Position, and
Period.
The religion of the Babylonians and Assyrians was
the polytheistic
faith professed by the peoples inhabiting the Tigris
and Euphrates
valleys from what may be regarded as the dawn of history
until the
Christian era began, or, at least, until the inhabitants
were brought
under the influence of Christianity. The chronological
period covered
may be roughly estimated at about 5000 years.
The belief of the
people, at the end of that time, being Babylonian
heathenism leavened
with Judaism, the country was probably ripe for the
reception of the
new faith. Christianity, however, by no means
replaced the earlier
polytheism, as is evidenced by the fact, that the
worship of Nebo and
the gods associated with him continued until the fourth
century of the
Christian era.
By whom followed.
It was the faith of two distinct peoples the
Sumero-Akkadians, and
the Assyro-Babylonians. In what country it had
its beginnings is
unknown it comes before us, even at the
earliest period, as a faith
already well-developed, and from that fact, as well
as from the names
of the numerous deities, it is clear that it began
with the former
race the Sumero-Akkadians who
spoke a non-Semitic language largely
affected by phonetic decay, and in which the grammatical
forms had in
certain cases become confused to such an extent that
those who study
it ask themselves whether the people who spoke it
were able to
understand each other without recourse to devices
such as the “tones”
to which the Chinese resort. With few exceptions,
the names of the
gods which the inscriptions reveal to us are all derived
from this
non-Semitic language, which furnishes us with satisfactory
etymologies
for such names as Merodach, Nergal, Sin, and the divinities
mentioned
in Berosus and Damascius, as well as those of hundreds
of deities
revealed to us by the tablets and slabs of Babylonia
and Assyria.
The documents.
Outside the inscriptions of Babylonia and Assyria,
there is but little
bearing upon the religion of those countries, the
most important
fragment being the extracts from Berosus and Damascius
referred to
above. Among the Babylonian and Assyrian remains,
however, we have an
extensive and valuable mass of material, dating from
the fourth or
fifth millennium before Christ until the disappearance
of the
Babylonian system of writing about the beginning of
the Christian era.
The earlier inscriptions are mostly of the nature
of records, and give
information about the deities and the religion of
the people in the
course of descriptions of the building and rebuilding
of temples, the
making of offerings, the performance of ceremonies,
etc. Purely
religious inscriptions are found near the end of the
third millennium
before Christ, and occur in considerable numbers,
either in the
original Sumerian text, or in translations, or both,
until about the
third century before Christ. Among the more recent
inscriptions those
from the library of the Assyrian king Assur-bani-apli
and the later
Babylonian temple archives, there are many
lists of deities, with
numerous identifications with each other and with
the heavenly bodies,
and explanations of their natures. It is needless
to say that all this
material is of enormous value for the study of the
religion of the
Babylonians and Assyrians, and enables us to reconstruct
at first hand
their mythological system, and note the changes which
took place in
the course of their long national existence.
Many interesting and
entertaining legends illustrate and supplement the
information given
by the bilingual lists of gods, the bilingual incantations
and hymns,
and the references contained in the historical and
other documents. A
trilingual list of gods enables us also to recognise,
in some cases,
the dialectic forms of their names.
The importance
of the subject.
Of equal antiquity with the religion of Egypt, that
of Babylonia and
Assyria possesses some marked differences as to its
development.
Beginning among the non-Semitic Sumero-Akkadian population,
it
maintained for a long time its uninterrupted development,
affected
mainly by influences from within, namely, the homogeneous
local cults
which acted and reacted upon each other. The
religious systems of
other nations did not greatly affect the development
of the early
non-Semitic religious system of Babylonia. A
time at last came,
however, when the influence of the Semitic inhabitants
of Babylonia
and Assyria was not to be gainsaid, and from that
moment, the
development of their religion took another turn.
In all probably this
augmentation of Semitic religious influence was due
to the increased
numbers of the Semitic population, and at the same
period the
Sumero-Akkadian language began to give way to the
Semitic idiom which
they spoke. When at last the Semitic Babylonian
language came to be used
for official documents, we find that, although the
non-Semitic divine
names are in the main preserved, a certain number
of them have been
displaced by the Semitic equivalent names, such as
Samas for the
sun-god, with Kittu and Mesaru ("justice and righteousness”)
his
attendants; Nabu ("the teacher” = Nebo) with
his consort Tasmetu ("the
hearer"); Addu, Adad, or Dadu, and Rammanu, Ramimu,
or Ragimu = Hadad
or Rimmon ("the thunderer"); Bel and Beltu (Beltis
= “the lord” and
“the lady” par excellence), with
some others of inferior rank. In
place of the chief divinity of each state at the head
of each separate
pantheon, the tendency was to make Merodach, the god
of the capital
city Babylon, the head of the pantheon, and he seems
to have been
universally accepted in Babylonia, like Assur in Assyria,
about 2000
B.C. or earlier.
The uniting of
two pantheons.
We thus find two pantheons, the Sumero-Akkadian with
its many gods,
and the Semitic Babylonian with its comparatively
few, united, and
forming one apparently homogeneous whole. But
the creed had taken a
fresh tendency. It was no longer a series of
small, and to a certain
extent antagonistic, pantheons composed of the chief
god, his consort,
attendants, children, and servants, but a pantheon
of considerable
extent, containing all the elements of the primitive
but smaller
pantheons, with a number of great gods who had raised
Merodach to be
their king.
In Assyria.
Whilst accepting the religion of Babylonia, Assyria
nevertheless kept
herself distinct from her southern neighbour by a
very simple device,
by placing at the head of the pantheon the god Assur,
who became for
her the chief of the gods, and at the same time the
emblem of her
distinct national aspirations for Assyria
had no intention whatever
of casting in her lot with her southern neighbour.
Nevertheless,
Assyria possessed, along with the language of Babylonia,
all the
literature of that country indeed, it is
from the libraries of her
kings that we obtain the best copies of the Babylonian
religious
texts, treasured and preserved by her with all the
veneration of which
her religious mind was capable, and the
religious fervour of the
Oriental in most cases leaves that of the European,
or at least of the
ordinary Briton, far behind.
The later period
in Assyria.
Assyria went to her downfall at the end of the seventh
century before
Christ worshipping her national god Assur, whose cult
did not cease
with the destruction of her national independence.
In fact, the city
of Assur, the centre of that worship, continued to
exist for a
considerable period; but for the history of the religion
of Assyria,
as preserved there, we wait for the result of the
excavations being
carried on by the Germans, should they be fortunate
enough to obtain
texts belonging to the period following the fall of
Nineveh.
In Babylonia.
Babylonia, on the other hand, continued the even tenor
of her way.
More successful at the end of her independent political
career than
her northern rival had been, she retained her faith,
and remained the
unswerving worshipper of Merodach, the great god of
Babylon, to whom
her priests attributed yet greater powers, and with
whom all the other
gods were to all appearance identified. This
tendency to monotheism,
however, never reached the culminating point never
became
absolute except, naturally, in the minds
of those who, dissociating
themselves, for philosophical reasons, from the superstitious
teaching
of the priests of Babylonia, decided for themselves
that there was but
one God, and worshipped Him. That orthodox Jews
at that period may have
found, in consequence of this monotheistic tendency,
converts, is not
by any means improbable indeed, the names
met with during the later
period imply that converts to Judaism were made.
The picture presented
by the study.
Thus we see, from the various inscriptions, both Babylonian
and
Assyrian the former of an extremely early
period the growth and
development, with at least one branching off, of one
of the most
important religious systems of the ancient world.
It is not so
important for modern religion as the development of
the beliefs of the
Hebrews, but as the creed of the people from which
the Hebrew nation
sprang, and from which, therefore, it had its beginnings,
both
corporeal and spiritual, it is such as no student
of modern religious
systems can afford to neglect. Its legends, and
therefore its
teachings, as will be seen in these pages, ultimately
permeated the
Semitic West, and may in some cases even had penetrated
Europe, not
only through heathen Greece, but also through the
early Christians,
who, being so many centuries nearer the time of the
Assyro-Babylonians, and also nearer the territory
which they anciently
occupied, than we are, were far better acquainted
than the people of
the present day with the legends and ideas which they
possessed.