"THAT MAN PARTRIDGE!"
Any man can work when every stroke of his hand brings down the fruit rattling
from the tree to the ground; but to labor in season and out of season, under
every discouragement, by the power of faith . . . that requires a heroism which
is transcendent. And no man, I think, ever puts the plow into the furrow
and does not look back, and sows good seed therein, that a harvest does not
follow. Henry
Ward Beecher.
It was a handy place to live, that
little tar-paper shanty around which the prairie wind
whooed and whiffed with such disdain. So small
was it that it was possible to wash oneself, dress
oneself and get breakfast without getting out of bed.
On the wall was a shelf which did duty as a table.
There were also a little box stove and some odds and
ends. When the roof leaked, which was every time
it rained, it was necessary to put pans on the bed
to catch the drip.
But it was better than the tent in
which E. A. Partridge and his brother slept through
their first star-strewn winter nights on the open
prairie more pretentious than the tent and
assuredly not so cold. The two boys were proud
of it, even though they were fresh from civilization from
Simcoe County, Ontario, where holly-hocks topped the
fences of old-fashioned flower gardens in summer and
the houses had shingles on top to keep out the weather,
and where there were no coyotes to howl lonesomely
at night, where Well, never mind.
Those houses belonged to other people; the shanty
was theirs. All around stretched acres and acres
of snow; but there was land under that snow rich,
new land and that was theirs, too, by right
of homesteading.
It was about Christmas time in 1883
when E. A. Partridge was twenty-one. The place
was near Sintaluta, District of Assiniboia, North-West
Territories, and homesteading there in the days before
the Rebellion was no feather bed for those who tackled
it. A piece of actual money was a thing to take
out and look at every little while, to show to one’s
friends and talk about.
Season after season the half starved
agricultural pathfinders lost their hard-earned crops
by drouth and what was not burned out by the sun was
eaten by ubiquitous gophers. The drouth was due,
no doubt, to the frequent prairie fires which swept
the country; these found birth in the camp-fire coals
left by ignorant or careless settlers on their way
in. Under the rays of the summer sun the blackened
ground became so hot that from it ascended a column
of scorching air which interfered with the condensation
of vapor preceding the falling of rain. Clouds
would bank up above the prairie horizon, eagerly watched
by anxious homesteaders; but over the burned area
the clouds seemed to thin out without a drop falling
upon the parching crops.
Forty-three acres, sown to wheat,
was the first crop which the Partridge brothers put
in. The total yield was seven bushels, obtained
from around the edges of a slough!
One by one discouraged settlers gathered
together their few belongings and sought fresh trails.
Lone men trudged by, pack on back, silent and grim.
Swearing at his horses, wheels squealing for axle-grease,
tin pans rattling and flashing in the hot morning
sun, a settler with a family stopped one day to ask
questions of the two young men. He was on his
way somewhere no place in particular.
“I tell ye, boys, this country
ain’t no place fer a white man,”
he volunteered. “When y’ain’t
freezin’ ye’re burnin’ up, an’
that’s what happens in hell!” He spat
a stream of tobacco juice over the wagon wheel and
clawed his beard, his brown face twisted quizzically.
“God A’mighty ain’t nowheres near
here! He didn’t come this fur West stopped
down to Rat Portage! Well, anyways, good luck to
ye both; but ef ye don’t git it, young fellers,
don’t ye go blamin’ me, by Jupiter!”
He cracked his whip. “Come up out o’
that, ye God-forsaken old skates!” And, mud-caked
wheels screeching, tin pans banging and glaring, he
jolted back to the trail that led away in distance
to No Place In Particular.
But along with some others who confessed
to being poor walkers, the Partridge boys stuck right
where they were. They set about the building
of a more permanent and comfortable shack a
sod house this time. It took more than seven
thousand sods, one foot by three, three inches thick;
but when it was finished it was a precocious raindrop
or a mendacious wind that could find its way in.
About thirteen miles distant was a
little mud schoolhouse, and one day E. A. Partridge
was asked to go over and teach in it. It was
known that back East, besides working on his father’s
farm, he had taught school for awhile. Learning
was a truant for the younger generation on the prairies
at that time, there being only a few private schools
scattered here and there. Though it was not much
of an opportunity for anything but something to do,
the offer was accepted, and every morning, after sucking
a couple of eggs for a breakfast, E. A. Partridge
took to loping across the prairie on a “Shag”
pony.
But the little school put an idea
into his head. He wondered if it might be worth
while starting a private school of his own, and in
1885 he thought the Broadview locality offered profitable
prospects. He decided to go down there and look
over the situation.
By this time the occupants of the
sod house numbered four three Partridge
brothers and a friend. The problem of fitting
out the school-teacher for his Broadview trip so that
he would create the necessary impression among strangers
was one which called for corrugated brows. The
solution of it was not to be found in any of the teacher’s
few text-books; it quite upset Euclid’s idea
that things which were equal to the same thing were
equal to one another when it came to finding
enough parts to make a respectable whole! For
among the four bachelors was not one whole suit of
clothes sufficiently presentable for social events.
Everything was rough and ready in those days and
in spite of the hardships the friendly pioneer settlers
had some good times together; but the sod house quartette
had never been seen at any of these gatherings not
all four at one time! Three of them were always
so busy with this or that work that they had to stay
home, you know; it would have been embarrassing to
admit that it was only by pooling their clothes they
could take turns in exhibiting a neighborly spirit.
As it was, there was often a secret fear of exhibiting
even more an anxiety which led the visitor
to keep the wall at his back like a man expecting
general excitement to break loose at any moment!
On reaching Broadview the prospects
for the new school looked bright, so the hopeful pedagogue
sent back word to the sod house to this effect.
“And don’t you fellows
forget to send my linen,” he wrote jokingly.
“Make the trunk heavy, too. I don’t
know how long it will have to represent my credit!”
When the trunk arrived it was so heavy
that it took two men to carry it into the hotel.
When in the secrecy of his own room E. A. Partridge
ventured to look inside he found his few books, a pair
of “jumper” socks and a lot
of stones! Also there was an old duster with
a piece of paper pinned to it, advising: “Here’s
your linen!”
The Broadview school did not last
long for the reason that the second North-West Rebellion
broke out that year and the teacher joined the Yorkton
Rangers. Fifty cents a day and grub was an alluring
prospect; many a poor homesteader would have joined
the ranks on active service for the grub alone, especially
when the time of his absence was being allowed by
the Government to apply on the term set for homestead
duties before he could come into full possession of
his land. Many farmers earned money, also, teaming
supplies from the railway north to Battleford and
Prince Albert.
In common with his fellow grain growers,
the five years that followed were years of continuous
struggle for E. A. Partridge. The railway came
and the country commenced to settle quickly.
The days of prairie fires that ran amuck gave way
to thriving crops; but at thirty and forty cents per
bushel the thriving of those who sowed them was another
matter.
This man with the snappy blue eyes
and caustic tongue was among the first to foresee
“the rising colossus,” the shadow of which
was creeping slowly across the farmer’s path,
and he watched the “brewing menace” with
growing concern. With every ounce of his tremendous
energy he resented the encroachment of Capital upon
the liberties of Labor. Being of the people
and temperamentally a democrat, he had a great yearning
for the reorganization of society in the general interest.
His championship in this direction earned him the
reputation in some quarters of being full of “fads,”
a visionary. But his neighbors, who had toiled
and suffered beside him through the years, knew “Ed.”
Partridge, man to man, and held him in high regard;
they admired him for his human qualities, respected
him for his abilities, and wondered at his theories.
On occasion they, too, shook their heads doubtfully.
They could not know the big part in their emancipation
which this friend and neighbor of theirs was destined
to play through many days of crisis. Not yet
had the talley begun.
But events even now slowly were shaping.
With the winning of their first clash the farmers’
movement was achieving momentum. In the latter
part of December, 1902, down in the town of Virden,
Manitoba, a committee was appointed at a meeting of
the Virden Agricultural Society, to arrange a district
meeting for the purpose of organizing the first Grain
Growers’ Association in Manitoba. As soon
as the date was set J. W. Scallion wrote to W. R.
Motherwell, urgently asking him to assist in the organization.
Although roads and weather were rough, the President
of the Territorial Grain Growers’ Association
at considerable inconvenience went down to Virden,
taking with him Matt. Snow and copies of the
constitution and by-laws upon which the Territorial
Association was founded, With this assistance a strong
local association was formed at Virden on January 9th,
1903, with capable officers and a first-year membership
of one hundred and twenty-five.
The same difficulties that faced the
farmers farther West were being experienced in Manitoba
and the newspapers were full of protesting letters
from country points. As President of the Virden
Grain Growers’ Association, J. W. Scallion wrote
letters to every place where complaints were being
voiced and urged organization. At every opportunity
it was advocated through the press that from the eastern
boundary of Manitoba to the Rocky Mountains the farmers
should organize themselves for self-defence against
oppression, present or possible, by “the interests.”
In about six weeks over fifteen local associations
had been formed in Manitoba and Virden began calling
for a Provincial association. Accordingly, on
March 3rd and 4th, 1903, the Manitoba grain growers
held their first convention at Brandon with one hundred
delegates present, representing twenty-six local associations.
Great enthusiasm marked the event and the officers
chosen were all men of initiative.
The members of the parent organization
watched the rapid expansion on all sides with sparkling
eyes. Their own second annual convention at
Indian Head revealed considerable progress and the
promise of greater things to come. On the invitation
of the delegates from the Regina district it was decided
to hold the third annual convention at the capital
and the rousing gathering which met there in due course
was productive of such stimulus and publicity that
its effect was felt long afterward.
At every convention the farmers found
some additional weak spot in the Grain Act and suggested
remedial legislation. Records are lacking to
show in what order the various changes came; but step
by step the farmers were gaining their rights.
It all seemed so wonderful to get together
thus and frame requests of the Government at Ottawa,
to find their very wording incorporated in the Act.
The farmers scarcely had dared to think of such a
thing before. To them the ear of a government
was a delicate organism beyond reach, attuned to the
acoustics of High Places only; that it was an ear
to hear, an ear to the ground to catch the voice of
the people was a discovery. At any rate when
W. R. Motherwell and J. B. Gillespie, of the Territories,
D. W. McCuaig and R. C. Henders, of Manitoba, went
to Ottawa for the first time they were received with
every consideration and many of their requests on behalf
of the farmers granted.
With such recognition and the recurring
evidence of advantageous results the jeering grins
of a certain section of the onlooking public began
to sober down to a less disrespectful mien. Those
who talked glibly at first of the other farmers’
organizations which they had seen go to pieces became
less free with their forebodings.
In 1904 the farmers began to press
for something more than the proper distribution of
cars and the freedom of shipment. They were
dissatisfied with the grading system and the re-inspection
machinery. Some of them claimed that the grading
system did not classify wheat according to its milling
value. Some wanted a change in the Government’s
staff at the office of the Chief Grain Inspector where
the official grading was done. Some wanted a
sample market; some didn’t. The farmers
were about evenly divided.
The Department of Agriculture for
the Territories commissioned Professor Robert Harcourt,
Chemist of the Ontario Agricultural College, to conduct
tests as to the comparative values of the different
grades of wheat. E. A. Partridge, of Sintaluta,
and A. A. Perley, of Wolseley, undertook to secure
eight-bushel samples of the various grades from their
districts. These were carefully sacked and shipped
to the Chief Grain Inspector at Winnipeg, where he
graded them and forwarded them to Professor Harcourt,
sealed in such a way that any tampering with the shipment
would be detected readily.
These samples were all of 1903 crop.
There had been a bad snowstorm in September of that
year and much wheat had been standing in stook.
The farmers believed that the grain was not frozen
or injured in any way and that they were defrauded
to some extent in the grading of their wheat.
The samples represented all grades from “N Hard” to “Feed.” They were
milled with exceptional care to prevent mixing of the
various lots and the flours obtained were put through
three different baking tests.
The conclusion reached was that there
did not appear to be much difference in the value
of the different grades of wheat. Even the “Feed”
sample proved by no means useless for bread-making
purposes, either in yield or quality; the only thing
that rendered it less available for bakers’
use was its darker color. All who saw the loaves
were surprised at the quality of this bread.
The tests on these 1903 samples confirmed
the farmers in their opinion that on 1903 wheat the
spread in price between N Hard and N was not
in harmony with the milling quality. From N Hard the amount of flour obtained was 70.8 per cent.
as against 68 per cent. from the N grade.
The large percentage of stook-frozen grain that went
into the lower grades because it was technically debarred
from the higher ones no doubt raised the milling value,
it was thought, of all the grades that year.
The Department of Agriculture for
the Territories therefore decided to repeat the tests
with 1904 wheat. The samples with which Professor
Harcourt was furnished represented the grain just as
it was sold by the farmer and graded either at the
elevator or by the Chief Grain Inspector; it was not
a composite sample of the commercial grades.
The second tests practically confirmed the work done
the previous year. The milling, chemical and
baking tests failed to show very wide differences
in the composition and milling value of the grades
submitted. The conclusion reached was that the
difference in composition and milling value was nearly
as great between samples of any one grade as between
the various grades.
The farmers began to feel that it
would be a good thing to have a representative at
Winnipeg to watch the grading of their cars and to
look after their interests generally. The Department
of Agriculture for the Territories was asked by the
Sintaluta grain growers to appoint a man and W. H.
Gaddes was commissioned to act for two weeks.
Then the farmers began to wonder if they could not
send down a man of their own; at one of their meetings
the question was put and those present subscribed
five dollars apiece for the purpose.
Thus it came about that on the 7th
of January, 1905, there stepped from the train at
the C. P. R. depot in Winnipeg a man who looked no
different from any one of a dozen other farmers who
daily reached the city, tanned of cheek and bright
of eye. But his business in town was of a very
special nature. In his pocket was a hundred dollars
and the grip in his hand was packed for a month’s
stay.
It was a month of “cold shoulders”
and patronizing manners for E. A. Partridge.
No band music was played in his honor, no festive
board was spread, nor was he taken around and shown
the sights of the city. On the contrary, he
was made to feel like a spy in the camp of an enemy;
for he found himself entirely without status, the grain
dealers recognizing him merely as a farmers’
representative, whatever that was. Even at the
office of the Chief Grain Inspector he was looked upon
as a man who was meddling with something which he
wasn’t supposed to know anything about.
Nevertheless, the Chief Inspector
himself gave him information at times and there were
one or two others who took the trouble to explain some
things about which he asked questions. Among
the latter was a grain man by the name of Tom Coulter.
For the most part, however, the presence of the “farmers’
representative” at Winnipeg was looked upon
as a joke; so that information as to the grain business
became for him largely a still hunt. He visited
offices, listened to how interviews were conducted
over the telephone and picked up whatever loose ends
he could find to follow up.
“Who is that fellow, anyway?”
asked a grain man who had just got back to the city.
He jerked his thumb over his shoulder.
“Oh, him!” laughed his
partner as he saw who was indicated. “Only
that gazabo from Sintaluta who’s been nosing
around lately. Some hayseeds out the line sent
him down here to learn the grain business. They
believe that all wheat’s N Hard, all grain
buyers are thieves, and that hell’s to be divided
equally between the railways and the milling companies!”
“So that’s the guy, eh? that’s
that man Partridge!”