TAXATION AND GOVERNMENT.
In that strangely beautiful story,
“The Cloister and the Hearth,” in which
Charles Reade has drawn such a vivid picture of human
life at the close of the Middle Ages, there is a good
description of the siege of a revolted town by the
army of the Duke of Burgundy. Arrows whiz, catapults
hurl their ponderous stones, wooden towers are built,
secret mines are exploded. The sturdy citizens,
led by a tall knight who seems to bear a charmed life,
baffle every device of the besiegers. At length
the citizens capture the brother of the duke’s
general, and the besiegers capture the tall knight,
who turns out to be no knight after all, but just
a plebeian hosier. The duke’s general is
on the point of ordering the tradesman who has made
so much trouble to be shot, but the latter still remains
master of the situation; for, as he dryly observes,
if any harm comes to him, the enraged citizens will
hang the general’s brother. Some parley
ensues, in which the shrewd hosier promises for the
townsfolk to set free their prisoner and pay a round
sum of money if the besieging army will depart and
leave them in peace. The offer is accepted, and
so the matter is amicably settled. As the worthy
citizen is about to take his leave, the general ventures
a word of inquiry as to the cause of the town’s
revolt. “What, then, is your grievance,
my good friend?” Our hosier knight, though deft
with needle and keen with lance, has a stammering
tongue. He answers: “Tuta tuta tuta tuta too
much taxes!”
It only needs to be pointed out, however,
that in every town some things are done for the benefit
of all the inhabitants of the town, things which concern
one person just as much as another. Thus roads
are made and kept in repair, school-houses are built
and salaries paid to school-teachers, there are constables
who take criminals to jail, there are engines for
putting out fires, there are public libraries, town
cemeteries, and poor-houses. Money raised for
these purposes, which are supposed to concern all
the inhabitants, is supposed to be paid by all the
inhabitants, each one furnishing his share; and the
share which each one pays is his town tax.
Government, then, is the directing
or managing of such affairs as concern all the people
alike, as, for example, the punishment of
criminals, the enforcement of contracts, the defence
against foreign enemies, the maintenance of roads
and bridges, and so on. To the directing or managing
of such affairs all the people are expected to contribute,
each according to his ability, in the shape of taxes.
Government is something which is supported by the people
and kept alive by taxation. There is no other
way of keeping it alive.
If we are in any doubt as to what
is really the government of some particular country,
we cannot do better than observe what person or persons
in that country are clothed with authority to tax the
people. Mere names, as customarily applied to
governments, are apt to be deceptive. Thus in
the middle of the eighteenth century France and England
were both called “kingdoms;” but so far
as kingly power was concerned, Louis XV. was a very
different sort of a king from George II. The
French king could impose taxes on his people, and it
might therefore be truly said that the government
of France was in the king. Indeed, it was Louis
XV’s immediate predecessor who made the famous
remark, “The state is myself.” But
the English king could not impose taxes; the only
power in England that could do that was the House of
Commons, and accordingly it is correct to say that
in England, at the time of which we are speaking,
the government was (as it still is) in the House of
Commons.