‘Our time be a-most gone by,’
said the miller looking up from his work and laying
aside the millpeck for a moment as he rubbed his eyes
with his white and greasy sleeve. From a window
of the old mill by Okebourne I was gazing over the
plain green with rising wheat, where the titlarks
were singing joyously in the sunshine. A millstone
had been ‘thrown off’ on some full sacks — like
cushions — and Tibbald, the miller, was dexterously
pecking the grooves afresh.
The millpeck is a little tool like
a double adze, or perhaps rather like two chisels
set in the head of a mallet. Though age was stealing
upon him, Tibbald’s eye and hand were still true,
and his rude sculpture was executed with curious precision.
The grooves, which are the teeth of the millstone,
radiate from the centre, but do not proceed direct
to the edge: they slant slightly.
‘There bean’t many as
can do this job,’ he said, ’I can put in
sixteen or twenty to the inch. These old French
burrs be the best stone; they be hard, but they be
mild and takes the peck well.’ Ponderous
as the millstones appear, they are capable of being
set so that their surfaces shall grind with extreme
accuracy. The nether, called the ‘bed stone,’
is stationary; the upper millstone, or ‘runner,’
revolves, and the grain crushed between the two works
out along the furrows to the edge.
Now and then the miller feels the
grain as it emerges with his pudgy thumb and finger,
and knows by touch how the stones are grinding.
It is perceptibly warm at the moment it issues forth,
from the friction: yet the stones must not grind
too close, or they ‘kill’ the wheat, which
should be only just cracked, so as to skin well.
To attain this end, first, the surfaces of the stones
must be level, and the grooves must be exactly right;
and, secondly, the upper stone must be hung at the
exact distance above the other to the smallest fraction
of an inch. The upper millstone is now sometimes
balanced with lead, which Tibbald said was not the
case of old.
‘We used to have a good trade
at this mill,’ he continued, as he resumed his
pecking; ’but our time be a-most gone by.
We be too fur away up in these here Downs. There!
Listen to he!’ A faint hollow whistle came up
over the plain, and I saw a long white cloud of steam
miles away, swiftly gliding above the trees beneath
which in the cutting the train was running.
‘That be th’ express.
It be that there steam as have done for us. Everything
got to go according to that there whistle: they
sets the church clock by he. The big London mills
as be driven by steam does the most of the work; and
this here foreign wheat, as comes over in the steamers,
puts the market down, so as we yent got a chance to
buy up a lot and keep it till the price gets better.
I seed in the paper as the rate is gone down a penny:
the steamers be going to ship the American wheat a
penny a bushel cheaper. So it bean’t much
good for Hilary to talk about his wheat. I thenks
that’ll about do.’
He laid down the millpeck, and took
his millstaff to prove the work he had done.
This was made of well-seasoned oak, two pieces put
together so that they should not warp. He rubbed
the edge with ruddle, and, placing the millstaff on
the stone, turned it about on its shorter axis:
where the ruddle left its red mark more pecking would
be required. There was but one small spot, and
this he quickly put right. Even the seasoned
oak, however, is not always true, and to be certain
on the point Tibbald had a millstaff prover. This
is of rigid steel, and the staff is put on it; if
any daylight is visible between the two the staff
is not accurate — so delicately must these
great stones be adjusted for successful grinding.
The largest of them are four feet
two inches diameter; and dangerous things they are
to move, for if the men do not all heave or ‘give’
at the same moment the stone may slip, and the edge
will take off a row of fingers as clean as the guillotine.
Tibbald, of course, had his joke about that part of
the machinery which is called the ‘damsel.’
He was a righteous man enough as millers go, but your
miller was always a bit of a knave; nor could he forbear
from boasting to me how he had been half an hour too
soon for Hilary last Overboro’ market.
He said the vast water-wheel was of
elm, but it would not last so long up so near the
springs. Upon a river or brook the wheel might
endure for thirty years, and grind corn for a generation.
His millpond was close to the spring-head, and the
spring-water ate into the wood and caused it to decay
much quicker. The spokes used to be mortised in,
now they used flanges, ironwork having almost destroyed
the business of the ancient millwright. Of all
manual workers, probably the old style of millwright
employed the greatest variety of tools, and was the
cleverest in handling them. There seemed no end
to the number of his chisels and augers; some of the
augers of immense size. In winter time the millwright
made the millstones, for the best stones are not in
one piece but composed of forty or fifty. The
French burrs which Tibbald preferred come over in
fragments, and these are carefully fitted together
and stuck with plaster of Paris. Such work required
great nicety: the old millwright was, in fact,
a kind of artist in his handicraft.
I could not help regretting, as Tibbald
dilated on these things, that the village millwright
no longer existed; the care, the skill, the forethought,
the sense of just proportion he exhibited quite took
him out of the ranks of the mere workman. He
was a master of his craft, and the mind he put into
it made him an artist. Tibbald went on that he
did not care for the Derby or Welsh millstones.
These were in one piece, but they were too hard for
the delicate grinding necessary to make the fine flour
needed for good bread. They answered best for
barley meal. Now, the French burr was not only
hard but mild, and seemed to feel the corn as it crushed
it. A sack of wheat lost 4 lb. in grinding.
I asked about the toll: he showed me the old measure,
reckoned at the tenth of a sack; it was a square box.
When the lord’s tenants in the olden times were
forced to have their corn ground at the lord’s
mill, the toll was liable to be abused in a cruel manner;
hence the universal opinion that a miller must be a
knave. Even in much more recent times, when the
labourers took part of their wages in flour, there
is said to have been a great deal of sleight-of-hand
in using the toll-box, and the miller’s thumb
grew fat by continually dipping into other folk’s
sacks.
But Tibbald had an argument even here,
for he said that men nowadays never grew so strong
as they used to do when they brought their own wheat
to be ground at the mill, and when they made their
bread and baked it at home. His own father once
carried the fattest man in the parish on his back
half a mile; I forget how much he weighed exactly,
but it was something enormous, and the fat man, moreover,
held a 56 lb. weight in each hand. He himself
remembered when Hilary used to be the strongest man
in the place; when the young men met together they
contended who should lift the heaviest weight, and
he had seen Hilary raise 5 cwt., fair lifting, with
the hands only, and without any mechanical appliance.
Hilary, too, used to write his name with a carpenter’s
flat cedar pencil on the whitewashed ceiling of the
brewhouse, holding the while a 1/2 cwt. of iron hung
on his little finger. The difficulty was to get
the weight up, lifting it fairly from the ground;
you could lift it very well half-way, but it was just
when the arm was bent that the tug came to get it past
the hip, after which it would go up comparatively
easily.
Now this great strength was not the
result of long and special training, or, indeed, of
any training at all; it came naturally from outdoor
life, outdoor work, plain living (chiefly bacon), and
good bread baked at home. At the present time
men ate the finest and whitest of bread, but there
was no good in it. Folk grew tall and big — taller
than they used to be, he thought — and they
could run quick, and so forth; but there was no stamina,
no power of endurance, of withstanding exposure like
there was formerly. The mere measure of a man,
he was certain, had nothing to do with his strength;
and he could never understand how it was that the
army folk would have men precisely so high and so
many inches round. Just then he was called away
to a carter who had brought up his team and waggon
at the door, and as he was gone some time I went up
under the roof, whence there was a beautiful view
down over the plain.
The swifts, which had but just arrived,
were rushing through the sky in their headlong way;
they would build presently in the roof. The mill
was built at the mouth of a coombe on the verge of
the Downs; the coombe was narrow and steep, as if
nature had begun a cutting with the view of tunnelling
through the mass of the hills. At the upper end
of the coombe the spring issued, and at the lower
was the millpond. There is something peculiarly
human in a mill — something that carries the
mind backwards into the past, the days of crossbow
and lance and armour. Possibly there was truth
in Tibbald’s idea that men grow larger in the
present time without corresponding strength, for is
it not on record that some at least of the armour
preserved in collections will not fit those who have
tried it on in recent times? Yet the knight for
whom it was originally made, though less in stature
and size, may have had much more vigour and power of
endurance.
The ceaseless rains last year sent
the farmers in some places to the local millers once
more somewhat in the old style. Part of their
wheat proved so poor that they could not sell it at
market; and, rather than waste it, they had it ground
at the village mills with the idea of consuming as
much of the flour as possible at home. But the
flour was so bad as to be uneatable. As I parted
with Tibbald that morning he whispered to me, as he
leaned over the hatch, to say a good word for him
with Hilary about the throw of oak that was going on
in one part of the Chace. ’If you was to
speak to he, he could speak to the steward, and may
be I could get a stick or two at a bargain’ — with
a wink. Tibbald did a little in buying and selling
timber, and, indeed, in many other things. Pleased
as he was to show me the mill, and to talk about it
by the hour together, the shrewd old fellow still had
an eye to business.
After a while, in walking along the
footpaths of the meadows and by the woods, a feeling
grew upon me that it would be pleasant to know something
of their history. It was through inquiring about
the age of the rookery that this thought took shape.
No one could tell me how long the rooks had built
there, nor were there any passing allusions in old
papers to fix the date. There was no tradition
of it among the oldest people; all they knew was that
the rooks had always been there, and they seemed to
indicate a belief that there the rooks would always
remain. It seemed to me, however, that the site
of their city was slowly travelling, and in a few
generations might be found on the other side of the
Chace. Some of the trees where the nests were
most numerous were decaying, and several were already
deserted. As the trees died, the rooks moved
to the next clump, and thus gradually shifted their
city.
This inquiry led to further reflections
about the past of the woods and meadows. Besides
the birds, the flowers, and animals that had been
there for so many, many centuries, there were the folk
in the scattered homesteads, whose ancestors might
have left some record. In these times history
is concerned only with great cities or strategical
positions of world-wide renown; interest is concentrated
on a siege of Paris or a march towards Constantinople.
In days of yore battles were often fought in or near
what seem to us mere villages; little places whose
very names are uncertain and exact site unascertainable
were the centres of strife. Some of these places
are buried under the sward as completely as Herculaneum
under the lava. The green turf covers them, the
mower passes over with his scythe and knows not of
them.
Hilary had observed in one of his
meadows that the turf turned brown or burnt up in
squares during hot summer weather. This he conjectured
to be caused by the shallowness of the soil over some
ancient foundations; and some years before he had
had the curiosity to open a hole, and soon came upon
a hidden wall. He did not excavate farther, but
the old folk, when they heard of it, remembered a tradition
of a village having once existed there. At present
there were no houses near; the place, whatever it
was, had disappeared. The mention of this meadow
led to some conversation about the names of the fields,
which are often very curious.
Such names as Lea, Leaze, Croft, and
so on, are readily explained; but what was the original
meaning of The Cossicles? Then there were Zacker’s
Hook, the Conigers, Cheesecake, Hawkes, Rials, Purley,
Strongbowls, Thrupp, Laines, Sannetts, Gaston, Wexils,
Wernils, Glacemere, several Hams, Haddons, and Weddingtons,
Slades, and so on, and a Truelocks. These were
quickly put down; scores of still more singular names
might be collected in every parish. It is the
meadows and pastures which usually bear these designations;
the ploughed fields are often only known by their
acreage, as the Ten Acre Piece, or the Twelve Acres.
Some of them are undoubtedly the personal names of
former owners. But in others ancient customs,
allusions to traditions, fragments of history, or
of languages now extinct, may survive.
There was a meadow where deep trenches
could be traced, green now, but clearly once a moat,
but there was not even a tradition about it. On
the Downs overlooking the Idovers was an earthwork
or entrenchment, of which no one knew anything.
Hilary believed there was an old book — a
history of Overboro’ town — which might
perhaps contain some information, but where it could
be found he did not know. After some consideration,
however, he thought there might be a copy at the Crown,
once an old posting-inn, at Overboro’: that
was about the only place where I should be likely
to find it. So one warm summer day I walked into
Overboro’, following a path over the Downs, whose
short sward affords the best walking in the world.
At the Crown, now no more an inn but
an hotel, the archway was blocked up with two hand-trucks
piled with trunks and portmanteaus, the property of
commercial gentlemen and just about to be conveyed
to the station. What with the ostler and the
‘boots’ and the errand-boys, all hanging
about for their fees, it was a push to enter; and the
waiters within seemed to equally occupy the passage,
fetching the dust-coats and walking-sticks and flourishing
coat-brushes. Seeing a door marked ‘Coffee-room,’
I took refuge, and having ordered luncheon began to
consider how I should open my subject with the landlord,
who was clearly as much up to the requirements of
modern life as if his house had been by a London terminus.
Time-tables in gilt-stamped covers strewed the tables;
wine lists stood on edge; a card of the local omnibus
to the station was stuck up where all could see it;
the daily papers hung over the arm of a cosy chair;
the furniture was new; the whole place, it must be
owned, extremely comfortable and the service good.
But it was town and not country — to-day
and not the olden time; and I did not feel courage
enough to ask for the book. I believe I should
have left the place without mentioning it, but, fortunately
looking round the room while the lunch was prepared,
I found it in the bookcase, where there was a strange
mixture of the modern and antique. I took down
the history from between Rich’s thin grey ’Ruins
of Babylon’ and a yellow-bound railway novel.
Towards the close of the eighteenth
century a learned gentleman had taken much pains to
gather together this account of the town. He began
with the story of Brutus, and showed that one of the
monarchs descended from the illustrious Trojan founded
a city here. Some fossil shells, indeed, that
had been dug up furnished him with conclusive proof
that the Deluge had not left the site uncovered, since
no how else could they have got there: an argument
commonly accepted in his day. Thus he commenced,
like the monks themselves, with the beginning of the
world; but then came a wide gap down to Domesday Book.
The hides and yardlands held by the conquerors — how
much was in demesne, how many acres were wood and
how many meadow — the number of servi,
and what the mill paid were duly translated and recorded.
The descent of the manors through
the monasteries and the persons who purchased them
at the Dissolution filled several pages, and was supplemented
with a charter recognising rights of infang and outfang,
assize of bread and ale, and so forth. Finally,
there was a list of the mayors, which some one had
carried on in manuscript on a fly-leaf to within ten
years of date. There was an air of precision in
the exact sentences, and the writer garnished his
tale with frequent quotations from Latin writers.
In the midst was a wood-cut of a plant having no sort
of relevancy to the subject-matter, but for which he
returned thanks for the loan of the block.
But he had totally omitted his own
times. These quotations, these lists and charters,
the extracts from Domesday, read dry and formal — curious,
and yet not interesting. Had he described the
squires and yeomen, the townspeople of his own day,
their lives and manner of thinking, how invaluable
and pleasing his work would have been!
Hilary said that in these little country
towns years ago people had to be very careful how
they acted, lest they should offend some local magnate.
He remembered a tradesman telling him how once he had
got into great disgrace for putting a new knocker
on his private side door, without first asking permission
and sending round to obtain the opinion of an old
gentleman. This person had nothing whatever to
do with the property, but lived retired and ruled
his neighbours with a rod of iron. The old knocker
was quite worn out, but the new one had scarcely been
fastened on when the unfortunate owner was summoned
to the presence of the irate old gentleman, who demanded
with great wrath what on earth he meant by setting
himself up above his station in this way. It
was only by a humble answer, and by begging the old
gentleman to walk down and look at the discarded knocker,
promising that it should be replaced if he thought
proper, that he could be appeased. A man then
hardly dared appear in a new hat without first suggesting
the idea to his social superior.