The city fringe.
It is my constant habit to take little
runs into the outskirts of our city, and when doing
so I often stare with all my eyes as I note what has
taken place in a limited number of years. Districts
hardly more than a mile or so from the centre of the
city, which in my boyhood were fields and meadows,
are now laid out into streets and covered with houses
and shops. Indeed, I sometimes feel very aged
when I look upon places where as a boy I went fishing
for small fry, and now find the river that afforded
me such juvenile sport is, owing to the enhanced value
of laud, compressed into the dimensions of a fair-sized
gutter, with houses and small factories closely packed
on its margin covering every foot of ground.
I go in another direction, and scarcely
farther than the distance just named, and I come to
a spot where once stood the fine large park (Aston)
which I remember was enclosed by a brick wall on every
side. Scarcely a trace of this extensive old
wall can I now see, and the site of the old park,
or nearly the whole of it, is now covered with streets
and buildings. Aston Hall, the grand old Elizabethan
house built by the Holtes in the time of Charles I.,
still stands in a state of good preservation, and
is fortunately now the property of the city, together
with some forty acres of surrounding land, which is,
as is well known, used as a public recreation ground.
To speak a little more in detail,
I am not the only person living who remembers “Pudding
Brook” and “Vaughton’s Hole.”
The name of “Padding Brook” was, in my
boyish days, given to a swampy area of fields now
covered by Gooch Street and surrounding thoroughfares.
Pudding Brook proper was, however, a little muddy
stream that flowed or oozed along the district named
and finally emptied itself into the old moat not far
from St. Martin’s Church. Vaughton’s
Hole, to my juvenile mind, was represented by a deep
pool in the River Rea, where something direful took
place, in which a Mr. Vaughton was tragically concerned.
The real facts are at least, so I read that
there was a clay pit, sixty feet deep of water, situated
near the Rea, and in this pit at least one man was
drowned. The place was named after an old local
family named Vaughton, who owned considerable property
in the neighbourhood of the present Gooch Street.
Where Gooch Street now crosses the
Rea, I remember there was a footbridge, and beyond
that the river was a pretty, purling, sylvan stream,
with bushes and rushes growing on its green banks.
A field walk past an old farm house led on to Moseley
Hall, which was looked upon as being quite away in
the country. As for Moseley itself, it was a pretty
little village in those days. The old village
green, the rustic country inns (of which the “Fighting
Cocks” was the chief), and some low-roofed,
old-fashioned houses, backed by the parish church tower,
made up a picture which still remains in my mind’s
eye. The railway tunnel which is now looked upon
as only a long bridge, was then regarded as something
large in its way, and, perhaps, slightly dangerous,
almost justifying a little something strong to sustain
courage when travelling through it.
Beyond Moseley Church was a pretty
road to Moseley Wake Green, in which were, if I remember
rightly, one or two timbered houses and some old-fashioned
residences, surrounded by high trees. Many of
these have now disappeared. In another direction
from the church was a country road running to Sparkbrook,
and near which were an important house and lands belonging
to the wealthy Misses Anderton, whose possessions have
been heard of in more recent days.
I now often visit Moseley, and change,
but not decay, in all around I see. The prevailing
colour of the old village green is now red brick,
and the modern colour does not agree so well with my
vision as the more rustic tones of a bygone day; whilst
the noise and bustle of tram cars, the swarms of suburban
residents that emerge from the railway station (especially
at certain times in the day), are fast wiping out the
peaceful, pretty Moseley of my youthful days.
These new old villages often present
some curious anachronisms. A grey old church,
partly buried by a hoary fat churchyard, is surrounded
by the most modern of shops and stores; and a primitive
little bow-windowed cottage, with a few flower pots
in the window, has, perchance, a glaring gin shop
next door. This is more or less the case at Moseley,
and it is pretty much the same at Handsworth.
I remember when old Handsworth Church
stood surrounded by fields, and now it is built up
to with villas on nearly every side, and has a neighbouring
liquor vault instead of the old-fashioned inn such
as often keeps old parish churches in countenance
and affords a place of refuge and refreshment for
rustic churchwardens, bell-ringers, parish clerks,
and the like.
Old Handsworth how well
I remember it also Soho, and the remains
of the old mint, associated with the honoured names
of Boulton and Watt. Then there was that long
straight stretch of road from the old pike at the
top of Soho Hill, along which were some large and important
residences, occupied by business men of Birmingham,
who doubtless regarded this Handsworth and Soho district
as being quite out in the country. The stretch
of road to which I have just referred is now one long
street, or soon will be, reaching from the once Soho
toll-gate to the New Inns, and farther on, indeed,
to the park wall of Sandwell.
Sandwell Park ah, yes,
I have a pretty distinct recollection of what that
was, also the Hall, in my boyhood days. The park,
or portions of it, still shews some signs of its past
picturesque glories; at any rate, it is not built
over after the manner of Aston. The Hall, however,
scarcely now conveys an idea of the place it once was.
I remember its interior when it was the residence
of its noble owner and his family, and I recall the
splendidly furnished rooms, the riding school, and
the gardens. I remember, too, that the Lord Dartmouth
of the time of which I speak was, like Mr. Gladstone,
an amateur woodman. He used to like to go about
with axe and saw, and do a little tree felling and
branch lopping to please his fancy, and exercise his
limbs and muscles. Sandwell Park, as most people
know, has now been deserted for many years by its titled
owner, and Sandwell Park Colliery, Limited, reigns
in its stead.
But recollections of the past are
making me “talky,” and, I fear, tedious.
I could scribble and chatter about bygone Birmingham
from now till about the end of the century, which,
however, as I write, is not very far off. But,
my gentle reader, you shall be spared. Most people
know that Birmingham is swallowing up its immediate
suburbs, and the process of deglutition is still going
on. The city has had its rise, and will have
its decline some day probably, but not while people
want pins, pens, electro-plate, guns, dear and cheap
jewellery, and while Birmingham can make these things
better or sell them cheaper than other folks.
As for the centre of the city, I have
already made some references to the transformations
that have recently taken place. A few words may,
however, be said about our modern street and shop architecture.
In the important new thoroughfare, Corporation Street the
outcome of Mr. Chamberlain’s great improvement
scheme there is a curious series of shops
and public buildings. Some are of one style, some
of another, and many of no style at all. The
architecture in this thoroughfare certainly presents
plenty of variety more variety perhaps than
beauty. There are the new Assize Courts the
foundation-stone of which was laid by the Queen in
1887; they are built of brick and terra-cotta,
redundant with detailed ornament, some of it perhaps
of a too florid character. Near to our local
Palace of Justice is the County Court, which is severe
in its simplicity, quasi-classic in style, and decidedly
plain in design. There are shops that have a
certain suggestion and imitation of old-fashioned
quaintness, and there are other buildings that have
a tinge of the Scotch baronial hall style of architecture.
Then there is the coffee-house Gothic, the pie-shop
Perpendicular, the commercial Classic, the fender
and fire-grate Transitional, the milk and cream Decorated,
and various hybrid architectural styles.
The buildings in this street have,
as I have said, the charm of diversity, and that,
I suppose, is something to the good. Regent Street,
London, is a fine thoroughfare, but it will probably
be admitted that it is anything but unmonotonous in
appearance or lovely to look upon from an architectural
point of view. The buildings in our grand new
street may not be beyond criticism, but there are no
long lines of buildings of the same heavy dull pattern
from end to end. This arises from the fact that
the land has not been let in big patches to capitalists
or builders who might have erected a series of shops
of one uniform pattern, but has been leased to tradesmen
and others who have taken a few yards of land, on
which they have built premises suited to their requirements,
and in accordance with their aim, tastes, or the bent
and ability of their architects. Hence the variety,
charming or otherwise according to the taste and eye
of the spectator. Anyway, we have in Birmingham
a fine broad street which will, perhaps, compare favourably
with any thoroughfare in any other British city, with
the exception of Princes Street, Edinburgh. In
the way of splendid streets the Scotch capital must
be allowed to take the plum.