Soon after my arrival in London, I
called on Brande, at the address he had given me in
Brook Street. He received me with the pleasant
affability which a man of the world easily assumes,
and his apology for being unable to pass the evening
with me in his own house was a model of social style.
The difficulty in the way was practically an impossibility.
His Society had a meeting on that evening, and it was
imperative that he should be present.
“Why not come yourself?”
he said. “It is what we might call a guest
night. That is, visitors, if friends of members,
are admitted, and as this privilege may not be again
accorded to outsiders, you ought to come before you
decide finally to join us. I must go now, but
Natalie” (he did not say “Miss Brande”)
“will entertain you and bring you to the hall.
It is very near in Hanover Square.”
“I shall be very glad indeed
to bring Miss Brande to the hall,” I answered,
changing the sentence in order to correct Brande’s
too patronising phrase.
“The same thing in different
words, is it not? If you prefer it that way,
please have it so.” His imperturbability
was unaffected.
Miss Brande here entered the room.
Her brother, with a word of renewed apology, left
us, and presently I saw him cross the street and hail
a passing hansom.
“You must not blame him for
running off,” Miss Brande said. “He
has much to think of, and the Society depends almost
wholly on himself.”
I stammered out that I did not blame
him at all, and indeed my disclaimer was absolutely
true. Brande could not have pleased me better
than he had done by relieving us of his company.
Miss Brande made tea, which I pretended
to enjoy in the hope of pleasing her. Over this
we talked more like old and well proven friends than
mere acquaintances of ten days’ standing.
Just once or twice the mysterious chord which marred
the girl’s charming conversation was touched.
She immediately changed the subject on observing my
distress. I say distress, for a weaker word would
not fittingly describe the emotion I felt whenever
she blundered into the pseudo-scientific nonsense which
was her brother’s favourite affectation.
At least, it seemed nonsense to me. I could not
well foresee then that the theses which appeared to
be mere theoretical absurdities, would ever be proven as
they have been very terrible realities.
On subjects of ordinary educational interest my hostess
displayed such full knowledge of the question and
ease in dealing with it, that I listened, fascinated,
as long as she chose to continue speaking. It
was a novel and delightful experience to hear a girl
as handsome as a pictorial masterpiece, and dressed
like a court beauty, discourse with the knowledge,
and in the language, of the oldest philosopher.
But this was only one of the many surprising combinations
in her complex personality. My noviciate was still
in its first stage.
The time to set out for the meeting
arrived all too soon for my inclination. We decided
to walk, the evening being fine and not too warm,
and the distance only a ten minutes’ stroll.
At a street crossing, we met a crowd unusually large
for that neighbourhood. Miss Brande again surprised
me. She was watching the crowd seething and swarming
past. Her dark eyes followed the people with a
strange wondering, pitying look which I did not understand.
Her face, exquisite in its expression at all times,
was now absolutely transformed, beatified. Brande
had often spoken to me of mesmerism, clairvoyance,
and similar subjects, and it occurred to me that he
had used his sister as a medium, a clairvoyante.
Her brain was not, therefore, under normal control.
I determined instantly to tell him on the first opportunity
that if he did not wish to see the girl permanently
injured, he would have to curtail his hypnotic influence.
“It is rather a stirring sight,”
I said so sharply to Miss Brande that she started.
I meant to startle her, but did not succeed as far
as I wished.
“It is a very terrible sight,” she answered.
“Oh, there is no danger,” I said hastily,
and drew her hand over my arm.
“Danger! I was not thinking of danger.”
As she did not remove her hand, I
did not infringe the silence which followed this,
until a break in the traffic allowed us to cross the
street. Then I said:
“May I ask what you were thinking of just now,
Miss Brande?”
“Of the people their lives their
work their misery!”
“I assure you many are very
happy,” I replied. “You take a morbid
view. Misery is not the rule. I am sure
the majority are happy.”
“What difference does that make?”
the girl said with a sigh. “What is the
end of it all the meaning of it all?
Their happiness! Cui Bono?”
We walked on in silence, while I turned
over in my mind what she had said. I could come
to no conclusion upon it save that my dislike for her
enigmatic aberrations was becoming more intense as
my liking for the girl herself increased. To
change the current of her thoughts and my own, I asked
her abruptly:
“Are you a member of the Cui Bono Society?”
“I! Oh, no. Women are not allowed
to join for the present.”
“I am delighted to hear it,”
I said heartily, “and I hope the rule will continue
in force.”
She looked at me in surprise.
“Why should you mind? You are joining yourself.”
“That is different. I don’t
approve of ladies mixing themselves up in these curious
and perhaps questionable societies.”
My remark amused her. Her eyes
sparkled with simple fun. The change in her manner
was very agreeable to me.
“I might have expected that.”
To my extreme satisfaction she now looked almost mischievous.
“Herbert told me you were a little ”
“A little what?”
“Well, a little you
won’t be vexed? That is right. He said
a little mediaeval.”
This abated my appreciation of her
sense of humour, and I maintained a dignified reticence,
which unhappily she regarded as mere sullenness, until
we reached the Society’s room.
The place was well filled, and the
company, in spite of the extravagantly modern costumes
of the younger women, which I cannot describe better
than by saying that there was little difference in
it from that of ordinary male attire, was quite conventional
in so far as the interchange of ordinary courtesies
went. When, however, any member of the Society
mingled with a group of visitors, the conversation
was soon turned into a new channel. Secrets of
science, which I had been accustomed to look upon
as undiscoverable, were bandied about like the merest
commonplaces of education. The absurdity of individuality
and the subjectivity of the emotions were alike insisted
on without notice of the paradox, which to me appeared
extreme. The Associates were altruistic for the
sake of altruism, not for the sake of its beneficiaries.
They were not pantheists, for they saw neither universal
good nor God, but rather evil in all things themselves
included. Their talk, however, was brilliant,
and, with allowance for its jarring sentiments, it
possessed something of the indefinable charm which
followed Brande. My reflections on this identity
of interest were interrupted by the man himself.
After a word of welcome he said:
“Let me show you our great experiment;
that which touches the high-water mark of scientific
achievement in the history of humanity. It is
not much in itself, but it is the pioneer of many
marvels.”
He brought me to a metal stand, on
which a small instrument constructed of some white
metal was placed. A large number of wires were
connected with various portions of it, and these wires
passed into the side-wall of the building.
In appearance, this marvel of micrology,
so far as the eye-piece and upper portions went, was
like an ordinary microscope, but its magnifying power
was to me unbelievable. It magnified the object
under examination many thousand times more than the
most powerful microscope in the world.
I looked through the upper lens, and
saw a small globe suspended in the middle of a tiny
chamber filled with soft blue light, or transparent
material. Circling round this globe four other
spheres revolved in orbits, some almost circular,
some elliptical, some parabolic. As I looked,
Brande touched a key, and the little globules
began to fly more rapidly round their primary, and
make wider sweeps in their revolutions. Another
key was pressed, and the revolving spheres slowed down
and drew closer until I could scarcely distinguish
any movement. The globules seemed to form
a solid ball.
“Attend now!” Brande exclaimed.
He tapped the first key sharply.
A little grey cloud obscured the blue light.
When it cleared away, the revolving globes had disappeared.
“What do you think of it?” he asked carelessly.
“What is it? What does
it mean? Is it the solar system or some other
system illustrated in miniature? I am sorry for
the misadventure.”
“You are partly correct,”
Brande replied. “It is an illustration of
a planetary system, though a small one. But there
was no misadventure. I caused the somewhat dangerous
result you witnessed, the wreckage not merely of the
molecule of marsh gas you were examining which
any educated chemist might do as easily as I but
the wreckage of its constituent atoms. This is
a scientific victory which dwarfs the work of Helmholtz,
Avogadro, or Mendelejeff. The immortal Dalton
himself” (the word “immortal” was
spoken with a sneer) “might rise from his grave
to witness it.”
“Atoms molecules!
What are you talking about?” I asked, bewildered.
“You were looking on at the
death of a molecule a molecule of marsh
gas, as I have already said. It was caused by
a process which I would describe to you if I could
reduce my own life work and that of every
scientific amateur who has preceded me since the world
began into half a dozen sentences.
As that would be difficult, I must ask you to accept
my personal assurance that you witnessed a fact, not
a fiction of my imagination.”
“And your instrument is so perfect
that it not only renders molecules and atoms but their
diffusion visible? It is a microscopic impossibility.
At least it is amazing.”
“Pshaw!” Brande exclaimed
impatiently. “My instrument does certainly
magnify to a marvellous extent, but not by the old
device of the simple microscope, which merely focussed
a large area of light rays into a small one.
So crude a process could never show an atom to the
human eye. I add much to that. I restore
to the rays themselves the luminosity which they lost
in their passage through our atmosphere. I give
them back all their visual properties, and turn them
with their full etheric blaze on the object under
examination. Great as that achievement is, I
deny that it is amazing. It may amaze a Papuan
to see his eyelash magnified to the size of a wire,
or an uneducated Englishman to see a cheese-mite magnified
to the size of a midge. It should not amaze you
to see a simple process a little further developed.”
“Where does the danger you spoke
of come in?” I asked with a pretence of interest.
Candidly, I did not believe a single word that Brande
had said.
“If you will consult a common
text-book on the physics of the ether,” he replied,
“you will find that one grain of matter contains
sufficient energy, if etherised, to raise a hundred
thousand tons nearly two miles. In face of such
potentiality it is not wise to wreck incautiously even
the atoms of a molecule.”
“And the limits to this description
of scientific experiment? Where are they?”
“There are no limits,”
Brande said decisively. “No man can say
to science ‘thus far and no farther.’
No man ever has been able to do so. No man ever
shall!”