My journey through central France
took me by Chartres, Orleans, down the Loire to Nantes,
then through La Vendée to Fontenay, Niort, Poitiers,
Saintes, Rochefort, La Rochelle, Bordeaux, Angoulême,
Limoges, and thence back to Paris. On looking
at the book for the first time since I read the proof-sheets
I find it amusing. The fault of it, as an account
of the district traversed, is, that it treats of the
localities described on a scale that would have needed
twenty volumes, instead of two, to complete the story
of my tour in the same proportion. I do not remember
that any of my critics noted this fault. Perhaps
they feared that on the first suggestion of such an
idea I should have set about mending the difficulty
by the production of a score of other volumes on the
subject! I could easily have done so. I
was in no danger of incurring the anathema launched
by Sterne I think it was Sterne against
the man who went from Dan to Beersheba and found all
barren. I found matter of interest everywhere,
and could have gone on doing so, as it seemed to me
in those days, for ever.
The part of France I visited is not
much betravelled by Englishmen, and the general idea
is that it is not an interesting section of the country.
I thought, and still think, otherwise. My notion
is, that if a line were drawn through France from
Calais to the centre of the Pyrenean chain, by far
the greater part of the prettiest country and most
interesting populations, as well as places, would be
found to the westward of it. I do not think that
my bill of fare excited any great interest in the
reading world. But I suppose that I contrived
to interest a portion of it; for the book was fairly
successful.
I wrote a book in many respects of
the same kind many years subsequently, giving an account
of a journey through certain little-visited districts
of central Italy, under the title of a Lenten Journey.
It is not, I think, so good a book as my French journeys
furnished, mainly to my mind because it was in one
small volume instead of two big ones, and both for
want of space and want of time was done hurriedly
and too compendiously. The true motto for the
writer of such a book is nihil a me alienum puto,
whether humanum or otherwise. My own opinion
is, to make a perfectly clean breast of it, that I
could now write a fairly amusing book on a journey
from Tyburn turnpike to Stoke Pogis. But then
such books should be addressed to readers who are
not in such a tearing hurry as the unhappy world is
in these latter days.
It would seem that I found my two
octavo volumes did not afford me nearly enough space
to say my say respecting the country traversed, for
they are brought to an end somewhat abruptly by a hurried
return from Limoges to Paris; whereas my ramble was
much more extended, including both the upper and lower
provinces of Auvergne and the whole of the Bourbonnais.
My voluminous notes of the whole of these wanderings
are now before me. But I will let my readers off
easy, recording only that I walked from Murat to St.
Flour, a distance of fifteen miles, in five minutes
under three hours. Not bad! My diary notes
that it was frequently very difficult to find my way
in walking about Auvergne, from the paucity of people
I could find who could speak French, the langue
du pays being as unintelligible as Choctaw.
This would hardly be the case now.
I don’t know whether a knot
of leading tradesmen at Bordeaux could now be found
to talk, as did such a party with whom I got into
conversation in that year, 1840. It was explained
to me that England, as was well known, had liberated
her slaves in the West Indies perfectly well knowing
that the colonies would be absolutely ruined by the
measure, but expecting to be amply compensated by the
ruin of the French colonies, which would result from
the example, and the consequent extension of trade
with the East Indies, from which France would be compelled
to purchase all the articles her own colonies now
supplied her with. One of these individuals told
me and the rest of his audience, that he had the means
of knowing that the interest of the English
national debt was paid every year by fresh borrowing,
and that bankruptcy and absolute smash must occur
within a few years. “Ah!” said a
much older, grey-headed man, who had been listening
sitting with his hands reposing on his walking-stick
before him, and who spoke with a sort of patient,
long-expecting hope and a deep sigh, “ah! we
have been looking for that many a year; but I am beginning
to doubt whether I shall live to see it.”
My assurances that matters were not altogether so
bad as they supposed in England of course met with
little credence. Still, they listened to me, and
did not show angry signs of a consciousness that I
was audaciously befooling them, till the talk having
veered to London, I ventured to assure them that London
was not surrounded by any octroi boundary, and
that no impost of that nature was levied there.
Then in truth I might as well have assured them that
London streets were literally paved with gold.
On the 30th of May, 1840, I returned
with my mother from Paris to her house in York Street.
Life had been very pleasant there to her I believe,
and certainly to me during those periods of it which
my inborn love of rambling allowed me to pass there.
But in the following June it was determined that the
house in York Street should be given up. Probably
the causa causans of this determination was
the fact of my sister’s removal to far Penrith.
But I think too, that there was a certain unavowed
feeling, that we had eaten up London, and should enjoy
a move to new pastures.
I remember well a certain morning
in York Street when we my mother and I held
a solemn audit of accounts. It was found that
during her residence in York Street she had spent
a good deal more than she had supposed. She had
entertained a good deal, giving frequent “little
dinners.” But dinners, however little, are
apt in London to leave tradesmen’s bills not
altogether small in proportion to their littleness.
“The fact is,” said my mother, “that
potatoes have been quite exceptionally dear.”
For a very long series of years she never heard the
last of those exceptional potatoes. But despite
the alarming deficit caused by those unfortunate vegetables,
I do not think the abandonment of the establishment
in York Street was caused by financial considerations.
She was earning in those years large sums of money quite
as large as any she had been spending and
might have continued in London had she been so minded.
No doubt I had much to do with the
determination we came to. But for my part, if
it had at that time been proposed to me, that our
establishment should be reduced to a couple of trunks,
and all our worldly possessions to the contents of
them, with an opening vista of carriages, diligences,
and ships ad libitum in prospect, I should
have jumped at the idea. A caravan, which in addition
to shirts and stockings could have carried about one’s
books and writing tackle would have seemed the summum
bonum of human felicity.
So we turned our backs on London without
a thought of regret and once again “took the
road;” but this time separately, my mother going
to my sister at Penrith and I to pass the summer months
in wanderings in Picardy, Lorraine, and French Flanders,
and the ensuing winter in Paris.
I hardly know which was the pleasanter
time. By this time I was no stranger to Paris,
and had many friends there. It was my first experiment
of living there as a bachelor, as I was going to say,
but I mean “on my own hook,” and left
altogether to my own devices. I found of course
that my then experiences differed considerably from
those acquired when living en famille.
But I am disposed to think that the tolerably intimate
knowledge I flatter myself I possessed of the Paris
and Parisians of Louis Philippe’s time was mainly
the result of this second residence. I remember
among a host of things indicating the extent of the
difference between those days and these, that I lived
in a very good apartment, au troisième, in one
of the streets immediately behind the best part of
the Rue de Rivoli for one hundred francs a month!
This price included all service (save of course a tip
to the porter), and the preparation of my coffee for
breakfast if I needed it. For dinner, or any
other meal, I had to go out.
“Society” lived in Paris
in those days not unreasonably as the result
soon showed in perpetual fear of being knocked
all to pieces by an outbreak of revolution, though
of course nobody said so. But I lived mainly
(though not entirely) among the bien pensants
people, who looked on all anti-governmental manifestations
with horror. Perhaps the restless discontent
which destroyed Louis Philippe’s government
is the most disheartening circumstance in the whole
course of recent French history. That the rule
of Charles Dix should have occasioned revolt may be
regrettable, but is not a matter for surprise.
But that of Louis Philippe was not a stagnant or retrogressive
regime. “La carrière” was
very undeniably open to talent and merit of every
description. Material well-being was on the increase.
And the door was not shut against any political change
which even very advanced Liberalism, of the kind consistent
with order, might have aspired to. But the Liberalism
which moved France was not of that kind.
One of my most charming friends of
those days, Rosa Stewart, who afterwards became and
was well known to literature as Madame Blaze de Bury,
was both too clever and too shrewd an observer, as
well as, to me at least, too frank to pretend any
of the assurance which was then de mode.
She saw what was coming, and was fully persuaded that
it must come. I hope that her eye may rest on
this testimony to her perspicacity, though I know
not whether she still graces this planet with her
very pleasing presence. For as, alas! in so many
scores of other instances, our lives have drifted
apart, and it is many years since I have heard of
her.
One excursion I specially remember
in connection with that autumn was partly, I think,
a pedestrian one, to Amiens and Beauvais, made in
company with the W A ,
of whom my brother speaks in his autobiography; which
I mention chiefly for the sake of recording my testimony
to the exactitude of his description of that very singular
individual. If it had not been for the continual
carefulness necessitated by the difficulty of avoiding
all cause of quarrel, I should say that he was about
the pleasantest travelling companion I have ever known.
In the beginning of April, 1841, after
a little episode of spring wandering in the Tyrol
and Bavaria (in the course of which I met my mother
at the chateau of her very old friend the Baroness
de Zandt, who has been mentioned before, and was now
living somewhat solitarily in her huge house in its
huge park near Bamberg), my mother and I started for
Italy. Neither of us had at that time conceived
the idea of making a home there. The object of
the journey, which had been long contemplated by my
mother, was the writing of a book on Italy, as she
had already done on Paris and on Vienna.
Our journey was a prosperous one in
all respects, and our flying visit to Italy was very
pleasant. My mother’s book was duly written,
and published by Mr. Bentley in 1842. But the
Visit to Italy, as the work was entitled (with
justly less pretence than the titles of either of
its predecessors had put forward), was in truth all
too short. And I find that almost all of the
huge mass of varied recollections which are connected
in my mind with Italy and Italian people and things
belong to my second “visit” of nearly half
a century’s duration!
We made, however, several pleasant
acquaintances and some fast friends, principally at
Florence, and thus paved the way, although little
intending it at the time, for our return thither.
Our visit was rendered shorter than
it would probably otherwise have been by my mother’s
strong desire to be with my sister, who was expecting
the birth of her first child at Penrith. And for
this purpose we left Rome in February, 1842, in very
severe weather. We crossed the Mont Cenis in
sledges which to me was a very acceptable
experience, but to my mother was one, which nothing
could have induced her to face, save the determination
not to fail her child at her need.
How well I remember hearing as I sat
in the banquette of the diligence which was
just leaving Susa for its climb up the mountain amid
the snow, then rapidly falling, the driver of the descending
diligence, which had accomplished its work and was
just about entering the haven of Susa, sing out to
our driver “Vous allez vous amuser
joliment la haut, croyez moi!”
We did not, however, change the diligence
for the sledges till we came to the descent on the
northern side. But as we made our slow way to
the top our vehicle was supported from time to time
on either side by twelve strapping fellows, who put
their shoulders to it.
I appreciated during that journey,
though I was glad to see the mountain in its winter
dress, the recommendation not to let your flight be
in the winter.