1600-1622
Born in Scotland. The circumstance
explained. Princess Anne. Royal
marriages. Getting married by proxy. James
thwarted. Getting married by proxy. James
thwarted. James in Copenhagen. Charles’s
feeble infancy. Death of Elizabeth. Accession
of James to the English crown. Second sight. Prediction
fulfilled. An explanation. Charles’s
titles of nobility. Charles’s governess. Windsor
Castle. Journey to London. A
mother’s love. Rejoicings. Charles’s
continued feebleness. His progress in learning. Charles
improves in health. Death of his brother. Charles’s
love of athletic sports. Buckingham. Buckingham’s
style of living. Royalty. True
character of royalty. The king and Buckingham. Indecent
correspondence. Buckingham’s pig. James’s
petulance. The story of Gib. The
king’s frankness. Glitter of royalty. The
appearance. The reality.
King Charles the First was born in
Scotland. It may perhaps surprise the reader
that an English king should be born in Scotland.
The explanation is this:
They who have read the history of
Mary Queen of Scots, will remember that it was the
great end and aim of her life to unite the crowns of
England and Scotland in her own family. Queen
Elizabeth was then Queen of England. She lived
and died unmarried. Queen Mary and a young man
named Lord Darnley were the next heirs. It was
uncertain which of the two had the strongest claim.
To prevent a dispute, by uniting these claims, Mary
made Darnley her husband. They had a son, who,
after the death of his father and mother, was acknowledged
to be the heir to the British throne, whenever Elizabeth’s
life should end. In the mean time he remained
King of Scotland. His name was James. He
married a princess of Denmark; and his child, who
afterward was King Charles the First of England, was
born before he left his native realm.
King Charles’s mother was, as
has been already said, a princess of Denmark.
Her name was Anne. The circumstances of her marriage
to King James were quite extraordinary, and attracted
great attention at the time. It is, in some sense,
a matter of principle among kings and queens, that
they must only marry persons of royal rank, like themselves;
and as they have very little opportunity of visiting
each other, residing as they do in such distant capitals,
they generally choose their consorts by the reports
which come to them of the person and character of
the different candidates. The choice, too, is
very much influenced by political considerations,
and is always more or less embarrassed by negotiations
with other courts, whose ministers make objections
to this or that alliance, on account of its supposed
interference with some of their own political schemes.
As it is very inconvenient, moreover,
for a king to leave his dominions, the marriage ceremony
is usually performed at the court where the bride
resides, without the presence of the bridegroom, he
sending an embassador to act as his representative.
This is called being married by proxy. The bride
then comes to her royal husband’s dominions,
accompanied by a great escort. He meets her usually
on the frontiers; and there she sees him for the first
time, after having been married to him some weeks
by proxy. It is true, indeed, that she has generally
seen his picture, that being usually sent to
her before the marriage contract is made. This,
however, is not a matter of much consequence, as the
personal predilections of a princess have generally
very little to do with the question of her marriage.
Now King James had concluded to propose
for the oldest daughter of the King of Denmark and
he entered into negotiations for this purpose.
This plan, however, did not please the government of
England, and Elizabeth, who was then the English queen,
managed so to embarrass and interfere with the scheme,
that the King of Denmark gave his daughter to another
claimant. James was a man of very mild and quiet
temperament, easily counteracted and thwarted in his
plans; but this disappointment aroused his energies,
and he sent a splendid embassy into Denmark to demand
the king’s second daughter, whose name was Anne.
He prosecuted this suit so vigorously that the marriage
articles were soon agreed to and signed. Anne
embarked and set sail for Scotland. The king
remained there, waiting for her arrival with great
impatience. At length, instead of his bride, the
news came that the fleet in which Anne had sailed
had been dispersed and driven back by a storm, and
that Anne herself had landed on the coast of Norway.
James immediately conceived the design
of going himself in pursuit of her. But knowing
very well that all his ministers and the officers of
his government would make endless objections to his
going out of the country on such an errand, he kept
his plan a profound secret from them all. He
ordered some ships to be got ready privately, and
provided a suitable train of attendants, and then embarked
without letting his people know where he was going.
He sailed across the German Ocean to the town in Norway
where his bride had landed. He found her there,
and they were married. Her brother, who had just
succeeded to the throne, having received intelligence
of this, invited the young couple to come and spend
the winter at his capital of Copenhagen; and as the
season was far advanced, and the sea stormy, King
James concluded to accept the invitation. They
were received in Copenhagen with great pomp and parade,
and the winter was spent in festivities and rejoicings.
In the spring he brought his bride to Scotland.
The whole world were astonished at the performance
of such an exploit by a king, especially one of so
mild, quiet, and grave a character as that which James
had the credit of possessing.
Young Charles was very weak and feeble
in his infancy. It was feared that he would not
live many hours. The rite of baptism was immediately
performed, as it was, in those days, considered essential
to the salvation of a child dying in infancy that
it should be baptized before it died. Notwithstanding
the fears that were at first felt, Charles lingered
along for some days, and gradually began to acquire
a little strength. His feebleness was a cause
of great anxiety and concern to those around him;
but the degree of interest felt in the little sufferer’s
fate was very much less than it would have been if
he had been the oldest son. He had a brother,
Prince Henry, who was older than he, and, consequently,
heir to his father’s crown. It was not
probable, therefore, that Charles would ever be king;
and the importance of every thing connected with his
birth and his welfare was very much diminished on
that account.
It was only about two years after
Charles’s birth that Queen Elizabeth died, and
King James succeeded to the English throne. A
messenger came with all speed to Scotland to announce
the fact. He rode night and day. He arrived
at the king’s palace in the night. He gained
admission to the king’s chamber, and, kneeling
at his bedside, proclaimed him King of England.
James immediately prepared to bid his Scotch subjects
farewell, and to proceed to England to take possession
of his new realm. Queen Anne was to follow him
in a week or two, and the other children, Henry and
Elizabeth; but Charles was too feeble to go.
In those early days there was a prevailing
belief in Scotland, and, in fact, the opinion still
lingers there, that certain persons among the old
Highlanders had what they called the gift of the second
sight that is, the power of foreseeing futurity
in some mysterious and incomprehensible way.
An incident is related in the old histories connected
with Charles’s infancy, which is a good illustration
of this. While King James was preparing to leave
Scotland, to take possession of the English throne,
an old Highland laird came to bid him farewell.
He gave the king many parting counsels and good wishes,
and then, overlooking the older brother, Prince Henry,
he went directly to Charles, who was then about two
years old, and bowed before him, and kissed his hand
with the greatest appearance of regard and veneration.
King James undertook to correct his supposed mistake,
by telling him that that was his second son, and that
the other boy was the heir to the crown. “No,”
said the old laird, “I am not mistaken.
I know to whom I am speaking. This child, now
in his nurse’s arms, will be greater than his
brother. This is the one who is to convey his
father’s name and titles to succeeding generations.”
This prediction was fulfilled; for the robust and
healthy Henry died, and the feeble and sickly-looking
Charles lived and grew, and succeeded, in due time,
to his father’s throne.
Now inasmuch as, at the time when
this prediction was uttered, there seemed to be little
human probability of its fulfillment, it attracted
attention; its unexpected and startling character made
every one notice and remember it; and the old laird
was at once an object of interest and wonder.
It is probable that this desire to excite the admiration
of the auditors, mingled insensibly with a sort of
poetic enthusiasm, which a rude age and mountainous
scenery always inspire, was the origin of a great
many such predictions as these; and then, in the end,
those only which turned out to be true were remembered,
while the rest were forgotten; and this was the way
that the reality of such prophetic powers came to
be generally believed in.
Feeble and uncertain of life as the
infant Charles appeared to be, they conferred upon
him, as is customary in the case of young princes,
various titles of nobility. He was made a duke,
a marquis, an earl, and a baron, before he had strength
enough to lift up his head in his nurse’s arms.
His title as duke was Duke of Albany; and as this was
the highest of his nominal honors, he was generally
known under that designation while he remained in
Scotland.
When his father left him, in order
to go to England and take possession of his new throne,
he appointed a governess to take charge of the health
and education of the young duke. This governess
was Lady Cary. The reason why she was appointed
was, not because of her possessing any peculiar qualifications
for such a charge, but because her husband, Sir Robert
Cary, had been the messenger employed by the English
government to communicate to James the death of Elizabeth,
and to announce to him his accession to the throne.
The bearer of good news to a monarch must always be
rewarded, and James recompensed Sir Robert for his
service by appointing his wife to the post of governess
of his infant son. The office undoubtedly had
its honors and emoluments, with very little of responsibility
or care.
One of the chief residences of the
English monarchs is Windsor Castle. It is situated
above London, on the Thames, on the southern shore.
It is on an eminence overlooking the river and the
delightful valley through which the river here meanders.
In the rear is a very extensive park or forest, which
is penetrated in every direction by rides and walks
almost innumerable. It has been for a long time
the chief country residence of the British kings.
It is very spacious, containing within its walls many
courts and quadrangles, with various buildings surrounding
them, some ancient and some modern. Here King
James held his court after his arrival in England,
and in about a year he sent for the little Charles
to join him.
The child traveled very slowly, and
by very easy stages, his nurses and attendants watching
over him with great solicitude all the way. The
journey was made in the month of October. His
mother watched his arrival with great interest.
Being so feeble and helpless, he was, of course, her
favorite child. By an instinct which very strongly
evinces the wisdom and goodness which implanted it,
a mother always bestows a double portion of her love
upon the frail, the helpless, and the suffering.
Instead of being wearied out with protracted and incessant
calls for watchfulness and care, she feels only a deeper
sympathy and love, in proportion to the infirmities
which call for them, and thus finds her highest happiness
in what we might expect would be a weariness and a
toil.
Little Charles was four years old
when he reached Windsor Castle. They celebrated
his arrival with great rejoicings, and a day or two
afterward they invested him with the title of Duke
of York, a still higher distinction than he had before
attained. Soon after this, when he was perhaps
five or six years of age, a gentleman was appointed
to take the charge of his education. His health
gradually improved, though he still continued helpless
and feeble. It was a long time before he could
walk, on account of some malformation of his limbs.
He learned to talk, too, very late and very slowly.
Besides the general feebleness of his constitution,
which kept him back in all these things, there was
an impediment in his speech, which affected him very
much in childhood, and which, in fact, never entirely
disappeared.
As soon, however, as he commenced
his studies under his new tutor, he made much greater
progress than had been expected. It was soon
observed that the feebleness which had attached to
him pertained more to the body than to the mind.
He advanced with considerable rapidity in his learning.
His progress was, in fact, in some degree, promoted
by his bodily infirmities, which kept him from playing
with the other boys of the court, and led him to like
to be still, and to retire from scenes of sport and
pleasure which he could not share.
The same cause operated to make him
not agreeable as a companion, and he was not a favorite
among those around him. They called him Baby
Charley. His temper seemed to be in some sense
soured by the feeling of his inferiority, and by the
jealousy he would naturally experience in finding
himself, the son of a king, so outstripped in athletic
sports by those whom he regarded as his inferiors in
rank and station.
The lapse of a few years, however,
after this time, made a total change in Charles’s
position and prospects. His health improved, and
his constitution began to be confirmed and established.
When he was about twelve years of age, too, his brother
Henry died. This circumstance made an entire
change in all his prospects of life. The eyes
of the whole kingdom, and, in fact, of all Europe,
were now upon him as the future sovereign of England.
His sister Elizabeth, who was a few years older than
himself, was, about this time, married to a German
prince, with great pomp and ceremony, young Charles
acting the part of brideman. In consequence of
his new position as heir-apparent to the throne, he
was advanced to new honors, and had new titles conferred
upon him, until at last, when he was sixteen years
of age, he was made Prince of Wales, and certain revenues
were appropriated to support a court for him, that
he might be surrounded with external circumstances
and insignia of rank and power, corresponding with
his prospective greatness.
In the mean time his health and strength
rapidly improved, and with the improvement came a
taste for manly and athletic sports, and the attainment
of excellence in them. He gradually acquired great
skill in all the exploits and performances of the
young men of those days, such as shooting, riding,
vaulting, and tilting at tournaments. From being
a weak, sickly, and almost helpless child, he became,
at twenty, an active, athletic young man, full of
life and spirit, and ready for any romantic enterprise.
In fact, when he was twenty-three years old, he embarked
in a romantic enterprise which attracted the attention
of all the world. This enterprise will presently
be described.
There was at this time, in the court
of King James, a man who became very famous afterward
as a favorite and follower of Charles. He is
known in history under the name of the Duke of Buckingham.
His name was originally George Villiers. He was
a very handsome young man, and he seems to have attracted
King James’s attention at first on this account.
James found him a convenient attendant, and made him,
at last, his principal favorite. He raised him
to a high rank, and conferred upon him, among other
titles, that of Duke of Buckingham. The other
persons about the court were very envious and jealous
of his influence and power; but they were obliged
to submit to it. He lived in great state and
splendor, and for many years was looked up to by the
whole kingdom as one of the greatest personages in
the realm. We shall learn hereafter how he came
to his end.
If the reader imagines, from the accounts
which have been given thus far in this chapter of
the pomp and parade of royalty, of the castles and
the ceremonies, the titles of nobility, and the various
insignia of rank and power, which we have alluded
to so often, that the mode of life which royalty led
in those days was lofty, dignified, and truly great,
he will be very greatly deceived. All these things
were merely for show things put on for
public display, to gratify pride and impress the people,
who never looked behind the scenes, with high ideas
of the grandeur of those who, as they were taught,
ruled over them by a divine right. It would be
hard to find, in any class of society except those
reputed infamous, more low, gross, and vulgar modes
of life than have been exhibited generally in the royal
palaces of Europe for the last five hundred years.
King James the First has, among English sovereigns,
rather a high character for sobriety and gravity of
deportment, and purity of morals; but the glimpses
we get of the real, every-day routine of his domestic
life, are such as to show that the pomp and parade
of royalty is mere glittering tinsel, after all.
The historians of the day tell such
stories as these. The king was at one time very
dejected and melancholy, when Buckingham contrived
this plan to amuse him. In the first place, however,
we ought to say, in order to illustrate the terms
on which he and Buckingham lived together, that the
king always called Buckingham Steeny, which
was a contraction of Stephen. St. Stephen was
always represented in the Catholic pictures of the
saints, as a very handsome man, and Buckingham being
handsome too, James called him Steeny by way of a
compliment. Steeny called the king his dad,
and used to sign himself, in his letters, “your
slave and dog Steeny.” There are extant
some letters which passed between the king and his
favorite, written, on the part of the king, in a style
of grossness and indecency such that the chroniclers
of those days said that they were not fit to be printed.
They would not “blot their pages” with
them, they said. King Charles’s letters
were more properly expressed.
To return, then, to our story.
The king was very much dejected and melancholy.
Steeny, in order to divert him, had a pig dressed up
in the clothes of an infant child. Buckingham’s
mother, who was a countess, personated the nurse,
dressed also carefully for the occasion. Another
person put on a bishop’s robes, satin gown, lawn
sleeves, and the other pontifical ornaments. They
also provided a baptismal font, a prayer-book, and
other things necessary for a religious ceremony, and
then invited the king to come in to attend a baptism.
The king came, and the pretended bishop began to read
the service, the assistants looking gravely on, until
the squealing of the pig brought all gravity to an
end. The king was not pleased; but the
historian thinks the reason was, not any objection
which he had to such a profanation, but to his not
happening to be in a mood for it at that time.
There was a negotiation going on for
a long time for a marriage between one of the king’s
sons, first Henry, and afterward Charles, and a princess
of Spain. At one time the king lost some of the
papers, and was storming about the palace in a great
rage because he could not find them. At last
he chanced to meet a certain Scotchman, a servant
of his, named Gib, and, like a vexed and impatient
child, who lays the charge of a lost plaything upon
any body who happens to be at hand to receive it,
he put the responsibility of the loss of the papers
upon Gib. “I remember,” said he,
“I gave them to you to take care of. What
have you done with them?” The faithful servant
fell upon his knees, and protested that he had not
received them. The king was only made the more
angry by this contradiction, and kicked the Scotchman
as he kneeled upon the floor. The man rose and
left the apartment, saying, “I have always been
faithful to your majesty, and have not deserved such
treatment as this. I can not remain in your service
under such a degradation. I shall never see you
again.” He left the palace, and went away.
A short time after this, the person
to whose custody the king had really committed the
papers came in, and, on learning that they were wanted,
produced them. The king was ashamed of his conduct.
He sent for his Scotch servant again, and was not
easy until he was found and brought into his presence.
The king kneeled before him and asked his forgiveness,
and said he should not rise until he was forgiven.
Gib was disposed to evade the request, and urged the
king to rise; but James would not do so until Gib
said he forgave him, in so many words. The whole
case shows how little of dignity and noble bearing
there really was in the manners and conduct of the
king in his daily life, though we are almost ready
to overlook the ridiculous childishness and folly
of his fault, on account of the truly noble frankness
and honesty with which he acknowledged it.
Thus, though every thing in which
royalty appeared before the public was conducted with
great pomp and parade, this external magnificence
was then, and always has been, an outside show, without
any thing corresponding to it within. The great
mass of the people of England saw only the outside.
They gazed with admiration at the spectacle of magnificence
and splendor which royalty always presented to their
eyes, whenever they beheld it from the distant and
humble points of view which their position afforded
them. Prince Charles, on the other hand, was
behind the curtain. His childhood and youth were
exposed fully to all the real influences of these
scenes. The people of England submitted to be
governed by such men, not because they thought them
qualified to govern, or that the circumstances under
which their characters were formed were such as were
calculated to form, in a proper manner, the minds
of the rulers of a Christian people. They did
not know what those circumstances were. In their
conceptions they had grand ideas of royal character
and life, and imagined the splendid palaces which
some saw, but more only heard of, at Westminster, were
filled with true greatness and glory. They were
really filled with vulgarity, vice, and shame.
James was to them King James the First, monarch of
Great Britain, France, and Ireland, and Charles was
Charles, Prince of Wales, Duke of York, and heir-apparent
to the throne. Whereas, within the palace, to
all who saw them and knew them there, and really,
so far as their true moral position was concerned,
the father was “Old Dad,” and the son,
what his father always called him till he was twenty-four
years old, “Baby Charley.”