REVOLT OF THE BARONAGE
All hope of progress, of any wise
and statesmanlike settlement of Ireland, utterly died
away when, on Easter night, 16th April 1172, Henry
sailed from Wexford. The next morning he landed
near St. David’s. He entered its gates
as a pilgrim, on foot and staff in hand, while the
monks came out in solemn procession to lead him to
the ancient church on the other side of the river.
Suddenly a Welsh woman sprang out from among the crowd,
and striking her hands together wildly, threw herself
at his feet crying with a loud voice, “Avenge
us to-day, Lechlavar! Avenge the people of this
land!” The woman’s bitter cry told the
first thought of all the thronging multitudes of eager
Welshmen that day, how Merlin had prophesied that
an English king, the conqueror of Ireland, should
die on Lechlavar, a great stone which formed a rude
natural bridge across the stream, and round which the
pagan superstitions of an immemorial past still clung.
When the strange procession reached the river, Henry
stood for a moment looking steadily at the stone, then
with a courage which we can scarcely measure, he firmly
set his foot on it and slowly crossed over; and from
the other side, in the face of all the people he turned
and flung his taunt at the prophet, “Who will
ever again believe the lies of Merlin?” As he
passed through Cardiff another omen met him; a white-robed
monk stood before him as he came out of church.
“God hold thee, Cuning!” he cried in the
English tongue, and broke out into passionate warnings
of evil to come unless the king would show more reverence
to the Sunday, a matter about which there was at this
time a great stirring of religious feeling. “Ask
this rustic,” said Henry in French to a knight
who held his rein, “whether he has dreamed this.”
The monk turned from the interpreter to the king and
spoke again: “Whether I have dreamed this
or no, mark this day, for unless thou amendest thy
life, before this year has passed thou shalt hear
such news of those thou lovest best, and shalt win
such sorrow from them, that it shall not fail thee
till thy dying day!”
From Wales Henry struck across England,
“turning neither to right nor left, and marching
at a double pace.” In a few days he was
at Portsmouth. To hinder further mischief the
younger Henry was ordered to join him and carried
over sea; and the first news that reached Louis was
the king’s arrival in Normandy. “The
King of England,” Louis cried in his amazement,
“is now in Ireland, now in England, now in Normandy;
he may rather be said to fly than go by horse or boat!”
Henry hastened on his landing to meet the legates.
Negotiations were opened in May. Submission was
inevitable, for fear of the rebellion which was then
actually brewing left him in fact no choice of action.
He agreed unreservedly to their demands. As an
earnest of repentance and reformation he consented
to a new coronation of his son; and on the 27th of
August the young king was crowned again, along with
his wife, at Winchester. Henry completed his submission
at Avranches on the 27th of September. He swore
that he had not desired the death of Thomas, but to
make satisfaction for the anger he had shown, he promised
to take the cross, to give funds to the Knights Templars
for the defence of Jerusalem, and to found three religious
houses. He renounced the Constitutions of Clarendon.
He swore allegiance to Alexander against the anti-Pope.
He promised that the possessions of Canterbury should
be given back as they were a year before the flight
of Thomas, and that his exiled friends should be restored
to their possessions. No king of England had
ever suffered so deep a humiliation. It seemed
as thought he martyr were at last victorious.
A year after the murder, in December 1172, Canterbury
cathedral was once more solemnly opened, amid the cries
of a vast multitude of people, “Avenge, O Lord,
the blood which has been poured out!” On the
anniversary of the Christmas Day when Thomas had launched
his last excommunications, the excited people
noted “a great thunder sudden and horrible in
Ireland, in England, and in all the kingdoms of the
French.” Very soon mighty miracles were
wrought by the name of the martyr throughout the whole
of Europe. The metal phials which hung from the
necks of pilgrims to the shrine of Canterbury became
as famous as the shell and palm branch which marked
the pilgrims to Compostella and Jerusalem. Before
ten years were passed the King of France, the Count
of Nevers, the Count of Boulogne, the Viscount of
Aosta, the Archbishop of Reims, had knelt at his shrine
among English prelates, nobles, knights, and beggars.
The feast of the Trinity which Thomas had appointed
to be observed on the anniversary of his consecration
spread through the whole of Christendom. Henry,
in fact, had to bear the full storm of scorn and hatred
that falls on every statesman who stands in advance
of the public opinion of his day. But his seeming
surrender at Avranches won for the politic king immediate
and decisive advantages. All fear of excommunication
and interdict had passed away. The clergy were
no longer alienated from him. The ecclesiastical
difficulties raised by the coronation, and the jealousies
of Louis, were set at rest. The alliance of the
Pope was secured. The conquest of Ireland was
formally approved. Success seemed to crown Henry’s
scheme for the building up of his empire. Britanny
had been secured for Geoffrey in 1171; in June 1172
Richard was enthroned as Duke of Aquitaine; in the
following August Henry was crowned for the second
time King of England. Only the youngest child,
scarcely five years old, was still “John Lackland,”
and in this same year Henry provided a dominion for
John by a treaty of marriage between him and the heiress
of the Count of Maurienne. Her inheritance stretched
from the Lake of Geneva almost to the Gulf of Genoa;
and the marriage would carry the Angevin dominions
almost from the Atlantic to the Alps, and give into
Henry’s control every pass into Italy from the
Great St. Bernard to the Col di Tenda,
and all the highways by which travellers from Geneva
and German lands beyond it, from Burgundy or from
Gaul, made their way to Rome. To celebrate such
a treaty Henry forgot his thrift. The two kings
of England travelled with ostentatious splendour to
meet the Count of Maurienne in Auvergne in January
1173. The King of Aragon and the Count of Toulouse
met them at Montferrand, and a peace which Henry concluded
between Toulouse and Aragon declared the height of
his influence. Raymond bent at last to do homage
for Toulouse, an act of submission which brought the
dominion of Anjou to the very border of the Mediterranean.
There was a wild outbreak of alarm
among all Henry’s enemies as from his late humiliation
he suddenly rose to this new height of power.
The young king listened eagerly to those who plotted
mischief, and one night in mid-Lent he fled to the
court of Louis. In an agony of apprehension Henry
sought to close the breach, and sent messages of conciliation
to the French king. “Who sends this message
to me?” demanded Louis. “The King
of England,” answered the messengers. “It
is false,” he said; “behold the King of
England is here, and he sends no message to me by
you; but if you so call his father who once was king,
know ye that he asking is dead.” The Counts
of Flanders, of Boulogne, and of Blois, joined the
young king in Paris, and did homage to him for fiefs
which he bestowed on them Kent, Dover,
Eochester, lands in Lincolnshire, and domains and
castles in Normandy while he won the aid
of the Scot king by granting him all Northumberland
to the Tyne. The rebellion was organized in a
month. Eleanor sent Richard, commander of the
forces of Aquitaine, and Geoffrey, lord of Britanny,
to take their share in the revolt; she herself was
hastening after them when she was seized and thrown
into prison. In Aquitaine, where the people impartially
hated both French and Normans, the enthusiasm for
independence was stirred by songs such as those of
the troubadour, Bertrand de Born, lord of a fortress
and a thousand men, who “was never content, save
when the kings of the North were at war.”
In Normandy old hatreds had deepened year by year
as Henry had gone on steadily seizing castles and lands
which had fallen out of the possession of the crown.
In 1171 he had doubled the revenue of the duchy by
lands which the nobles had usurped. In 1172 he
had alarmed them by having a new return made of the
feudal tenures for purposes of taxation. The
great lords of the duchy with one consent declared
against him. Britanny sprang to arms. If
Maine and Anjou remained fairly quiet, there was in
both of them a powerful party of nobles who joined
the revolt. The rebel party was everywhere increased
by all who had joined the young king, “not because
they thought his the juster cause,” but in fierce
defiance of a rule intolerable for its justice and
its severity. England was no less ready for rebellion.
The popular imagination was still moved by the horror
of the archbishop’s murder. The generation
that remembered the miseries of the former anarchy
was now passing away, and to some of the feudal lords
order doubtless seemed the greater ill. The new
king too had lavished promises and threats to win
the English nobles to his side. “There were
few barons in England who were not wavering in their
allegiance to the king, and ready to desert him at
any time.” The more reckless eagerly joined
the rebellion; the more prudent took refuge in France,
that they might watch how events would go; there was
a timid and unstable party who held outwardly to the
king in vigilant uncertainty, haunted by fears that
they should be swept away by the possible victory of
his son. Such descendants of the Normans of the
Conquest as had survived the rebellions and confiscations
of a hundred years were eager for revenge. The
Earl of Leicester and his wife were heirs of three
great families, whose power had been overthrown by
the policy of the Conqueror and his sons. William
of Aumale was descended from the Count who had claimed
the throne in the Conqueror’s days, and bitterly
remembered the time before Henry’s accession,
when he had reigned almost as king in Northern England.
Hugh of Puiset, Bishop of Durham, whose diocese stretched
across Northumberland, and who ruled as Earl Palatine
of the marchland between England and Scotland; the
Earl of Huntingdon, brother of the Scot king; Roger
Mowbray, lord of the castles of Thirsk and Malessart
north of York, and of a strong castle in the Isle
of Axholm; Earl Ferrers, master of fortresses in Derby
and Stafford; Hugh, Earl of Chester and Lord of Bayeux
and Avranches, joined the rebellion. So did the
old Hugh Bigod, Earl of Norfolk, who had already fought
and schemed against Henry in vain twenty years before.
The Earls of Clare and Gloucester on the Welsh border
were of very doubtful loyalty. Half of England
was in revolt, and north of a line drawn from Huntingdon
to Chester the king only held a few castles York,
Richmond, Carlisle, Newcastle, and some fortresses
of Northumberland. The land beyond Sherwood and
the Trent, shut off by an almost continuous barrier
of marsh and forest from the south, was still far
behind the rest of England in civilization. The
new industrial activity of Yorkshire was not yet forty
years old; in a great part of the North money-rents
had scarcely crept in, and the serfs were still toiling
on under the burden of labour-dues which had been found
intolerable elsewhere. The fines, the taxes, the
attempt to bring its people under a more advanced
system of government must have pressed very hardly
on this great district which was not yet ready for
it; and to the fierce anger of the barons, and the
ready hostility of the monasteries, was perhaps added
the exasperation of freeholder and serf.
Henry, however, was absolute master
of the whole central administration of the realm.
Moreover, by his decree of the year before he had set
over every shire a sheriff who was wholly under his
own control, trained in his court, pledged to his
obedience, and who had firm hold of the courts, the
local forces, and the finances. The king now hastened
to appoint bishops whom he could trust to the vacant
sees. Geoffrey, an illegitimate son who had been
born to him very early, probably about the time when
he visited England to receive knighthood, was sent
to Lincoln; and friends of the king were consecrated
to Winchester, Ely, Bath, Hereford, and Chichester.
Prior Richard of Dover, a man “laudably inoffensive
who prudently kept within his own sphere,” was
made Archbishop of Canterbury. Richard de Lucy
remained in charge of the whole kingdom as justiciar.
The towns and trading classes were steadfast in loyalty,
and the baronage was again driven, as it had been
before, to depend on foreign mercenaries.
War first broke out in France in the
early summer of 1173. Normandy and Anjou were
badly defended, and their nobles were already half
in revolt, while the forces of France, Flanders, Boulogne,
Chartres, Champagne, Poitou, and Britanny were allied
against Henry. The counts of Flanders and Boulogne
invaded Normandy from the north-east, and the traitor
Count of Aumale, the guardian of the Norman border,
gave into their hands his castles and lands.
Louis and Henry’s sons besieged Verneuil in the
south-west. To westward the Earl of Chester and
Ralph of Fougères organized a rising in Britanny.
In “extreme perplexity,” utterly unable
to meet his enemies in the field, Henry could only
fortify his frontier, and hastily recall the garrison
which he had left in Ireland, while he poured out
his treasure in gathering an army of hired soldiers.
Meanwhile he himself waited at Rouen, “that
he might be seen by all the people, bearing with an
even mind whatever happened, hunting oftener than usual,
showing himself with a cheerful face to all who came,
answering patiently those who wished to gain anything
from him; while those whom he had nourished from days
of childhood, those whom he had knighted, those who
had been his servants and his most familiar counsellors,
night by night stole away from him, expecting his
speedy destruction and thinking the dominion of his
son at once about to be established.” Never
did the kings show such resource and courage as in
the campaign that followed. The Count of Boulogne
was killed in battle, and the invading army in the
north-east hesitated at the unlucky omen and fell
back. Instantly Henry seized his opportunity.
He rode at full speed to Verneuil with his army, a
hastily collected mob of chance soldiers so dissatisfied
and divided in allegiance that he dared not risk a
battle. An audacious boast saved the crafty king.
“With a fierce countenance and terrible voice”
he cried to the French messengers who had hurried
out to see if the astounding news of his arrival were
true, “Go tell your king I am at hand as you
see!” At the news of the ferocity and resolution
of the enemy, Louis, “knowing him to be fierce
and of a most bitter temper, as a bear robbed of its
whelps rages in the forest,” hastily retreated,
and Henry, as wise a general as he was excellent an
actor, fell back to Rouen. Meanwhile he sent to
Britanny a force of Brabantines, whom alone he could
trust. They surrounded the rebels at Dol; and
before Henry, “forgetting food and sleep”
and riding “as though he had flown,” could
reach the place, most of his foes were slain.
The castle where the rest had taken refuge surrendered,
and he counted among his prisoners the Earl of Chester,
Ralph of Fougères, and a hundred other nobles.
The battle of Dol practically decided the war.
It seemed vain to fight against Henry’s good
luck. A few Flemings once crossed the Norman border,
and were defeated and drowned in retreat by the bridge
breaking. “The very elements fight for
the Normans!” cried the baffled and disheartened
Louis. “When I entered Normandy my army
perished for want of water, now this one is destroyed
by too much water.” In despair he sought
to save himself by playing the part of mediator; and
in September Henry met his sons at Gisors to discuss
terms of peace. His terms were refused and the
meeting broke up; but Henry remained practically master
of the situation.
Meanwhile in England the rebellion
had broken out in July. The Scottish army ravaged
the north; the Earl of Leicester, with an army of Flemings
which he had collected by the help of Louis and the
younger Henry, landed on the coast of Suffolk, where
Hugh Bigod was ready to welcome him. De Lucy
and Bohun hurried from the north to meet this formidable
danger, and with the help of the Earls of Cornwall,
Arundel, and Gloucester, they defeated Leicester in
a great battle at Fornham on the 17th of October.
The earl himself was taken prisoner, and 10,000 of
his foreign troops were slain. He and his wife
were sent by Henry’s orders to Normandy, and
there thrown into prison. A truce was made with
Scotland till the end of March. The king of France
and the younger Henry abandoned hope, “for they
saw that God was with the king;” and there was
a general pause in the war.
With the spring of 1174, however,
the strife raged again on all sides. Ireland
rose in rebellion. William of Scotland marched
into England supported by a Flemish force. Roger
Mowbray, and probably the Bishop of Durham, were in
league with him. Earl Ferrers fortified his castles
in Derby and Stafford; Leicester Castle was still
held by the Earl of Leicester’s knights; Huntingdon
by the Scot king’s brother; and the Earl of
Norfolk was joined in June by a picked body of Flemings.
The king’s castles at Norwich, Northampton,
and Nottingham, were taken by the rebels, and a formidable
line of enemies stretched right across mid-England.
At the same time France and Flanders threatened invasion
with a strong fleet, and “so great an army as
had not been seen for many years.” Count
Philip, who had set his heart on the promised Kent,
and on winning entrance into the lands of the Cistercian
wool-growers of Lincolnshire, swore before Louis and
his nobles that within fifteen days he would attack
England; the younger Henry joined him at Gravelines
in June, and they only waited for a fair wind to cross
the Channel.
The justiciars were in an extremity
of despair. “Seeing the evil that was done
in the land,” they anxiously sent messenger after
messenger to the king. But Henry had little time
to heed English complaints. Richard had declared
war in Aquitaine; Maine and Anjou were half in revolt;
Louis was on the point of invading Normandy. As
a last resource his hard-pressed ministers sent Richard
of Ilchester, the bishop-elect of Winchester, whom
they knew to be favoured by the king beyond all others,
to tell him again of “the hatred of the barons,
the infidelity of the citizens, the clamour of the
crowd always growing worse, the greed of the ‘new
men,’ the difficulty of holding down the insurrection.”
“The English have sent their messengers before,
and here comes even this man!” laughed the Normans;
“what will be left in England to send after
the king save the Tower of London!” Richard reached
Henry on the 24th of June, and on the same day Henry
abandoned Normandy to Louis’ attack, and made
ready for return. “He saw that while he
was absent, and as it were not in existence, no one
in England would offer any opposition to him who was
expected to be his successor;” and he “preferred
that his lands beyond the sea should be in peril rather
than his own realm of England.” Sending
forward a body of Brabantines, he followed with his
train of prisoners Queen Eleanor, Queen
Margaret and her sister Adela, the Earls of Chester
and of Leicester, and various governors of castles
whom he carried with him in chains. In an agony
of anxiety the king watched for a fair wind till the
7th of July. At last the sails were spread; but
of a sudden the waves began to rise, and the storm
to grow ominously. Those who watched the face
of the king saw him to be in doubt; then he lifted
his eyes to heaven and prayed before them all, “If
I have set before my eyes the things which make for
the peace of clergy and people, if the King of heaven
has ordained that peace shall be restored by my arrival,
then let Him in His mercy bring me to a safe port;
but if He is against me, and has decreed to visit
my kingdom with a rod, then let me never touch the
shores of the land.”
A good omen was granted, and he safely
reached Southampton. Refusing even to enter the
city, and eating but bread and water, he pressed forward
to Canterbury. At its gates he dismounted and
put away from him the royal majesty, and with bare
feet, in the garb of a pilgrim and penitent, his footsteps
marked with blood, he passed on to the church.
There he sought the martyr’s sepulchre, and lying
prostrate with outstretched hands, he remained long
in prayer, with abundance of tears and bitter groanings.
After a sermon by Foliot the king filled up the measure
of humiliation. He made public oath that he was
guiltless of the death of the archbishop, but in penitence
of his hasty words he prayed absolution of the bishops,
and gave his body to the discipline of rods, receiving
three or five strokes from each one of the seventy
monks. That night he prayed and fasted before
the shrine, and the next day rode still fasting to
London, which he reached on the 14th. Three days
later a messenger rode at midnight to the gate of
the palace where the king lay ill, worn out by suffering
and fatigue for which the doctors had applied their
usual remedy of bleeding. He forced his way to
the door of the king’s bedchamber. “Who
art thou?” cried the king, suddenly startled
from sleep. “I am the servant of Ranulf
de Glanville, and I come to bring good tidings.” “Ranulf
our friend, is he well?” “He
is well, my lord, and behold he holds your enemy,
the King of Scots, captive in chains at Richmond.”
The king was half stunned by the news, but as the
messenger produced Glanville’s letter, he sprang
from his bed, and in a transport of emotion and tears,
gave thanks to God, while the joyful ringing of bells
told the good news to the London citizens.
Two great dangers, in fact, had passed
away while the king knelt before the shrine at Canterbury.
On that very day the Scottish army had been broken
to pieces. In the south the fleet which lay off
the coast of Flanders had dispersed. On the 18th
of July, the day after the good news had come, Henry
himself marched north with the army that had been
gathered while he lay ill. Before a week was over
Hugh Bigod had yielded up his castles and banished
his Flemish soldiers. The Bishop of Durham secretly
sent away his nephew, the Count of Bar, who had landed
with foreign troops. Henry’s Welsh allies
attacked Tutbury, a castle of the Earl of Ferrers.
Geoffrey, the bishop-elect of Lincoln, had before
Henry’s landing waged vigorous war on Mowbray.
By the end of July the whole resistance was at an
end. On the last day of the month the king held
a council at Northampton, at which William of Scotland
stood before him a prisoner, while Hugh of Durham,
Mowbray, Ferrers, and the officers of the Earl of
Leicester came to give up their fortresses. The
castles of Huntingdon and Norfolk were already secured.
The suspected Earls of Gloucester and of Clare swore
fidelity at the King’s Court. Scotland was
helpless. A treaty was made with the Irish kings.
Wales was secured by a marriage between the prince
of North Wales and Henry’s sister.
But there was still danger over sea,
where the armies of the French and the Flemings had
closed round Rouen. On the 8th of August, exactly
a month after his landing at Southampton, Henry again
crossed the Channel with his unwieldy train of prisoners.
As he stood under the walls of Rouen, the besieging
armies fled by night. Louis’ fancy already
showed him the English host in the heart of France,
and in his terror he sought for peace. The two
kings concluded a treaty at Gisors, and on the 30th
of September the conspiracy against Henry was finally
dissolved. His sons did homage to him, and bound
themselves in strange medieval fashion by the feudal
tie which was the supreme obligation of that day; he
was now “not only their father, but their liege
lord.” The Count of Flanders gave up into
Henry’s hands the charter given him by the young
king. The King of Scotland made absolute submission
in December 1174, and was sent back to his own land.
Eleanor alone remained a close prisoner for years
to come.
The revolt of 1173-74 was the final
ruin of the old party of the Norman baronage.
The Earl of Chester got back his lands, but lost his
castles, and was sent out of the way to the Irish
war; he died before the king in 1181. Leicester
humbly admitted “that he and all his holdings
were at the mercy of the king,” and Henry “restored
to him Leicester, and the forest which by common oath
of the country had been sworn to belong to the king’s
own domain, for he knew that this had been done for
envy, and also because it was known that the king
hated the earl;” but Henry had a long memory,
and the walls of Leicester were in course of time thrown
down and its fortifications levelled. The Bishop
of Durham had to pay 200 marks of silver for the king’s
pardon, and give up Durham Castle. At the death
of Hugh Bigod in 1177 Henry seized the earl’s
treasure. The Earls of Clare and Gloucester died
within two years, and the king’s son John was
made Gloucester’s heir. The rebel Count
of Aumale died in 1179, and his heiress married the
faithful Earl of Essex, who took the title of Aumale
with all the lands on both sides of the water.
In 1186 Roger Mowbray went on crusade. The king
took into his own hands all castles, even those of
“his most familiar friend,” the justiciar
De Lucy. The work of dismantling dangerous fortresses
which he had begun twenty years before was at last
completed, and no armed revolt of the feudal baronage
was ever again possible in England.
But the rebellion had wakened in the
king’s mind a deep alarm, which showed itself
in a new severity of temper. Famine and plague
had fallen on the country; the treasury was well nigh
empty; law and order were endangered. Henry hastened
to return as soon as his foreign campaign was over,
and in May 1175 “the two kings of England, whom
a year before the breadth of the kingdom could not
contain, now crossed in one ship, sat at one table,
and slept in one bed.” In token of reconciliation
with the Church they attended a synod at Westminster,
and went together on solemn pilgrimage to the martyr’s
tomb. Then they made a complete visitation of
the whole kingdom. Starting from Reading on the
1st of June, they went by Oxford to Gloucester, then
along the Welsh border to Shrewsbury, through the
midland counties by Lichfield and Nottingham to York,
and then back to London, having spent on their journey
two months and a few days; and in autumn they made
a progress through the south-western provinces.
At every halt some weighty business was taken in hand.
The Church was made to feel anew the royal power.
Twelve of the great abbeys were now without heads,
and the king, justly fearing lest the monks should
elect abbots from their own body, “and thus the
royal authority should be shaken, and they should
follow another guidance than his own,” sent
orders that on a certain day chosen men should be sent
to elect acceptable prelates at his court and in his
presence. The safety of the Welsh marches was
assured. The castle of Bristol was given up to
the king, and border barons and Welsh princes swore
fidelity at Gloucester. An edict given at Woodstock
ordered that no man who during the war had been in
arms against the king should come to his court without
a special order; that no man should remain in his
court after the setting of the sun, or should come
to it before the sun rising; in the England that lay
west of the Severn, none might carry bow and arrow
or pointed knife. In this wild border district
the checks which prevailed elsewhere against violent
crime were unknown. The outlaw or stranger who
fled to forest or moorland for hiding, might lawfully
be slain by any man who met him. No “murder-fine”
was known there. The king, not daring perhaps
to interfere with the “liberties” of the
west, may have sought to check crime by this order
against arms; but such a law was practically a dead
letter, for in a land where every man was the guardian
of his own life it was far more perilous to obey the
new edict than to disregard it.
The king’s harsh mood was marked
too by the cruel prosecutions of offences against
forest law which had been committed in the time of
the war. The severe punishments were perhaps
a means of chastizing is affected landowners; they
were certainly useful in filling the empty treasury.
Nobles and barons everywhere were sued for hunting
or cutting wood or owning dogs, and were fined sometimes
more than their whole possessions were worth.
In vain the justiciar, De Lucy, pleaded for justice
to men who had done these things by express orders
of the king given to De Lucy himself; “his testimony
could prevail nothing against the royal will.”
Even the clergy were dragged before the civil courts,
“neither archbishop nor bishop daring to make
any protest.” The king’s triumph over
the rebellion was visibly complete when at York the
treaty which had been made the previous year with
the King of Scotland was finally concluded, and William
and his brother did homage to the English sovereigns.
A few weeks later Henry and his son received at Windsor
the envoys of the King of Connaught, the only one
of the Irish princes who had till now refused homage.
In the Church as in the State the
royal power was unquestioned. A papal legate
arrived in October, who proved a tractable servant
of the king; “with the right hand and the left
he took gifts, which he planted together in his coffers”.
His coming gave Henry opportunity to carry out at
last through common action of Church and State his
old scheme of reforms. In the Assize of Northampton,
held in January 1176, the king confirmed and perfected
the judicial legislation which he had begun ten years
before in the Assize of Clarendon. The kingdom
was divided into six circuits. The judges appointed
to the circuits were given a more full independence
than they had before, and were no longer joined with
the sheriffs of the counties in their sessions, their
powers were extended beyond criminal jurisdiction
to questions of property, of inheritance, of wardship,
of forfeiture of crown lands, of advowsons to churches,
and of the tenure of land. For the first time
the name of Justitiarii Itinerantes was given
in the Pipe Roll to these travelling justices, and
the anxiety of the king to make the procedure of his
courts perfectly regular, instead of depending on oral
tradition, was shown by the law books which his ministers
began at this time to draw up. As a security
against rebellion, a new oath of fealty was required
from every man, whether earl or villein, fugitives
and outlaws were to be more sharply sought after,
and felons punished with harsher cruelty. “Thinking
more of the king than of his sheep,” the legate
admitted Henry’s right to bring the clergy before
secular courts for crimes against forest law, and
in various questions of lay fiefs; and agreed
that murderers of clerks, who till then had been dealt
with by the ecclesiastical courts, should bear the
same punishment as murderers of laymen, and should
be disinherited. Religious churchmen looked on
with helpless irritation at Henry’s first formal
victory over the principles of Thomas; in the view
of his own day he had “renewed the Assize of
Clarendon, and ordered to be observed the execrable
decrees for which the blessed martyr Thomas had borne
exile for seven years, and been crowned with the crown
of martyrdom.”
During the next two years Henry was
in perpetual movement through the land from Devon
to Lincoln, and between March 1176 and August 1177
he summoned eighteen great councils, besides many
others of less consequence. From 1178 to 1180
he paid his last long visit to England, and again with
the old laborious zeal he began his round of journeys
through the country. “The king inquired
about the justices whom he had appointed, how they
treated the men of the kingdom; and when he learned
that the land and the subjects were too much burthened
with the great number of justices, because there were
eighteen, he elected five two clerks and
three laymen all of his own household;
and he ordered that they should hear all appeals of
the kingdom and should do justice, and that they should
not depart from the King’s Court, but should
remain there to hear appeals, so that if any question
should come to them they should present it to the
audience of the king, and that it should be decided
by him and by the wise men of the kingdom.”
The Justices of the Bench, as they were called,
took precedence of all other judges. The influence
of their work was soon felt. From this time written
records began to be kept of the legal compromises
made before the King’s Court to render possible
the transference of land. It seems that in 1181
the practice was for the first time adopted of entering
on rolls all the business which came to the King’s
Court, the pleas of the Crown and common pleas between
subjects. Unlike in form to the great Roll of
the Pipe, in which the records of the Exchequer Court
had long been kept, the Plea Rolls consisted of strips
of parchment filed together by their tops, on which,
in an uncertain and at first a blundering fashion,
the clerks noted down their records of judicial proceedings.
But practice soon brought about an orderly and mechanical
method of work, and the system of procedure in the
Bench rapidly attained a scientific perfection.
Before long the name of the Curia Regis was
exclusively applied to the new court of appeal.
The work of legal reform had now practically
come to an end. Henry indeed still kept a jealous
watch over his judges. Once more, on the retirement
of De Lucy in 1179, he divided the kingdom into new
circuits, and chose three bishops Winchester,
Ely, and Norwich “as chief justiciars,
hoping that if he had failed before, the seat least
he might find steadfast in righteousness, turning
neither to the right nor to the left, not oppressing
the poor, and not deciding the cause of the rich for
bribes.” In the next year he set Glanville
finally at the head of the legal administration.
After that he himself was called to other cares.
But he had really finished his task in England.
The mere system of routine which the wisdom of Henry
I. had set to control the arbitrary power of the king
had given place to a large and noble conception of
government; and by the genius of Henry II. the law
of the land was finally established as the supreme
guardian of the old English liberties and the new
administrative order.