It is impossible to touch on more
than a few characteristic examples of Purcell’s
achievement There are many charming detached
songs; the Harpsichord Lessons contain exquisite
things There is also a quantity of unpublished
sacred and secular music of high value.
When Purcell died, on November 21,
1695, he was busy with the music for Tom d’Urfey’s
Don Quixote (part iii.), being helped by one
Eccles, who enjoyed a certain mild fame in his day
The last song, “set in his sicknesse,”
was a song supposed to be sung by a mad woman, “From
rosy bowers.” The recitative is magnificent;
two of the sections in tempo are fine, especially
the second; the last portion is meant to depict raving
lunacy, and does so It is by no means one of
Purcell’s greatest efforts, and he apparently
had no notion of making a dramatic exit from this
world If the doctors knew what disease killed
him, they never told The professional libeller
of the dead, Hawkins, speaks of dissipations and late
hours: and he would have us believe that he left
his family in poverty As a matter of fact, Mrs.
Purcell was left quite well off, and was able to give
her son Edward a good education She had also
property to bequeath when she died in 1706 Purcell
worked so hard that he cannot have had time for the
life of tavern-rioting that Hawkins invented
All we know is that he died, and that his death was
a tragic loss to England A few days later he
was buried in Westminster Abbey, to the sound of his
own most solemn music A tablet to his memory
was placed near the grave, and the inscription on
it is said to have been written by the wife of Sir
Robert Howard, author of the Indian Queen and
other forgotten master-works The light of English
music had gone out, though few at the moment realised
it, for Dr. Blow and Eccles and others went on composing
music which was thought very good But the light
had gone, and it was not Handel who extinguished it
Handel did not come to England for fifteen years,
and during that fifteen years not a single composition
worthy of being placed within measurable distance
of Purcell’s average work fell from an English
pen Purcell was by no means forgotten all at
once The four-part sonatas were issued in 1697,
the Harpsichord Lessons in 1696; the Choice
Ayres for the Theatre-selections from
the stage music-came out in 1697; the first
book of the Orpheus Britannicus appeared in
1698, and a second edition of it in 1706; the second
book of the same appeared in 1702, and a second edition
in 1711; while a third edition of both books was published
as late as 1721, when Handel had been settled in England
some years The fame of our last great musician
survived him for quite a long time, as things go
That the re-issue of his works was not due alone to
the energy of his widow is clear, for she died in 1706.
It is indeed mournful to contemplate
the havoc disease and death play with the might-have-beens
of men and of causes Pelham Humphries, an unmistakable
genius, was carried away at twenty-seven; Henry Purcell,
one of the mightiest of the world’s masters of
music, died at the age of thirty-seven, only two years
older than his peer in genius, Mozart Yet he
left a glorious record, and his days must have been
glorious Men like Purcell do not create music
such as theirs by blind instinct, as a cat catches
mice A mighty brain and mightier heart must have
worked with passionate energy, the fires must have
burnt at an unbroken white heat, to produce so much
unsurpassable music in so short a time The qualities
we find in the music were in him before they got into
the music; all that we can enjoy he enjoyed first
He had, too, a high destiny to work out, and he knew
it Thomas Tudway said he was ambitious to exceed
everyone of his time To the last he laboured
unceasingly, and if he died, as has been suspected,
of consumption, there is no trace of the fever of
ill-health nor any morbidness in his creations
They are charged with energy-often elemental,
volcanic energy that nothing can resist; and at its
lowest, the energy is the energy of robust health and
a keen appetite That energy carried him far beyond
the modest goal he thought of, exceeding his fellows
He won the topmost heights within the reach of man
The old polyphonists he never tried to rival, but in
the style of music he wrote no composer has gone or
can go higher than he A wiseacre has said that
he left a sterile monument It may be that monuments
in the British Museum blow and blossom and reproduce
their kind: outside they do not If the
wiseacre meant that Purcell did not leave, as Haydn
and Mozart undoubtedly did, a form in which dullards
may compose until the world is sick, then the wiseacre
is right But the inventors and perfecters of forms
have not always wrought an unmitigated good
If Haydn left a fruitful monument in the symphony,
and Handel in his particular form of oratorio, and
if we thankfully praise Haydn and Handel for these
their benefits, must we not also blame Haydn for the
dull symphonies that nearly drove Schumann and Wagner
mad, and Handel for the countless copies of his oratorios
that rendered stupid, dull, and insensible to the
beauty of music those generations that have attended
our great musical festivals? The spirit of Purcell’s
work and its technique did not die with Purcell:
the spirit of much of Handel’s music, and certainly
of his masterpiece, Israel in Egypt, is Purcell’s;
and eighteenth-century contrapuntist though Handel
was, much of his technique came from Purcell
Rightly regarded, Purcell’s monument is anything
but sterile Felix Mottl, worried to exasperation
by stale laments for Mozart’s premature death,
once lifted up his voice and thanked God for Mozart,
the Heaven-sent man In the same spirit we may
be thankful for Purcell In his music we have
the full and perfect expression of all that was fair
and sweet and healthy in this England of ours; “all
thoughts, all passions, all delights,” that our
English nature is capable of find a voice in his music-if
only we will take the trouble to listen to it
He is neglected, it is true, but he is immortal:
time is nothing: he can wait If our age
neglects him, his age neglected Shakespeare
Shakespeare’s time came; Purcell’s cannot
be for ever delayed.