floating like a drowning
sprig of blue borage in the cup. His was indeed
essentially one of those suspended minds that float
above the will and action; when at last reality could
be evaded no longer it killed him; he never really
believed nor felt the urgent need that goads my more
accurate nature to believe and do. Always when
I think of us together, I feel that I am on my legs
and that he sits about. And yet he could tell
me things I sought to know, prove what I sought to
believe, shape beliefs to a conviction in me that
I alone could never attain.
He took life as it came, let his fancy
play upon it, selected, elucidated, ignored, threw
the result in jest or observation or elaborate mystification
at us, and would have no more of it.... He would
be earnest for a time and then break away. “The
Last Trump” is quite typical of the way in which
he would turn upon himself. It sets out so straight
for magnificence; it breaks off so abominably.
You will read it.
Yet he took things more seriously than he seemed to
do.
This war, I repeat, killed him.
He could not escape it. It bore him down.
He did his best to disregard it. But its worst
stresses caught him in the climax of a struggle with
a fit of pneumonia brought on by a freak of bathing
by moonlight in an English October, a thing
he did to distract his mind from the tension after
the Marne and it destroyed him. The
last news they told him was that the Germans had made
their “shoot and scuttle” raid upon Whitby
and Scarborough. There was much circumstantial
description in the morning’s paper. They
had smashed up a number of houses and killed some
hundreds of people, chiefly women and children.
Ten little children had been killed or mutilated in
a bunch on their way to school, two old ladies at a
boarding-house had had their legs smashed, and so on.
“Take this newspaper,”
he said, and held it out to his nurse. “Take
it,” he repeated irritably, and shook it at her.
He stared at it as it receded.
Then he seemed to be staring at distant things.
“Wild Asses of the Devil,”
he said at last. “Oh! Wild Asses of
the Devil! I thought somehow it was a joke.
It wasn’t a joke. There they are, and the
world is theirs.”
And he turned his face to the wall
and never spoke again.
Section - 3
But before I go on it is necessary
to explain that the George Boon I speak of is not
exactly the same person as the George Boon, the Great
Writer, whose fame has reached to every bookshop in
the world. The same bodily presence perhaps they
had, but that is all. Except when he chose to
allude to them, those great works on which that great
fame rests, those books and plays of his that have
made him a household word in half a dozen continents,
those books with their style as perfect and obvious
as the gloss upon a new silk hat, with their flat
narrative trajectory that nothing could turn aside,
their unsubdued and apparently unsubduable healthy
note, their unavoidable humour, and their robust pathos,
never came between us. We talked perpetually of
literature and creative projects, but never of that
“output” of his. We talked as men
must talk who talk at all, with an untrammelled freedom;
now we were sublime and now curious, now we pursued
subtleties and now we were utterly trivial, but always
it was in an undisciplined, irregular style quite
unsuitable for publication. That, indeed, was
the whole effect of the George Boon I am now trying
to convey, that he was indeed essentially not for
publication. And this effect was in no degree
diminished by the fact that the photograph of his
beautiful castellated house, and of that extraordinarily
irrelevant person Mrs. Boon for I must speak
my mind of her and of her two dogs (Binkie
and Chum), whom he detested, were, so to speak, the
poulet and salade in the menu of every illustrated
magazine.
The fact of it is he was one of those
people who will not photograph; so much of him was movement, gesture,
expression, atmosphere, and colour, and so little of him was form. His
was the exact converse of that semi-mineral physical quality that men call
handsome, and now that his career has come to its sad truncation I see no
reason why I should further conceal the secret of the clear, emphatic, solid
impression he made upon all who had not met him. It was, indeed, a
very simple secret;
He never wrote anything for his
public with his own hand.
He did this of set intention.
He distrusted a certain freakishness of his finger-tips
that he thought might have injured him with his multitudinous
master. He knew his holograph manuscript would
certainly get him into trouble. He employed a
lady, the lady who figures in his will, Miss Bathwick,
as his amanuensis. In Miss Bathwick was all his
security. She was a large, cool, fresh-coloured,
permanently young lady, full of serious enthusiasms;
she had been faultlessly educated in a girls’
high school of a not too modern type, and she regarded
Boon with an invincible respect. She wrote down
his sentences (spelling without blemish in all the
European languages) as they came from his lips, with
the aid of a bright, efficient, new-looking typewriter.
If he used a rare word or a whimsical construction,
she would say, “I beg your pardon, Mr. Boon,”
and he would at once correct it; and if by any lapse
of an always rather too nimble imagination he carried
his thoughts into regions outside the tastes and interests
of that enormous ante-bellum public it was
his fortune to please, then, according to the nature
of his divagation, she would either cough or sigh
or in certain eventualities get
up and leave the room.
By this ingenious device if
one may be permitted to use the expression for so
pleasant and trustworthy an assistant he
did to a large extent free himself from the haunting
dread of losing his public by some eccentricity of
behaviour, some quirk of thought or fluctuation of
“attitude” that has pursued him ever since
the great success of “Captain Clayball,”
a book he wrote to poke fun at the crude imaginings
of a particularly stupid schoolboy he liked, had put
him into the forefront of our literary world.
Section - 4
He had a peculiar, and, I think, a
groundless terror of the public of the United States
of America, from which country he derived the larger
moiety of his income. In spite of our remonstrances,
he subscribed to the New York Nation to the
very end, and he insisted, in spite of fact, reason,
and my earnest entreaties (having regard to the future
unification of the English-speaking race), in figuring
that continental empire as a vain, garrulous, and
prosperous female of uncertain age, and still more
uncertain temper, with unfounded pretensions to intellectuality
and an ideal of refinement of the most negative description,
entirely on the strength of that one sample. One
might as well judge England by the Spectator.
My protests seemed only to intensify his zest in his
personification of Columbia as the Aunt Errant of
Christendom, as a wild, sentimental, and advanced
maiden lady of inconceivable courage and enterprise,
whom everything might offend and nothing cow.
“I know,” he used to say, “something
will be said or done and she’ll have hysterics;
the temptation to smuggle something through Miss Bathwick’s
back is getting almost too much for me. I could,
you know. Or some one will come along with something
a little harder and purer and emptier and more emphatically
handsome than I can hope to do. I shall lose her
one of these days.... How can I hope to keep
for ever that proud and fickle heart?”
And then I remember he suddenly went
off at a tangent to sketch out a great novel he was
to call “Aunt Columbia.” “No,”
he said, “they would suspect that ’Aunt
Dove.’” She was to be a lady of great,
unpremeditated wealth, living on a vast estate near
a rather crowded and troublesome village. Everything
she did and said affected the village enormously.
She took the people’s children into her employment;
they lived on her surplus vegetables. She was
to have a particularly troublesome and dishonest household
of servants and a spoiled nephew called Teddy.
And whenever she felt dull or energetic she drove
down into the village and lectured and blamed the
villagers for being overcrowded, for being
quarrelsome, for being poor and numerous, for not,
in fact, being spinster ladies of enormous good fortune....
That was only the beginning of one of those vast schemes
of his that have left no trace now in all the collection.
His fear of shocking America was,
I think, unfounded; at any rate, he succeeded in the
necessary suppressions every time, and until the day
of his death it was rare for the American press-cuttings
that were removed in basketfuls almost daily with
the other debris of his breakfast-table to speak of
him in anything but quasi-amorous tones. He died
for them the most spiritual as well as the most intellectual
of men; “not simply intellectual, but lovable.”
They spoke of his pensive eyes, though, indeed, when
he was not glaring at a camera they were as pensive
as champagne, and when the robust pathos bumped against
the unavoidable humour as they were swept along the
narrow torrent of his story they said with all the
pleasure of an apt quotation that indeed in his wonderful
heart laughter mingled with tears.
Section - 5
I think George Boon did on the whole
enjoy the remarkable setting of his philosophical
detachment very keenly; the monstrous fame of him
that rolled about the world, that set out east and
came back circumferentially from the west and beat
again upon his doors. He laughed irresponsibly,
spent the resulting money with an intelligent generosity,
and talked of other things. “It is the quality
of life,” he said, and “The people love
to have it so.”
I seem to see him still, hurrying
but not dismayed, in flight from the camera of an
intrusive admirer an admirer not so much
of him as of his popularity up one of his
garden walks towards his agreeable study. I recall
his round, enigmatical face, an affair of rosy rotundities,
his very bright, active eyes, his queer, wiry, black
hair that went out to every point in the heavens,
his ankles and neck and wrists all protruding from
his garments in their own peculiar way, protruding
a little more in the stress of flight. I recall,
too, his general effect of careless and, on the whole,
commendable dirtiness, accentuated rather than corrected
by the vivid tie of soft orange-coloured silk he invariably
wore, and how his light paces danced along the turf.
(He affected in his private dominions trousers of
faint drab corduroy that were always too short, braced
up with vehement tightness, and displaying claret-coloured
socks above his easy, square-toed shoes.) And I know
that even that lumbering camera coming clumsily to
its tripod ambush neither disgusted nor vulgarized
him. He liked his game; he liked his success and
the opulent stateliness it gave to the absurdities
of Mrs. Boon and all the circumstances of his profoundly
philosophical existence; and he liked it all none
the worse because it was indeed nothing of himself
at all, because he in his essence was to dull intelligences
and commonplace minds a man invisible, a man who left
no impression upon the camera-plate or moved by a
hair’s breadth the scale of a materialist balance.
Section - 6
But I will confess the state of the
remains did surprise and disappoint me.
His story of great literary enterprises,
holograph and conducted in the profoundest secrecy,
tallied so completely with, for example, certain reservations,
withdrawals that took him out of one’s company
and gave him his evident best companionship, as it
were, when he was alone. It was so entirely like
him to concoct lengthy books away from his neatly
ordered study, from the wise limitations of Miss Bathwick’s
significant cough and her still more significant back,
that we all, I think, believed in these unseen volumes
unquestioningly. While those fine romances, those
large, bright plays, were being conceived in a publicity
about as scandalous as a royal gestation, publicly
planned and announced, developed, written, boomed,
applauded, there was, we knew, this undercurrent of
imaginative activity going on, concealed from Miss
Bathwick’s guardian knowledge, withdrawn from
the stately rhythm of her keys. What more natural
than to believe he was also writing it down?
Alas! I found nothing but fragments.
The work upon which his present fame is founded was
methodical, punctual and careful, and it progressed
with a sort of inevitable precision from beginning
to end, and so on to another beginning. Not only
in tone and spirit but in length (that most important
consideration) he was absolutely trustworthy; his
hundred thousand words of good, healthy, straightforward
story came out in five months with a precision almost
astronomical. In that sense he took his public
very seriously. To have missed his morning’s
exercises behind Miss Bathwick’s back would have
seemed to him the most immoral nay, worse,
the most uncivil of proceedings.
“She wouldn’t understand
it,” he would say, and sigh and go.
But these scraps and fragments are
of an irregularity diametrically contrasting with
this. They seem to have been begun upon impulse
at any time, and abandoned with an equal impulsiveness,
and they are written upon stationery of a variety
and nature that alone would condemn them in the eyes
of an alienist. The handwriting is always atrocious
and frequently illegible, the spelling is strange,
and sometimes indecently bad, the punctuation is sporadic,
and many of the fragments would be at once put out
of court as modern literature by the fact that they
are written in pencil on both sides of the paper!
Such of the beginnings as achieve a qualified completeness
are of impossible lengths; the longest is a piece allowing
for gaps of fourteen thousand words, and
another a fragment shaping at about eleven. These
are, of course, quite impossible sizes, neither essay
nor short story nor novel, and no editor or publisher
would venture to annoy the public with writings of
so bizarre a dimension. In addition there are
fragments of verse. But I look in vain for anything
beyond the first chapter of that tremendous serial,
“The Wild Asses of the Devil,” that kept
on day by day through June and July to the very outbreak
of the war, and only a first chapter and a few illustrations
and memoranda and fragments for our “Mind of
the Race,” that went on intermittently for several
years. Whole volumes of that great hotchpotch
of criticism are lost in the sandbanks of my treacherous
memory for ever.
Much of the matter, including a small
MS. volume of those brief verses called Limericks
(personal always, generally actionable, and frequently
lacking in refinement), I set aside at an early date.
Much else also I rejected as too disjointed and unfinished,
or too eccentric. Two bizarre fragments called
respectively “Jane in Heaven” and “An
Account of a Play,” I may perhaps find occasion
to issue at a later date, and there were also several
brief imitations of Villiers de l’Isle Adam
quite alien to contemporary Anglo-Saxon taste, which
also I hold over. Sometimes upon separate sheets,
sometimes in the margins of other compositions, and
frequently at the end of letters received by him I
found a curious abundance of queer little drawings,
caricatures of his correspondents, burlesque renderings
of occurrences, disrespectful sidenotes to grave and
pregnant utterances, and the like. If ever the
correspondence of George Boon is published, it will
have to be done in fac-simile. There is
a considerable number of impressions of the back of
Miss Bathwick’s head, with and without the thread
of velvet she sometimes wore about her neck, and quite
a number of curiously idealized studies of that American
reading public he would always so grotesquely and
annoyingly insist on calling “Her.”
And among other things I found a rendering of myself
as a short, flattened little object that has a touch
of malignity in it I had no reason to expect.
Few or none of these quaint comments are drawn with
Indian ink upon millboard in a manner suitable for
reproduction, and even were they so, I doubt whether
the public would care for very many of them. (I give
my own portrait it is singularly unlike
me to show the style of thing he did.)
Of the “Mind of the Race”
I may perhaps tell first. I find he had written
out and greatly embellished the singularly vivid and
detailed and happily quite imaginary account of the
murder of that eminent litterateur, Dr. Tomlinson
Keyhole, with which the “Mind of the Race”
was to have concluded; and there are an extraordinarily
offensive interview with Mr. Raymond Blathwayt (which,
since it now “dates” so markedly, I have
decided to suppress altogether) and an unfinished
study of “the Literary Statesmen of the Transition
Years from the Nineteenth to the Twentieth Centuries”
(including a lengthy comparison of the greatness of
Lords Bryce and Morley, a eulogy of Lord Morley and
a discussion whether he has wit or humour) that were
new to me. And perhaps I may note at this point
the twenty sixpenny washing books in which Boon had
commenced what I am firmly convinced is a general
index of the works of Plato and Aristotle. It
is conceivable he did this merely as an aid to his
private reading, though the idea of a popular romancer
reading anything will come to the general reader with
a little shock of surprise.
For my own part and having in memory
his subtle and elusive talk, I am rather inclined
to think that at one time he did go so far as to contemplate
a familiar and humorous commentary upon these two pillars
of the world’s thought. An edition of them
edited and copiously illustrated by him would, I feel
sure, have been a remarkable addition to any gentleman’s
library. If he did turn his mind to anything of
the sort he speedily abandoned the idea again, and
with this mention and the note that he detested Aristotle,
those six and twenty washing books may very well follow
the bulk of the drawings and most of the verse back
into their original oblivion....
Section - 7
But now you will begin to understand
the nature of the task that lies before me. If
I am to do any justice to the cryptic George Boon,
if indeed I am to publish anything at all about him,
I must set myself to edit and convey these books whose
only publication was in fact by word of mouth in his
garden arbours, using these few fragments as the merest
accessories to that. I have hesitated, I have
collected unfavourable advice, but at last I have
resolved to make at least one experimental volume
of Boon’s remains. After all, whatever we
have of Aristotle and Socrates and all that we most
value of Johnson comes through the testimony of hearers.
And though I cannot venture to compare myself with
Boswell....
I know the dangers I shall run in
this attempt to save my friend from the devastating
expurgations of his written ostensible career.
I confess I cannot conceal from myself that, for example,
I must needs show Boon, by the standards of every
day, a little treacherous.
When I thrust an arm into one or other
of the scores of densely packed bins of press cuttings
that cumber the attics of his castellated mansion
and extract a sample clutch, I find almost invariably
praise, not judicious or intelligent praise perhaps,
but slab and generous praise, paragraphs, advice,
photographs, notices, notes, allusions and comparisons,
praise of the unparalleled gloss on his style by Doctor
Tomlinson Keyhole under the pseudonym of “Simon
up to Snuff,” praise of the healthiness of the
tone by Doctor Tomlinson Keyhole under the pseudonym
of “The Silver Fish,” inspired announcements
of some forthcoming venture made by Doctor Tomlinson
Keyhole under the pseudonym of “The True-Born
Englishman,” and interesting and exalting speculations
as to the precise figure of Boon’s income over
Dr. Tomlinson Keyhole’s own signature; I find
chatty, if a little incoherent, notices by Braybourne
of the most friendly and helpful sort, and interviews
of the most flattering description by this well-known
litterateur and that. And I reflect that while
all this was going on, there was Boon on the other
side of Miss Bathwick’s rampart mind, not only
not taking them and himself seriously, not only not
controlling his disrespectful internal commentary on
these excellent men, but positively writing it down,
regaling himself with the imagined murder of this
leader of thought and the forcible abduction to sinister
and melancholy surroundings of that!
And yet I find it hard to do even
this measure of justice to my friend. He was
treacherous, it must be written, and yet he was, one
must confess, a singularly attractive man. There
was a certain quality in his life it was
pleasant. When I think of doing him justice I
am at once dashed and consoled by the thought of how
little he cared how I judged him. And I recall
him very vividly as I came upon him on one occasion.
He is seated on a garden roller an
implement which makes a faultless outdoor seat when
the handle is adjusted at a suitable angle against
a tree, and one has taken the precaution to skid the
apparatus with a piece of rockery or other convenient
object. His back is against the handle, his legs
lie in a boneless curve over the roller, and an inch
or so of native buff shows between the corduroy trousers
and the claret-coloured socks. He appears to
be engaged partly in the dégustation of an unappetizing
lead pencil, and partly in the contemplation of a
half-quire of notepaper. The expression of his
rubicund face is distinctly a happy one. At the
sound of my approach he looks up. “I’ve
been drawing old Keyhole again!” he says like
a schoolboy.
Nevertheless, if critics of standing
are to be drawn like this by authors of position,
then it seems to me that there is nothing before us
but to say Good-bye for ever to the Dignity of Letters.