In these words the Psalmist declares,
that in consequence of having obeyed God’s commandments
he had obtained more wisdom and understanding than
those who had first enlightened his ignorance, and
were once more enlightened than he. As if he
said, “When I was a child, I was instructed
in religious knowledge by kind and pious friends, who
told me who my Maker was, what great things He had
done for me, how much I owed to Him, and how I was
to serve Him. All this I learned from them,
and I rejoice that they taught it me: yet they
did more; they set me in the way to gain a knowledge
of religious truth in another and higher manner.
They not only taught me, but trained me; they were
careful that I should not only know my duty, but do
it. They obliged me to obey; they obliged me
to begin a religious course of life, which (praised
be God!) I have ever pursued; and this obedience to
His commandments has brought me to a clearer knowledge
of His truth, than any mere instruction could convey.
I have been taught, not from without merely, but
from within. I have been taught by means of a
purified heart, by a changed will, by chastened reins,
by a mortified appetite, by a bridled tongue, by eyes
corrected and subdued. ’I have more understanding
than my teachers, for Thy testimonies,’ O Lord,
’are my study; I am wiser than the aged, because
I keep Thy commandments.’”
We may sometimes hear men say, “How
do you know that the Bible is true? You are told
so in Church; your parents believed it; but might they
not be mistaken? and if so, you are mistaken also.”
Now to this objection it maybe answered, and very
satisfactorily, “Is it then nothing toward convincing
us of the truth of the Gospel, that those whom we love
best and reverence most believe it? Is it against
reason to think that they are right, who have considered
the matter most deeply? Do we not receive what
they tell us in other matters, though we cannot prove
the truth of their information; for instance, in matters
of art and science; why then is it irrational to believe
them in religion also? Have not the wisest and
holiest of men been Christians? and have not unbelievers,
on the contrary, been very generally signal instances
of pride, discontent, and profligacy? Again,
are not the principles of unbelief certain to dissolve
human society? and is not this plain fact, candidly
considered, enough to show that unbelief cannot be
a right condition of our nature? for who can believe
that we were intended to live in anarchy? If
we have no good reason for believing, at least we
have no good reason for disbelieving. If you
ask why we are Christians, we ask in turn, Why should
we not be Christians? it will be enough to remain
where we are, till you do what you never can do prove
to us for certain, that the Gospel is not Divine; it
is enough for us to be on the side of good men, to
be under the feet of the Saints, to ’go our
way forth by the footsteps of the flock, and to feed
our kids beside the shepherds’ tent.’”
This would be quite a sufficient answer,
had we nothing else to say; but I will give another,
and that in connexion with the text; I will show you
that the most unlearned Christian may have a very real
and substantial argument, an intimate token, of the
truth of the Gospel, quite independent of the authority
of his parents and teachers; nay, that were all the
world, even were his teachers, to tell him that religion
was a dream, still he would have a good reason for
believing it true.
This reason, I say, is contained in
the text “I have more understanding
than the aged, because I keep Thy commandments.”
By obeying the commands of Scripture, we learn that
these commands really come from God; by trying we
make proof; by doing we come to know. Now how
comes this to pass? It happens in several ways.
1. Consider the Bible tells us
to be meek, humble, single-hearted, and teachable.
Now, it is plain that humility and teachableness are
qualities of mind necessary for arriving at the truth
in any subject, and in religious matters as well as
others. By obeying Scripture, then, in practising
humility and teachableness, it is evident we are at
least in the way to arrive at the knowledge
of God. On the other hand, impatient, proud,
self-confident, obstinate men, are generally wrong
in the opinions they form of persons and things.
Prejudice and self-conceit blind the eyes and mislead
the judgment, whatever be the subject inquired into.
For instance, how often do men mistake the characters
and misconstrue the actions of others! how often are
they deceived in them! how often do the young form
acquaintances injurious to their comfort and good!
how often do men embark in foolish and ruinous schemes!
how often do they squander their money, and destroy
their worldly prospects! And what, I ask, is
so frequent a cause of these many errors as wilfulness
and presumption? The same thing happens also
in religious inquiries. When I see a person hasty
and violent, harsh and high-minded, careless of what
others feel, and disdainful of what they think, when
I see such a one proceeding to inquire into religious
subjects, I am sure beforehand he cannot go right he
will not be led into all the truth it is
contrary to the nature of things and the experience
of the world, that he should find what he is seeking.
I should say the same were he seeking to find out
what to believe or do in any other matter not religious, but
especially in any such important and solemn inquiry;
for the fear of the Lord (humbleness, teachableness,
reverence towards Him) is the very beginning
of wisdom, as Solomon tells us; it leads us to think
over things modestly and honestly, to examine patiently,
to bear doubt and uncertainty, to wait perseveringly
for an increase of light, to be slow to speak, and
to be deliberate in deciding.
2. Consider, in the next place,
that those who are trained carefully according to
the precepts of Scripture, gain an elevation, a delicacy,
refinement, and sanctity of mind, which is most necessary
for judging fairly of the truth of Scripture.
A man who loves sin does not wish
the Gospel to be true, and therefore is not a fair
judge of it; a mere man of the world, a selfish and
covetous man, or a drunkard, or an extortioner, is,
from a sense of interest, against that Bible which
condemns him, and would account that man indeed a
messenger of good tidings of peace who could prove
to him that Christ’s doctrine was not from God.
“Every one that doeth evil hateth the light,
neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should
be reproved.” I do not mean to say
that such men necessarily reject the word of God,
as if we could dare to conclude that all who do not
reject it are therefore sure to be not covetous, drunkards,
extortioners, and the like; for it is often a man’s
interest not openly to reject it, though it be against
him; and the bulk of men are inconsistent, and have
some good feelings left, even amid their sins and
vices, which keep them from going all lengths.
But, while they still profess to honour, at least
they try to pervert and misinterpret Scripture, and
that comes to the same thing. They try to persuade
themselves that Christ will save them, though they
continue in sin; or they wish to believe that future
punishment will not last for ever; or they conceive
that their good deeds or habits, few and miserable
as they are at best, will make up for the sins of
which they are too conscious. Whereas such men
as have been taught betimes to work with God their
Saviour in ruling their hearts, and curbing
their sinful passions, and changing their wills though
they are still sinners, have not within them that
treacherous enemy of the truth which misleads the
judgments of irreligious men.
Here, then, are two very good reasons
at first sight, why men who obey the Scripture precepts
are more likely to arrive at religious truth, than
those who neglect them; first, because such men are
teachable men; secondly, because they are pure in
heart; such shall see God, whereas the proud provoke
His anger, and the carnal are His abhorrence.
But to proceed. Consider, moreover,
that those who try to obey God evidently gain a knowledge
of themselves at least; and this may be shown to be
the first and principal step towards knowing God.
For let us suppose a child, under God’s blessing,
profiting by his teacher’s guidance, and trying
to do his duty and please God. He will perceive
that there is much in him which ought not to be in
him. His own natural sense of right and wrong
tells him that peevishness, sullenness, deceit, and
self-will, are tempers and principles of which he
has cause to be ashamed, and he feels that these bad
tempers and principles are in his heart. As
he grows older, he will understand this more and more.
Wishing, then, and striving to act up to the law
of conscience, he will yet find that, with his utmost
efforts, and after his most earnest prayers, he still
falls short of what he knows to be right, and what
he aims at. Conscience, however, being respected,
will become a more powerful and enlightened guide than
before; it will become more refined and hard to please;
and he will understand and perceive more clearly the
distance that exists between his own conduct and thoughts,
and perfection. He will admire and take pleasure
in the holy law of God, of which he reads in Scripture;
but he will be humbled withal, as understanding himself
to be a continual transgressor against it. Thus
he will learn from experience the doctrine of original
sin, before he knows the actual name of it. He
will, in fact, say to himself, what St. Paul describes
all beginners in religion as saying, “What I
would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.
I delight in the law of God after the inward man,
but I see another law in my members, warring against
the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity.
I know that in my flesh dwelleth no good thing.”
The effect of this experience will be to make him
take it for granted, as an elementary truth, that
he cannot gain heaven for himself; to make him feel
himself guilty before God; and to feel, moreover,
that even were he admitted into the Divine presence,
yet, till his heart be (so to say) made over again,
he cannot perfectly enjoy God. This, surely,
is the state of self-knowledge; these are the convictions
to which every one is brought on, who attempts honestly
to obey the precepts of God. I do not mean that
all that I have been saying will necessarily pass
through his mind, and in the same order, or that he
will be conscious of it, or be able to speak of it,
but that on the whole thus he will feel.
When, then, even an unlearned person
thus trained from his own heart, from the
action of his mind upon itself, from struggles with
self, from an attempt to follow those impulses of
his own nature which he feels to be highest and noblest,
from a vivid natural perception (natural, though cherished
and strengthened by prayer, natural, though unfolded
and diversified by practice, natural, though of that
new and second nature which God the Holy Ghost gives),
from an innate, though supernatural perception of
the great vision of Truth which is external to him
(a perception of it, not indeed in its fulness, but
in glimpses, and by fits and seasons, and in its persuasive
influences, and through a courageous following on
after it, as a man in the dark might follow after
some dim and distant light) I say, when
a person thus trained from his own heart, reads the
declarations and promises of the Gospel, are we to
be told that he believes in them merely because he
has been bid believe in them? Do we not see
he has besides this a something in his own breast
which bears a confirming testimony to their truth?
He reads that the heart is “deceitful above
all things and desperately wicked,” and that
he inherits an evil nature from Adam, and that he
is still under its power, except so far as he has been
renewed. Here is a mystery; but his own actual
and too bitter experience bears witness to the truth
of the declaration; he feels the mystery of iniquity
within him. He reads, that “without holiness
no man shall see the Lord;” and his own love
of what is true and lovely and pure, approves and
embraces the doctrine as coming from God. He
reads, that God is angry at sin, and will punish the
sinner, and that it is a hard matter, nay, an impossibility,
for us to appease His wrath. Here, again, is
a mystery: but here, too, his conscience anticipates
the mystery, and convicts him; his mouth is stopped.
And when he goes on to read that the Son of God has
Himself come into the world in our flesh, and died
upon the Cross for us, does he not, amid the awful
mysteriousness of the doctrine, find those words fulfilled
in him which that gracious Saviour uttered, “And
I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all
men unto Me”? He cannot choose but believe
in Him. He says, “O Lord, Thou art stronger
than I, and hast prevailed.”
Here then, I say, he surely possesses
an evidence perfectly distinct from the authority
of superiors and teachers; like St. Paul, he is in
one way not taught of men, “but by the revelation
of Jesus Christ.” Others have but bid
him look within, and pray for God’s grace to
be enabled to know himself; and the more he understands
his own heart, the more are the Gospel doctrines recommended
to his reason. He is assured that Christ does
not speak of Himself, but that His word is from God.
He is ready, with the Samaritan woman, to say to all
around him, “Come, see a man, which told me
all things that ever I did: is not this the Christ?”
Or, again, in the words which the Samaritans of the
same city used to the woman after conversing with
Christ; “Now we believe, not because of thy
saying” (not merely on the authority of friends
and relatives), “for we have heard Him ourselves,
and know that this is indeed the Christ, the Saviour
of the world.”
The Bible, then, seems to say, God
is not a hard master to require belief, without affording
grounds for believing; only follow your own sense
of right, and you will gain from that very obedience
to your Maker, which natural conscience enjoins, a
conviction of the truth and power of that Redeemer
whom a supernatural message has revealed; do but examine
your thoughts and doings; do but attempt what you know
to be God’s will, and you will most assuredly
be led on into all the truth: you will recognize
the force, meaning, and awful graciousness of the
Gospel Creed; you will bear witness to the truth of
one doctrine, by your own past experience of yourselves;
of another, by seeing that it is suited to your necessity;
of a third, by finding it fulfilled upon your obeying
it. As the prophet says, “Bring ye”
your offering “into Mine house,” saith
the Lord, “and prove Me now herewith, if I will
not open you the windows of heaven, and pour you out
a blessing that there shall not be room enough to
receive it.”
My brethren, it is always reasonable
to insist upon these subjects; but it is peculiarly
so in times when a spirit of presumptuous doubting
is in many places abroad. As many of us as live
in the world must expect to hear our faith despised,
and our conscientious obedience ridiculed; we must
expect to be taunted and scorned by those who find
it much easier to attack another’s creed than
to state their own. A little learning is a dangerous
thing. When men think they know more than others,
they often talk for the sake of talking, or to show
their ability (as they think), their shrewdness and
depth; and they speak lightly of the All-Holy God,
to gratify their empty self-conceit and vanity.
And often it answers no purpose to dispute with such
persons; for not having been trained up to obey their
conscience, to restrain their passions, and examine
their hearts, they will assent to nothing you can
say; they will be questioning and arguing about every
thing; they have no common ground with you, and when
they talk of religion they are like blind persons
talking of colours. If you urge how great a
gift it is to be at peace with God, or of the arduousness
and yet desirableness of perfection, or the beauty
of saintliness, or the dangerousness of the world,
or the blessedness of self-control, or the glory of
virginity, or the answers which God gives to prayer,
or the marvellousness and almost miraculousness of
His providences, or the comfort of religion in
affliction, or the strength given you over your passions
in the Most Holy Sacrament, such persons understand
you not at all. They will laugh, they will scoff,
at best they will wonder: any how what you say
is no evidence to them. You cannot convince
them, because you differ from them in first principles;
it is not that they start from the same point as you,
and afterwards strike off in some wayward direction;
but their course is altogether distinct, they have
no point in common with you. For such persons
then you can only pray; God alone can bring down pride,
self-conceit, an arrogant spirit, a presumptuous temper;
God alone can dissipate prejudice; God alone can overcome
flesh and blood. Useful as argument may be for
converting a man, in such cases God seldom condescends
to employ it. Yet, let not such vain or ignorant
reasoners convert you to unbelief in great matters
or little; let them not persuade you, that your faith
is built on the mere teaching of fallible men; do
not you be ridiculed out of your confidence and hope
in Christ. You may, if you will, have an inward
witness arising from obedience: and though you
cannot make them see it, you can see it yourselves,
which is the great thing; and it will be quite sufficient,
with God’s blessing, to keep you stedfast in
the way of life.
Lastly, let me remark how dangerous
their state is who are content to take the truths
of the Gospel on trust, without caring whether or not
those truths are realized in their own heart and conduct.
Such men, when assailed by ridicule and sophistry,
are likely to fall; they have no root in themselves;
and let them be quite sure, that should they fall
away from the faith, it will be a slight thing at the
last day to plead that subtle arguments were used
against them, that they were altogether unprepared
and ignorant, and that their seducers prevailed over
them by the display of some little cleverness and human
knowledge. The inward witness to the truth lodged
in our hearts is a match for the most learned infidel
or sceptic that ever lived: though, to tell the
truth, such men are generally very shallow and weak,
as well as wicked; generally know only a little, pervert
what they know, assume false principles, and distort
or suppress facts: but were they as accomplished
as the very author of evil, the humblest Christian,
armed with sling and stone, and supported by God’s
unseen might, is, as far as his own faith is concerned,
a match for them. And, on the other hand, the
most acute of reasoners and most profound of thinkers,
the most instructed in earthly knowledge, is nothing,
except he has also within him the presence of the
Spirit of truth. Human knowledge, though of
great power when joined to a pure and humble faith,
is of no power when opposed to it, and, after ail,
for the comfort of the individual Christian, it is
of little value.
May we, then, all grow in heavenly
knowledge, and, with that end, labour to improve what
is already given us, be it more or be it less, knowing
that “he that is faithful in little is faithful
also in much,” and that “to him that hath,
more shall be given.”