THE SCHOOLHOUSE DEBATES (CONCLUDED)
The dust was wiped from more Bibles
in the community around Fairmount School following
the debates between Peter Newby and Robert Davis than
for many a day. Even old Mr. Stephenson, who was
the most indifferent to the claims of religion, hunted
a Bible, and declared he was going to find out which
one was right, Newby or Davis. Charley Moss, a
goodhearted, but wild, wicked fellow, became interested
also. He bought his first New Testament and dedicated
himself to the task of reading it through. “I
must find out,” said he, “what this young
man Davis is talking about. His religion seems
to be the real thing.”
The next prayer meeting night found
the house packed to the limit. Conjectures and
opinions as to how the debate would go were passed
back and forth. Peter Newby’s partisans
rallied to his support. A few were inclined to
accept Robert Davis’ views, while the majority
were moved by morbid curiosity to watch the outcome
of a verbal conflict. Peter Newby wore an air
of entire confidence on this occasion he
had the seventh chapter of Romans back of him he thought.
Nearly every one else who accepted the old theology
of the community expected him to “clean up”
his opponent in grand style that night.
As for Robert Davis, the previous
week had been one of prayer and study. He had
first entered the prayer meeting with the intention
to help along a good work. He had no intention
of entering into debate or controversy with anyone.
Now, as he viewed the matter, he was surprised to
find the rôle that he was playing. On the first
night, he had only intended to stand up for and express
his convictions toward a very vital subject that
of living above sin. He had been a sinner, he
had now become soundly converted, had received light
on sanctification (though he was not yet sanctified)
and holy living, and his only object had been to be
loyal to the truth he had found. As it looked
to him now, he was one of the principals in a battle
between truth and error. He was very young in
faith, and it is not to be wondered at if his zeal
was greater than his knowledge. Day by day he
prayed that the saving truth of the gospel might be
made plain to all, and that deadly error might be
exposed, and its power to blind the people destroyed,
completely and eternally.
“Romans 7,” called out
Peter Newby, who led off without consulting anybody.
“Read the first verse, Mrs. Johnson. Everybody
follow the reading. There are so many present
tonight that only a small portion will get to read.
Pay strict attention.”
After the chapter was read, Peter began:
“Neighbors,” he said,
“you have known me for a long time, and all of
you know that I am fair and square to everybody.
I try to treat my neighbors right. I have been
a Christian a long time. I was baptized fifty
years ago in the Big Sandy River. Water baptism
is essential to salvation, so somewhere between the
time I went down into the water and came up out of
it, I was converted.
“Now we are studying the seventh
chapter of Romans. Paul gives his experience
in this chapter. Paul was a great man but he said
that he was ‘carnal, sold under sin’ . Now my experience is just like Paul’s.
He says, ’For what I would, that do I not; but
what I hate, that do I,’ and then in verse 19,
’For the good that I would I do not: but
the evil which I would not, that I do.’
This is my experience. I do many things I ought
not to do, and I leave undone many things I ought
to do. This old tongue of mine says many ugly
things, and when I get with wicked boys and men I
crack my jokes too, and these hands often do wrong,
but, friends, I am trying in my weak way to serve the
Lord and to make heaven my home. But I do not
expect to be better than Paul. He said that when
he would do good, evil was present with him.
This is my experience. I would like to do good,
but the flesh is too weak, and there is too much sin
in me.” Peter sat down.
Robert Davis arose. Every eye
was upon him. Bibles and Testaments were opened.
Old Mr. Stephenson was there with his Bible, and very
attentive was he. Charley Moss had his Testament
open at the proper place.
“At first glance, it may seem,”
Robert said, “that Romans 7 upholds a life of
more or less sinning in a Christian. A closer
view, however, reveals that it does not. The
first night that I was present at these prayer meetings,
Brother Newby laid down one sound method for interpreting
the Scriptures. He said, ’First, one should
know who was writing, second, one should know to whom
he was writing, and third, one should know what he
was writing about.’ This is a sound theory.
Let us apply it to the text in question. First,
who was writing? Paul. Second, to whom was
he writing? To the Christians at Rome. Third,
what was he writing about? His experience under
the law.”
This assertion came like a thunderclap
from a clear sky. Peter Newby saw, at once, the
significance of the statement, and he shifted uneasily
in his seat. He riveted his eyes to the text,
in an effort to discover some point that would be
in opposition to Robert’s statement. The
crowd looked open-mouthed. This was a new doctrine they
had never heard it explained that way. The interest
was intense.
Continuing, Robert said: “This
is made plain by the first few verses of the chapter.
Please notice them ’Know ye not, brethren,
(for I speak to them that know the law,) how that
the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth?’
Then he shows in the verses following that Christians
have ‘become dead to the law’ through Christ,
and that they are married to Christ, and bring forth
fruit unto God. ’But now we are delivered
from the law,’ says Paul.
“His whole argument, down to
and including verse 6, is that we have died to the
law through crucifixion with Christ, and are therefore
free to marry another. We have become dead to
the law, and since death dissolves the marriage vow,
we are, therefore, free from connection with the law,
and are joined unto Christ. Beginning with verse
14 to the end of the chapter, is given an explanation
of how Paul’s sinful nature brought him into
subjection to its demands. It is a clear testimony
of an honest man’s experience under the old law.
By that law he became aware of sin and felt its sinfulness,
yet that law brought no grace nor power to preserve
him from violating its prohibitions. He desired
to do good, but could not. Sin came to life and
slew him. Paul was condemned by the law, and
yet he could not come from under the condemnation.
He was, so to speak, tied or married to a dead body,
a law or master which brought death, and he wondered
where deliverance would come from. ‘Thank
God,’ he says, ’it will come through Jesus
Christ the Lord.’
“This cannot be the experience
of Christians,” said Robert. “If you
will just look at the second verse of chapter 8, you
will find these words: ’For the law of
the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free
from the law of sin and death.’ And verse
3 says, ’For what the law could not do, in that
it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own
Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, [or
by a sacrifice for sin] condemned sin in the flesh,’
and verse 4 states: ‘That the righteousness
of the law might be fulfilled in us,’ etc.
“Hence, it is evident that Christians
are to live holy lives. God demands holiness
of us. ‘Be ye holy; for I am holy,’
says 1 Pe:16. Yea, we are to repent and turn
away from all sin, for Christ ’gave himself
for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity,
and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous
of good works’ (Titus 2:14). And ’the
grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared
to all men, teaching us that, denying ungodliness
and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously,
and godly, in this present world’ (Titus 2:11,
12).”
The arrow of conviction shot deep
down into many hearts as Robert Davis spoke these
words. The truth he spoke commended itself to
their minds and consciences. Some rebelled, and
rejected his sound arguments. Peter Newby especially
was agitated. He felt himself sinking into despair,
as far as argument was concerned. Old Mr. Stephenson
and Charley Moss trembled from head to foot. The
Spirit of God was working powerfully in their and
others’ hearts.
“I am not going to accept the
interpretations placed upon this seventh chapter of
Romans by the speaker,” said Peter, as he arose
to reply. “Why? Because I never heard
it explained that way. Why? Because I have
heard Brother Peters preach from these texts, and he
has always declared a man could not keep from sin.
Living free from sin! Whoever heard of such a
thing? It can’t be done, that is all there
is to it. We cannot keep from sin. Paul
said sin was ever present with him, and I know it
is with me. I try to do right, but sin gets the
better of me. I ask God to forgive me every time
I pray. I tell you, a man simply cannot live
without committing sin.”
When Peter Newby sat down, Robert
Davis arose again, and said:
“There is a text of scripture
that says certain persons cannot cease from sin.
I do not say that anyone here fulfills the description
in that text. Peter says, in his Second Epistle,
chapter two, verse 14: ‘Having eyes full
of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin.’
As I said, I charge no man with this kind of character,
and only read it to give you a Scriptural description
of one who cannot live without sin.”
It was painfully evident that this
was an unwise thing to say at that particular time.
Robert Davis was young, and full of zeal. Most
probably he should not have uttered those words.
Peter Newby was powerfully affected. He felt
as if his character had been scandalized before the
whole crowd. His face waxed red with an inner
rage. His body quivered and shook with excitement.
No one had ever seen him quite so exercised.
He arose slowly, but with extreme determination.
Things had gone as far as they could without a physical
clash.
“Hold your place, young man,
I will not allow anyone to insult me in this manner.
Be careful what you say. There will be another
chapter added to this if you are not careful.
I will defend my honor, no matter what it costs.”
And he resumed his seat.
The air was filled with intense excitement.
A few words from Robert Davis would have struck fire,
and he knew it. So he quietly sat still without
saying a word. The tenseness of the situation
was painful. Just then Mary Davis started that
old familiar song:
“Jesus, lover of my soul,
Let me to thy bosom
fly,
While the nearer waters roll,
While the tempest still
is high.
Hide me, O my Savior, hide,
Till the storm of life
is past,
Safe into the haven guide,
Oh, receive my soul
at last.”
A few joined in toward the last half
of the verse, and, as she began on the second verse,
the whole congregation sang with vigor:
“Other refuge have I none,
Hangs my helpless soul
on thee;
Leave, oh, leave me not alone,
Still support and comfort
me.
All my trust on thee is stayed,
All my help from thee
I bring,
Cover my defenseless head
With the shadow of thy
wing.”
Robert and Mary Davis started for
home as soon as they could. Peter Newby got into
an argument with old Mr. Stephenson, who by this time
had become a sort of champion of Robert’s and
a crowd encircled them. Peter Newby found a match
in the old man, for Mr. Stephenson, at this time,
while mentally convinced, was still unsaved, and could
be as personal and ironical as Mr. Newby. They
argued the point of a sinless life for an hour, mixed
a good deal of personal invective into the argument,
which drew from the crowd vociferous “ha! ha’s!”
and they parted without feeling one whit better toward
one another than they did before.