Nicholson’s plan, which he proceeded
to carry out, was to pay a visit to Egypt, where he
was desirous to see Thebes, Cairo, and the Pyramids,
and thence journey home by way of Constantinople and
Vienna. He did not intend to stay long in any
of these places, but circumstances were against him.
At both the Turkish and Austrian capitals he was detained
by adventures which appealed strongly to his chivalrous
nature. The account of these comes to us through
Sir John Kaye, to whom Nicholson’s mother told
the story.
At the time that Nicholson arrived
in Constantinople, early in the New Year of 1850,
the city held a notable prisoner. This was Louis
Kossuth, the Hungarian patriot, whom the Austrians
had driven into exile. Owing to British influence,
the revolutionary leader’s asylum in Turkey
was rendered safe for the time, but a movement was
set on foot by his friends to smuggle him out of the
country and convey him to America. Such a project
received all Nicholson’s sympathies, and when
a friend of his an Englishman who had married
a Hungarian lady and served in the Magyar army enlisted
his help, he readily placed himself at the other’s
service.
The scheme was a simple one.
Every day Kossuth took a ride accompanied by a few
Turkish soldiers, the route being changed on each occasion.
It was accordingly arranged that he should choose to
ride on a particular day in the direction of the sea-coast.
At a certain spot the conspirators were to await
him and his escort, overpower the latter, and carry
Kossuth on board an American frigate which was to be
at hand.
Unhappily for the patriot, a lady
who was in the secret revealed it to a bosom friend,
who in turn confided in another. In a short time
it came to the knowledge of the Austrian ambassador.
Representations were at once made to the Turkish
authorities, who redoubled their vigilance, and the
plot fell through.
The same friend, “General G ,”
through whom Nicholson had been interested in the
attempt to free Kossuth, now asked the young officer
to do him another favour. His wife, a Hungarian
lady, as has been said, was imprisoned in an Austrian
fortress. So vigorous was the confinement that
she was kept in ignorance of her husband’s fate,
and the General was anxious to send her news of his
escape and present whereabouts. Nicholson promptly
undertook to convey a letter to the unfortunate lady,
should it be possible to do so, and started off immediately
for the fortress.
On arriving at his destination, he
marched boldly up to the gate of the citadel, demanding
to see the officer of the guard.
“I am Major Nicholson of the
Indian Army,” he said, “and I shall be
greatly obliged if you will allow me to see my friend,
Madame G .”
The request was undoubtedly an irregular
one, but the Austrian officer, after a little demur,
courteously gave his permission. Nicholson was
then conducted to the prisoner’s cell and told
that he could have five minutes’ conversation,
no longer. As soon as the door had closed behind
him, and he and Madame G were alone,
he pulled off one of his boots and drew out the letter,
saying, “You have just five minutes to read
it, and give me any message for your husband.”
There was no time for the poor lady
to express her gratitude as fully as she would have
liked. Having read the welcome letter, she told
her visitor what she wished him to say to her husband,
and then the five minutes having expired Nicholson
departed.
“These two incidents,”
says Sir John Kaye, “speak for themselves.
There is no lack, thank God, of kind men, brave men,
or good men among us, but out of them all how many
would have done these two things for ‘his neighbour’?
How many respectable men would at this moment condemn
them both?”
What Henry Lawrence and his noble
wife thought of the Kossuth enterprise was expressed
in a letter from the latter some months later.
“You can hardly believe,” she wrote, “the
interest and anxiety with which we watched the result
of your projected deed of chivalry. . . . When
I read of your plan my first thought was about your
mother, mingled with the feeling that I should not
grudge my own son in such a cause.”
After having performed his mission,
Nicholson made his way to London, where he found his
mother awaiting him at Sir James Hogg’s town
house. It was now the month of April. The
rest of the year he spent in sight-seeing, visiting
his old home at Lisburn, and looking up various relatives
in Ireland and England. He found time, however,
to make a journey to St. Petersburg, where he was
much impressed by a grand review of troops by the
Tsar. This opportunity to study the Russian
military system gave him considerable satisfaction,
as he had already devoted some attention to the French
and Prussian armies. But what struck him most
was a recent Prussian invention, the needle-gun, which
he saw would be the arm of the future. In strong
terms he urged the importance of introducing this
weapon in place of the old-fashioned muskets then
in use, but his counsel was unheeded.
At the end of 1851 Nicholson bade
good-bye to his mother, and set off on his return
journey to India. His friend, Herbert Edwardes,
had preceded him thither some months earlier, taking
with him his newly-wedded wife. To Nicholson
Edwardes had said before he left, “If your heart
meets one worthy of it, return not alone,” but
the advice was not followed. Nicholson, with
all the fascination which his personality exerted
over women, gave no indication of being susceptible
to the grand passion, and he went forth to take up
the great task that lay before him single-handed.