JESUS DISCUSSED IN JERUSALEM
“And after these things Jesus
walked in Galilee: for He would not walk
in Judaea, because the Jews sought to kill Him.
Now the feast of the Jews, the feast of tabernacles,
was at hand. His brethren therefore said
unto Him, Depart hence, and go into Judaea, that Thy
disciples also may behold Thy works which Thou
doest. For no man doeth anything in secret,
and himself seeketh to be known openly. If Thou
doest these things, manifest Thyself to the world.
For even His brethren did not believe on Him.
Jesus therefore saith unto them, My time is not
yet come; but your time is alway ready. The world
cannot hate you; but Me it hateth, because I testify
of it, that its works are evil. Go ye up
unto the feast: I go not up yet unto this feast;
because My time is not yet fulfilled. And
having said these things unto them, He abode still
in Galilee. But when His brethren were gone
up unto the feast, then went He also up, not publicly,
but as it were in secret. The Jews therefore
sought Him at the feast, and said, Where is He?
And there was much murmuring among the multitudes
concerning Him: some said, He is a good man;
others said, Not so, but He leadeth the multitude
astray. Howbeit no man spoke openly of Him
for fear of the Jews. But when it was now the
midst of the feast Jesus went up into the temple,
and taught. The Jews therefore marvelled,
saying, How knoweth this man letters, having never
learned? Jesus therefore answered them, and
said, My teaching is not Mine but His that sent
Me. If any man willeth to do His will he shall
know of the teaching, whether it be of God, or whether
I speak from Myself. He that speaketh from
himself seeketh his own glory: but he that
seeketh the glory of him that sent him, the same is
true, and no unrighteousness is in him. Did
not Moses give you the law, and yet none of you
doeth the law? Why seek ye to kill Me? The
multitude answered, Thou hast a devil: who
seeketh to kill Thee? Jesus answered and
said unto them, I did one work, and ye all marvel.
For this cause hath Moses given you circumcision (not
that it is of Moses, but of the fathers); and
on the Sabbath ye circumcise a man. If a
man receiveth circumcision on the Sabbath, that
the law of Moses may not be broken; are ye wroth with
Me, because I made a man every whit whole on the
Sabbath? Judge not according to appearance,
but judge righteous judgement. Some therefore
of them of Jerusalem said, Is not this He whom they
seek to kill? And lo, He speaketh openly,
and they say nothing unto Him. Can it be
that the rulers indeed know that this is the Christ?
Howbeit we know this man whence He is; but when
the Christ cometh, no one knoweth whence He is.
Jesus therefore cried in the temple, teaching
and saying, Ye both know Me, and know whence I am;
and I am not come of Myself, but He that sent
Me is true, whom ye know not. I know Him;
because I am from Him, and He sent Me. They sought
therefore to take Him: and no man laid his
hand on Him, because His hour was not yet come.
But of the multitude many believed on Him; and
they said, When the Christ shall come, will He do more
signs than those which this man hath done?
The Pharisees heard the multitude murmuring these
things concerning Him; and the chief priests and
the Pharisees sent officers to take Him. Jesus
therefore said, Yet a little while am I with you,
and I go unto Him that sent Me. Ye shall
seek Me, and shall not find Me: and where I am,
ye cannot come. The Jews therefore said among
themselves, Whither will this man go that we shall
not find Him? will He go unto the Dispersion among
the Greeks, and teach the Greeks? What is this
word that He said, Ye shall seek Me, and shall
not find Me: and where I am, ye cannot come?
Now on the last day, the great day of the feast, Jesus
stood and cried, saying, If any man thirst, let him
come unto Me and drink. He that believeth
on Me, as the Scripture hath said, out of his
belly shall flow rivers of living water. But this
spake He of the Spirit, which they that believed
on Him were to receive: for the Spirit was
not yet given: because Jesus was not yet glorified.
Some of the multitude therefore, when they heard these
words, said, This is of a truth the prophet.
Others said, This is the Christ. But some
said, What, doth the Christ come out of Galilee?
Hath not the Scripture said that the Christ cometh
of the seed of David, and from Bethlehem, the
village where David was? So there arose a
division in the multitude because of Him. And
some of them would have taken Him; but no man
laid hands on Him. The officers therefore
came to the chief priests and Pharisees; and they
said unto them, Why did ye not bring Him?
The officers answered, Never man so spake.
The Pharisees therefore answered them, Are ye also
led astray? Hath any of the rulers believed on
Him, or of the Pharisees? But this multitude
which knoweth not the law are accursed. Nicodemus
saith unto them (he that came to Him before, being
one of them), Doth our law judge a man, except it first
hear from himself and know what he doeth?
They answered and said unto him, Art thou also
of Galilee? Search, and see that out of Galilee
ariseth no prophet.” JOHN vii.
After describing how matters were
brought to a crisis in Galilee, and pointing out that,
as the result of our Lord’s work there, only
twelve men adhered to Him, and in even this final
selection not all were to be trusted, John
passes on to describe the state of feeling towards
Jesus in Jerusalem, and how the storm of unbelief
gathered until it broke in violence and outrage.
This seventh chapter is intended to put us in the
right point of view by exhibiting the various estimates
that were formed of the work and person of Jesus,
and the opinions which any one might hear uttered
regarding Him at every table in Jerusalem.
But the motive of His going to Jerusalem
at all calls for remark. His brothers, who might
have been expected to understand His character best,
were very slow to believe in Him. They only felt
He was different from themselves, and they were nettled
by His peculiarity. But they felt that the credit
of the family was involved, and also that if
His claims should turn out to be true, their position
as brothers of the Messiah would be flattering.
Accordingly they betray considerable anxiety to have
His claims pronounced upon; and seeing that His work
in Galilee had come to so little, they do their utmost
to provoke Him to appeal at once to the central authority
at Jerusalem. They did not as yet believe in
Him, they could not entertain the idea that the boy
they had knocked about and made to run their messages
could be the long-expected King; and yet there was
such trustworthy report of the extraordinary things
He had done, that they felt there was something puzzling
about Him, and for the sake of putting an end to their
suspense they do what they can to get Him to go again
to Jerusalem. The lever they use to move Him is
a taunt: “If these works of yours
are genuine miracles, don’t hang about villages
and little country towns, but go and show yourself
in the capital. No one who is really confident
that he has a claim on public attention wanders about
in solitary places, but repairs to the most crowded
haunts of men. Go up now to the feast, and your
disciples will gather round you, and your claims will
be settled once for all.”
To this Jesus replies that the hour
for such a proclamation of Himself has not yet come.
That hour is to come. At the following Passover
He entered Jerusalem in the manner desired by His
brethren, and the result, as He foresaw, was His death.
As yet such a demonstration was premature. The
brothers of Jesus did not apprehend the virulence of
hatred which Jesus aroused, and did not perceive how
surely His death would result from His going up to
the feast as the acknowledged King of the Galilaeans.
He Himself sees all this plainly, and therefore declines
the plan of operation proposed by His brothers; and
instead of going up with them as the proclaimed Messiah,
He goes up quietly by Himself a few days after.
To go up as His brothers’ nominee, or to go up
in the way they proposed, was counter to the whole
plan of His life. Their ideas and proposals were
made from a point of view wholly different from His.
Very often we can do at our own instance, in our own
way and at our own time, what it would be a vast mistake
to do at the instigation of people who look at the
matter differently from ourselves, and have quite
another purpose to serve. Jesus could safely do
without display what He could not do ostentatiously;
and He could do as His Father’s servant what
He could not do at the whim of His brothers.
The feast to which He thus quietly
went up was the Feast of Tabernacles. This feast
was a kind of national harvest home; and consequently
in appointing it God commanded that it should be held
“in the end of the year, when thou hast gathered
in thy labours out of the field;” that is to
say, in the end of the natural year, or in early
autumn, when the farm operations finished one rotation
and began a new series. It was a feast, therefore,
full of rejoicing. Every Israelite appeared in
holiday attire, bearing in his hands a palm-branch,
or wearing some significant emblem of earth’s
fruitfulness. At night the city was brilliantly
illuminated, especially round the Temple, in which
great lamps, used only on these occasions, were lit,
and which possibly occasioned our Lord’s remark
at this time, as reported in the following chapter,
“I am the Light of the world.” There
can be little doubt that when, on the last day of
the feast, He stood and cried, “If any man thirst,
let him come unto Me and drink,” the form of
his invitation was moulded by one of the customs of
the feast. For one of the most striking features
of the feast was the drawing of water in a golden vessel
from the pool of Siloam, and carrying it in procession
to the Temple, where it was poured out with such a
burst of triumph from the trumpets of the Levites,
aided by the Hallelujahs of the people, that it became
a common Jewish saying, “He who has not seen
the rejoicing at the pouring out of the water from
the pool of Siloam has never seen rejoicing in his
life.” This pouring out of the water before
God seemed to be an acknowledgment of His goodness
in watering the corn-lands and pastures, and also a
commemoration of the miraculous supply of water in
the desert; while to some of the more enlightened
it bore also a spiritual significance, and recalled
the words of Isaiah, “With joy shall ye draw
water out of the wells of salvation.”
But this feast was not solely a celebration
of the ingathering, or a thanksgiving for the harvest.
The name of it reminds us that another feature was
quite as prominent. In its original institution
God commanded, “Ye shall dwell in booths or
tabernacles seven days; all that are Israelites born
shall dwell in booths,” the reason being added,
“that your generations may know that I made the
children of Israel to dwell in booths when I brought
them out of the land of Egypt.” The particular
significance of the Israelites dwelling in booths seems
to be that it marked their deliverance from a life
of bondage to a life of freedom; it reminded them
how they had once no settled habitation, but yet found
a booth in the desert preferable to the well-provided
residences of Egypt. And every Feast of Tabernacles
seemed intended to recall these thoughts. In
the midst of their harvest, at the end of the year,
when they were once more laying up store for winter,
and when every one was reckoning whether it would
be an abundant and profitable year for him or no,
they were told to live for a week in booths, that
they might think of that period in their fathers’
experience when God was their all, when they had no
provision for the morrow, and which was yet the most
triumphant period of their history. All wealth,
all distinctions of rank, all separation between rich
and poor, was for a while forgotten, as each man dwelt
in his little green hut as well sheltered as his neighbour.
And to every one was suggested the thought, that let
the coming winter be well provided or ill provided,
let it be bleak to some and bright to others, at bottom
the provision of this world is to all alike but as
a green bough between them and destitution; but that
all alike, reduce them if you will to a booth which
has neither store nor couch in it, have still the
Most High God for their deliverer, and provider, and
habitation.
Even before Jesus appeared at this
feast He was the subject of much talk and exchange
of opinions.
1. The first characteristic of
the popular mind, as exhibited here by John, is its
subservience to authority. Those who had a favourable
opinion of Jesus uttered it with reserve and caution,
“for fear of the Jews” that
is, of the Jerusalem Jews, who were known to be adverse
to His claims. And the authorities, knowing the
subservience of the people, considered it a sufficient
reply to the favourable reports brought them by their
own officers, to say, “Have any of the rulers
or of the Pharisees believed on Him?” This seems
a very childish mode of settling a great question,
and we are ready to charge the Jews with a singular
lack of independence; but we reflect that among ourselves
great questions are settled very much by authority
still. In politics we take our cue from one or
two newspapers, conducted by men who show themselves
quite fallible; and in matters of even deeper moment,
how many of us can say we have thought out a creed
for ourselves, and have not accepted our ideas from
recognised teachers? And whether these teachers
be the accredited representatives of traditional theology,
or have secured an audience by their departure from
ordinary views, we have in our own conscience a surer
guide to the truth about Christ. For much that
we may build upon the foundation we must be indebted
to others; but for that which is radical, for the
determination of the relation we ourselves are to
hold to Christ, we must follow not authority but our
own conscience.
Our equanimity need not, then, be
greatly disturbed by the fact that so many of the
rulers of public opinion do not believe in Christ.
We need not tremble for Christianity when we see how
widely extended is the opinion that miracles are the
fancy of a credulous age. We need not be over-anxious
or altogether downcast when we hear philosophers sublimely
talk as if they had seen all round Christ, and taken
His measure, and rendered satisfactory account of
the pious delusions He Himself was subject to, and
the groundless hallucinations which misled His followers
into unheard-of virtue, and made them good men by mistake.
Consider the opinions of men of insight and of power,
but do not be overawed by them, for you have in yourself
a surer guide to truth. Look at Christ with your
own eyes, frankly open your own soul before Him, and
trust the impression He makes upon you.
2. Again, John notices the perplexity
of the people. They saw that, much as the authorities
desired to put Him out of the way, they shrank from
decisive measures. And from this they naturally
gathered that the rulers had some idea that this was
the Christ. Then besides, they saw the miracles
Jesus did, and asked whether the Christ would do more
miracles. They saw, too, that He was “a
good Man,” and on the whole, therefore, they
were disposed to look favourably on His claims; but
then there always recurred the thought, “We
know this Man whence He is; but when Christ cometh,
no man knoweth whence He is.” They thought
they could account for Christ and trace Him to His
origin; and therefore they could not believe He was
from God. This is the common difficulty.
Men find it difficult to believe that One who was
really born on earth and did not suddenly appear,
nobody knew whence, can in any peculiar sense be from
God. They dwell upon the truly human nature of
Christ, and conceive that this precludes the possibility
of His being from God in any sense in which we are
not from God.
To this perplexity Jesus addresses
Himself in the words (ver. 28), “Me you
do in a sense know, and also whence I come, but that
does not give you the full knowledge you need, for
it is not of Myself I am come; your knowledge of Me
cannot solve your perplexity, because I am not sent
by Myself; He that sent Me is the real one, and
Him you do not know. I know Him because I am
from Him, and He hath sent Me.” That is
to say: Your knowledge of Me is insufficient,
because you do not, through Me, recognise God.
Your knowledge of Me is insufficient so long as you
construe Me into a mere earthly product. To know
Me, as you know Me, is not enough; for not in Myself
can you find the originating cause of what I am and
what I do. You must go behind my earthly origin,
and the human appearance which you know, if you are
to account for My presence among you, and for My conduct
and teaching. It matters little what you know
of Me, if through Me you are not brought to the knowledge
of God. He is the real One, He is the Supreme
Truth; and Him, alas! you do not know while you profess
to know Me.
3. John notes the insufficient
tests used both by the people and by the authorities
for ascertaining whether Jesus was or was not their
promised King. The tests they used were such
as these, “Will Christ do more miracles?”
“Will He come from the same part of the country?”
and so forth. Among ourselves it has become customary
to speak as if it were impossible to find or apply
any sufficient test to the claims of Christ; impossible
to ascertain whether He is, in a peculiar sense, Divine,
and whether we can absolutely trust all He said, and
accept the views of God He cherished and proclaimed.
Certainly Christ Himself does not countenance this
mode of speaking. In all His conversations with
the unbelieving Jews He condemned them for their unbelief,
ascribed it to moral defects, and persistently maintained
that it was within the reach of any man to ascertain
whether He was true or a pretender. There is a
class of expressions which occur in this Gospel which
clearly show what Jesus Himself considered to be the
root of unbelief. To Pilate He says, “Every
one that is of the truth heareth My voice.”
To the Jews He says, “He that is of God, heareth
God’s words; ye therefore hear them not, because
ye are not of God.” And again in this seventh
chapter, “If any man is desirous to do the will
of God, he will know of My doctrine whether it be
of God, or whether I speak of Myself.” All
these statements convey the impression that Christ’s
person and teaching will uniformly be acceptable to
those who love the truth, and who are anxious to do
the will of God.
Faith in Christ is thus represented
as an act rather of the spiritual nature than of the
intellect, and as the result of sympathy with the
truth rather than of critical examination of evidence.
A painter or art-critic familiar with the productions
of great artists feels himself insulted if you offer
him evidence to convince him of the genuineness of
a work of art over and above the evidence which it
carries in itself, and which to him is the most convincing
of all. If one of the lost books of Tacitus were
recovered, scholars would not judge it by any account
that might be given of its preservation and discovery,
but would say, Let us see it and read it, and we will
very soon tell you whether it is genuine or not.
When the man you have seen every day for years, and
whose character you have looked into under the strongest
lights, is accused of dishonesty, and damaging evidence
is brought against him, does it seriously disturb
your confidence in him? Not at all. No evidence
can countervail the knowledge gained by intercourse.
You know the man, directly, and you believe in him
without regard to what other persons advance in his
favour or against him. Christ expects acceptance
on similar grounds. Look at Him, listen to Him,
pass with Him from day to day of His life, and say
whether it is possible that He can be a deceiver,
or that He can be deceived. He Himself is confident
that those who seek the truth, and are accustomed
to acknowledge and follow the truth always, will follow
Him. He is confident that they will find that
He so fits in with what they have already learnt, that
naturally and instinctively they will accept Him.
It is at the point in which all men
are interested that Christ appeals to us at
the point of life or conduct; and He says that whoever
truly desires to do God’s will, will find that
His teaching leads him right. And if men would
only acknowledge Christ in this respect, and begin,
as conscience bids them, by accepting His life as
exhibiting the highest rule of conduct, they would
sooner or later acknowledge Him in all. A man
may not at once see all that is involved in the fact
that Christ exhibits, as no one else exhibits, the
will of God; but if He will but acknowledge Him as
the Teacher of God’s will, not coming
to Him with a spirit of suspicion but of earnest desire
to do God’s will, that man will become a convinced
follower of Christ. There are, of course, persons
of a sound moral disposition who get entangled intellectually
in perplexing difficulties about the person of Christ
and His relation to God; but if such persons are humble and
humility is a virtue of decisive consequence they
will, by virtue of their experience in moral questions,
and by their practical knowledge of the value of harmony
with God, prize the teaching of Christ, and recognise
its superiority, and submit themselves to its influence.
It was on the last day of the feast
that our Lord made the most explicit revelation of
Himself to the people. For seven days the people
dwelt in their booths; on the eighth day they celebrated
their entrance into the promised land, forsook their
booths, and, as it is said in the end of the chapter,
“went every man to his own house.”
But on this great day of the feast no water was drawn
from the pool of Siloam. On each of the preceding
days the golden pitcher was in request, and the procession
that followed the priest who carried it praised God
who had brought water out of the rock in the desert;
but on the eighth day, commemorating their entrance
into “a land of springs of water,” this
rite of drawing the water ceased.
But the true worshippers among these
Israelites had been seeing a spiritual meaning in
the water, and had been conscious of an uneasy feeling
of thirst still in the midst of these Temple services an
uneasy questioning whether even yet Israel had passed
the thirsty desert, and had received the full gift
God had meant to give. There were thinking men
and thirsty souls then as there are now; and to these,
who stood perhaps a little aside, and looked half
in compassion, half in envy, at the merry-making of
the rest, it seemed a significant fact that, in the
Temple itself, with all its grandeur and skilful appliances,
there was yet no living fountain to quench the thirst
of men a significant fact that to find
water the priest had to go outside the gorgeous Temple
to the modest “waters of Siloah that go softly.”
All through the feast these men wondered morning by
morning when the words of Joel were to come true,
when it should come to pass that “a fountain
should come forth of the house of the Lord,”
or when that great and deep river should begin to
flow which Ezekiel saw in vision issuing from the
threshold of the Lord’s house, and waxing deeper
and wider as it flowed. And now once more the
last day of the feast had come, the water was no longer
drawn, and yet no fountain had burst up in the Temple
itself, their souls were yet perplexed, unsatisfied,
craving, athirst, when suddenly, as if in answer to
their half-formed thoughts and longings, a clear,
assured, authoritative voice passed through their ear
to their inmost soul: “If any man thirst,
let him come unto Me and drink. He that believeth
on Me, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living
water.”
In these words Christ proclaims that
He is the great Temple-fountain; or rather, that He
is the true Temple, and that the Holy Ghost proceeding
from Him, and dwelling in men, is the life-giving fountain.
All the cravings after a settled and eternal state,
all the longings for purity and fellowship with the
Highest, which the Temple services rather quickened
than satisfied, Christ says He will satisfy. The
Temple service had been to them as a screen on which
the shadows of things spiritual were thrown; but they
longed to see the realities face to face, to have
God revealed, to know the very truth of things, and
set foot on eternal verity. This thirst is felt
by all men whose whole nature is alive, whose experience
has shaken them out of easy contentment with material
prosperity; they thirst for a life which does not
so upbraid and mock them as their own life does; they
thirst to be able to live, so that the one half of
their life shall not be condemned by the other half;
they thirst to be once for all in the “ampler
ether” of happy and energetic existence, not
looking through the bars and fumbling at the lock.
This thirst and all legitimate cravings we feel Christ
boldly and explicitly promises to satisfy; nay more,
all illegitimate cravings, all foolish discontent,
all vicious dissatisfaction with life, all morbid
thirst that is rapidly becoming chronic disease in
us, all weak and false views of life, He will rid us
of, and give us entrance into the life that God lives
and imparts into pure, healthy, hopeful
life.
Christ stands and cries still in the
midst of a thirsting world: “Whosoever
will let him take of the water of life freely.”
Has His voice become so familiar that it has lost
all significance? For all who can hear and believe,
His truth remains. There is life abundant
life for us. Drink of any other fountain, and
you only intensify thirst, and make life more difficult,
spending energy without renewing it. Live in Christ
and you live in God. You have found the centre,
the heart, the eternal life. As Christ stood
and cried to the people He was conscious of power
to impart to them a freshly welling spring of life a
life that would overflow for the strengthening and
gladdening of others besides themselves. He has
the same consciousness to-day; the deep, living benefits
He confers are as open to all ages as the sunshine
and the air; there is no necessity binding any one
soul to feel that life is a failure, an empty, disappointing
husk, serving no good purpose, bringing daily fresh
misery and deeper hopelessness, a thing perhaps manfully
to fight our way through but certainly not to rejoice
in. If any one has such views of life it is because
he has not honestly, believingly, and humbly responded
to Christ’s word and come to Him.