When Lord John Russell visited Elba,
he was asked by Napoleon, then a prisoner there, whether
he thought that his rival, the Duke of Wellington,
would be able to live without the excitement of war,
which Napoleon used to call “a splendid game.”
It seemed incredulous to Napoleon that a man who had
shown himself so good a soldier as Wellington should
retire into the position of a simple citizen, and
Napoleon, little knowing the great man, thought that
he would probably use his influence as a statesman
to involve his country in war again. To some
it may possibly seem strange that Gordon, who had distinguished
himself as a soldier, and had saved an empire, should
again take up the humble avocation of an engineer
officer, but so he did. He was in reality only
a captain of engineers, though a brevet lieutenant-colonel
in the army, when in February 1865 he returned home.
He took a few months’ leave, which he spent
quietly at Southampton with his father and mother,
shunning all publicity.
On the expiration of his leave he
was sent to Gravesend, to superintend the building
of some forts for the protection of the Thames.
During one of our periodical panics as to the safety
of the country, large sums of money were voted for
defensive purposes. Gordon’s duties were
very subordinate as far as these defences were concerned.
The plans were made out by others, and his duty was
merely to see them executed. Though he worked
very hard in the performance of his duty, he made no
secret of the fact that he thoroughly disapproved of
the way in which the national money was being wasted.
It is said that one day, when the Commander-in-chief
came to inspect the progress of the work, Gordon denounced
the whole thing most vehemently, and exposed its worthlessness.
It is characteristic of the man that he had the courage
of his opinions at all times. He must have been
carried away a good deal by his feelings, for when
he got home that day he said that he might have been
put under arrest for the way in which he had denounced
the work of his superiors. As it was, his Royal
Highness smiled good-naturedly at his vehemence, and
took no further notice. But though Gordon thoroughly
disapproved of the nature of the defences on which
he was engaged, he worked very hard at them, and it
certainly is through no fault of his if the Thames
fortifications are not all they should be. He
was an early riser and a hard worker, and as he hardly
ever went into society, and did not go in for games,
he found time to engage in all kinds of religious
and philanthropic work, in addition to his other duties.
He spent six years at Gravesend, and, although this
is not a popular station with many officers, he found
so much to be done, that in after years he used to
look back upon the time spent there as the happiest
of his life. After the stirring scenes through
which he had passed in the Crimea and in China, it
may have appeared to some a very commonplace, uninteresting
sort of life to eke out for so many years, but no
one more than Gordon felt the force of the truth conveyed
in the lines:
“‘A commonplace
life,’ we say and we sigh;
But why should
we sigh as we say?
The commonplace sun in the
commonplace sky
Makes up the commonplace
day.
The moon and the stars are
commonplace things,
And the flower that blooms,
and the bird that sings;
But dark were the world, and
sad our lot,
If the flowers failed, and
the sun shone not;
And God, who studied each
separate soul,
Out of commonplace lives made
His beautiful whole.”
One remarkable characteristic of Gordon
was the persistent way in which he avoided publicity
of any sort, evading every effort to bring him forward.
When he first came to Gravesend no one knew him, and
he used quietly to take a seat in the gallery of the
parish church. As soon as it was discovered that
the stranger who occupied such a humble place, was
no other than the renowned “Chinese Gordon,”
great efforts were made to induce him to take a more
prominent position. But it was in vain.
What was good enough for the poor was good enough for
him, and he did not approve of the rich and the eminent
occupying all the good seats, to the exclusion of
the poor, whose souls were just as valuable in the
sight of God. Again, he steadily refused to take
the chair at all public meetings. It was not
that he could not speak at such gatherings, for, although
he was not a good speaker, he was by no means a bad
one, and he was always willing to conduct services
for the poor. He had a horror of taking a prominent
position, and the only occasion on which he ever broke
through his rule as to taking the chair, was at a
meeting of some three hundred children over which he
presided. He was, however, very much at home
when sitting in front of a class of children, and
this he infinitely preferred to giving formal addresses
even to children. Only once was he persuaded to
address the whole school collectively. Speaking
to a large number of children requires a special gift,
and this he did not possess. His strength with
children lay in the fact that he obtained a personal
influence over each one individually. With a
small class he could get to know each by name, and
win the affections of all one by one. The words,
“He loved little children,” which were
the only epitaph on the tomb of a certain Sunday-school
teacher, might well be applied to Gordon. It is
difficult to say what kind of teacher he was, or whether
he availed himself of the latest developments in the
art of instructing children; but this is quite clear,
that he had one of the best qualifications a teacher
can possess, love for his pupils. There is a
tale of a lady visitor who once asked a little boy
why he went so far to his Sunday-school, when there
were as good ones nearer at hand. The reply was,
“They may be as good, but they are not so good
for me;” and when the lady asked him “Why
not?” he said, “Because they love a fellow
over there.” Love is a qualification that
is too often lacking in teachers, but it was one that
Gordon displayed very prominently. Need we wonder
that the “dear little fellows,” as he
used to call them, responded by loving him in return?
Nor was it only in the Sunday-school
that Gordon’s love for the young was exhibited;
he also had a class in the ragged school, and used
to invite his boys to his house for instruction in
the evening on week days, as well as on Sunday evenings.
When three or four of them had scarlet fever, he nursed
them in his own house, and would sit up at night talking
to them, till he could get them to drop off to sleep.
He used to call these boys “kings,” a
name suggested to him when reading Rev. , “And
hath made us kings and priests unto God.”
He exclaimed to his sister, “Why then, these
are little ‘kings,’” and he stuck
to the name. He took great pains to secure good
posts for his boys in ships going to sea, and on a
map on his wall he kept a number of little flags representing
the boys he had sent abroad. These flags he used
to move about as he heard from time to time where
the lads were. We need not be surprised that
among these boys were some who ardently loved him,
and that they used to give expression to their feelings
by scribbling on the wall with a piece of chalk, as
boys will do, “God bless the Kernel,”
“C. G. is a jolly good fellow,” or
“Long life to our dear teacher, Gordon.”
The ragged school at Gravesend still retains the Chinese
flags which he presented to the boys, flags which he
had himself captured from the Taiping rebels.
They are now kept as precious relics, to be displayed
only on special occasions. Sir Henry Gordon says,
that when the news reached England of the death of
the heroic defender of Khartoum, a young man, about
twenty-five years of age, called on him to inform
him that he and others who had been Gordon’s
boys at Gravesend, wished to put up some kind of memorial
to his memory, and that he was willing to give L25.
He was much overcome when speaking of all that Gordon
had done for him.
Another writer relates that on one
occasion when Gordon was watching some workmen, he
saw among them a lad looking very unhappy. On
his inquiring, the lad said, “Mother has left
us, and gone away from home; and everything there
is so miserable that it is not like home at all.”
At once the boy was invited to spend his evenings at
the Fort House, where he was instructed in the night
school class, and taught to read his Bible. Some
little time after this he fell ill, and the doctor
decided that he ought to be taken to the local infirmary.
“Shall I see you there, Colonel?” he asked
with wistful eyes; “I know I am going to die.”
“But you are not afraid,” replied Gordon,
“for now you know who says, ‘I am the
Resurrection and the Life.’ He will be as
near to you in the infirmary as here, and as near
to you in death as in life.” “Oh
yes, I know Him now;” and so he did, for as the
narrator said, “The Colonel had led him to Christ
by his life and teaching.” When in the
hospital the young lad said to a nurse, “Read
the Bible to me, there is nothing like it.”
“But you are very tired,” said the nurse.
“Yes, I am very tired. I do long to go
to Jesus.” This is a briefly narrated incident,
and is but a specimen of many that might be recorded
if space permitted.
Gordon also took special pleasure
in visiting the workhouse and talking to the paupers,
remembering that
“Down in the human heart,
crushed by the tempter,
Feelings lie buried
that grace can restore;
Touched by a loving heart,
wakened by kindness,
Chords that were
broken will vibrate once more.”
Workhouse inmates are, as a rule,
a very disheartening class to visit. A large
percentage of them have been brought there by faults
of their own, and most of them are beyond the age
when one may reasonably hope for reform. Gordon’s
kind heart was proof against disappointment, and he
persistently used to visit the old people, supplying
tobacco to the men, and tea to the women, and chatting
away to them, in an effort to help them to forget
their troubles. He was mindful, too, of the sick,
caring not who the sufferer was nor what his complaint;
so long as he was in need, so long was Gordon a regular
visitor at his sick-bed. Frequently when he heard
that the doctors had ordered delicacies beyond the
reach of a patient, he would purchase what was required,
and administer it with his own hands. Mr. Lilley
says:
“On one occasion he visited a
poor, wretched woman, in an apparently dying condition.
He at once lighted a fire, made some gruel for
her, and fed her with his own hand. He afterwards
appointed a nurse to look after her, and sent a
doctor to her, and it is believed that she is
still residing at Gravesend, a living testimony
to his generous care.”
The people so loved him, that often
instead of sending for the clergyman when in sickness
or trouble, the poor would send for the Colonel living
at Fort House, the official residence of the officer
commanding the Royal Engineers.
Even his house and garden seem to
have been placed at the disposal of the poor in the
neighbourhood. A visitor once remarked to his
housekeeper on the beautiful vegetables his garden
produced. She replied that the Colonel never
touched them, but used to let the poor people come
in and cultivate plots of ground in the garden, and
grow their own vegetables; and even when presents
of fruit were sent him by friends, he used to take
them to the bedside of some sick person, who he thought
needed them more than he did.
As for his own food, nothing could
have been more simple and plain. The Rev. S.
H. Swaine says, “Coming home with us one afternoon
late, we found his tea waiting for him a
most unappetising stale loaf and a teapot of tea.
I remarked upon the dryness of the bread, when he took
the whole loaf (a small one) and crammed it into the
slop-basin, and poured all the tea upon it, saying
it would soon be ready for him to eat, and in half-an-hour
it would not matter what he had eaten.”
It is said that some of the boys whom he invited to
live in his house were a good deal disappointed when
they saw the kind of fare that was put before them.
They had fondly imagined that the occupant of such
a grand house would have sumptuous meals, which they
would share, and they were not prepared for the plain
salt-beef, and other good but very plain food, to
which the Colonel was in the habit of sitting down.
But though he denied himself luxuries of any sort,
he often used to take grapes and other dainties to
the sick and the dying.
All forms of distress aroused his
interest; and when the late Canon Miller of Greenwich
was collecting money for the suffering people at Coventry,
during the cotton famine, Gordon took a large and valuable
gold medal, that had been presented to him by the Empress
of China, and having with a gouge scooped out his
name, which was engraved upon it, put it into an envelope
and despatched it to the Canon, merely notifying briefly
the object for which it was sent. Efforts have
been since made to discover the fate of the medal,
which was of the best gold, and twice the size of
a crown piece, but owing to the death of Canon Miller,
they have hitherto been unsuccessful.
Gordon was, indeed, generous to a
fault, and sometimes he was taken in by impostors;
but as he had a good knowledge of human nature, he
was not deceived so often as many with his generous
heart would be. His generosity was only limited
by his purse, and there were times in his life when
he drew the line too fine, for, as he himself once
said, “I assure you that many a time I have
not known where my food was to come from, nor if I
should find a place in which to lie down at night.”
So long as there was money in his pocket, so long
had he money to give away; but on many occasions he
forgot that he had a long railway journey before him,
and that the generosity he displayed to the needy
would not be extended to him at the railway ticket
office. But on the whole, his money was well
laid out; many is the lad he started in life, many
the waif he picked up from the gutter, who, now a well-to-do
respectable member of society, might, but for him,
have been a criminal, getting into trouble himself,
and leading others astray.
It would be interesting to follow
more in detail the career of this remarkable man at
Gravesend, but space forbids. Gordon only spent
six years at this kind of work, and much of the time
was engaged in his official duties, yet the results
were so good, that one cannot but regret that a longer
part of his career was not passed in the same way.
From his letters written in the Soudan, it is evident
that he often thought of devoting his old age to work
among the poor, had he been spared. It was, however,
willed otherwise, and we are only permitted to see
how much can be done by a man in six years, when his
heart is thoroughly in the work.
It has been remarked more than once,
that Gordon’s military career reminds one of
the great soldier Cromwell, who did so much to rescue
England from the degenerate condition into which it
had fallen under the miserable rule of the Stuarts.
In the same way the six years spent by Gordon at Gravesend,
very forcibly remind us of the great religious philanthropist,
Lord Shaftesbury, who did perhaps more than any other
man of this nineteenth century, or any other century,
to relieve human suffering, and to solve some of those
difficult problems that are associated with the condition
of the poor. Lord Shaftesbury had little in common
with Cromwell, except that both loved God and hated
tyranny and injustice. Their ways of going to
work were very different, but one cannot help seeing
that Gordon combined much of both characters; and
had his lot fallen in different times or different
circumstances, he might have undertaken the work of
either. He had all the martial instinct of a
Cromwell, and, with it, the love of relieving suffering
which so characterised Lord Shaftesbury. His one
object seems to have been to
“Rescue the perishing,
care for the dying,
Snatch them in
pity from sin and the grave;
Weep o’er the erring
ones, lift up the fallen,
Tell them of Jesus,
the Mighty to save.”
Gordon was never allowed to carry
on any work for any great length of time, and the
six years at Gravesend passed very quickly. In
1871 he was appointed British representative on the
European Commission to superintend the improvement
of the mouth of the Danube, so that it might be made
more navigable for ships. He was engaged in this
work for two years, with his headquarters at Galatz;
and the eminent war correspondent, Archibald Forbes,
says that he “found his memory still green there
in the early years of the Russo-Turkish war, fourteen
years after he had exchanged the mosquitoes of the
Lower Danube for the not less venomous insects of
the Upper Nile.”
Apart from the testimony of Archibald
Forbes, we may be quite sure that he did some good
work at Galatz, for it would be difficult to imagine
him doing nothing but the ordinary routine of official
duties. He always discovered an opening of some
sort by which he could help his fellow-creatures,
and his active mind and sympathetic nature were, in
the words of Jean Ingelow, always asking the question
of those with whom he came in contact
“Are there no briers
across thy pathway thrust?
Are there no thorns
that compass it about?
Nor any stones that thou wilt
deign to trust
My hand to gather
out?”
The time had now come when he was
to be called to a new form of work, one to which he
was to give the best years of his life, and for which
ultimately he was to sacrifice life itself. In
the Crimea and in China, he had shown what he could
do as a soldier; at Gravesend he had set a noble example
to the world of what a Christian philanthropist might
do in his spare hours; and now he was to be called
to wage war with the horrors of slavery. We had
him in our midst for six years, and we found no work
for him worthy of his abilities; but while we overlooked
his merits, other nations were not so blind.
Just as later on the King of the Belgians was anxious
to secure his services which we were allowing to remain
idle, so now Nubar Pasha, the far-sighted minister
of Ismail Khan, Khedive of Egypt, persuaded him to
enter the Egyptian service, and go to Africa as Governor
of the Equatorial Provinces.
But before we follow him into the
Soudan, it may be well to dwell for a little on the
distinctly religious aspect of his life.