Jeanne Josephe Marie Antoinette, of
Lorraine, archduchess of Austria, the unfortunate
queen of Louis XVI. of France, was the daughter of
Francis I. and Maria Theresa, and was born at Vienna,
in 1755. She was educated with the utmost care,
and nature had bestowed upon her the highest beauty
of person. Her accomplishments, talents, grace,
virtue, and uncommon loveliness, fitted her for the
queen of a gallant nation; and as such she would have
been honored in France, had she lived before oppression
had roused the people to madness. Her mother,
in a letter to her future husband, after alluding
to the care with which she had formed her mind, says,
“Your bride, dear dauphin, is separated from
me. As she has ever been my delight, so she will
be your happiness. For this purpose, I have enjoined
upon her, as among her highest duties, the most tender
attachment to your person, the greatest attention
to every thing that can please or make you happy.
Above all things, I have recommended to her humility
towards God, because I am convinced that it is impossible
for us to secure the happiness of the subjects confided
to us without love to Him who destroys the sceptres
and the thrones of kings according to his will.”
The marriage took place at Versailles,
May 16th, 1770, and was celebrated with uncommon splendor;
but, immediately after the ceremony, a thunder-storm
of unparalleled violence broke over the palace of
Versailles, darkened the surrounding scenery, and struck
terror into the hearts of the people for miles around.
On May 30th, the festivities at Paris were saddened
by a most terrible accident; a number of citizens
being crushed to death in the Rue Royale,
by some mismanagement on the part of the proper authorities.
Fifty-three persons were found dead, and three hundred
more were dangerously injured.
The magnanimity of Marie Antoinette
displayed itself soon after her elevation to the throne,
on the death of Louis XV. An officer of the body-guard,
who had given her offence on some former occasion,
expressed his intention of resigning his commission;
but the queen forbade him. “Remain,”
said she; “forget the past. Far be it from
the queen of France to revenge the injuries of the
dauphiness.” She devoted herself to the
interests of her people with an assiduity unparalleled
in a sovereign of her age; yet, becoming obnoxious
to the court party, her character was assailed in
every shape and quarter; she was accused of setting
on foot conspiracies which never existed, and of entertaining
views which never entered her mind. She was termed
the Austrian, and it was openly asserted, as
well as privately insinuated, that her heart was estranged
from the country of her husband, and her mind solely
occupied with the interests of her native land.
In her conduct, there was matter for
gentle reproof, but none for malevolent accusation.
A gayety which sometimes degenerated into levity,
a passion for fashionable novelties, and an undisguised
contempt for court formalities, instead of being regarded
as the foibles and imprudences of a young and
innocent mind, were construed into evidences of the
existence of loose principles, unbridled extravagance,
and hatred for the nation. She was likewise charged
with pettishness under reproof; and we can readily
conceive how a female of so high a rank, conscious
of the purity of her intentions, and perpetually assailed
by reckless cavillers, assumed, in reply to the unworthy
insinuations of her enemies, the tone which her virtue
and her birth appeared to warrant. The affair
of the diamond necklace created an extraordinary sensation.
A jeweller at Paris demanded payment for a necklace
so costly that the finances of a queen would hardly
warrant its purchase. The result of an examination
was the proof of the queen’s integrity.
On the 6th October, 1789, the mob
broke into the palace of Versailles, murdered some
of the bodyguards, and threatened the queen in the
most frightful language. At midnight, she received
a letter from a friendly clergyman, advising her to
seek safety in flight, as her life would be sacrificed
early the next morning. She resolved to remain,
and destroyed the warning letter. She heard the
footsteps of the ruffian rabble; she thought her time
had come, but her life was saved. The progress
of the ruffians was arrested at the very door of her
chamber, where her faithful guardsmen laid down their
lives to secure for their queen a retreat to the chamber
of the king. The king and queen showed themselves,
with their children, in the balcony. The mass
of heads beneath for a moment ceased to be agitated;
but it was only for a moment. Silence was broken
by a thousand tongues “No children no
children! The queen! the queen alone!”
This was a trying moment; but Antoinette
had firmness for the crisis. Putting her son
and daughter into her husband’s arms, she advanced
alone into the balcony. A spectacle like this
filled the fierce people with admiration, and thundering
sounds of “Vive la Reine!” succeeded
to the imprecations of the preceding moment. Such
is the fickleness of a mob! The march to Paris
was a succession of terrors! The heads of the
two faithful guardsmen, elevated on pikes, met the
eyes of the poor queen as she looked from her carriage
windows.
The fate of Antoinette darkened rapidly.
With the king, she fled to Varennes with
him was brought back to Paris. Her courage did
not fail in the scene of the Legislative Assembly,
before which body she was present with her husband,
heard his deposition pronounced, and then went into
the Temple, where he was imprisoned. Here, where
the light of heaven faintly fell through grated windows,
surrounded by her family, she appeared to feel entire
resignation to the will of Him on whom the happiness
of the humblest individual depends. When she heard
the condemnation of the king from the lips of the royal
victim, she had the firmness to congratulate him on
the speedy delivery from trouble that awaited him.
Her eternal separation from her son did not shake
her firmness, and, with a heart apparently unbroken,
she was consigned to the loathsome depths of a dungeon,
August 5th, 1793.
The accusations brought against the
unhappy queen, on her trial, were all unfounded, and
merely advanced because her enemies had still respect
enough for justice to mimic its forms in their guilty
court. She was charged with having squandered
the public money, and with leaguing in secret with
the common enemies of France. The clearness of
her innocence, the falsehood and frivolity of the witnesses,
the eloquence of the defenders, and her own noble
bearing, were of no avail: Marie Antoinette was
doomed to die upon the scaffold.
The expression of her countenance,
as she passed to the place of execution, awed the
bloodthirsty populace; but the once matchless beauty
of that noble countenance was gone forever. One
unacquainted with the ravages of grief could not believe
that the haggard and forsaken being whom they led
to sacrifice, was the same young queen, who, a short
time before, held in thrall the chivalry of France,
by her exquisite loveliness, her winning grace, and
sportive gayety. Antoinette cast back a long,
last look at the Tuileries a look which
told of sorrowful remembrance and of agonizing emotion;
then, with an air of dignified resignation, she ascended
the scaffold. “My God,” cried she,
as she kneeled on that fatal platform, “enlighten
and affect my executioner! Adieu, my children,
my beloved ones: I am going to your father!”
Thus she perished, in her thirty-eighth year, October
16th, 1793.
In the gayety of youth and the sunshine
of prosperity, Marie Antoinette had exhibited some
foibles amid many virtues. In the beginning of
her trials, she displayed, as well as those around
her, serious mistakes of judgment; but in the dark
hour of adversity, she exhibited a spectacle of truth,
firmness, and dignity, hardly less than sublime.
When confined with her family in the prison of the
Temple, with only a glimmering ray of light stealing
through the iron bars, she displayed the utmost calmness,
cheered all around with her counsel and example, and
taught them to disregard privation, sickness, and
suffering.
When her husband told her that he
was condemned to the scaffold, she congratulated him
upon the speedy termination of an existence so painful,
and the unperishing reward that should crown it.
Before the Revolutionary Tribunal she was unabashed,
and, when accused of a horrid crime, she put her traducers
to shame by exclaiming, “I appeal to every mother
here whether such an act be possible!” In solitude,
and in the depths of a damp and loathsome dungeon,
where she was confined for weeks, she was still serene
and uncomplaining. In parting with her son; in
taking a last adieu of the palace which had witnessed
her triumphs; in facing the scaffold, and the wretches
around it; and in bidding a final farewell to life, Marie
Antoinette evinced that patient, deep, and touching
heroism which a woman and a Christian alone can display.