HIS DEBT TO HENRY CHALLIS
I
Challis was out of England for more
than three years after that one brief intrusion of
his into the affairs of Mr. and Mrs. Stott. During
the interval he was engaged upon those investigations,
the results of which are embodied in his monograph
on the primitive peoples of the Melanesian Archipelago.
It may be remembered that he followed Dr. W. H. R.
Rivers’ and Dr. C. G. Seligmann’s inquiry
into the practice and theory of native customs.
Challis developed his study more particularly with
reference to the earlier evolution of Totemism, and
he was able by his patient work among the Polynesians
of Tikopia and Ontong Java, and his comparisons of
those sporadic tribes with the Papuasians of Eastern
New Guinea, to correct some of the inferences with
regard to the origins of exogamy made by Dr. J. G.
Frazer in his great work on that subject, published
some years before. A summary of Challis’s
argument may be found in vol. li. of the
Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute.
When he returned to England, Challis
shut himself up at Chilborough. He had engaged
a young Cambridge man, Gregory Lewes, as his secretary
and librarian, and the two devoted all their time
to planning, writing, and preparing the monograph
referred to.
In such circumstances it is hardly
remarkable that Challis should have completely forgotten
the existence of the curious child which had intrigued
his interest nearly four years earlier, and it was
not until he had been back at Challis Court for more
than eight months, that the incursion of Percy Crashaw
revived his memory of the phenomenon.
The library at Challis Court occupies
a suite of three rooms. The first and largest
of the three is part of the original structure of the
house. Its primitive use had been that of a chapel,
a one-storey building jutting out from the west wing.
This Challis had converted into a very practicable
library with a continuous gallery running round at
a height of seven feet from the floor, and in it he
had succeeded in arranging some 20,000 volumes.
But as his store of books grew-and at one
period it had grown very rapidly-he had
been forced to build, and so he had added first one
and then the other of the two additional rooms which
became necessary. Outside, the wing had the appearance
of an unduly elongated chapel, as he had continued
the original roof over his addition, and copied the
style of the old chapel architecture. The only
external alteration he had made had been the lowering
of the sills of the windows.
It was in the furthest of these three
rooms that Challis and his secretary worked, and it
was from here that they saw the gloomy figure of the
Rev. Percy Crashaw coming up the drive.
This was the third time he had called.
His two former visits had been unrewarded, but that
morning a letter had come from him, couched in careful
phrases, the purport of which had been a request for
an interview on a “matter of some moment.”
Challis frowned, and rose from among
an ordered litter of manuscripts.
“I shall have to see this man,”
he said to Lewes, and strode hastily out of the library.
Crashaw was perfunctorily apologetic,
and Challis, looking somewhat out of place, smoking
a heavy wooden pipe in the disused, bleak drawing-room,
waited, almost silent, until his visitor should come
to the point.
“... and the-er-matter
of some moment, I mentioned,” Crashaw mumbled
on, “is, I should say, not altogether irrelevant
to the work you are at present engaged upon.”
“Indeed!” commented Challis,
with a lift of his thick eyebrows, “no Polynesians
come to settle in Stoke, I trust?”
“On broad lines, relevant on
broad, anthropological lines, I mean,” said
Crashaw.
Challis grunted. “Go on!” he said.
“You may remember that curious-er-abnormal
child of the Stotts?” asked Crashaw.
“Stotts? Wait a minute.
Yes! Curious infant with an abnormally intelligent
expression and the head of a hydrocephalic?”
Crashaw nodded. “Its development
has upset me in a most unusual way,” he continued.
“I must confess that I am entirely at a loss,
and I really believe that you are the only person
who can give me any intelligent assistance in the
matter.”
“Very good of you,” murmured Challis.
“You see,” said Crashaw,
warming to his subject and interlacing his fingers,
“I happen, by the merest accident, I may say,
to be the child’s godfather.”
“Ah! you have responsibilities!”
commented Challis, with the first glint of amusement
in his eyes.
“I have,” said Crashaw,
“undoubtedly I have.” He leaned forward
with his hands still clasped together, and rested
his forearms on his thighs. As he talked he worked
his hands up and down from the wrists, by way of emphasis.
“I am aware,” he went on, “that on
one point I can expect little sympathy from you, but
I make an appeal to you, nevertheless, as a man of
science and-and a magistrate; for ... for
assistance.”
He paused and looked up at Challis,
received a nod of encouragement and developed his
grievance.
“I want to have the child certified
as an idiot, and sent to an asylum.”
“On what grounds?”
“He is undoubtedly lacking mentally,”
said Crashaw, “and his influence is, or may
be, malignant.”
“Explain,” suggested Challis.
For a few seconds Crashaw paused,
intent on the pattern of the carpet, and worked his
hands slowly. Challis saw that the man’s
knuckles were white, that he was straining his hands
together.
“He has denied God,” he
said at last with great solemnity.
Challis rose abruptly, and went over
to the window; the next words were spoken to his back.
“I have, myself, heard this
infant of four years use the most abhorrent blasphemy.”
Challis had composed himself.
“Oh! I say; that’s bad,” he
said as he turned towards the room again.
Crashaw’s head was still bowed.
“And whatever may be your own philosophic doubts,”
he said, “I think you will agree with me that
in such a case as this, something should be done.
To me it is horrible, most horrible.”
“Couldn’t you give me any details?”
asked Challis.
“They are most repugnant to me,” answered
Crashaw.
“Quite, quite! I understand.
But if you want any assistance.... Or do you
expect me to investigate?”
“I thought it my duty, as his
godfather, to see to the child’s spiritual welfare,”
said Crashaw, ignoring the question put to him, “although
he is not, now, one of my parishioners. I first
went to Pym some few months ago, but the mother interposed
between me and the child. I was not permitted
to see him. It was not until a few weeks back
that I met him-on the Common, alone.
Of course, I recognised him at once. He is quite
unmistakable.”
“And then?” prompted Challis.
“I spoke to him, and he replied
with, with-an abstracted air, without looking
at me. He has not the appearance in any way of
a normal child. I made a few ordinary remarks
to him, and then I asked him if he knew his catechism.
He replied that he did not know the word ‘catechism.’
I may mention that he speaks the dialect of the common
people, but he has a much larger vocabulary.
His mother has taught him to read, it appears.”
“He seems to have a curiously
apt intelligence,” interpolated Challis.
Crashaw wrung his clasped hands and
put the comment on one side. “I then spoke
to him of some of the broad principles of the Church’s
teaching,” he continued. “He listened
quietly, without interruption, and when I stopped,
he prompted me with questions.”
“One minute!” said Challis.
“Tell me; what sort of questions? That is
most important.”
“I do not remember precisely,”
returned Crashaw, “but one, I think, was as
to the sources of the Bible. I did not read anything
beyond simple and somewhat unusual curiosity into
those questions, I may say.... I talked to him
for some considerable time-I dare say for
more than an hour....”
“No signs of idiocy, apparently, during all
this?”
“I consider it less a case of
idiocy than one of possession, maleficent possession,”
replied Crashaw. He did not see his host’s
grim smile.
“Well, and the blasphemy?” prompted Challis.
“At the end of my instruction,
the child, still looking away from me, shook his head
and said that what I had told him was not true.
I confess that I was staggered. Possibly I lost
my temper, somewhat. I may have grown rather
warm in my speech. And at last ...”
Crashaw clenched his hands and spoke in such a low
voice that Challis could hardly hear him. “At
last he turned to me and said things which I could
not possibly repeat, which I pray that I may never
hear again from the mouth of any living being.”
“Profanities, obscenities, er-swear-words,”
suggested Challis.
“Blasphemy, blasphemy,”
cried Crashaw. “Oh! I wonder that I
did not injure the child.”
Challis moved over to the window again.
For more than a minute there was silence in that big,
neglected-looking room. Then Crashaw’s feelings
began to find vent in words, in a long stream of insistent
asseverations, pitched on a rising note that swelled
into a diapason of indignation. He spoke of the
position and power of his Church, of its influence
for good among the uneducated, agricultural population
among which he worked. He enlarged on the profound
necessity for a living religion among the poorer classes;
and on the revolutionary tendency towards socialism,
which would be encouraged if the great restraining
power of a creed that enforced subservience to temporal
power was once shaken. And, at last, he brought
his arguments to a head by saying that the example
of a child of four years old, openly defying a minister
of the Church, and repudiating the very conception
of the Deity, was an example which might produce a
profound effect upon the minds of a slow-thinking
people; that such an example might be the leaven which
would leaven the whole lump; and that for the welfare
of the whole neighbourhood it was an instant necessity
that the child should be put under restraint, his
tongue bridled, and any opportunity to proclaim his
blasphemous doctrines forcibly denied to him.
Long before he had concluded, Crashaw was on his feet,
pacing the room, declaiming, waving his arms.
Challis stood, unanswering, by the
window. He did not seem to hear; he did not even
shrug his shoulders. Not till Crashaw had brought
his argument to a culmination, and boomed into a dramatic
silence, did Challis turn and look at him.
“But you cannot confine a child
in an asylum on those grounds,” he said; “the
law does not permit it.”
“The Church is above the law,” replied
Crashaw.
“Not in these days,” said Challis; “it
is by law established!”
Crashaw began to speak again, but
Challis waved him down. “Quite, quite.
I see your point,” he said, “but I must
see this child myself. Believe me, I will see
what can be done. I will, at least, try to prevent
his spreading his opinions among the yokels.”
He smiled grimly. “I quite agree with you
that that is a consummation which is not to be desired.”
“You will see him soon?” asked Crashaw.
“To-day,” returned Challis.
“And you will let me see you again, afterwards?”
“Certainly.”
Crashaw still hesitated for a moment.
“I might, perhaps, come with you,” he
ventured.
“On no account,” said Challis.
II
Gregory Lewes was astonished at the
long absence of his chief; he was more astonished
when his chief returned.
“I want you to come up with
me to Pym, Lewes,” said Challis; “one of
my tenants has been confounding the rector of Stoke.
It is a matter that must be attended to.”
Lewes was a fair-haired, hard-working
young man, with a bent for science in general that
had not yet crystallised into any special study.
He had a curious sense of humour, that proved something
of an obstacle in the way of specialisation.
He did not take Challis’s speech seriously.
“Are you going as a magistrate?”
he asked; “or is it a matter for scientific
investigation?”
“Both,” said Challis. “Come
along!”
“Are you serious, sir?” Lewes still doubted.
“Intensely. I’ll explain as we go,”
said Challis.
It is not more than a mile and a half
from Challis Court to Pym. The nearest way is
by a cart track through the beech woods, that winds
up the hill to the Common. In winter this track
is almost impassable, over boot-top in heavy mud;
but the early spring had been fairly dry, and Challis
chose this route.
As they walked, Challis went through
the early history of Victor Stott, so far as it was
known to him. “I had forgotten the child,”
he said; “I thought it would die. You see,
it is by way of being an extraordinary freak of nature.
It has, or had, a curious look of intelligence.
You must remember that when I saw it, it was only
a few months old. But even then it conveyed in
some inexplicable way a sense of power. Every
one felt it. There was Harvey Walters, for instance-he
vaccinated it; I made him confess that the child made
him feel like a school-boy. Only, you understand,
it had not spoken then -”
“What conveyed that sense of power?” asked
Lewes.
“The way it had of looking at
you, staring you out of countenance, sizing you up
and rejecting you. It did that, I give you my
word; it did all that at a few months old, and without
the power of speech. Only, you see, I thought
it was merely a freak of some kind, some abnormality
that disgusted one in an unanalysed way. And
I thought it would die. I certainly thought it
would die. I am most eager to see this new development.”
“I haven’t heard.
It confounded Crashaw, you say? And it cannot
be more than four or five years old now?”
“Four; four and a half,”
returned Challis, and then the conversation was interrupted
by the necessity of skirting a tiny morass of wet leaf-mould
that lay in a hollow.
“Confounded Crashaw? I
should think so,” Challis went on, when they
had found firm going again. “The good man
would not soil his devoted tongue by any condescension
to oratio recta, but I gathered that the child had
made light of his divine authority.”
“Great Cæsar!” ejaculated
Lewes; “but that is immense. What did Crashaw
do-shake him?”
“No; he certainly did not lay
hands on him at all. His own expression was that
he did not know how it was he did not do the child
an injury. That is one of the things that interest
me enormously. That power I spoke of must have
been retained. Crashaw must have been blue with
anger; he could hardly repeat the story to me, he was
so agitated. It would have surprised me less
if he had told me he had murdered the child.
That I could have understood, perfectly.”
“It is, of course, quite incomprehensible
to me, as yet,” commented Lewes.
When they came out of the woods on
to the stretch of common from which you can see the
great swelling undulations of the Hampden Hills, Challis
stopped. A spear of April sunshine had pierced
the load of cloud towards the west, and the bank of
wood behind them gave shelter from the cold wind that
had blown fiercely all the afternoon.
“It is a fine prospect,”
said Challis, with a sweep of his hand. “I
sometimes feel, Lewes, that we are over-intent on our
own little narrow interests. Here are you and
I, busying ourselves in an attempt to throw some little
light-a very little it must be-on
some petty problems of the origin of our race.
We are looking downwards, downwards always; digging
in old muck-heaps; raking up all kinds of unsavoury
rubbish to prove that we are born out of the dirt.
And we have never a thought for the future in all
our work,-a future that may be glorious,
who knows? Here, perhaps in this village, insignificant
from most points of view, but set in a country that
should teach us to raise our eyes from the ground;
here, in this tiny hamlet, is living a child who may
become a greater than Socrates or Shakespeare, a child
who may revolutionise our conceptions of time and
space. There have been great men in the past who
have done that, Lewes; there is no reason for us to
doubt that still greater men may succeed them.”
“No; there is no reason for
us to doubt that,” said Lewes, and they walked
on in silence towards the Stotts’ cottage.
III
Challis knocked and walked in.
They found Ellen Mary and her son at the tea-table.
The mother rose to her feet and dropped
a respectful curtsy. The boy glanced once at
Gregory Lewes and then continued his meal as if he
were unaware of any strange presence in the room.
“I’m sorry. I am
afraid we are interrupting you,” Challis apologised.
“Pray sit down, Mrs. Stott, and go on with your
tea.”
“Thank you, sir. I’d
just finished, sir,” said Ellen Mary, and remained
standing with an air of quiet deference.
Challis took the celebrated armchair,
and motioned Lewes to the window-sill, the nearest
available seat for him. “Please sit down,
Mrs. Stott,” he said, and Ellen Mary sat, apologetically.
The boy pushed his cup towards his
mother, and pointed to the teapot; he made a grunting
sound to attract her attention.
“You’ll excuse me, sir,”
murmured Ellen Mary, and she refilled the cup and
passed it back to her son, who received it without
any acknowledgment. Challis and Lewes were observing
the boy intently, but he took not the least notice
of their scrutiny. He discovered no trace of
self-consciousness; Henry Challis and Gregory Lewes
appeared to have no place in the world of his abstraction.
The figure the child presented to
his two observers was worthy of careful scrutiny.
At the age of four and a half years,
the Wonder was bald, save for a few straggling wisps
of reddish hair above the ears and at the base of the
skull, and a weak, sparse down, of the same colour,
on the top of his head. The eyebrows, too, were
not marked by any line of hair, but the eyelashes
were thick, though short, and several shades darker
than the hair on the skull.
The face is not so easily described.
The mouth and chin were relatively small, overshadowed
by that broad cliff of forehead, but they were firm,
the chin well moulded, the lips thin and compressed.
The nose was unusual when seen in profile. There
was no sign of a bony bridge, but it was markedly
curved and jutted out at a curious angle from the line
of the face. The nostrils were wide and open.
None of these features produced any effect of childishness;
but this effect was partly achieved by the contours
of the cheeks, and by the fact that there was no indication
of any lines on the face.
The eyes nearly always wore their
usual expression of abstraction. It was very
rarely that the Wonder allowed his intelligence to
be exhibited by that medium. When he did, the
effect was strangely disconcerting, blinding.
One received an impression of extraordinary concentration:
it was as though for an instant the boy was able to
give one a glimpse of the wonderful force of his intellect.
When he looked one in the face with intention, and
suddenly allowed one to realise, as it were, all the
dominating power of his brain, one shrank into insignificance,
one felt as an ignorant, intelligent man may feel
when confronted with some elaborate theorem of the
higher mathematics. “Is it possible that
any one can really understand these things?”
such a man might think with awe, and in the same way
one apprehended some vast, inconceivable possibilities
of mind-function when the Wonder looked at one with,
as I have said, intention.
He was dressed in a little jacket-suit,
and wore a linen collar; the knickerbockers, loose
and badly cut, fell a little below the knees.
His stockings were of worsted, his boots clumsy and
thick-soled, though relatively tiny. One had
the impression always that his body was fragile and
small, but as a matter of fact the body and limbs were,
if anything, slightly better developed than those
of the average child of four and a half years.
Challis had ample opportunity to make
these observations at various periods. He began
them as he sat in the Stotts’ cottage. At
first he did not address the boy directly.
“I hear your son has been having
a religious controversy with Mr. Crashaw,” was
his introduction to the object of his visit.
“Indeed, sir!” Plainly this was not news
to Mrs. Stott.
“Your son told you?” suggested Challis.
“Oh! no, sir, ’e never
told me,” replied Mrs. Stott, “’twas
Mr. Crashaw. ’E’s been ’ere
several times lately.”
Challis looked sharply at the boy,
but he gave no sign that he heard what was passing.
“Yes; Mr. Crashaw seems rather upset about it.”
“I’m sorry, sir, but -”
“Yes; speak plainly,”
prompted Challis. “I assure you that you
will have no cause to regret any confidence you may
make to me.”
“I can’t see as it’s
any business of Mr. Crashaw’s, sir, if you’ll
forgive me for sayin’ so.”
“He has been worrying you?”
“’E ’as, sir, but
’e ...” she glanced at her son-she
laid a stress on the pronoun always when she spoke
of him that differentiated its significance-“’e
’asn’t seen Mr. Crashaw again, sir.”
Challis turned to the boy. “You
are not interested in Mr. Crashaw, I suppose?”
he asked.
The boy took no notice of the question.
Challis was piqued. If this extraordinary
child really had an intelligence, surely it must be
possible to appeal to that intelligence in some way.
He made another effort, addressing Mrs. Stott.
“I think we must forgive Mr.
Crashaw, you know, Mrs. Stott. As I understand
it, your boy at the age of four years and a half has
defied-his cloth, if I may say so.”
He paused, and as he received no answer, continued:
“But I hope that matter may be easily arranged.”
“Thank you, sir,” said
Mrs. Stott. “It’s very kind of you.
I’m sure, I’m greatly obliged to you,
sir.”
“That’s only one reason
of my visit to you, however,” Challis hesitated.
“I’ve been wondering whether I might not
be able to help you and your son in some other way.
I understand that he has unusual power of-of
intelligence.”
“Indeed ’e ’as, sir,” responded
Mrs. Stott.
“And he can read, can’t he?”
“I’ve learned ’im what I could,
sir: it isn’t much.”
“Well, perhaps I could lend him a few books.”
Challis made a significant pause,
and again he looked at the boy; but as there was no
response, he continued: “Tell me what he
has read.”
“We’ve no books, sir,
and we never ’ardly see a paper now. All
we ’ave in the ’ouse is a Bible and
two copies of Lillywhite’s cricket annual as
my ’usband left be’ind.”
Challis smiled. “Has he read those?”
he asked.
“The Bible ’e ’as, I believe,”
replied Mrs. Stott.
It was a conversation curious in its
impersonality. Challis was conscious of the anomaly
that he was speaking in the boy’s presence,
crediting him with a remarkable intelligence, and yet
addressing a frankly ignorant woman as though the
boy was not in the room. Yet how could he break
that deliberate silence? It seemed to him as though
there must, after all, be some mistake; yet how account
for Crashaw’s story if the boy were indeed an
idiot?
With a slight show of temper he turned to the Wonder.
“Do you want to read?”
he asked. “I have between forty and fifty
thousand books in my library. I think it possible
that you might find one or two which would interest
you.”
The Wonder lifted his hand as though
to ask for silence. For a minute, perhaps, no
one spoke. All waited, expectant; Challis and
Lewes with intent eyes fixed on the detached expression
of the child’s face, Ellen Mary with bent head.
It was a strange, yet very logical question that came
at last:
“What should I learn out of
all them books?” asked the Wonder. He did
not look at Challis as he spoke.
IV
Challis drew a deep breath and turned
towards Lewes. “A difficult question, that,
Lewes,” he said.
Lewes lifted his eyebrows and pulled
at his fair moustache. “If you take the
question literally,” he muttered.
“You might learn-the
essential part ... of all the knowledge that has been
... discovered by mankind,” said Challis.
He phrased his sentence carefully, as though he were
afraid of being trapped.
“Should I learn what I am?” asked the
Wonder.
Challis understood the question in
its metaphysical acceptation. He had the sense
of a powerful but undirected intelligence working from
the simple prémisses of experience; of a
cloistered mind that had functioned profoundly; a
mind unbound by the tradition of all the speculations
and discoveries of man, the essential conclusions
of which were contained in that library at Challis
Court.
“No!” said Challis, after
a perceptible interval, “that you will not learn
from any books in my possession, but you will find
grounds for speculation.”
“Grounds for speculation?”
questioned the Wonder. He repeated the words
quite clearly.
“Material-matter
from which you can-er-formulate
theories of your own,” explained Challis.
The Wonder shook his head. It
was evident that Challis’s sentence conveyed
little or no meaning to him.
He got down from his chair and took
up an old cricket cap of his father’s, a cap
which his mother had let out by the addition of another
gore of cloth that did not match the original material.
He pulled this cap carefully over his bald head, and
then made for the door.
At the threshold the strange child
paused, and without looking at any one present said:
“I’ll coom to your library,” and
went out.
Challis joined Lewes at the window,
and they watched the boy make his deliberate way along
the garden path and up the lane towards the fields
beyond.
“You let him go out by himself?” asked
Challis.
“He likes to be in the air, sir,” replied
Ellen Mary.
“I suppose you have to let him go his own way?”
“Oh! yes, sir.”
“I will send the governess cart
up for him to-morrow morning,” said Challis,
“at ten o’clock. That is, of course,
if you have no objection to his coming.”
“’E said ’e’d
coom, sir,” replied Ellen Mary. Her tone
implied that there was no appeal possible against
her son’s statement of his wishes.
V
“His methods do not lack terseness,”
remarked Lewes, when he and Challis were out of earshot
of the cottage.
“His methods and manners are
damnable,” said Challis, “but -”
“You were going to say?” prompted Lewes.
“Well, what is your opinion?”
“I am not convinced, as yet,” said Lewes.
“Oh, surely,” expostulated Challis.
“Not from objective, personal
evidence. Let us put Crashaw out of our minds
for the moment.”
“Very well; go on, state your case.”
“He has, so far, made four remarks
in our presence,” said Lewes, gesticulating
with his walking stick. “Two of them can
be neglected; his repetition of your words, which
he did not understand, and his condescending promise
to study your library.”
“Yes; I’m with you, so far.”
“Now, putting aside the preconception
with which we entered the cottage, was there really
anything in the other two remarks? Were they not
the type of simple, unreasoning questions which one
may often hear from the mouth of a child of that age?
‘What shall I learn from your books?’
Well, it is the natural question of the ignorant child,
who has no conception of the contents of books, no
experience which would furnish material for his imagination.”
“Well?”
“The second remark is more explicable
still. It is a remark we all make in childhood,
in some form or another. I remember quite well
at the age of six or seven asking my mother:
‘Which is me, my soul or my body?’ I was
brought up on the Church catechism. But you at
once accepted these questions-which, I
maintain, were questions possible in the mouth of a
simple, ignorant child-in some deep, metaphysical
acceptation. Don’t you think, sir, we should
wait for further evidence before we attribute any
phenomenal intelligence to this child?”
“Quite the right attitude to
take, Lewes-the scientific attitude,”
replied Challis. “Let’s go by the
lane,” he added, as they reached the entrance
to the wood.
For some few minutes they walked in
silence; Challis with his head down, his heavy shoulders
humped. His hands were clasped behind him, dragging
his stick as it were a tail, which he occasionally
cocked. He walked with a little stumble now and
again, his eyes on the ground. Lewes strode with
a sure foot, his head up, and he slashed at the tangle
of last year’s growth on the bank whenever he
passed some tempting butt for the sword-play of his
stick.
“Do you think, then,”
said Challis at last, “that much of the atmosphere-you
must have marked the atmosphere-of the child’s
personality, was a creation of our own minds, due to
our preconceptions?”
“Yes, I think so,” Lewes
replied, a touch of defiance in his tone.
“Isn’t that what you want to believe?”
asked Challis.
Lewes hit at a flag of dead bracken
and missed. “You mean...?” he prevaricated.
“I mean that that is a much
stronger influence than any preconception, my dear
Lewes. I’m no pragmatist, as you know; but
there can be no doubt that with the majority of us
the wish to believe a thing is true constitutes the
truth of that thing for us. And that is, in my
opinion, the wrong attitude for either scientist or
philosopher. Now, in the case we are discussing,
I suppose at bottom I should like to agree with you.
One does not like to feel that a child of four and
a half has greater intellectual powers than oneself.
Candidly, I do not like it at all.”
“Of course not! But I can’t think
that -”
“You can if you try; you would
at once if you wished to,” returned Challis,
anticipating the completion of Lewes’s sentence.
“I’ll admit that there
are some remarkable facts in the case of this child,”
said Lewes, “but I do not see why we should,
as yet, take the whole proposition for granted.”
“No! I am with you there,”
returned Challis. And no more was said until
they were nearly home.
Just before they turned into the drive,
however, Challis stopped. “Do you know,
Lewes,” he said, “I am not sure that I
am doing a wise thing in bringing that child here!”
Lewes did not understand. “No, sir?
Why not?” he asked.
“Why, think of the possibilities
of that child, if he has all the powers I credit him
with,” said Challis. “Think of his
possibilities for original thought if he is kept away
from all the traditions of this futile learning.”
He waved an arm in the direction of the elongated
chapel.
“Oh! but surely,” remonstrated
Lewes, “that is a necessary groundwork.
Knowledge is built up step by step.”
“Is it? I wonder.
I sometimes doubt,” said Challis. “Yes,
I sometimes doubt whether we have ever learned anything
at all that is worth knowing. And, perhaps, this
child, if he were kept away from books.... However,
the thing is done now, and in any case he would never
have been able to dodge the School attendance officer.”