1571-1451 B.C. [USHER].

Among the great actors in the world’s history must surely be presented the man who gave the first recorded impulse to civilization, and who is the most august character of antiquity.  I think Moses and his legislation should be considered from the standpoint of the Scriptures rather than from that of science and criticism.  It is very true that the legislation and ritualism we have been accustomed to ascribe to Moses are thought by many great modern critics, including Ewald, to be the work of writers whose names are unknown, in the time of Hezekiah and even later, as Jewish literature was developed.  But I remain unconvinced by the modern theories, plausible as they are, and weighty as is their authority; and hence I have presented the greatest man in the history of the Jews as our fathers regarded him, and as the Bible represents him.  Nor is there any subject which bears more directly on the elemental principles of theological belief and practical morality, or is more closely connected with the progress of modern religious and social thought, than a consideration of the Mosaic writings.  Whether as a “man of God,” or as a meditative sage, or as a sacred historian, or as an inspired prophet, or as an heroic liberator and leader of a favored nation, or as a profound and original legislator, Moses alike stands out as a wonderful man, not to the eyes of Jews merely, but to all enlightened nations and ages.  He was evidently raised up for a remarkable and exalted mission, ­not only to deliver a debased and superstitious people from bondage, but to impress his mind and character upon them and upon all other nations, and to link his name with the progress of the human race.

He arose at a great crisis, when a new dynasty reigned in Egypt, ­not friendly, as the preceding one had been, to the children of Israel; but a dynasty which had expelled the Shepherd Kings, and looked with fear and jealousy upon this alien race, already powerful, in sympathy with the old regime, located in the most fertile sections of the land, and acquainted not merely with agriculture, but with the arts of the Egyptians, ­a population of over two millions of souls; so that the reigning monarch, probably a son of the Sesostris of the Greeks, bitterly exclaimed to his courtiers, “The children of Israel are more and mightier than we!” And the consequence of this jealousy was a persecution based on the elemental principle of all persecution, ­that of fear blended with envy, carried out with remorseless severity; for in case of war (and the new dynasty scarcely felt secure on the throne) it was feared the Hebrews might side with enemies.  So the new Pharaoh (Rameses II., as is thought by Rawlinson) attempted to crush their spirit by hard toils and unjust exactions.  And as they still continued to multiply, there came forth the dreadful edict that every male child of the Hebrews should be destroyed as soon as born.

It was then that Moses, descended from a family of the tribe of Levi, was born, ­1571 B.C., according to Usher.  I need not relate in detail the beautiful story of his concealment for three months by his mother Jochebed, his exposure in a basket of papyrus on the banks of the Nile, his rescue by the daughter of Pharaoh, at that time regent of the kingdom in the absence of her father, ­or, as Wilberforce thinks, the wife of the king of Lower Egypt, ­his adoption by this powerful princess, his education in the royal household among those learned priests to whose caste even the King belonged.  Moses himself, a great master of historical composition, has in six verses told that story, with singular pathos and beauty; yet he directly relates nothing further of his life until, at the age of forty, he killed an Egyptian overseer who was smiting one of his oppressed brethren, and buried him in the sands, ­thereby showing that he was indignant at injustice, or clung in his heart to his race of slaves.  But what a history might have been written of those forty years of luxury, study, power, and honor! ­since Josephus speaks of his successful and brilliant exploits as a conqueror of the Ethiopians.  What a career did the son of the Hebrew bondwoman probably lead in the palaces of Memphis, sitting at the monarch’s table, feted as a conqueror, adopted as grandson and perhaps as heir, a proficient in all the learning and arts of the most civilized nation of the earth, enrolled in the college of priests, discoursing with the most accomplished of his peers on the wonders of magical enchantment, the hidden meaning of religious rites, and even the being and attributes of a Supreme God, ­the esoteric wisdom from which even a Pythagoras drew his inspiration; possibly tasting, with generals and nobles, all the pleasures of sin.  But whether in pleasure or honor, the soul of Moses, fortified by the maternal instructions of his early days, ­for his mother was doubtless a good as well as a brave woman, ­soars beyond his circumstances, and he seeks to avenge the wrongs of his brethren.  Not wisely, however, for he slays a government official, and is forced to flee, ­a necessity which we can hardly comprehend in view of his rank and power, unless it revealed all at once to the astonished king his Hebrew birth, and his dangerous sympathies with an oppressed people, the act showing that he may have sought, in his earnest soul, to break their intolerable bonds.

Certainly Moses aspires prematurely to be a deliverer.  He is not yet prepared for such a mighty task.  He is too impulsive and inexperienced.  It must need be that he pass through a period of preparation, learn patience, mature his knowledge, and gain moral force, which preparation could be best made in severe contemplation; for it is in retirement and study that great men forge the weapons which demolish principalities and powers, and master those principia which are the foundation of thrones and empires.  So he retires to the deserts of Midian, among a scattered pastoral people, on the eastern shore of the Red Sea, and is received by Jethro, a priest of Midian, whose flocks he tends, and whose daughter he marries.

The land of Midian, to which he fled, is not fertile like Egypt, nor rich in unnumbered monuments of pride and splendor, with pyramids for mausoleums, and colossal statues to perpetuate kingly memories.  It is not scented with flowers and variegated with landscapes of beauty and fertility, but is for the most part, with here and there a patch of verdure, a land of utter barrenness and dreariness, and, as Hamilton paints it, “a great and terrible wilderness, where no soft features mitigated the unbroken horror, but dark and brown ridges, red peaks like pyramids of fire; no rounded hillocks or soft mountain curves, but monstrous and misshapen cliffs, rising tier above tier, and serrated for miles into rugged grandeur, and grooved by the winter torrents cutting into the veins of the fiery rock:  a land dreary and desolate, yet sublime in its boldness and ruggedness, ­a labyrinth of wild and blasted mountains, a terrific and howling desolation.”

It is here that Moses seeks safety, and finds it in the home of a priest, where his affections may be cultivated, and where he may indulge in lofty speculations and commune with the Elohim whom he adores; isolated yet social, active in body but more active in mind, still fresh in all the learning of the schools of Egypt, and wise in all the experiences of forty years.  And the result of his studies and inspirations was, it is supposed, the book of Genesis, in which he narrates more important events, and reveals more lofty truths than all the historians of Greece unfolded in their collective volumes, ­a marvel of historic art, a model of composition, an immortal work of genius, the oldest and the greatest written history of which we have record.

And surely what poetry, pathos, and eloquence, what simplicity and beauty, what rich and varied lessons of human experience, what treasures of moral wisdom, are revealed in that little book!  How sublimely the poet-prophet narrates the misery of the Fall, and the promised glories of the Restoration!  How concisely the historian compresses the incidents of patriarchal life, the rise of empires, the fall of cities, the certitudes of faith, of friendship, and of love!  All that is vital in the history of thousands of years is condensed into a few chapters, ­not dry and barren annals, but descriptions of character, and the unfolding of emotions and sensibilities, and insight into those principles of moral government which indicate a superintending Power, creating faith in a world of sin, and consolation amid the wreck of matter.

Thus when forty more years are passed in study, in literary composition, in religious meditation, and active duties, in sight of grand and barren mountains, amid affections and simplicities, ­years which must have familiarized him with every road and cattle-drive and sheep-track, every hill and peak, every wady and watercourse, every timber-belt and oasis in the Sinaitic wilderness, through which his providentially trained military instincts were to safely conduct a vast multitude, ­Moses, still strong and laborious, is fitted for his exalted mission as a deliverer.  And now he is directly called by the voice of God himself, amid the wonders of the burning bush, ­Him whom, thus far, he had, like Abraham, adored as the Elohim, the God Almighty, but whom henceforth he recognizes as Jehovah (Jahveh) in His special relations to the Jewish nation, rather than as the general Deity who unites the attributes ascribed to Him as the ruler of the universe.  Moses quakes before that awful voice out of the midst of the bush, which commissions him to deliver his brethren.  He is no longer bold, impetuous, impatient, but timid and modest.  Long study and retirement from the busy haunts of men have made him self-distrustful.  He replies to the great I Am, “Who am I, that I should bring forth the Children of Israel out of Egypt?  Behold, I am not eloquent; they will not believe me, nor hearken to my voice.”  In spite of the miracle of the rod, Moses obeys reluctantly, and Aaron, his elder brother, is appointed as his spokesman.

Armed with the mysterious wonder-working rod, at length Moses and Aaron, as representatives of the Jewish people, appear in the presence of Pharaoh, and in the name of Jehovah request permission for Israel to go and hold a feast in the wilderness.  They do not demand emancipation or emigration, which would of course be denied.  I cannot dwell on the haughty scepticism and obdurate hardness of the King ­“Who is Jehovah, that I should obey his voice?” ­the renewed persecution of the Hebrews, the successive plagues and calamities sent upon Egypt, which the magicians could not explain, and the final extorted and unwilling consent of Pharaoh to permit Israel to worship the God of Moses in the wilderness, lest greater evils should befall him than the destruction of the first-born throughout the land.

The deliverance of a nation of slaves is at last, it would seem, miraculously effected; and then begins the third period of the life of Moses, as the leader and governor of these superstitious, sensual, idolatrous, degraded slaves.  Then begin the real labors and trials of Moses; for the people murmur, and are consumed with fears as soon as they have crossed the sea, and find themselves in the wilderness.  And their unbelief and impatience are scarcely lessened by the tremendous miracle of the submersion of the pursuing host, and all successive miracles, ­the mysterious manna, the pillar of cloud and of fire, the smitten rock at Horeb, and the still more impressive and awful wonders of Sinai.

The guidance of the Israelites during these forty years in the wilderness is marked by transcendent ability on the part of Moses, and by the most disgraceful conduct on the part of the Israelites.  They are forgetful of mercies, ungrateful, rebellious, childish in their hankerings for a country where they had been more oppressed than Spartan Helots, idolatrous, and superstitious.  They murmur for flesh to eat; they make golden calves to worship; they seek a new leader when Moses is longer on the Mount than they expect.  When any new danger threatens they lay the blame on Moses; they even foolishly regret that they had not died in Egypt.

Obviously such a people were not fit for freedom, or even for the conquest of the promised land.  They were as timid and cowardly as they were rebellious.  Even the picked men sent out to explore Canaan, with the exception of Caleb and Joshua, reported nations of giants impossible to subdue.  A new generation must arise, disciplined by forty years’ experience, made hardy and strong by exposure and suffering.  Yet what nation, in the world’s history, ever improved so much in forty years?  What ruler ever did so much for a people in a single reign?  This abject race of slaves in forty years was transformed into a nation of valiant warriors, made subject to law and familiar with the fundamental principles of civilization.  What a marvellous change, effected by the genius and wisdom of one man, in communion with Almighty power!

But the distinguishing labor of Moses during these forty years, by which he linked his name with all subsequent ages, and became the greatest benefactor of mind the world has seen until Christ, was his system of Jurisprudence.  It is this which especially demands our notice, and hence will form the main subject of this lecture.

In reviewing the Mosaic legislation, we notice both those ordinances which are based on immutable truth for the rule of all nations to the end of time, and those prescribed for the peculiar situation and exigencies of the Jews as a theocratic state, isolated from other nations.

The moral code of Moses, by far the most important and universally accepted, rests on the fundamental principles of theology and morality.  How lofty, how impressive, how solemn this code!  How it appeals at once to the consciousness of all minds in every age and nation, producing convictions that no sophistry can weaken, binding the conscience with irresistible and terrific bonds, ­those immortal Ten Commandments, engraven on the two tables of stone, and preserved in the holy and innermost sanctuary of the Jews, yet reappearing in all their literature, accepted and reaffirmed by Christ, entering into the religious system of every nation that has received them, and forming the cardinal principles of all theological belief!  Yet it was by Moses that these Commandments came.  He is the first, the favored man, commissioned by God to declare to the world, clearly and authoritatively, His supreme power and majesty, whom alone all nations and tribes and people are to worship to remotest generations.  In it he fearfully exposes the sin of idolatry, to which all nations are prone, ­the one sin which the Almighty visits with such dreadful penalties, since this involves, and implies logically, rebellion against Him, the supreme ruler of the universe, and disloyalty to Him as a personal sovereign, in whatever form this idolatry may appear, whether in graven images of tutelary deities, or in the worship of Nature (ever blind and indefinite), or in the exaltation of self, in the varied search for pleasure, ambition, or wealth, to which the debased soul bows down with grovelling instincts, and in the pursuit of which the soul forgets its higher destiny and its paramount obligations.  Moses is the first to expose with terrific force and solemn earnestness this universal tendency to the oblivion of the One God amid the temptations, the pleasures, and the glories of the world, and the certain displeasure of the universal sovereign which must follow, as seen in the fall of empires and the misery of individuals from his time to ours, the uniform doom of people and nations, whatever the special form of idolatry, whenever it reaches a peculiar fulness and development, ­the ultimate law of all decline and ruin, from which there is no escape, “for the Lord God is a jealous God, visiting the iniquities of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation.”  So sacred and awful is this controlling Deity, that it is made a cardinal sin even to utter His name in vain, in levity or blasphemy.  In order also to keep Him before the minds of men, a day is especially appointed ­one in seven ­which it is the bounden duty as well as privilege of all generations to keep with peculiar sanctity, ­a day of rest from labor as well as of adoration; an entirely new institution, which no Pagan nation, and no other ancient nation, ever recognized.  After thus laying solemn injunctions upon all men to render supreme allegiance to this personal God, ­for we can find no better word, although Matthew Arnold calls it “the Power which maketh for righteousness,” ­Moses presents the duties of men to each other, chiefly those which pertain to the abstaining from injuries they are most tempted to commit, extending to the innermost feelings of the heart, for “thou shalt not covet anything which is thy neighbor’s;” thus covering, in a few sentences, the primal obligations of mankind to God and to society, afterward expanded by a greater teacher into the more comprehensive law of Love, which is to bind together mortals on earth, as it binds together immortals in heaven.

All Christian nations have accepted these Ten Commandments, even Mohammedan nations, as appealing to the universal conscience, ­not a mere Jewish code, but a primary law, susceptible of boundless obligation, never to be abrogated; a direct injunction of the Almighty to the end of time.

The Ten Commandments seem to be the foundation of the subsequent and more minute code which Moses gave to the Jews; and it is interesting to see how its great principles have entered, more or less, into the laws of Christian nations from the decline of the Roman Empire, into the Theodosian code, the laws of Charlemagne, of Ina, of Alfred, and especially into the institutions of the Puritans, and of all other sects and parties wherever the Bible is studied and revered.  They seem to be designed not merely for Jews, but for Gentiles also, since there is no escape from their obligation.  They may seem severe in some of their applications, but never unjust; and as long as the world endures, the relations between man and man are to be settled on lofty moral grounds.  An elevated morality is the professed aim of all enlightened lawgivers; and the prosperity of nations is built upon it, for it is righteousness which exalteth them.  Culture is desirable; but the welfare of nations is based on morals rather than on aesthetics.  On this point Moses, or even Epictetus, is a greater authority than Goethe.  All the ordinances of Moses tend to this end.  They are the publication of natural religion, ­that God is a rewarder of virtuous actions, and punishes wicked deeds.  Moses, from first to last, insists imperatively on the doctrine of personal responsibility to God, which doctrine is the logical sequence of belief in Him as the moral governor of the world.  And in enforcing this cardinal truth he is dogmatic and dictatorial, as a prophet and ambassador of the Most High should be.

It is a waste of time to use arguments in the teaching of the primal principles which appeal to consciousness; and I am not certain but that elaborate and metaphysical reasoning on the nature and attributes of God weakens rather than strengthens the belief in Him, since He is a power made known by revelation, and received and accepted by the soul at once, if received at all.  Among the earliest noticeable corruptions of the Church was the introduction of Greek philosophy to harmonize and reconcile with it the truths of the gospel, which to a certain class ever have been, and ever will be, foolishness.  The speculations and metaphysics of theologians, I verily believe, have done more harm than good, ­from Athanasius to Jonathan Edwards, ­whenever they have brought the aid of finite reason to support the ultimate truths declared by an infinite and almighty mind.  Moses does not reason, nor speculate, nor refine; he affirms, and appeals to the law written on the heart, ­to the consciousness of mankind.  What he declares to be duties are not even to be discussed.  They are to be obeyed with unhesitating obedience, since no discussion or argument can make them clearer or more imperative.  The obligation to obey them is seen and felt at once, as soon as they are declared.  What he says in regard to the relations of master and servant; to injuries inflicted on the body; to the respect due to parents; to the protection of the widow, the fatherless, and the unfortunate; to delicacy in the treatment of women; to unjust judgments; to bribery and corruption; to revenge, hatred, and covetousness; to falsehood and tale-bearing; to unchastity, theft, murder, and adultery, ­can never be gainsaid, and would have been accepted by Roman jurists as readily as by modern legislators; yea, they would not be disputed by savages, if they acknowledged a God at all.  The elevated morality of the ethical code of Moses is its most striking feature, since it appeals to the universal heart, and does not conflict with some of the ethical teachings of those great lights of the Pagan world to whose consciousness God has been revealed.  Moses differs from them only in the completion and scope and elevation of his system, and in its freedom from the puerilities and superstitions which they blended with their truths, and from which he was emancipated by inspiration.  Brahma and Confucius and Socrates taught some great truths which Moses would accept, but they taught errors likewise.  He taught no errors, though he permitted some sins which in the beginning did not exist, ­such, for instance, as polygamy.  Christ came not to destroy his law, but to fulfil it and complete it.  In two things especially, how emphatic his teaching and how permanent his influence! ­in respect to the observance of the Sabbath and the relations of the sexes.  To him, more than to any man in the world’s history, do we owe the elevation of woman, and the sanctity and blessing of a day of rest.  In the awful sacredness of the person, and in the regular resort to the sanctuary of God, we see his immortal authority and his permanent influence.

The other laws which Moses promulgated are more special and minute, and seem to be intended to preserve the Jews from idolatry, the peculiar sin of the surrounding nations; and also, more directly, to keep alive the recognition of a theocratic government.

Thus the ceremonial or ritualistic law ­an important part of the Mosaic Code ­constantly points to Jehovah as the King of the Jews, as well as their Supreme Deity, for whose worship the rites and ceremonies are devised with great minuteness, to keep His personality constantly before their minds.  Moreover, all their rites and ceremonies were typical and emblematical of the promised Saviour who was to arise; in a more emphatic sense their King, and not merely their own Messiah, but the Redeemer of the whole race, who should reign finally as King of kings and Lord of lords.  And hence these rites and sacrifices, typical of Him who should offer Himself as a sacrifice for the sins of the world, are not supposed to be binding on other nations after the great sacrifice has been made, and the law of Moses has been fulfilled by Jesus and the new dispensation has been established.  We see a complicated and imposing service, with psalms and hymns, and beautiful robes, and smoking altars, ­all that could inspire awe and reverence.  We behold a blazing tabernacle of gold and silver and precious woods and gorgeous tapestries, with inner and secret recesses to contain the ark and the tables of stone, the mysterious rod, the urn of manna, the book of the covenant, the golden throne over-canopied by cherubs with outstretched wings, and the mercy-seat for the Shekinah who sat between the cherubim.  The sacred and costly vessels, the candlesticks of pure and beaten gold, the lamps, the brazen sea, the embroidered vestments of the priests, the breastplate of precious stones, the golden chains, the emblematic rings, the éphods and mitres and girdles, the various altars for sacrifice, the burnt-offerings, peace-offerings, meat-offerings, and sin-offerings, the consecrated cakes and animals for sacrifice, the rites for cleansing leprosy and all uncleanliness, the grand atonements and solemn fasts and festivals, ­all were calculated to make a strong impression on a superstitious people.  The rites and ceremonies of the Jews were so attractive that they made up for all other amusements and spectacles; they answered the purpose of the Gothic churches and cathedrals of Europe in the Middle Ages, when these were the chief attractions of the period.  There is nothing absurd in ritualism among ignorant and superstitious people, who are ever most easily impressed through their senses and imagination.  It was the wisdom of the Middle Ages, ­the device of popes and bishops and abbots to attract and influence the people.  But ritualism ­useful in certain ages and circumstances, certainly in its most imposing forms, if I may say it ­does not seem to be one of the peculiarities of enlightened ages; even the ritualism of the wilderness lost much of its hold upon the Jews themselves after their captivity, and still more when Greek and Roman civilization had penetrated to Jerusalem.  The people who listened to Peter and Paul could no longer be moved by imposing rites, even as the European nations ­under the preaching of Luther, Knox, and Latimer ­lost all relish for the ceremonies of the Middle Ages.  What, then, are we to think of the revival of observances which lost their force three hundred years ago, unless connected with artistic music?  It is music which vitalizes ritualistic worship in our times, as it did in the times of David and Solomon.  The vitality of the Jewish ritual, when the nation had emerged from barbarism, was in its connections with a magnificent psalmody.  The Psalms of David appeal to the heart and not to the senses.  The ritualism of the wilderness appealed to the senses and not to the heart; and this was necessary when the people had scarcely emerged from barbarism, even as it was deemed necessary amid the turbulence and ignorance of the tenth century.

In the ritualism which Moses established there was the absence of everything which would recall the superstitions and rites, or even the doctrines, of the Egyptians.  In view of this, we account partially for the almost studied reticence in respect to a future state, upon which hinged many of the peculiarities of Egyptian worship.  It would have been difficult for Moses to have recognized the future state, in the degrading ignorance and sensualism of the Jews, without associating with it the tutelary deities of the Egyptians and all the absurdities connected with the doctrine of metempsychosis, which consigned the victims of future punishment to enter the forms of disgusting and hideous animals, thereby blending with the sublime doctrine of a future state the most degrading superstitions.  Bishop Warburton seizes on the silence of Moses respecting a future state to prove, by a learned yet sophistical argument, his divine legation, because he ignored what so essentially entered into the religion of Egypt.  But whether Moses purposely ignored this great truth for fear it would be perverted, or because it was a part of the Egyptian economy which he wished his people to forget, still it is also possible that this doctrine of immortality was so deeply engraved on the minds of the people that there was no need to recognize it while giving a system of ritualistic observances.  The comparative silence of the Old Testament concerning immortality is one of its most impressive mysteries.  However dimly shadowed by Job and David and Isaiah, it seems to have been brought to light only by the gospel.  There is more in the writings of Plato and Cicero about immortality than in the whole of the Old Testament, And this fact is so remarkable, that some trace to the sages of Greece and Egypt the doctrine itself, as ordinarily understood; that is, a necessary existence of the soul after death.  And they fortify themselves with those declarations of the apostles which represent a happy immortality as the special gift of God, ­not a necessary existence, but given only to those who obey his laws.  If immortality be not a gift, but a necessary existence, as Socrates supposed, it seems strange that heathen philosophers should have speculated more profoundly than the patriarchs of the East on this mysterious subject.  We cannot suppose that Plato was more profoundly instructed on such a subject than Abraham and Moses.  It is to be noted, however, that God seems to have chosen different races for various missions in the education of his children.  As Saint Paul puts it, “There are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit,... diversities of workings, but the same God who worketh in all.”  The Hebrew genius was that of discerning and declaring moral and spiritual truth; while that of the Greeks was essentially philosophic and speculative, searching into the reasons and causes of existing phenomena.  And it is possible, after all, that the loftiest of the Greek philosophers derived their opinions from those who had been admitted to the secret schools of Egypt, where it is probable that the traditions of primitive ages were preserved, and only communicated to a chosen few; for the ancient schools were esoteric and not popular.  The great masters of knowledge believed one thing and the people another.  The popular religion was always held in contempt by the wise in all countries, although upheld by them in external rites and emblems and sacrifices, from patriotic purposes.  The last act of Socrates was to sacrifice a cock to Esculapius, with a different meaning from that which was understood by the people.

The social and civil code of Moses seems to have had primary reference to the necessary isolation of the Jews, to keep them from the abominations of other nations, and especially idolatry, and even to make them repulsive and disagreeable to foreigners, in order to keep them a peculiar people.  The Jew wore an uncouth dress.  When he visited strangers he abstained from their customs, and even meats.  When a stranger visited the Jew he was compelled to submit to Jewish restraints.  So that the Jew ever seems uncourteous, narrow, obstinate, and grotesque:  even as others appeared to him to be pagan and unclean.  Moses lays down laws best calculated to keep the nation separated and esoteric; but there is marvellous wisdom in those which were directed to the development of national resources and general prosperity in an isolated state.  The nation was made strong for defence, not for aggression.  It must depend upon its militia, and not on horses and chariots, which are designed for distant expeditions, for the pomp of kings, for offensive war, and military aggrandizement.  The legislation of Moses recognized the peaceful virtues rather than the warlike, ­agricultural industry, the network of trades and professions, manufacturing skill, production, not waste and destruction.  He discouraged commerce, not because it was in itself demoralizing, but because it brought the Jews too much in contact with corrupt nations.  And he closely defined political power, and divided it among different magistrates, instituting a wise balance which would do credit to modern legislation.  He gave dignity to the people by making them the ultimate source of authority, next to the authority of God.  He instituted legislative assemblies to discuss peace and war, and elect the great officers of state.  While he made the Church support the State, and the State the Church, yet he separated civil power from the religious, as Calvin did at Geneva.  The functions of the priest and the functions of the magistrate were made forever distinct, ­a radical change from the polity of Egypt, where kings were priests, and priests were civil rulers as well as a literary class; a predominating power to whom all vital interests were intrusted.  The kingly power among the Jews was checked and hedged by other powers, so that an overgrown tyranny was difficult and unusual.  But above all kingly and priestly power was the power of the Invisible King, to whom the judges and monarchs and supreme magistrates were responsible, as simply His delegates and vicegerents.  Upon Him alone the Jews were to rely in all crises of danger; in Him alone was help.  And it is remarkable that whenever Jewish rulers relied on chariots and horses and foreign allies, they were delivered into the hands of their enemies.  It was only when they fell back upon the protecting arms of their Eternal Lord that they were rescued and saved.  The mightiest monarch ruled only with delegated powers from Him; and it was the memorable loyalty of David to his King which kept him on the throne, as it was self-reliance ­the exhibition of independent power ­which caused the sceptre to depart from Saul.

I cannot dwell on the humanity and wisdom which marked the social economy of the Jews, as given by Moses, ­in the treatment of slaves (emancipated every fifty years), in the sanctity of human life, in the liberation of debtors every seven years, in kindness to the poor (who were allowed to glean the fields), in the education of the people, in the division of inherited property, in the inaliénation of paternal inheritances, in the discouragement of all luxury and extravagance, in those regulations which made disproportionate fortunes difficult, the vast accumulation of which was one of the main causes of the decline of the Roman Empire, and is now one of the most threatening evils of modern civilization.  All the civil and social laws of the Jewish commonwealth tended to the elevation of woman and the cultivation of domestic life.  What virtues were gradually developed among those sensual slaves whom Moses led through the desert!  In what ancient nation were seen such respect to parents, such fidelity to husbands, such charming delights of home, such beautiful simplicities, such ardent loves, such glorious friendships, such regard to the happiness of others!

Such, in brief, was the great work which Moses performed, the marvellous legislation which he gave to the Israelites, involving principles accepted by the Christian world in every age of its history.  Now, whence had this man this wisdom?  Was it the result of his studies and reflections and experiences, or was it a wisdom supernaturally taught him by the Almighty?  On the solution of this inquiry into the divine legation of Moses hang momentous issues.  It is too grand and important an inquiry to be disregarded by any one who studies the writings of Moses; it is too suggestive a subject to be passed over even in a literary discourse, for this age is grappling with it in most earnest struggles.  No matter whether or not Moses was gifted in a most extraordinary degree to write his code.  Nobody doubts his transcendent genius; nobody doubts his wonderful preparation.  If any uninspired man could have written it, doubtless it was he.  It was the most learned and accomplished of the apostles who was selected to be the expounder of the gospel among the Gentiles; so it was the ablest man born among the Jews who was chosen to give them a national polity.  Nor does it detract from his fame as a man of genius that he did not originate the most profound of his declarations.  It was fame enough to be the oracle and prophet of Jehovah.  I would not dishonor the source of all wisdom, even to magnify the abilities of a great man, fond as critics are of exalting the wisdom of Moses as a triumph of human genius.  It is natural to worship strength, human or divine.  We adore mind; we glorify oracles.  But neither written history nor philosophy will support the work of Moses as a wonder of mere human intellect, without ignoring the declarations of Moses himself and the settled belief of all Christian ages.

It is not my object to make an argument in defence of the divine legation of Moses; nor is it my design to reply to the learned criticisms of those who doubt or deny his statements.  I would not run a-tilt against modern science, which may hereafter explain and accept what it now rejects.  Science ­whether physical or metaphysical ­has its great truths, and so has Revelation; the realm of each is distinct while yet their processes are incomplete:  and it is the hope and firm belief of many God-fearing scientists that the patient, reverent searching of to-day into God’s works, of matter and of mind, as it collects the myriad facts and classifies them into such orderly sequences as indicate the laws of their being, will confirm to men’s reason their faith in the revealed Word.  Certainly this is a consummation devoutly to be wished.  I am not scientist enough to judge of its probability, but it is within my province to present a few deductions which can be fairly drawn from the denial of the inspiration of the Mosaic Code.  I wish to show to what conclusions this denial logically leads.

We must remember that Moses himself most distinctly and most emphatically affirms his own divine legation; for is not almost every chapter prefaced with these remarkable words, “And the Lord spake unto Moses”?  Jehovah himself, in some incomprehensible way, amid the lightnings and the wonders of the sacred Mount, communicated His wisdom.  Now, if we disbelieve this direct and impressive affirmation made by Moses, ­that Jehovah directed him what to say to the people he was called to govern, ­why should we believe his other statements, which involve supernatural agency or influence pertaining to the early history of the race?  Where, then, is his authority?  What is it worth?  He has indeed no authority at all, except so far as his statements harmonize with our own definite knowledge, and perhaps with scientific speculations.  We then make our own reason and knowledge, not the declarations of Moses, the ultimate authority.  As a divine oracle to us, his voice is silent; ay, his august voice is drowned by the discordant and contradictory opinions that are ever blended with the speculations of the schools.  He tells us, in language of the most impressive simplicity and grandeur, that he was directly instructed and commissioned by Jehovah to communicate moral truths, ­truths, we should remember, which no one before him is known to have uttered, and truths so important that the prosperity of nations is identified with them, and will be so identified as long as men shall speculate and dream.  If we deny this testimony, then his narration of other facts, which we accept, is not to be fully credited; like other ancient histories, it may be and it may not be true, ­but there is no certainty.  However we may interpret his detailed narration of the genesis of our world and our race, ­whether as chronicle or as symbolic poem, ­its central theme and thought, the direct creative agency of Jehovah, which it was his privilege to announce, stands forth clear and unmistakable.  Yet if we deny the supernaturalism of the code, we may also deny the supernaturalism of the creation, in so far as both rest on the authority of Moses.

And, further, if Moses was not inspired directly from God to write his code, then it follows that he ­a man pre-eminent for wisdom, piety, and knowledge ­was an impostor, or at least, like Mohammed and George Fox, a self-deceived and visionary man, since he himself affirms his divine legation, and traces to the direct agency of Jehovah not merely his code, but even the various deliverances of the Israelites.  And not only was Moses mistaken, but the Jewish nation, and Christ and the apostles, and the greatest lights of the Church from Augustine to Bossuet.

Hence it follows necessarily that all the miracles by which the divine legation of Moses is supported and credited, have no firm foundation, and a belief in them is superstitious, ­as indeed it is in all other miracles recorded in the Scriptures, since they rest on testimony no more firmly believed than that believed by Christ and the apostles respecting Moses.  Sweep away his authority as an inspiration, and you undermine the whole authority of the Bible; you bring it down to the level of all other books; you make it valuable only as a thesaurus of interesting stories and impressive moral truths, which we accept as we do all other kinds of knowledge, leaving us free to reject what we cannot understand or appreciate, or even what we dislike.

Then what follows?  Is it not the rejection of many of the most precious revelations of the Bible, to which we wish to cling, and without a belief in which there would be the old despair of Paganism, the dreary unsettlement of all religious opinions, even a disbelief in an intelligent First Cause of the universe, certainly of a personal God, ­and thus a gradual drifting away to the dismal shores of that godless Epicureanism which Socrates derided, and Paul and Augustine combated?  Do you ask for a confirmation of the truths thus deduced from the denial of the supernaturalism of the Mosaic Code?  I ask you to look around.  I call no names; I invoke no theological hatreds; I seek to inflame no prejudices.  I appeal to facts as incontrovertible as the phenomena of the heavens.  I stand on the platform of truth itself, which we all seek to know and are proud to confess.  Look to the developments of modern thought, to some of the speculations of modern science, to the spirit which animates much of our popular literature, not in our country but in all countries, even in the schools of the prophets and among men who are “more advanced,” as they think, in learning, and if you do not see a tendency to the revival of an attractive but exploded philosophy, ­the philosophy of Democritus; the philosophy of Epicurus, ­then I am in an error as to the signs of the times.  But if I am correct in this position, ­if scepticism, or rationalism, or pantheism, or even science, in the audacity of its denials, or all these combined, are in conflict with the supernaturalism which shines and glows in every book of the Bible, and are bringing back for our acceptance what our fathers scorned, ­then we must be allowed to show the practical results, the results on life, which of necessity followed the triumph of the speculative opinions of the popular idols of the ancient world in the realm of thought.  Oh, what a life was that! what a poor exchange for the certitudes of faith and the simplicities of patriarchal times!  I do not know whether an Epicurean philosophy grows out of an Epicurean life, or the life from the philosophy; but both are indissolubly and logically connected.  The triumph of one is the triumph of the other, and the triumph of both is equally pointed out in the writings of Paul as a degeneracy, a misfortune, ­yea, a sin to be wiped out only by the destruction of nations, or some terrible and unexpected catastrophe, and the obscuration of all that is glorious and proud among the works of men.

I make these, as I conceive, necessary digressions, because a discourse on Moses would be pointless without them; at best only a survey of that marvellous and favored legislator from the standpoint of secular history.  I would not pull him down from the lofty pedestal whence he has given laws to all successive generations; a man, indeed, but shrouded in those awful mysteries which the great soul of Michael Angelo loved to ponder, and which gave to his creations the power of supernal majesty.

Thus did Moses, instructed by God, ­for this is the great fact revealed in his testimony, ­lead the inconstant Israelites through a forty years’ pilgrimage, securing their veneration to the last.  Thus did he keep them from the idolâtries for which they hankered, and preserved among them allegiance to an invisible King.  Thus did he impress his own mind and character upon them, and shape their institutions with matchless wisdom.  Thus did he give them a system of laws ­moral, ceremonial, and civil ­which kept them a powerful and peculiar people for more than a thousand years, and secured a prosperity which culminated in the glorious reigns of David and Solomon and a political power unsurpassed in Western Asia, to see which the Queen of Sheba came from the uttermost part of the earth, ­nay, more, which first formulated for that little corner of the world principles and precepts concerning the relations of men to God and to one another which have been an inspiration to all mankind for thousands of years.

Thus did this good and great man fulfil his task and deliver his message, with no other drawbacks on his part than occasional bursts of anger at the unparalleled folly and wickedness of his people.  What disinterestedness marks his whole career, from the time when he flies from Pharaoh to the appointment of his successor, relinquishing without regret the virtual government of Egypt, accepting cheerfully the austerities and privations of the land of Midian, never elevating his own family to power, never complaining in his herculean tasks!  With what eloquence does he plead for his people when the anger of the Lord is kindled against them, ever regarding them as mere children who know no self-control!  How patient he is in the performance of his duties, accepting counsel from Jethro and listening to the voice of Aaron!  With what stern and awful majesty does he lay down the law!  What inspiration gilds his features as he descends the Mount with the Tables in his hands!  How terrible he is amid the thunders and lightnings of Sinai, at the rock of Horeb, at the dances around the golden calf, at the rebellion of Korah and Dathan, at the waters of Meribah, at the burning of Nadab and Abihu!  How efficient he is in the administration of justice, in the assemblies of the people, in the great councils of rulers and princes, and in all the crises of the State; and yet how gentle, forgiving, tender, and accessible!  How sad he is when the people weary of manna and seek flesh to eat!  How nobly does he plead with the king of Edom for a passage through his territories!  How humbly does he call on God for help amid perplexing cares!  Never was a man armed with such authority so patient and so self-distrustful.  Never was so experienced and learned a man so little conscious of his greatness.

     “This was the truest warrior
        That ever buckled sword;
      This the most gifted poet
        That ever breathed a word: 
      And never earth’s philosopher
        Traced with his golden pen,
      On the deathless page, truths half so sage,
        As he wrote down for men.”

At length ­at one hundred and twenty years of age, with undimmed eye and unabated strength, after having done more for his nation and for posterity than any ruler or king in the world’s history, and won a fame which shall last through all the generations of men, growing brighter and brighter as his vast labors and genius are appreciated ­the time comes to lay down his burdens.  So he assembles together the princes and elders of Israel, recapitulates his laws, enumerates the mercies of the God to whom he has ever been loyal, and gives his final instructions.  He appoints Joshua as his successor, adds words of encouragement to the people, whom he so fervently loves, sings his final song, and ascends the mountain above the plains of Moab, from which he is permitted to see, but not to enter, the promised land; not pensive and sad like Godfrey, because he cannot enter Jerusalem, but full of joyous visions of the future glories of his nation, and breaking out in the language of exultation, “Who is like unto thee, O people saved by Jehovah, the shield of thy help and the sword of thy excellency!” So Moses, the like of whom no prophet has since arisen (except that later One whom he himself foretold), the greatest man in Jewish annals, passes away from mortal sight, and Jehovah buries him in a valley of the land of Moab, and no man knoweth his sepulchre until this day.

     “That was the grandest funeral
        That ever passed on earth;
      But no one heard the trampling,
        Or saw the train go forth, ­
      Perchance the bald old eagle
        On gray Bethpeor’s height,
      Out of his lonely eyrie
        Looked on the wondrous sight.”

     “And had he not high honor ­
        The hillside for a pall ­
      To lie in state, while angels wait
        With stars for tapers tall;
      And the dark rock-pines, like tossing plumes,
        Over his bier to wave,
      And God’s own hand, in that lonely land,
        To lay him in the grave?”

     “O lonely grave in Moab’s land! 
        O dark Bethpeor’s hill! 
      Speak to these curious hearts of ours,
        And teach them to be still! 
      God hath his mysteries of grace,
        Ways that we cannot tell;
      He hides them deep, like the hidden sleep
        Of him he loved so well.”